Had such high hopes for STB this year...Anonymous User wrote:STB matched.
2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
That report doesn't sound like the job was "less demanding" in 2005 (1995, definitely; 2005, not so much). I mean, my firm (one of the potential market leaders mentioned multiple times in this thread) reports that its average associate billable hours are actually *lower* than the average reported there for firms of 150+ lawyers. We can talk about how those numbers get massaged down for PR/recruiting reasons, but I would assume Altman Weil is using the same source that reports our average associate billables being in the high 1800s.mvp99 wrote:we don't want your reasonable arguments!enibs wrote:The real problem here is that law firms got way out ahead of themselves in the overheated period from 2005 to 2007, when starting base salaries in NYC went from $125K to $160K in two years. Then 2008 happened and these same firms found themselves feeling stupid. In constant dollars, the $125K of 2005, would be a little over $152K in 2015. Combined with the fact that supply and demand is still buyer-friendly, and that economic outlook is still uncertain, there's really no incentive to move.Anonymous User wrote:Why 190? I mean, besides talking one's book. NY to 175 seems more realistic.
don't know if you're considering in your analysis that the job was less demanding in 2005. This is all I could find http://www.altmanweil.com/dir_docs/reso ... cument.pdf
Not saying this HAS to change your conclusion
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
Shearman matched.
-
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:52 pm
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
Sweet necro, anon.Anonymous User wrote:Shearman matched.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
Lol.anonnymouse wrote:Sweet necro, anon.Anonymous User wrote:Shearman matched.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 8:35 am
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
What the man has to say about NY to 190k: LOL!
http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=120274 ... 2615717726
You can tell AmLaw's intended audience is not the same as ATL's
http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=120274 ... 2615717726
You can tell AmLaw's intended audience is not the same as ATL's
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 8:35 am
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
This is also interesting: http://www.nalp.org/1014research see Table 2 -- longest streak of stagnant salaries on record
- bowser
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:54 am
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
WTF, they compare apples to oranges. The nominal median household income in 1995 was $34,076. People are such lazy fact-ignoring pieces of crap.
"Since 1995, when first-year associates in New York made $85,000, their salaries have almost doubled, according to the National Association for Law Placement. Meanwhile household income in the U.S. has barely budged in the past 20 years, when adjusted for inflation. In 1995, the median was $50,978, while in 2014 it was $53,657."
"Since 1995, when first-year associates in New York made $85,000, their salaries have almost doubled, according to the National Association for Law Placement. Meanwhile household income in the U.S. has barely budged in the past 20 years, when adjusted for inflation. In 1995, the median was $50,978, while in 2014 it was $53,657."
- First Offense
- Posts: 7091
- Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:45 pm
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
bowser wrote:WTF, they compare apples to oranges. The nominal median household income in 1995 was $34,076. People are such lazy fact-ignoring pieces of crap.
"Since 1995, when first-year associates in New York made $85,000, their salaries have almost doubled, according to the National Association for Law Placement. Meanwhile household income in the U.S. has barely budged in the past 20 years, when adjusted for inflation. In 1995, the median was $50,978, while in 2014 it was $53,657."

Way to move the goalposts there. Jesus that's awful.
Edit: Although Associate salaries were 132k adjusted for inflation, so it has still gone up pretty significantly. Although if the bonuses were higher then, that could easily cover the difference.
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
Have heard that DPW will be shattering.
-
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:52 pm
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
At first I scoffed because only Kirkland SHATTERS but then I realized that you meant DPW will be shattering (notice the difference) the hoaps and dreams of thousands of associates by matching Cravath.Anonymous User wrote:Have heard that DPW will be shattering.
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 8:35 am
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
I trust this anonymous post without qualification. NY to 190k confirmed.Anonymous User wrote:Have heard that DPW will be shattering.
- Big Shrimpin
- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
anonnymouse wrote:At first I scoffed because only Kirkland SHATTERS but then I realized that you meant DPW will be shattering (notice the difference) the hoaps and dreams of thousands of associates by matching Cravath.Anonymous User wrote:Have heard that DPW will be shattering.
sounds right
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
DPW tends to announce on Wednesdays and the holiday party is today, stay tuned for SHATTER confirmationAnonymous User wrote:Have heard that DPW will be shattering.
-
- Posts: 1862
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:36 pm
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
It would be hilarious if DPW significantly undercuts Cravath's bonuses but goes to 190. Would be a nice windfall for associates at the few firms that already matched bonuses
- Cobretti
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
Embarrassingbowser wrote:WTF, they compare apples to oranges. The nominal median household income in 1995 was $34,076. People are such lazy fact-ignoring pieces of crap.
"Since 1995, when first-year associates in New York made $85,000, their salaries have almost doubled, according to the National Association for Law Placement. Meanwhile household income in the U.S. has barely budged in the past 20 years, when adjusted for inflation. In 1995, the median was $50,978, while in 2014 it was $53,657."
- Greenandgold
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 12:45 pm
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
In case anyone is curious, $85,000 in 1995 is about the same as $132,000 in 2015. So it's an increase from $132,000 to $160,000 for first-year associates in New York, compared to a median income of $50,978 in 1995 moving to $53,657 in 2015.Cobretti wrote:Embarrassingbowser wrote:WTF, they compare apples to oranges. The nominal median household income in 1995 was $34,076. People are such lazy fact-ignoring pieces of crap.
"Since 1995, when first-year associates in New York made $85,000, their salaries have almost doubled, according to the National Association for Law Placement. Meanwhile household income in the U.S. has barely budged in the past 20 years, when adjusted for inflation. In 1995, the median was $50,978, while in 2014 it was $53,657."
Source: http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl? ... year2=2015
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 593
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 11:29 pm
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
I'm sure employers may not care about this, but isn't context important? Did the cost of completing a plumbing certificate course increase by a gazillion percent between 1985-2015, too?
-
- Posts: 633
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2015 4:18 pm
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
Meanwhile COL and tuition have tripled or more....Greenandgold wrote:In case anyone is curious, $85,000 in 1995 is about the same as $132,000 in 2015. So it's an increase from $132,000 to $160,000 for first-year associates in New York, compared to a median income of $50,978 in 1995 moving to $53,657 in 2015.Cobretti wrote:Embarrassingbowser wrote:WTF, they compare apples to oranges. The nominal median household income in 1995 was $34,076. People are such lazy fact-ignoring pieces of crap.
"Since 1995, when first-year associates in New York made $85,000, their salaries have almost doubled, according to the National Association for Law Placement. Meanwhile household income in the U.S. has barely budged in the past 20 years, when adjusted for inflation. In 1995, the median was $50,978, while in 2014 it was $53,657."
Source: http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl? ... year2=2015
whoever wrote that is really dumb though or intentionally misleading people
- Br3v
- Posts: 4290
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:18 pm
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
Do you think this actually does make us per se worse candidates than in 1985? If the marginal benefit has reduced we might assume the quality candidates went elsewhere (IB), leaving us.cheaptilts wrote:I'm sure employers may not care about this, but isn't context important? Did the cost of completing a plumbing certificate course increase by a gazillion percent between 1985-2015, too?
DF's reverse auction is real.
- Cobretti
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
Apps have been down for years now, we are biglaw's silver medals.Br3v wrote:Do you think this actually does make us per se worse candidates than in 1985? If the marginal benefit has reduced we might assume the quality candidates went elsewhere (IB), leaving us.cheaptilts wrote:I'm sure employers may not care about this, but isn't context important? Did the cost of completing a plumbing certificate course increase by a gazillion percent between 1985-2015, too?
DF's reverse auction is real.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 349
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:21 pm
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
Meanwhile Amlaw100 PPP was ~$515,000 in 1996 and is $1.55 million now.
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 8:35 am
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
515k is 780k in today's dollars... but the associates are the ones being greedy.PMan99 wrote:Meanwhile Amlaw100 PPP was ~$515,000 in 1996 and is $1.55 million now.
- TLSModBot
- Posts: 14835
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:54 am
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
dude just make equity partner what's the big deal. Very easily attainable incharliekelly33 wrote:515k is 780k in today's dollars... but the associates are the ones being greedy.PMan99 wrote:Meanwhile Amlaw100 PPP was ~$515,000 in 1996 and is $1.55 million now.
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2015 Biglaw Boneus Thread
I love when people post Amlaw PPP numbers like they are tethered to real partner comp. It's so quaint. Have fun in Corporations class, guys.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login