Don't be upsetdakatz wrote:Lol, now the BC homers have some extra ammo. They will fight tooth and nail over their additional 3.58%Blindmelon wrote:BU/BC > USC/Vand/UT is surprising... with UCLA breaking about the UT/Vand/UCLA group. Of course, this doesn't account for clerkships which would push Vand/UT above BU/BC, but this is surprising.
2011 Top 50 Go-To Law Schools Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
BCLS

- Posts: 555
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 9:40 am
Re: 2011 Top 50 Go-To Law Schools
-
solidsnake

- Posts: 530
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:08 am
Re: 2011 Top 50 Go-To Law Schools
UCLA>yale zOMG!!! west coast revolution
so much for UChi being the clerkship powerhouse that tls proclaims it to be.
so much for UChi being the clerkship powerhouse that tls proclaims it to be.
-
dakatz

- Posts: 2422
- Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:19 pm
Re: 2011 Top 50 Go-To Law Schools
Lol, I'd point to USNews to reassert our dominance, but those rankings are going more and more out the window each time we see these NLJ250 figures. I mean, both of us are ranked below a steaming pile of WUSTL for crying out loud. How much credibility can it haveBCLS wrote:Don't be upsetdakatz wrote:Lol, now the BC homers have some extra ammo. They will fight tooth and nail over their additional 3.58%Blindmelon wrote:BU/BC > USC/Vand/UT is surprising... with UCLA breaking about the UT/Vand/UCLA group. Of course, this doesn't account for clerkships which would push Vand/UT above BU/BC, but this is surprising.BC FTW
-
dakatz

- Posts: 2422
- Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:19 pm
Re: 2011 Top 50 Go-To Law Schools
Um, these figures have nothing to do with clerkships. Not sure what you are talking about.solidsnake wrote:UCLA>yale zOMG!!! west coast revolution
so much for UChi being the clerkship powerhouse that tls proclaims it to be.
- D-hops

- Posts: 678
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 5:48 pm
Re: 2011 Top 50 Go-To Law Schools
My impressions:


Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
BlueDiamond

- Posts: 952
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 12:56 pm
Re: 2011 Top 50 Go-To Law Schools
their firm placement means they cant also have clerkship placements?solidsnake wrote:UCLA>yale zOMG!!! west coast revolution
so much for UChi being the clerkship powerhouse that tls proclaims it to be.
- Unitas

- Posts: 1379
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: 2011 Top 50 Go-To Law Schools
I am surprised Georgetown put more bodies into the NJ250 than Columbia did and came so close to number of Harvard.
-
solidsnake

- Posts: 530
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:08 am
Re: 2011 Top 50 Go-To Law Schools
dakatz wrote:Um, these figures have nothing to do with clerkships. Not sure what you are talking about.solidsnake wrote:UCLA>yale zOMG!!! west coast revolution
so much for UChi being the clerkship powerhouse that tls proclaims it to be.
Wow your deductive skills must have served you well in law school, genius.
schools like yls being ranked so low reflect higher number of its grads doing other things (like clerkships) -- not whether they actually had a lower chance at joining nlj250 firms.
unless you make the argument that uchi kids had the chance at clerkships but turned them down for firm jobs, then the inverse of the above holds true. Ans common knowledge says you don't turn down a judge once you get the offer, so the stats suggest that there were less clerkship offers (perhaps less kids applying, to be fair) for uchi kids than in years past.
Last edited by solidsnake on Fri Feb 25, 2011 11:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
BCLS

- Posts: 555
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 9:40 am
Re: 2011 Top 50 Go-To Law Schools
lol I'd rather see job placement stats than the U.S. News Rankings anyday. But to be fair im completely kidding, 3% is nothing. BC=BU, BU=BCdakatz wrote:Lol, I'd point to USNews to reassert our dominance, but those rankings are going more and more out the window each time we see these NLJ250 figures. I mean, both of us are ranked below a steaming pile of WUSTL for crying out loud. How much credibility can it haveBCLS wrote:Don't be upsetdakatz wrote:Lol, now the BC homers have some extra ammo. They will fight tooth and nail over their additional 3.58%Blindmelon wrote:BU/BC > USC/Vand/UT is surprising... with UCLA breaking about the UT/Vand/UCLA group. Of course, this doesn't account for clerkships which would push Vand/UT above BU/BC, but this is surprising.BC FTW
- fatduck

- Posts: 4135
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: 2011 Top 50 Go-To Law Schools
get a roomBCLS wrote:lol I'd rather see job placement stats than the U.S. News Rankings anyday. But to be fair im completely kidding, 3% is nothing. BC=BU, BU=BCdakatz wrote:Lol, I'd point to USNews to reassert our dominance, but those rankings are going more and more out the window each time we see these NLJ250 figures. I mean, both of us are ranked below a steaming pile of WUSTL for crying out loud. How much credibility can it have
- Helmholtz

- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: 2011 Top 50 Go-To Law Schools
And yet the number of GULC grads who didn't get into the NLJ250 is nearly as big as Columbia's entire class.Unitas wrote:I am surprised Georgetown put more bodies into the NJ250 than Columbia did and came so close to number of Harvard.
-
paulinaporizkova

- Posts: 2489
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:25 pm
Re: 2011 Top 50 Go-To Law Schools
tou-fucking-cheHelmholtz wrote:And yet the number of GULC grads who didn't get into the NLJ250 is nearly as big as Columbia's entire class.Unitas wrote:I am surprised Georgetown put more bodies into the NJ250 than Columbia did and came so close to number of Harvard.
-
dakatz

- Posts: 2422
- Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:19 pm
Re: 2011 Top 50 Go-To Law Schools
What you just said I already know. I completely understand that YLS is low in big firm placement because many to clerkships. But are you implying that high bigfirm placement means that clerkship placement is low? Dude, 42% of their class does something other than bigfirm work. If the majority of that leftover 42% are doing clerkships then yeah, I'd say their clerkship placement is pretty awesomesolidsnake wrote:dakatz wrote:Um, these figures have nothing to do with clerkships. Not sure what you are talking about.solidsnake wrote:UCLA>yale zOMG!!! west coast revolution
so much for UChi being the clerkship powerhouse that tls proclaims it to be.
Wow your deductive skills must have served you well in law school, genius.
schools like yls being ranked so low reflect higher number of its grads doing other things (like clerkships) -- not whether they actually had a lower chance at joining nlj250 firms.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Unitas

- Posts: 1379
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: 2011 Top 50 Go-To Law Schools
+1paulinaporizkova wrote:tou-fucking-cheHelmholtz wrote:And yet the number of GULC grads who didn't get into the NLJ250 is nearly as big as Columbia's entire class.Unitas wrote:I am surprised Georgetown put more bodies into the NJ250 than Columbia did and came so close to number of Harvard.
I didn't mean to imply that Georgetown's number was good, but it still surprises me.
- Helmholtz

- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: 2011 Top 50 Go-To Law Schools
Averaged over the last three years:
Chicago: 60.22
Columbia: 60.03
UPenn: 57.27
Northwestern: 54.39
Cornell: 53.94
NYU: 52.92
Berkeley: 52.74
UVA: 52.36
Harvard: 51.61
Stanford: 50.67
Duke: 49.88
Michigan: 49.49
GULC: 43.13
Vanderbilt: 40.50
USC: 39.21
BC: 37.99
UCLA: 37.81
BU: 35.27
GWU: 33.29
Fordham: 32.93
Schools not listed because of lack of 2008 data: Yale, Texas
Chicago: 60.22
Columbia: 60.03
UPenn: 57.27
Northwestern: 54.39
Cornell: 53.94
NYU: 52.92
Berkeley: 52.74
UVA: 52.36
Harvard: 51.61
Stanford: 50.67
Duke: 49.88
Michigan: 49.49
GULC: 43.13
Vanderbilt: 40.50
USC: 39.21
BC: 37.99
UCLA: 37.81
BU: 35.27
GWU: 33.29
Fordham: 32.93
Schools not listed because of lack of 2008 data: Yale, Texas
- JG Hall

- Posts: 362
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:18 pm
Re: 2011 Top 50 Go-To Law Schools
I'd like to see the difference between Vault placement and NLJ 250 placement, for a) prestige whoring and b) the difference is probably comprised of more regional firms.
- re-applicant

- Posts: 193
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 5:26 pm
Re: 2011 Top 50 Go-To Law Schools
What's the other half of Harvard doing? It's easy to say the leftovers from Yale are clerking and doing other things, but Harvard's class is much bigger.Helmholtz wrote:Averaged over the last three years:
Chicago: 60.22
Columbia: 60.03
UPenn: 57.27
Northwestern: 54.39
Cornell: 53.94
NYU: 52.92
Berkeley: 52.74
UVA: 52.36
Harvard: 51.61
Stanford: 50.67
Duke: 49.88
Michigan: 49.49
GULC: 43.13
Vanderbilt: 40.50
USC: 39.21
BC: 37.99
UCLA: 37.81
BU: 35.27
GWU: 33.29
Fordham: 32.93
Schools not listed because of lack of 2008 data: Yale, Texas
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
twistedwrister

- Posts: 256
- Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 11:02 am
Re: 2011 Top 50 Go-To Law Schools
School 2010 2011 change
Cornell 41.5 58.3 16.8
Chicago 53.1 59 5.9
Penn 50.8 53.1 2.3
Harvard 47.6 49.7 2.1
Columbia 54.4 55.2 0.8
Yale 35.3 33.8 -1.5
Boalt 50 45.6 -4.4
GULC 42.8 37.6 -5.2
Virginia 52.8 46.8 -6
NYU 50.1 43.3 -6.8
Michigan 51 42.4 -8.6
NW 55.9 44.4 -11.5
Duke 49.8 38 -11.8
Stanford 54.1 41.6 -12.5
Cornell 41.5 58.3 16.8
Chicago 53.1 59 5.9
Penn 50.8 53.1 2.3
Harvard 47.6 49.7 2.1
Columbia 54.4 55.2 0.8
Yale 35.3 33.8 -1.5
Boalt 50 45.6 -4.4
GULC 42.8 37.6 -5.2
Virginia 52.8 46.8 -6
NYU 50.1 43.3 -6.8
Michigan 51 42.4 -8.6
NW 55.9 44.4 -11.5
Duke 49.8 38 -11.8
Stanford 54.1 41.6 -12.5
-
Trequartista

- Posts: 135
- Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 4:26 am
Re: 2011 Top 50 Go-To Law Schools
Why won't people talk about Cornell's awesome numbers? 
-
dakatz

- Posts: 2422
- Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:19 pm
Re: 2011 Top 50 Go-To Law Schools
And I turned down Cornell why? Lol, If I wasn't doing well at (and if I wasn't so happy with) where I currently attended, I'd honestly be regretting that decision.
- BruceWayne

- Posts: 2034
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 9:36 pm
Re: 2011 Top 50 Go-To Law Schools
Wow I've always been one to say that things weren't as bad as people were saying, and I was never one to listen to that autoadmit bs, but when it's from an official source like this I have to change my tune. This is unreal. I think helmholtz and a few others in this thread have been on here for a while, but for those of us who were on TLS before 2008 this is just a complete turn around. People on here used to say "go to GULC sticker; you'll get biglaw no problem". The vault guides said things like "getting big law from CLS is like shooting fish in a barrel" and "UVA's placement is phenomenal. Unless you want Wachtell and only Wachtell you'll be fine". NLJ numbers for the top 10 were in the high 50's. Now you have the number 6 school on the list placing less than half in the nlj250 (and the thing that's so scary is that nlj250 is much more comprehensive than vault rankings. If this was Vault I'd actually say things were really good. Vaults heavily NYC focused. But for these numbers to be nlj). Ugh why did things have to crash when I decided to go to law school.............
I kind of wish I had taken the risk and ED'd to UChicago.......
I kind of wish I had taken the risk and ED'd to UChicago.......
Last edited by BruceWayne on Sat Feb 26, 2011 12:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
rose711

- Posts: 287
- Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 11:57 pm
Re: 2011 Top 50 Go-To Law Schools
Where can I find the previous years' numbers? I want to add up the total number of jobs and compare them on an aggregate basis. I wonder if the number of jobs has decreased substantially. Which, duh - but I want to get a handle on that - how many entry level biglaw jobs are gone as of this most recent report?
Last edited by rose711 on Sat Feb 26, 2011 12:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
dakatz

- Posts: 2422
- Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:19 pm
Re: 2011 Top 50 Go-To Law Schools
Lol its a sad dose of irony that I managed 2 T14 acceptances, and they end up the top 2 schools on this list. I guess someone is trying to tell me I made a bad decision turning them down.BruceWayne wrote:Wow I've always been one to say that things weren't as bad as people were saying, and I was never one to listen to that autoadmit bs, but when it's from an official source like this I have to change my tune. This is unreal. I think helmholtz and a few others in this thread have been on here for a while, but for those of us who were on TLS before 2008 this is just a complete turn around. People on here used to say "go to GULC sticker; you'll get biglaw no problem". The vault guides said things like "getting big law from CLS is like shooting fish in a barrel" and "UVA's placement is phenomenal. Unless you want Wachtell and only Wachtell you'll be fine". NLJ numbers for the top 10 were in the high 50's. Now you have the number 6 school on the list placing less than half in the nlj250 (and the thing that's so scary is that nlj250 is much more comprehensive than vault rankings. If this was Vault I'd actually say things were really good. Vaults heavily NYC focused--but for these numbers to be nlj). Ugh why did things have to crash when I decided to go to law school.............
I kind of wish I had taken the wish and ED'd to UChicago.......
-
smittytron3k

- Posts: 197
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: 2011 Top 50 Go-To Law Schools
Tons of us clerk (I think around 20 percent, nothing like Yale though). Also significant numbers going into government, PI, non-NLJ250 firms (boutiques and some regional midsize firms), and then a sizable (for HLS) chunk scrambling to get a job. I'm sure there are some horror stories but the mood here is pretty upbeat with regards to employment.re-applicant wrote:What's the other half of Harvard doing? It's easy to say the leftovers from Yale are clerking and doing other things, but Harvard's class is much bigger.Helmholtz wrote:Averaged over the last three years:
Chicago: 60.22
Columbia: 60.03
UPenn: 57.27
Northwestern: 54.39
Cornell: 53.94
NYU: 52.92
Berkeley: 52.74
UVA: 52.36
Harvard: 51.61
Stanford: 50.67
Duke: 49.88
Michigan: 49.49
GULC: 43.13
Vanderbilt: 40.50
USC: 39.21
BC: 37.99
UCLA: 37.81
BU: 35.27
GWU: 33.29
Fordham: 32.93
Schools not listed because of lack of 2008 data: Yale, Texas
- BruceWayne

- Posts: 2034
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 9:36 pm
Re: 2011 Top 50 Go-To Law Schools
OK I hate to sound like a crybaby but in all seriousness, no TLS hyperbole just real talk. What is going to happen to the people in the top 14 who miss biglaw/fed clerkship/pi? Are people with TOP 10 law degrees really going to be living at home with their parents working at RadioShack???? What have you guys heard from the people who struck out at OCI and don't have anything lined up (3Ls) what are they doing?! And the thing is that the worse class is class of 2011!!!!dakatz wrote:Lol its a sad dose of irony that I managed 2 T14 acceptances, and they end up the top 2 schools on this list. I guess someone is trying to tell me I made a bad decision turning them down.BruceWayne wrote:Wow I've always been one to say that things weren't as bad as people were saying, and I was never one to listen to that autoadmit bs, but when it's from an official source like this I have to change my tune. This is unreal. I think helmholtz and a few others in this thread have been on here for a while, but for those of us who were on TLS before 2008 this is just a complete turn around. People on here used to say "go to GULC sticker; you'll get biglaw no problem". The vault guides said things like "getting big law from CLS is like shooting fish in a barrel" and "UVA's placement is phenomenal. Unless you want Wachtell and only Wachtell you'll be fine". NLJ numbers for the top 10 were in the high 50's. Now you have the number 6 school on the list placing less than half in the nlj250 (and the thing that's so scary is that nlj250 is much more comprehensive than vault rankings. If this was Vault I'd actually say things were really good. Vaults heavily NYC focused--but for these numbers to be nlj). Ugh why did things have to crash when I decided to go to law school.............
I kind of wish I had taken the wish and ED'd to UChicago.......
Oh and people need to stop pissing on UChicago. They have NEVER had less than 51/2 percent biglaw placement AND they have high placement into top Vault firms, AND they have had lawyer/judge assessment scores higher than ANY school except HYS and CLS EVERY YEAR. AND they've placed more SCOTUS clerks than Stanford over the last decade. I don't give a damn what TLS says, Chicago is only barely behind Stanford. I used to love that school but I chickened out on ED because of their weak LRAP and I was afraid of ice cold Chicago....now I kind of regret it.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login