Mind posting the app?Joe Quincy wrote:This. Its not that hard. I have an app on my phone that tracks it for you and then you can email a report to yourself/secretary from the app. It even lets you setup how each client gets billed (.1/.25/etc).SBL wrote:This is legitimately a bad thing to do for about a million reasonsAnonymous User wrote:I'm the worst biller. At the end of the day, I'm like that took me about 2.5 hours. :O :X
New associate banter Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:41 pm
Re: New associate banter
-
- Posts: 432621
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: New associate banter
Can we share our buzz words for process as a corporate junior?
Drafting , reviewing and revising are my go-to words when I've got custody of a document or a chain. What about when you're making calls, tracking process, checking up on things? I've had various language but never anything I'm fully satisfied with.
Also, +1 to billing solo work with calls. "Reviewing precedent transaction documents, initial drafting of [document] and discussion with [senior associate] about transaction" or "Call with client and followup revisions to [document]." So money.
Ex.: A Monday morning deal closing. I'm in the office and glued to the deal from 8:00 am until 1:00 pm when we get final confirmation that the wire has hit. You can bet I'm billing every minute, but I've done a million tasks and not all of them lend themselves to active verbs (i.e. "yelling at the screen demanding the cross receipt to hurry about and come through")
Drafting , reviewing and revising are my go-to words when I've got custody of a document or a chain. What about when you're making calls, tracking process, checking up on things? I've had various language but never anything I'm fully satisfied with.
Also, +1 to billing solo work with calls. "Reviewing precedent transaction documents, initial drafting of [document] and discussion with [senior associate] about transaction" or "Call with client and followup revisions to [document]." So money.
Ex.: A Monday morning deal closing. I'm in the office and glued to the deal from 8:00 am until 1:00 pm when we get final confirmation that the wire has hit. You can bet I'm billing every minute, but I've done a million tasks and not all of them lend themselves to active verbs (i.e. "yelling at the screen demanding the cross receipt to hurry about and come through")
- snowpeach06
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 5:32 am
Re: New associate banter
Boss just handed off one of his pro bono projects to me. The problem is, he hurredly gave me just a list of documents to work from, gave me 0 background on the issue and did not make it at all clear what legal questions were involved. I basically have a list of copyright righted works and no idea what he wants from me. What the hell do I do in this scenario?
-
- Posts: 432621
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: New associate banter
Its not like I lie. I keep track meaning if I start something at 10AM, and finish around 2PM.. I bill 4 hours (even if I got up to pee). I just dont sit there billing all day .25 for this .25 for that. The only time I seperate out billing for the same client/matter is if its phone calls / meetings (b/c we have different internal codes for those).SBL wrote:This is legitimately a bad thing to do for about a million reasonsAnonymous User wrote:I'm the worst biller. At the end of the day, I'm like that took me about 2.5 hours. :O :X
Do you guys legit do billing entries all day long? I know partners don't bill for days - so theres no way they have complete accuracy.
My old firm when I was a paralegal had a timer on their billing program where you can set it to a client/matter number and it would bill as you work then you can shut it off or switch to a different client/matter. That was cool - but I dont have that here.
-
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 7:16 am
Re: New associate banter
Ask him exactly what he wants you to do?snowpeach06 wrote:Boss just handed off one of his pro bono projects to me. The problem is, he hurredly gave me just a list of documents to work from, gave me 0 background on the issue and did not make it at all clear what legal questions were involved. I basically have a list of copyright righted works and no idea what he wants from me. What the hell do I do in this scenario?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1565
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:44 am
Re: New associate banter
Read (or at least review quickly) everything first. Find out about the client as much as you can.snowpeach06 wrote:Boss just handed off one of his pro bono projects to me. The problem is, he hurredly gave me just a list of documents to work from, gave me 0 background on the issue and did not make it at all clear what legal questions were involved. I basically have a list of copyright righted works and no idea what he wants from me. What the hell do I do in this scenario?
Is there a pro bono coordinator from an agency or group who gave you guys this matter? Find out who and call them to touch base unless you don't think your boss would want you to.
Then go back and tell him that you have reviewed everything and ask about the next step. That way you can have an intelligent discussion with him.
- snowpeach06
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 5:32 am
Re: New associate banter
I think the issue is that he probably thought he told me what to do. My boss has this unfortunate way of speaking such that no one really knows what he is saying. He never finishes a sentence, assumes that everyone has his background as the former head of a government office and yet still manages to go on hour long monologues with mostly irrelevant information. Even if you try to interrupt, it doesn't really work. I can ask him again, but I doubt it will be more clear. I might try asking over e-mail or something. He still responds to e-mails in a bit of a round-about way, but, it's usually better than his verbal speech.lukertin wrote:Ask him exactly what he wants you to do?snowpeach06 wrote:Boss just handed off one of his pro bono projects to me. The problem is, he hurredly gave me just a list of documents to work from, gave me 0 background on the issue and did not make it at all clear what legal questions were involved. I basically have a list of copyright righted works and no idea what he wants from me. What the hell do I do in this scenario?
Ohh, yeah, so, by "documents" I mean I have one document, which I read. All it has is the title of something that may be a book or possibly recording, an author and the date the work was first published. I gathered from my boss's ramblings that they were first published in the UK, and likely have something to do with the Berne Convention. I also have no idea who gave him this project because, basically I work for a non-profit and my boss does lots of his own stuff on the side. This is one of his personal side projects, and his personal documents are not on our server for me to look through. I might do some research on the Berne Convention, and hopefully that will make it seem like I was working, despite not knowing the assignment. Ugh, shit.NYstate wrote:Read (or at least review quickly) everything first. Find out about the client as much as you can.snowpeach06 wrote:Boss just handed off one of his pro bono projects to me. The problem is, he hurredly gave me just a list of documents to work from, gave me 0 background on the issue and did not make it at all clear what legal questions were involved. I basically have a list of copyright righted works and no idea what he wants from me. What the hell do I do in this scenario?
Is there a pro bono coordinator from an agency or group who gave you guys this matter? Find out who and call them to touch base unless you don't think your boss would want you to.
Then go back and tell him that you have reviewed everything and ask about the next step. That way you can have an intelligent discussion with him.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: New associate banter
When a firm doesn't allow you to block bill, does that mean they are trying to get you to stuff like this:IAFG wrote:Right, that's what I am sayingAnonymous User wrote:Just roll in into whatever bigger thing you're doing on the matter.IAFG wrote:The suggestion was do to things in bigger chunks so instead of .1 email, turn that into a .3 something more substantive.
.25 hours - email - really took 5 minutes
.25 hours -reviewed draft - really took 5 minutes
.25 made phonecall - really took 2 minutes.
BAM 12 minutes into 45.
- Joe Quincy
- Posts: 373
- Joined: Thu May 16, 2013 10:42 am
Re: New associate banter
https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/hourstr ... 23934?mt=8jd20132013 wrote:Mind posting the app?Joe Quincy wrote:This. Its not that hard. I have an app on my phone that tracks it for you and then you can email a report to yourself/secretary from the app. It even lets you setup how each client gets billed (.1/.25/etc).SBL wrote:This is legitimately a bad thing to do for about a million reasonsAnonymous User wrote:I'm the worst biller. At the end of the day, I'm like that took me about 2.5 hours. :O :X
There are lots of them though.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: New associate banter
Pretty sure it's courts rather than firms that prohibit block billing.Desert Fox wrote:When a firm doesn't allow you to block bill, does that mean they are trying to get you to stuff like this:IAFG wrote:Right, that's what I am sayingAnonymous User wrote:Just roll in into whatever bigger thing you're doing on the matter.IAFG wrote:The suggestion was do to things in bigger chunks so instead of .1 email, turn that into a .3 something more substantive.
.25 hours - email - really took 5 minutes
.25 hours -reviewed draft - really took 5 minutes
.25 made phonecall - really took 2 minutes.
BAM 12 minutes into 45.
-
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 7:16 am
Re: New associate banter
Yes. People do that all the time. They assume you already know what they're talking about, they assume you have the same perspective as them, they assume lots of things and the end result is they don't say things because they assume you already know.snowpeach06 wrote:I think the issue is that he probably thought he told me what to do.
How to say it: "I'm not totally clear what it is I should be doing for this case. Because I don't want to spend the next __ days researching information that is not relevant to this issue, could we take 15 minutes to go over the objectives of this assignment?"
In the future I would also repeat to them what it is they want you to do. Sometimes people say one thing but mean another thing and it isn't apparent until they hear repeated from someone else.
- snowpeach06
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 5:32 am
Re: New associate banter
I did actually try doing the last part (repeating what I thought he wanted) but he cut me off to go on rambling. And just from the few weeks I've been working here, I can already tell he can accomplish nothing in 15 minutes. Our shortest meeting thus far has been two hours. Basically, even if I ask for clarification, I don't think I'm going to get it in a clear manner. I will try asking for clarification via e-mail and pray it's clear, but, I'm not holding my breath. Hopefully, if I keep asking and still keep fucking up, hopefully he will realize he never made the assignment clear and stop rambling long enough to make himself clear. Or I'll get fired, which doesn't actually bother me at this point, because I think my boss is going to be impossible to work for. Thanks for your help though. I think that's very good advice for most people with normal bosses, and maybe it will even work here.lukertin wrote:Yes. People do that all the time. They assume you already know what they're talking about, they assume you have the same perspective as them, they assume lots of things and the end result is they don't say things because they assume you already know.snowpeach06 wrote:I think the issue is that he probably thought he told me what to do.
How to say it: "I'm not totally clear what it is I should be doing for this case. Because I don't want to spend the next __ days researching information that is not relevant to this issue, could we take 15 minutes to go over the objectives of this assignment?"
In the future I would also repeat to them what it is they want you to do. Sometimes people say one thing but mean another thing and it isn't apparent until they hear repeated from someone else.
- Hodgy
- Posts: 2681
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 4:38 pm
Re: New associate banter
1. My firm has several methods of noting time and it depends on transactional/litigation and client preferences. Possibilities run the gamut from chronological task-by-task billing, to giant single matter-by-day billing, to modified versions like doing a block bill but notating time for each task within the block description. Luckily, I get to do block billing, which in transactional just makes so much more sense.
2. Still early in the game, but my issue is not finding billable tasks but finding billable tasks without time constraints. I know most of the billable work I get is largely because of my affordability for the client. Thus, it sucks also being told, "Keep it under _ hours." Especially when the task truly requires _+ hours. Together with the large amount of non-billable "catch-up" work I am getting, it feels like I am getting behind early to meet my reduced model. A good image is that of the green arrow on the Paced Program being my billable requirement.
Other than that, it has been great so far. I got assigned to two great partners who are not only nice, helpful, and concerned about my development, but also extremely talented within their practices. Shit is going to get busy soon.
2. Still early in the game, but my issue is not finding billable tasks but finding billable tasks without time constraints. I know most of the billable work I get is largely because of my affordability for the client. Thus, it sucks also being told, "Keep it under _ hours." Especially when the task truly requires _+ hours. Together with the large amount of non-billable "catch-up" work I am getting, it feels like I am getting behind early to meet my reduced model. A good image is that of the green arrow on the Paced Program being my billable requirement.
Other than that, it has been great so far. I got assigned to two great partners who are not only nice, helpful, and concerned about my development, but also extremely talented within their practices. Shit is going to get busy soon.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 7:16 am
Re: New associate banter
Could your assignment be related to this? http://www.uspto.gov/blog/director/entr ... _hear_fromsnowpeach06 wrote:I did actually try doing the last part (repeating what I thought he wanted) but he cut me off to go on rambling. And just from the few weeks I've been working here, I can already tell he can accomplish nothing in 15 minutes. Our shortest meeting thus far has been two hours. Basically, even if I ask for clarification, I don't think I'm going to get it in a clear manner. I will try asking for clarification via e-mail and pray it's clear, but, I'm not holding my breath. Hopefully, if I keep asking and still keep fucking up, hopefully he will realize he never made the assignment clear and stop rambling long enough to make himself clear. Or I'll get fired, which doesn't actually bother me at this point, because I think my boss is going to be impossible to work for. Thanks for your help though. I think that's very good advice for most people with normal bosses, and maybe it will even work here.
- snowpeach06
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 5:32 am
Re: New associate banter
Nope, although that is actually something else I am working on at the moment.lukertin wrote:Could your assignment be related to this? http://www.uspto.gov/blog/director/entr ... _hear_fromsnowpeach06 wrote:I did actually try doing the last part (repeating what I thought he wanted) but he cut me off to go on rambling. And just from the few weeks I've been working here, I can already tell he can accomplish nothing in 15 minutes. Our shortest meeting thus far has been two hours. Basically, even if I ask for clarification, I don't think I'm going to get it in a clear manner. I will try asking for clarification via e-mail and pray it's clear, but, I'm not holding my breath. Hopefully, if I keep asking and still keep fucking up, hopefully he will realize he never made the assignment clear and stop rambling long enough to make himself clear. Or I'll get fired, which doesn't actually bother me at this point, because I think my boss is going to be impossible to work for. Thanks for your help though. I think that's very good advice for most people with normal bosses, and maybe it will even work here.
- thesealocust
- Posts: 8525
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:50 pm
Re: New associate banter
Random life pro-tip: there are many things in life that you will need before you realize that you need them.
Non-law firm example:
* Plunger. Your life is going to be better if you have it before you need it.
law firm examples:
* Remote computer access. Can you access files? Move them to your computer? Run blacklines, access legal research, etc.? Navigate on your laptop and/or with multiple monitors as applicable? All the passwords in order and accessible? Can you access firm email from a browser if need be?
* Firm voice mail. Can you access it remotely? Have the password? Set up a greeting with your name?
* Finance and travel. Do you have a credit card? Does it have a reasonable limit for life as an associate who may need to travel? Do you have a passport? Is it expiring soon?
Non-law firm example:
* Plunger. Your life is going to be better if you have it before you need it.
law firm examples:
* Remote computer access. Can you access files? Move them to your computer? Run blacklines, access legal research, etc.? Navigate on your laptop and/or with multiple monitors as applicable? All the passwords in order and accessible? Can you access firm email from a browser if need be?
* Firm voice mail. Can you access it remotely? Have the password? Set up a greeting with your name?
* Finance and travel. Do you have a credit card? Does it have a reasonable limit for life as an associate who may need to travel? Do you have a passport? Is it expiring soon?
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: New associate banter
Ah see no one gives me time constraints, they just write stuff off later for the client.Hodgy wrote:1. My firm has several methods of noting time and it depends on transactional/litigation and client preferences. Possibilities run the gamut from chronological task-by-task billing, to giant single matter-by-day billing, to modified versions like doing a block bill but notating time for each task within the block description. Luckily, I get to do block billing, which in transactional just makes so much more sense.
2. Still early in the game, but my issue is not finding billable tasks but finding billable tasks without time constraints. I know most of the billable work I get is largely because of my affordability for the client. Thus, it sucks also being told, "Keep it under _ hours." Especially when the task truly requires _+ hours. Together with the large amount of non-billable "catch-up" work I am getting, it feels like I am getting behind early to meet my reduced model. A good image is that of the green arrow on the Paced Program being my billable requirement.
Other than that, it has been great so far. I got assigned to two great partners who are not only nice, helpful, and concerned about my development, but also extremely talented within their practices. Shit is going to get busy soon.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- KD35
- Posts: 950
- Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:30 am
Re: New associate banter
Is the updated passport really that necessary for work? Unless you're in that highly-coveted international law field.thesealocust wrote:* Finance and travel. Do you have a credit card? Does it have a reasonable limit for life as an associate who may need to travel? Do you have a passport? Is it expiring soon?
- Joe Quincy
- Posts: 373
- Joined: Thu May 16, 2013 10:42 am
Re: New associate banter
You never know. White collar people, etc all travel at times. Not to mention, you should always have one anyhow in case a family member is injured overseas. (I know someone this happened too...) Not to mention, if you can't find your SSN card you can show a passport for right to work, etc.KD35 wrote:Is the updated passport really that necessary for work? Unless you're in that highly-coveted international law field.thesealocust wrote:* Finance and travel. Do you have a credit card? Does it have a reasonable limit for life as an associate who may need to travel? Do you have a passport? Is it expiring soon?
- thesealocust
- Posts: 8525
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:50 pm
Re: New associate banter
Just ran into a friend who had to go on an emergency trip to Europe the other day. Very firm and practice area dependent, but not at all unrealistic generally speaking.KD35 wrote:Is the updated passport really that necessary for work? Unless you're in that highly-coveted international law field.thesealocust wrote:* Finance and travel. Do you have a credit card? Does it have a reasonable limit for life as an associate who may need to travel? Do you have a passport? Is it expiring soon?
-
- Posts: 432621
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: New associate banter
summered at a large ip boutique, and knew a couple of midlevels who traveled overseas for depositions. Also met an associate who did in his first year, and a 2nd year who did an emergency trip to asia that summer (not sure for what). it happens.KD35 wrote:Is the updated passport really that necessary for work? Unless you're in that highly-coveted international law field.thesealocust wrote:* Finance and travel. Do you have a credit card? Does it have a reasonable limit for life as an associate who may need to travel? Do you have a passport? Is it expiring soon?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Lincoln
- Posts: 1208
- Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:27 pm
Re: New associate banter
This even happened to two of our summer associates on a day's notice. Passport is essential not so much because you are likely to have to go, but if you do get asked, it's embarrassing as shit to have to say you can't go because you didn't follow instructions.thesealocust wrote:Just ran into a friend who had to go on an emergency trip to Europe the other day. Very firm and practice area dependent, but not at all unrealistic generally speaking.KD35 wrote:Is the updated passport really that necessary for work? Unless you're in that highly-coveted international law field.thesealocust wrote:* Finance and travel. Do you have a credit card? Does it have a reasonable limit for life as an associate who may need to travel? Do you have a passport? Is it expiring soon?
Also, first paycheck today. Life is good.
-
- Posts: 1565
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:44 am
Re: New associate banter
Lol. In this case all you can do is ask for direction. He should understand. On the plus side, this sounds like a cool project. Your boss sounds like he has some interesting projects going on.snowpeach06 wrote:I think the issue is that he probably thought he told me what to do. My boss has this unfortunate way of speaking such that no one really knows what he is saying. He never finishes a sentence, assumes that everyone has his background as the former head of a government office and yet still manages to go on hour long monologues with mostly irrelevant information. Even if you try to interrupt, it doesn't really work. I can ask him again, but I doubt it will be more clear. I might try asking over e-mail or something. He still responds to e-mails in a bit of a round-about way, but, it's usually better than his verbal speech.lukertin wrote:Ask him exactly what he wants you to do?snowpeach06 wrote:Boss just handed off one of his pro bono projects to me. The problem is, he hurredly gave me just a list of documents to work from, gave me 0 background on the issue and did not make it at all clear what legal questions were involved. I basically have a list of copyright righted works and no idea what he wants from me. What the hell do I do in this scenario?Ohh, yeah, so, by "documents" I mean I have one document, which I read. All it has is the title of something that may be a book or possibly recording, an author and the date the work was first published. I gathered from my boss's ramblings that they were first publishedNYstate wrote:Read (or at least review quickly) everything first. Find out about the client as much as you can.snowpeach06 wrote:Boss just handed off one of his pro bono projects to me. The problem is, he hurredly gave me just a list of documents to work from, gave me 0 background on the issue and did not make it at all clear what legal questions we
involved. I basically have a list of copyright righted works and no idea what he wants from me. What the hell do I do in this scenario?
Is there a pro bono coordinator from an agency or group who gave you guys this matter
Find out who and call them to touch base unless you don't think your boss would want you to.
Then go back and tell him that you have reviewed everything and ask about the next step. That way you can have an intelligent discussion with him.
in the UK, and likely have something to do with the Berne Convention. I also have no idea who gave him this project because, basically I work for a non-profit and my boss does lots of his own stuff on the side. This is one of his personal side projects, and his personal documents are not on our server for me to look through. I might do some research on the Berne Convention, and hopefully that will make it seem like I was working, despite not knowing the assignment. Ugh, shit.
-
- Posts: 1565
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:44 am
Re: New associate banter
Also, your boss doesn't expect perfection. Just tell him you need clarification or a little more guidance. That shouldn't be a problem.
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: New associate banter
I agree. This is kinda silly.NYstate wrote:Also, your boss doesn't expect perfection. Just tell him you need clarification or a little more guidance. That shouldn't be a problem.
I mean, don't get me wrong, some partners are better at explaining things than others. But for the ones who are unclear, you just gotta ask.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login