I actually heard Kirkland to 210k. But I doubt it. They’ll keep their brownies but not raise base.Big Red wrote:can we just focus on churning out unsubstantiated rumors about 215k, something the people really want?
NYC to 200k Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- LaLiLuLeLo
- Posts: 949
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 11:54 am
Re: NYC to 200k
-
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2017 1:59 pm
Re: NYC to 200k
Haven't we done a thing before where we quarantine head to head nonsense like this to its own thread?JohnnieSockran wrote:I'm sorry you have so much hate for me personally. Wish you the best.Anonymous User wrote:You said this before, but your threads are all about anger and I guess you're projecting. There's no need to shut people down for talking about your firm. Any wayz, just wanted to call you out.JohnnieSockran wrote:lawposeidon wrote:I don't intend to trash you. I just hope you turn things around with your mental health. Some of us are pulling for you.JohnnieSockran wrote:So is OMM confirmed?
This was me lawposeidon clicked wrong reply.
-
- Posts: 3294
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 1:29 pm
Re: NYC to 200k
Vanguardtoast and bananas wrote:We could pass the time discussing the best ways to spend that sweet extra $35kBig Red wrote:can we just focus on churning out unsubstantiated rumors about 215k, something the people really want?

-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
I don't have any hate for you stop projecting. I don't know who you are. I was just wondering why you went after me earlier and now I know. I'll shutup this is taking away from the drama of this thread. Good luck all on raises.JohnnieSockran wrote:
I'm sorry you have so much hate for me personally. Wish you the best.
Edit: lawposeidon again clicked wrong reply.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Tue Jun 05, 2018 5:55 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
how come only the second tier matched to 190. I'm picturing v10 executive committee members smoking cigars in a dark room signing a price-fixing agreement that Kirkland drafted.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Emma.
- Posts: 2408
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:57 pm
Re: NYC to 200k
Cobretti wrote:I can't wait for these raises to play themselves out so I don't have to go to TLS for another 2+ years.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Assuming you are in biglaw, how often do you go to the beach?JohnnieSockran wrote:I mean texas sounds cool, but no beaches. That's why I pay my west coast premium and remain jelly of your big ass homes.
I could fly to Cali twice a month and still come out ahead. And Texans tends to work less absurd hours than striver New Yorkers so the flight time is nbd.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
I'm a K&E associate. K&E hasn't raised.LaLiLuLeLo wrote:I actually heard Kirkland to 210k. But I doubt it. They’ll keep their brownies but not raise base.Big Red wrote:can we just focus on churning out unsubstantiated rumors about 215k, something the people really want?
fuck, I bet there was a "Kirkland University" program on this in the past year. KU 401: Introduction to Salary SuppressionAnonymous User wrote:how come only the second tier matched to 190. I'm picturing v10 executive committee members smoking cigars in a dark room signing a price-fixing agreement that Kirkland drafted.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Tue Jun 05, 2018 5:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 10:15 am
Re: NYC to 200k
My friend's dad is John Cravath, he said 215 is fucking confirmed.Big Red wrote:can we just focus on churning out unsubstantiated rumors about 215k, something the people really want?
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
There needs to be some antitrust investigation of collusion between law firms, because it is nonsensical that PPP has gone up by 50-100% at all firms since 2007 and yet associate compensation has actually gone down over the past 11 years (look it up; $40k bonuses for first-years in '07).Anonymous User wrote:how come only the second tier matched to 190. I'm picturing v10 executive committee members smoking cigars in a dark room signing a price-fixing agreement that Kirkland drafted.
-
- Posts: 3311
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: NYC to 200k
I think 200k is the most likely outcome here. Cravath will move and everyone else will fall in line.
Kirkland has no need to go further. Their business model is anti-lockstep anyway.
Kirkland has no need to go further. Their business model is anti-lockstep anyway.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
find your antitrust outline and ctrl+f for "conscious parallelism "Anonymous User wrote:There needs to be some antitrust investigation of collusion between law firms, because it is nonsensical that PPP has gone up by 50-100% at all firms since 2007 and yet associate compensation has actually gone down over the past 11 years (look it up; $40k bonuses for first-years in '07).Anonymous User wrote:how come only the second tier matched to 190. I'm picturing v10 executive committee members smoking cigars in a dark room signing a price-fixing agreement that Kirkland drafted.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Is this the move? Don't wanna get into the substance here, but I'd love any recs for good threads on getting into this kind of stuff (ideally providing insight into how to account for debt, etc.)Big Red wrote:Vanguardtoast and bananas wrote:We could pass the time discussing the best ways to spend that sweet extra $35kBig Red wrote:can we just focus on churning out unsubstantiated rumors about 215k, something the people really want?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- LaLiLuLeLo
- Posts: 949
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 11:54 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Shun the nonbelieverAnonymous User wrote:I'm a K&E associate. K&E hasn't raised.LaLiLuLeLo wrote:I actually heard Kirkland to 210k. But I doubt it. They’ll keep their brownies but not raise base.Big Red wrote:can we just focus on churning out unsubstantiated rumors about 215k, something the people really want?
fuck, I bet there was a "Kirkland University" program on this in the past year. KU 401: Introduction to Salary SuppressionAnonymous User wrote:how come only the second tier matched to 190. I'm picturing v10 executive committee members smoking cigars in a dark room signing a price-fixing agreement that Kirkland drafted.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2018 2:39 pm
Re: NYC to 200k
Long-time listener, first-time caller.minnbills wrote:lol you created a profile just to shitpost?jimmythetulip wrote:I bet you kneel for the National Anthem, too, don't you?minnbills wrote:I wouldn't live in texas for $1 million a year.
-
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2017 1:59 pm
Re: NYC to 200k
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 3&t=272809Anonymous User wrote:Is this the move? Don't wanna get into the substance here, but I'd love any recs for good threads on getting into this kind of stuff (ideally providing insight into how to account for debt, etc.)Big Red wrote:Vanguardtoast and bananas wrote:We could pass the time discussing the best ways to spend that sweet extra $35kBig Red wrote:can we just focus on churning out unsubstantiated rumors about 215k, something the people really want?
-
- Posts: 616
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:10 pm
Re: NYC to 200k
not sure why you folks aren't posting elsewhere for discussion
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- LaLiLuLeLo
- Posts: 949
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 11:54 am
Re: NYC to 200k
I like watching trainwreckspereira6 wrote:not sure why you folks aren't posting elsewhere for discussion
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Thank you!!!toast and bananas wrote:http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 3&t=272809Anonymous User wrote:Is this the move? Don't wanna get into the substance here, but I'd love any recs for good threads on getting into this kind of stuff (ideally providing insight into how to account for debt, etc.)Big Red wrote:Vanguardtoast and bananas wrote:We could pass the time discussing the best ways to spend that sweet extra $35kBig Red wrote:can we just focus on churning out unsubstantiated rumors about 215k, something the people really want?
Just asked for rec based on a comment. Figured it would end there (as it should)pereira6 wrote:not sure why you folks aren't posting elsewhere for discussion
- yomisterd
- Posts: 1571
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 12:52 pm
Re: NYC to 200k
companies don’t care where the associates at the law firm they hire went to school.Anonymous User wrote:Out of that list, K&E is the one that does not belong, not Debevoise. Like DPW, CSM and CGSH, the median lawyer at Debevoise attended Columbia; the median lawyer at Kirkland attended Cornell.Man from Nantucket wrote: How many Debevoise associates do we have in this thread?
spotted the straight through
- Single-Malt-Liquor
- Posts: 1450
- Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 4:49 pm
Re: NYC to 200k
Cobretti wrote:I can't wait for these raises to play themselves out so I don't have to go to TLS for another 2+ years.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
I agree. I was told by an associate at a top plaintiffs trial law firm that s/he knows *as fact* that his firm has an agreement not to hire from peer firms, a la: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Tech ... LitigationAnonymous User wrote:There needs to be some antitrust investigation of collusion between law firms, because it is nonsensical that PPP has gone up by 50-100% at all firms since 2007 and yet associate compensation has actually gone down over the past 11 years (look it up; $40k bonuses for first-years in '07).Anonymous User wrote:how come only the second tier matched to 190. I'm picturing v10 executive committee members smoking cigars in a dark room signing a price-fixing agreement that Kirkland drafted.
Everyone would recognize the name of the firm.
I increasingly suspect this is why *no* true plaintiff's firm (excluding susman, quinn, etc.) pays associates over about $120K. Not one. They all just pretend their "black box" bonuses will make up the difference someday (Spoiler alert: they don't. Most of those firms increase bonuses about $5K/year in lockstep fashion no matter how many billion dollar settlements they secure. Their associates get fed up after a few years and lateral to the highest bidder).
It is entirely plausible the plaintiffs bar could work out salary suppression agreements, as they meet at annual conventions that include tightly controlled secret meetings (I know because I attended once - not the closed meetings, but the convention). Definitely ample opportunity for a meeting of the minds.
That said, I still only know this second-hand. Could be a fair amount of conscious parallelism.
I haven't heard any comparable allegations about biglaw - I think it's actually more likely that the biglaw associate salary market is competitive and non-collusive. But not sure.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
So what's take home pay at 190k? NY will get an extra 6-7k in disposable income in our first year?
200k would be great.
THE MILBANK SCALE! Just keep repeating it until someone bumps us to 200k!
THE MILBANK SCALE!
200k would be great.
THE MILBANK SCALE! Just keep repeating it until someone bumps us to 200k!
THE MILBANK SCALE!
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Yep, another ~6k after tax.Anonymous User wrote:So what's take home pay at 190k? NY will get an extra 6-7k in disposable income in our first year?
200k would be great.
THE MILBANK SCALE! Just keep repeating it until someone bumps us to 200k!
THE MILBANK SCALE!
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
If you go onto ADP, for 190k, semi-monthly is $4799. 180k is 4595.Anonymous User wrote:Yep, another ~6k after tax.Anonymous User wrote:So what's take home pay at 190k? NY will get an extra 6-7k in disposable income in our first year?
200k would be great.
THE MILBANK SCALE! Just keep repeating it until someone bumps us to 200k!
THE MILBANK SCALE!
So roughly 5500.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login