Anonymous User wrote:I made Urban and IPLJ, and I feel incredibly lucky, but I am at a loss and I have to decide by tomorrow. I know Urban is regarded as the better journal (generally considered second to LR in prestige), and it has a larger alumni base, but I am interested in IP (would have an easier time picking a note topic), and several of my friends will be joining IPLJ. There is also the blog, which is pretty cool. If it were feasible I would definitely do both, but does Fordham even let us? Besides, I know people are waiting and I would not want to take a spot from one of my classmates.
Doing more than one journal is one of the stupidest thing a law student could do. It signals to employers that you have no idea what you're doing and are flailing about desperately trying to look important. I'm not saying you'll get dinged everywhere, but it is NOT good signaling. Journal work consists of horrifically routine editing, usually of only a portion of any given article so you don't even see the substance outside of the 10 pages or whatever that you have to edit. The substantive nature of it is irrelevant, you're reading one sentence at a time and punching numbers into lexis/westlaw or pulling books, not munching tea and biscuits discussing the finer points of the Mediocre Journal of Photocopying and Boring Law with your colleagues.
Being on a journal is good for editing skills. Being on a journal means you avoid "so why aren't you on a journal?" in an interview. Being on a journal that relates to your desired practice area can give you a very minor talking point, but will hardly be dispositive. Beyond that, it's just not a great experience. Even if you LOVE LOVE LOVE it (and you won't) the correct outlet for journal affection is by playing the politics of your journal and getting on its managing board/editorial board/high command/whatever, not doing more than one.