(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Sun Nov 07, 2021 11:12 am
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Nov 06, 2021 7:03 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Nov 06, 2021 3:30 pm
so what are the odds ropes matches Mintz in boston, at which point it also has to pay the same in NY? Could we be seeing a RopesMintz Scale as new top
I’m not gonna shit on Mintz like the poster above, but Ropes and Goodwin aren’t moving because of Mintz. Ropes loses people to Choate, K&E and Goodwin. Goodwin loses people to Ropes, K&E, Cooley and Gunderson. We get SA data from people who go to other firms. It’s not exactly a parade of Mintz acceptances
I'm not sure I agree re: other firms ignoring Mintz. As it stands, sure, but I think that's only because we literally don't know what's going on with Mintz. If some Mintz associate would FINALLY SPILL THE BEANS ABOUT ALL-IN 2020/2021 COMP and then if ATL posts an article about how Mintz is blowing higher ranked, more profitable firms out of the water, then I think other firms will have to listen. Alas, none of the Mintz associates seem to care about that.
Mintz associates: this is an important turning point for you. I am in Boston and I think I speak for others ITT when I say that I am prepared to give you top rankings on literally every market survey if you did indeed get top notch comp
and tell us about it now. But if you stay silent, my opinion of Mintz will get worse, and it's zeros all around. Seriously, how hard is it to just come clean here?
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Sun Nov 07, 2021 1:25 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Nov 07, 2021 11:12 am
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Nov 06, 2021 7:03 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Nov 06, 2021 3:30 pm
so what are the odds ropes matches Mintz in boston, at which point it also has to pay the same in NY? Could we be seeing a RopesMintz Scale as new top
I’m not gonna shit on Mintz like the poster above, but Ropes and Goodwin aren’t moving because of Mintz. Ropes loses people to Choate, K&E and Goodwin. Goodwin loses people to Ropes, K&E, Cooley and Gunderson. We get SA data from people who go to other firms. It’s not exactly a parade of Mintz acceptances
I'm not sure I agree re: other firms ignoring Mintz. As it stands, sure, but I think that's only because we literally don't know what's going on with Mintz. If some Mintz associate would FINALLY SPILL THE BEANS ABOUT ALL-IN 2020/2021 COMP and then if ATL posts an article about how Mintz is blowing higher ranked, more profitable firms out of the water, then I think other firms will have to listen. Alas, none of the Mintz associates seem to care about that.
Mintz associates: this is an important turning point for you. I am in Boston and I think I speak for others ITT when I say that I am prepared to give you top rankings on literally every market survey if you did indeed get top notch comp
and tell us about it now. But if you stay silent, my opinion of Mintz will get worse, and it's zeros all around. Seriously, how hard is it to just come clean here?
Lol, if anything Mintz associates are coming out looking great here by just staying out of the fray. For law students, this is the type of people you get at top firms - they're neurotic psychos who can't wait a week until other firms publish bonus news and will vengefully take it out on you in any petty way possible. Now imagine owing them a deliverable.
-
Joachim2017

- Posts: 291
- Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2019 8:17 pm
Post
by Joachim2017 » Sun Nov 07, 2021 1:46 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Nov 07, 2021 11:12 am
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Nov 06, 2021 7:03 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Nov 06, 2021 3:30 pm
so what are the odds ropes matches Mintz in boston, at which point it also has to pay the same in NY? Could we be seeing a RopesMintz Scale as new top
I’m not gonna shit on Mintz like the poster above, but Ropes and Goodwin aren’t moving because of Mintz. Ropes loses people to Choate, K&E and Goodwin. Goodwin loses people to Ropes, K&E, Cooley and Gunderson. We get SA data from people who go to other firms. It’s not exactly a parade of Mintz acceptances
I'm not sure I agree re: other firms ignoring Mintz. As it stands, sure, but I think that's only because we literally don't know what's going on with Mintz. If some Mintz associate would FINALLY SPILL THE BEANS ABOUT ALL-IN 2020/2021 COMP and then if ATL posts an article about how Mintz is blowing higher ranked, more profitable firms out of the water, then I think other firms will have to listen. Alas, none of the Mintz associates seem to care about that.
Mintz associates: this is an important turning point for you. I am in Boston and I think I speak for others ITT when I say that I am prepared to give you top rankings on literally every market survey if you did indeed get top notch comp
and tell us about it now. But if you stay silent, my opinion of Mintz will get worse, and it's zeros all around. Seriously, how hard is it to just come clean here?
lol, this guy sounds like a tool. get a grip, no one cares about your opinion of Mintz or how you fill out your rankings sheet.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Sun Nov 07, 2021 8:37 pm
Joachim2017 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 07, 2021 1:46 pm
lol, this guy sounds like a tool. get a grip, no one cares about your opinion of Mintz or how you fill out your rankings sheet.
Do you literally not care about making sure other firms at least match Mintz?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Mon Nov 08, 2021 1:51 am
ATL article from November 2nd on Mintz special bonuses. $20k for first and second years and $40k for 3rd year + which will be paid out at the end of March 2022. The email also mentions bonuses paid in September and says that these bonuses are additive and won't be credited against other bonuses (likely means EOY is still to come). Is this what everyone has been freaking out about for the past 10 pages?
https://abovethelaw.com/2021/11/mintz-s ... fall-2021/
-
objctnyrhnr

- Posts: 1521
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2013 2:44 am
Post
by objctnyrhnr » Mon Nov 08, 2021 8:04 am
Has mintz even been at market with bonus/salary from at least tail end of 2020 through all of 2021?
I feel like I heard somewhere it wasn’t. (At the very least i believe it was sub market until relatively very recently.)
And if that’s true, then what are we all even doing here?
Anybody know for sure?
-
zoomzoom888

- Posts: 3
- Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2020 11:19 pm
Post
by zoomzoom888 » Mon Nov 08, 2021 11:29 am
Can Cravath just move the market so we can all get on with our lives?!
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Mon Nov 08, 2021 12:21 pm
zoomzoom888 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 11:29 am
Can Cravath just move the market so we can all get on with our lives?!
That's an odd way to spell Milbank
Want to continue reading?
Register for access!
Did I mention it was FREE ?
Already a member? Login
-
objctnyrhnr

- Posts: 1521
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2013 2:44 am
Post
by objctnyrhnr » Mon Nov 08, 2021 1:11 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 12:21 pm
zoomzoom888 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 11:29 am
Can Cravath just move the market so we can all get on with our lives?!
That's an odd way to spell Milbank
Well played though I note the unnecessary anon usage. Regardless, I enjoyed the comment.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Mon Nov 08, 2021 9:39 pm
This article is quite funny. It scaremongers about the “hundreds of thousands of dollars” firms pay associates, but talks nothing about that same associate clearing $1.25—2.0MM of revenue in any given year. Just myopic boomer world view.
Where is the article focusing on my firm’s equity partners taking home $2.25MM in comp?
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Mon Nov 08, 2021 9:43 pm
The only logical reason they haven't yet announced a doubling of the scale is to increase the dramatic nature of the announcement when it comes out at triple the scale.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Mon Nov 08, 2021 10:04 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 9:43 pm
The only logical reason they haven't yet announced a doubling of the scale is to increase the dramatic nature of the announcement when it comes out at
triple the scale.
Now that's what I'm talking about.
-
Lesion of Doom

- Posts: 130
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2017 12:22 am
Post
by Lesion of Doom » Mon Nov 08, 2021 11:42 pm
This thread beautifully encapsulates the neurotic nature of biglaw associates. I'm still laughing at the concept of a "V80 firm".
Of course Mintz will not top the scale, but also of course Mintz matters. It will compel Choate and others to match, and Choate matching will compel the NYC firms inhabiting Boston to do so and you go from there.
More significantly, in my view, Mintz going first suggests that associates are undercompensated. No market NYC firm can claim that it's stretching to meet associate needs when Mintz is pushing ahead.
These incremental raises are horseshit, anyway. We should be thinking about our compensation as a percentage of our realization. Billing doesn't work that way, but in my very typical case as a busy junior I will have billed just under $2M in raw terms this year. Let's say my realization is $1.5M, a conservative number. I think 20% would be reasonable for a junior, thus $300k should by my all-in comp. And then reward your mids and seniors with a slightly higher percentage.
-
Elvis_Dumervil

- Posts: 26
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 7:07 pm
Post
by Elvis_Dumervil » Tue Nov 09, 2021 9:58 am
Lesion of Doom wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 11:42 pm
This thread beautifully encapsulates the neurotic nature of biglaw associates. I'm still laughing at the concept of a "V80 firm".
Of course Mintz will not top the scale, but also of course Mintz matters. It will compel Choate and others to match, and Choate matching will compel the NYC firms inhabiting Boston to do so and you go from there.
More significantly, in my view, Mintz going first suggests that associates are undercompensated. No market NYC firm can claim that it's stretching to meet associate needs when Mintz is pushing ahead.
These incremental raises are horseshit, anyway. We should be thinking about our compensation as a percentage of our realization. Billing doesn't work that way, but in my very typical case as a busy junior I will have billed just under $2M in raw terms this year. Let's say my realization is $1.5M, a conservative number. I think 20% would be reasonable for a junior, thus $300k should by my all-in comp. And then reward your mids and seniors with a slightly higher percentage.
That's the labor theory of value. It has been implemented elsewhere...
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
TUwave

- Posts: 79
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:30 pm
Post
by TUwave » Tue Nov 09, 2021 11:09 am
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 9:39 pm
This article is quite funny. It scaremongers about the “hundreds of thousands of dollars” firms pay associates, but talks nothing about that same associate clearing $1.25—2.0MM of revenue in any given year. Just myopic boomer world view.
Where is the article focusing on my firm’s equity partners taking home $2.25MM in comp?
Lol I love calling associates a "profit sinkhole" when we're literally the reason for profits at law firms.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Tue Nov 09, 2021 11:22 am
TUwave wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 11:09 am
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 9:39 pm
This article is quite funny. It scaremongers about the “hundreds of thousands of dollars” firms pay associates, but talks nothing about that same associate clearing $1.25—2.0MM of revenue in any given year. Just myopic boomer world view.
Where is the article focusing on my firm’s equity partners taking home $2.25MM in comp?
Lol I love calling associates a "profit sinkhole" when we're literally the reason for profits at law firms.
Also enjoyed the assertion that raises haven't helped retention when we have no idea what retention would have looked like without the raises.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
-
rgn122000

- Posts: 19
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 9:14 pm
Post
by rgn122000 » Tue Nov 09, 2021 11:59 am
Definitely Not North wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 11:58 am
is this week the week? I think this is around when we got the announcement last year.
My bet is Thursday though hoping its earlier.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Tue Nov 09, 2021 12:38 pm
Definitely Not North wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 11:58 am
is this week the week? I think this is around when we got the announcement last year.
First bonus announcement in the last two years:
2020 - November 11, Baker McKenzie
2019 - November 7, Milbank
So it could be any day now.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Tue Nov 09, 2021 3:12 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 12:38 pm
Definitely Not North wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 11:58 am
is this week the week? I think this is around when we got the announcement last year.
First bonus announcement in the last two years:
2020 - November 11, Baker McKenzie
2019 - November 7, Milbank
So it could be any day now.
Guy who rains on parades: Historically those were both early announcement dates. Although for all our sakes I hope it happens soon there's also no reason we couldn't see a first announcement around e.g., Thanksgiving.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Tue Nov 09, 2021 3:36 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 3:12 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 12:38 pm
Definitely Not North wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 11:58 am
is this week the week? I think this is around when we got the announcement last year.
First bonus announcement in the last two years:
2020 - November 11, Baker McKenzie
2019 - November 7, Milbank
So it could be any day now.
Guy who rains on parades: Historically those were both early announcement dates. Although for all our sakes I hope it happens soon there's also no reason we couldn't see a first announcement around e.g., Thanksgiving.
The traditional announcement date was the Monday after Thanksgiving (when Cravath holds its all-partners meeting). But years where the bonus scale went up happened earlier: 2014 when STB raised the scale to where it is now I think it was the Monday before Thanksgiving, and as noted in 2019 and 2020 it was in early November.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login