UChicago OCI 2014 Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
I want wachtell most so I bid them number one!
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
No.Neal Patrick Harris wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Omitted some for anonymity. NY unless otherwise noted.
1. Wachtell
2. Sullcrom
3. WilmerHale
4. Latham & Watkins
5. Boies Schiller
6. Allen & Overy (DC)
7. Skadden
8. Williams & Connolly (DC)
9. Gibson Dunn
10. King & Spalding
11. Steptoe & Johnson (DC)
12. Jenner & Block (DC)
13. Cooley
14. Freshfields Bruckhaus
15. Mayer Brown
16. Baker Botts (DC)
17. Winston & Strawn
lol is this the order you bid these firms?
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
The info is kind of useless if you don't say your bid order.
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
The previous list was lifted from the Word document used to organize my notes. Here are the results in "bid order":
1. Williams & Connolly (DC)
a. hit
2. Gibson Dunn
a. hit
3. Wachtell
a. hit
4. Skadden (NY)
a. hit
5. Sullcrom
a. Hit
6.
7. Boies Schiller
a. hit
8. WilmerHale
a. hit
9. Winston & Strawn
a. Hit
10.
11. Latham & Watkins
a. Hit
12.
13.
14. King & Spalding
a. hit
15. Freshfields Bruckhaus
a. hit
16. Paul Hastings
a. miss
17. Mayer Brown
a. hit
18. Cooley
a. hit
19.
20.
21. Pillsbury Winthrop
a. miss
22. Holland & Knight
a. miss
23. Baker Botts (DC)
a. hit
24.
25. Foley & Lardner
a. miss
26.
27. Allen & Overy (DC)
a. hit
28.
29. Sheppard Mullin
a. hit
30.
31.
32. Crowell & Moring (DC)
a. miss
33.
34. WilmerHale (DC)
a. hit
35. Foley & Lardner (DC)
a. miss
36. Jenner & Block (DC)
a. hit
37. Winston & Strawn (DC)
a. hit
38. Steptoe & Johnson (DC)
a. Hit
39.
Excuse the formatting.
1. Williams & Connolly (DC)
a. hit
2. Gibson Dunn
a. hit
3. Wachtell
a. hit
4. Skadden (NY)
a. hit
5. Sullcrom
a. Hit
6.
7. Boies Schiller
a. hit
8. WilmerHale
a. hit
9. Winston & Strawn
a. Hit
10.
11. Latham & Watkins
a. Hit
12.
13.
14. King & Spalding
a. hit
15. Freshfields Bruckhaus
a. hit
16. Paul Hastings
a. miss
17. Mayer Brown
a. hit
18. Cooley
a. hit
19.
20.
21. Pillsbury Winthrop
a. miss
22. Holland & Knight
a. miss
23. Baker Botts (DC)
a. hit
24.
25. Foley & Lardner
a. miss
26.
27. Allen & Overy (DC)
a. hit
28.
29. Sheppard Mullin
a. hit
30.
31.
32. Crowell & Moring (DC)
a. miss
33.
34. WilmerHale (DC)
a. hit
35. Foley & Lardner (DC)
a. miss
36. Jenner & Block (DC)
a. hit
37. Winston & Strawn (DC)
a. hit
38. Steptoe & Johnson (DC)
a. Hit
39.
Excuse the formatting.
- 2014
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Lol that might be one of the worst bid lists I've ever seen. Fortunately you go to Uchi so there's a 95% chance it still works out.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Considering I missed Wilmer DC at 24, I'm calling bs.Anonymous User wrote: 34. WilmerHale (DC)
a. hit
Excuse the formatting.
- Rahviveh
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
maybe he's QUINN SECURE2014 wrote:Lol that might be one of theworstmost prestigious bid lists I've ever seen. Fortunately you go to Uchi so there's a 95% chance it still works out.

-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
If you can't do it, no one can. The self-appointed standard bearer's plight.Anonymous User wrote:Considering I missed Wilmer DC at 24, I'm calling bs.Anonymous User wrote: 34. WilmerHale (DC)
a. hit
Excuse the formatting.
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Appreciate the snark. Unless there's some reason a 34 bid trumps a 24 bid, I don't get how this would actually happen rather than being made up, since there's no preselect.Anonymous User wrote:If you can't do it, no one can. The self-appointed standard bearer's plight.Anonymous User wrote:Considering I missed Wilmer DC at 24, I'm calling bs.Anonymous User wrote: 34. WilmerHale (DC)
a. hit
Excuse the formatting.
Considering they're on a day I have only two interviews, I don't think it's a scheduling thing. I'd understand if they were coming on the day I have 7, but that's not the case.
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
lolRahviveh wrote:maybe he's QUINN SECURE2014 wrote:Lol that might be one of theworstmost prestigious bid lists I've ever seen. Fortunately you go to Uchi so there's a 95% chance it still works out.
It's not firm-or-nothing for me, so it'd take an offer from one of these to get me there.
Sincerely,
Quincy Cure
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
This prompted me to look closer. I listed Wilmer DC and Winston DC as hits understanding that getting them for NY included their DC office. Let me know if that's inaccurate. If so, they're misses.Anonymous User wrote:Appreciate the snark. Unless there's some reason a 34 bid trumps a 24 bid, I don't get how this would actually happen rather than being made up, since there's no preselect.Anonymous User wrote:If you can't do it, no one can. The self-appointed standard bearer's plight.Anonymous User wrote:Considering I missed Wilmer DC at 24, I'm calling bs.Anonymous User wrote: 34. WilmerHale (DC)
a. hit
Excuse the formatting.
Considering they're on a day I have only two interviews, I don't think it's a scheduling thing. I'd understand if they were coming on the day I have 7, but that's not the case.
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Ok, that makes more sense. Didn't realize they were interviewing together and so your 8 bid would grab them. That also explains why they filled earlier than I expected.Anonymous User wrote:This prompted me to look closer. I listed Wilmer DC and Winston DC as hits understanding that getting them for NY included their DC office. Let me know if that's inaccurate. If so, they're misses.Anonymous User wrote:Unless there's some reason a 34 bid trumps a 24 bid, I don't get how this would actually happen rather than being made up, since there's no preselect.
Considering they're on a day I have only two interviews, I don't think it's a scheduling thing. I'd understand if they were coming on the day I have 7, but that's not the case.
I don't really know how that works, to be honest. Your guess sounds right to me.
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
We can only add firms during add-drop that we bid on?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Sat Feb 14, 2015 5:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 3:35 pm
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Good luck, doods.
The only 100% true advice I can give: Be nice to each other. There is always someone doing better, or worse, than you.
The only 100% true advice I can give: Be nice to each other. There is always someone doing better, or worse, than you.
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Can someone older and smarter walk me through the open sign up thing? Basically my understanding is that if a firm has open slots next to its name, come 12:30pm two days before their interview date, you can click on their name and slot yourself into their schedule. I'm not sure if I'm missing something or if I can't follow directions properly. Thanks a lot.
-
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 3:35 pm
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Correct. First come first serve, so for popular firms, you need to be refreshing like a man-man at 12:30.Mal Reynolds wrote:Can someone older and smarter walk me through the open sign up thing? Basically my understanding is that if a firm has open slots next to its name, come 12:30pm two days before their interview date, you can click on their name and slot yourself into their schedule. I'm not sure if I'm missing something or if I can't follow directions properly. Thanks a lot.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Are you limited to firms that you bid on (but didn't get)? The emails from OCS seem to indicate yes but I just want to be sure ahead of time due to the rushed aspect.
- beepboopbeep
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:36 pm
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Anonymous User wrote:Are you limited to firms that you bid on (but didn't get)? The emails from OCS seem to indicate yes but I just want to be sure ahead of time due to the rushed aspect.
So I'm guessing yes, but it's a bit unclear.Paul Woo wrote:Students who bid for an employer but did not get an employer can take advantage of a 24-hour first-come, first-served, open signup process via Symplicity. You need not have bid for an employer to see if any blank time slots are available.
-
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:24 pm
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
We weren't limited to firms we bid last year.beepboopbeep wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Are you limited to firms that you bid on (but didn't get)? The emails from OCS seem to indicate yes but I just want to be sure ahead of time due to the rushed aspect.So I'm guessing yes, but it's a bit unclear.Paul Woo wrote:Students who bid for an employer but did not get an employer can take advantage of a 24-hour first-come, first-served, open signup process via Symplicity. You need not have bid for an employer to see if any blank time slots are available.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
so much anxiety waiting to start watching everyone else wraps-up OCI
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Any idea why Jones Day Chicago only has 9 slots? Thought they added 21. Are people signing up before open-sign ups somehow?
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Paul Woo automatically added people who just missed them with bidding. I think it was up to around 7th or so. For people who are below that threshold, you will have to wait until open sign ups.Anonymous User wrote:Any idea why Jones Day Chicago only has 9 slots? Thought they added 21. Are people signing up before open-sign ups somehow?
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Makes sense, thanks!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login