Ranking the top litigation boutiques Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432613
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Ranking the top litigation boutiques
PPP are highest at Susman so it should be the top.
-
- Posts: 432613
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Ranking the top litigation boutiques
Boies or Quinn?
-
- Posts: 432613
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Ranking the top litigation boutiques
Please. Are you serious? Boies.Anonymous User wrote:Boies or Quinn?
-
- Posts: 432613
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Ranking the top litigation boutiques
I would consider both big firms not boutiques. They're way too leveraged to be boutiques.Anonymous User wrote:Boies or Quinn?
-
- Posts: 521
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:03 am
Re: Ranking the top litigation boutiques
Stupid question. I was looking at Kellogg's website and saw "Staff Attorneys" listed. What are staff attorneys?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432613
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Ranking the top litigation boutiques
they're usually TTT grads who don't get paid $160k+ and do work usually given to contract attorneys.Citizen Genet wrote:Stupid question. I was looking at Kellogg's website and saw "Staff Attorneys" listed. What are staff attorneys?
you don't want to be one of them
- ph14
- Posts: 3227
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:15 pm
Re: Ranking the top litigation boutiques
Bumping this for OCI 2012. Can anyone confirm this $125k signing bonus?!Anonymous User wrote:$125,000 signing bonus at Kellogg Huber. The hours there are apparently just as long as you would expect to find at Bartlit, Susman, etc.
-
- Posts: 3727
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: Ranking the top litigation boutiques
It's a post clerkship bonus (which are typically 50k anyway), and ATL said it was restricted to COA clerks in 2007.ph14 wrote:Bumping this for OCI 2012. Can anyone confirm this $125k signing bonus?!Anonymous User wrote:$125,000 signing bonus at Kellogg Huber. The hours there are apparently just as long as you would expect to find at Bartlit, Susman, etc.
--LinkRemoved--
http://abovethelaw.com/2007/03/skaddenf ... ping-pace/
Does Kellogg Huber do 2L OCI at Harvard?
- ph14
- Posts: 3227
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:15 pm
Re: Ranking the top litigation boutiques
Nope, or at least they aren't listed.bdubs wrote:It's a post clerkship bonus (which are typically 50k anyway), and ATL said it was restricted to COA clerks in 2007.ph14 wrote:Bumping this for OCI 2012. Can anyone confirm this $125k signing bonus?!Anonymous User wrote:$125,000 signing bonus at Kellogg Huber. The hours there are apparently just as long as you would expect to find at Bartlit, Susman, etc.
--LinkRemoved--
http://abovethelaw.com/2007/03/skaddenf ... ping-pace/
Does Kellogg Huber do 2L OCI at Harvard?
Thanks for the info re: the bonus.
- Tangerine Gleam
- Posts: 1280
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:50 pm
Re: Ranking the top litigation boutiques
Don't overlook MoloLamken.
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Ranking the top litigation boutiques
Are you a former mod who just bumped a two year old thread?
- fats provolone
- Posts: 7125
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm
Re: Ranking the top litigation boutiques
definitely doesn't work at mololamkenMal Reynolds wrote:Are you a former mod who just bumped a two year old thread?
- fats provolone
- Posts: 7125
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm
Re: Ranking the top litigation boutiques
deadAnonymous User wrote: The President of the United States was a lawyer. The CEO of Goldman Sachs went to law school.
Don't blame the legal profession as a whole cause you thought by going to a TTT shitlaw degree mill you would join the upper crust of society.
Your right there are alot of low lifes in the legal profession unfortunately. But in terms of overall prestige, only medicine has more lay prestige. Parents don't tell their kids they want them to grow up to be i-bankers or hedge fund managers, they tell their kids they want them to grow up and be doctors or lawyers.
Sure no one knows what Williams & Connolly is, but when you pull up in a porsche convertible with a $1,000 suit and a rolex, people get the idea that your a big shot. I wouldn't worry to much about comparing oneself to finance guys or CEO's. I think making more money than 99.9% of the rest of humanity should be good enough for most people.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
Re: Ranking the top litigation boutiques
Most prestigious firm named after a Battlestar Galactica legal scholar.fats provolone wrote:definitely doesn't work at mololamkenMal Reynolds wrote:Are you a former mod who just bumped a two year old thread?
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Ranking the top litigation boutiques
underratedDesert Fox wrote:Most prestigious firm named after a Battlestar Galactica legal scholar.fats provolone wrote:definitely doesn't work at mololamkenMal Reynolds wrote:Are you a former mod who just bumped a two year old thread?
- fats provolone
- Posts: 7125
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm
Re: Ranking the top litigation boutiques
i chortled
-
- Posts: 432613
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Ranking the top litigation boutiques
If you are considering litigation boutiques in Texas, you should also look at mckool smith. While they are known for their IP work, they do much more than that. Also, they make a point to give young associates tons of experience right out of the gate. I know several associates there who have several depositions and presented oral arguments at Markman hearings within the first 1-2 years at the firm. Per their website, first year compensation is $177,500 (including signing bonus). It looks like they have offices in Texas, NYC, California, and DC.
I came across Vault specialty rankings for lit boutiques. While I'm not sure how meaningful the rankings are, they at least list several of the firms that many would consider to be the best:
http://www.vault.com/company-rankings/l ... RankID=276
I came across Vault specialty rankings for lit boutiques. While I'm not sure how meaningful the rankings are, they at least list several of the firms that many would consider to be the best:
http://www.vault.com/company-rankings/l ... RankID=276
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 3:02 pm
Re: Ranking the top litigation boutiques
is there a reason why OP couldn't just look on Vault for this information?
- sundance95
- Posts: 2123
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:44 pm
Re: Ranking the top litigation boutiques
bc vault rankings are 100% predicated on NYC transactional biglaw, and do not mean shyte for lit, let alone boutique litJon_Snow wrote:is there a reason why OP couldn't just look on Vault for this information?
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Ranking the top litigation boutiques
Probably because Vault also sucks for this information, or maybe he just wanted to start a discussion on it.Jon_Snow wrote:is there a reason why OP couldn't just look on Vault for this information?
But if you're asking why people on TLS create stupid threads (i.e., threads that could easily be answered by a little google research) and how these threads can be started by seemingly intelligent people, you've asked a question for the ages.
- fats provolone
- Posts: 7125
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm
Re: Ranking the top litigation boutiques
yea what say you, anonymous user from three years ago??Jon_Snow wrote:is there a reason why OP couldn't just look on Vault for this information?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Ranking the top litigation boutiques
I know this is super old, but it does raise the question of what we'd call a "lit boutique." Traditional wisdom would suggest Boies Schiller, Quinn, MTO and Irell fall outside that category, whereas McKool, Susman, Keker, Kellogg Huber, ect. would fall within.
tl;dr of thread, it OP was ultimately choosing between Quinn and Boies, they were never looking at lit boutiques and this entire self-promotion was totally unnecessary
tl;dr of thread, it OP was ultimately choosing between Quinn and Boies, they were never looking at lit boutiques and this entire self-promotion was totally unnecessary
-
- Posts: 432613
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Ranking the top litigation boutiques
dovel and luner
We consider law students or attorneys with less than 2 years of experience with the following academic credentials:
Top 10% at Harvard Law School or Stanford Law School
Top 5% at all other top 10 law schools
We do not require (or give preference to) an engineering or science background.
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Ranking the top litigation boutiques
That might very we'll be a great firm, but just lol at using their selection criteria as a stand in for quality.
- fats provolone
- Posts: 7125
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm
Re: Ranking the top litigation boutiques
it is a good firm but 8 lawyers so gl getting a job there
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login