UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  
Anonymous User
Posts: 432757
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 01, 2011 4:24 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Proskauer ding by email
Chicago or NY?
NY
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432757
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 01, 2011 4:39 pm

Anonymous User wrote:anyone hear from any firms that did screeners yesterday?
Pillsbury DC cb

Interviewer TH
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432757
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 01, 2011 4:45 pm

Cravath CB
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432757
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 01, 2011 4:52 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Anyone hear from Orrick, McDermott, or Ropes (chi)?
McDermott Chi CB
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432757
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 01, 2011 5:16 pm

Cravath ding via e-mail.
Top

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!

Anonymous User
Posts: 432757
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 01, 2011 5:33 pm

Sheppard Mullin NY ding via email
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432757
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 01, 2011 5:42 pm

Weil DC ding by email
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432757
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 01, 2011 6:22 pm

Jones Day NY ding via e-mail
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432757
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 01, 2011 6:40 pm

Williams & Connolly cb
Top

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432757
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 01, 2011 6:42 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Anyone hear from Orrick, McDermott, or Ropes (chi)?
McDermott Chi CB
What group? And by email or phone?
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432757
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 01, 2011 6:53 pm

Holland and Knight ding via snail mail
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432757
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 01, 2011 6:53 pm

Past couple hours have been brutal.
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432757
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 01, 2011 6:54 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:anyone hear from any firms that did screeners yesterday?
Pillsbury DC cb

Interviewer TH
Sidley NY cb
Top

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!

Anonymous User
Posts: 432757
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 01, 2011 6:55 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Past couple hours have been brutal.
Nah, every hour since this process began has been equally bad.
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432757
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:10 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:anyone hear from any firms that did screeners yesterday?
Pillsbury DC cb

Interviewer TH
Sidley NY cb
WilmerHale DC cb
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432757
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:16 pm

Katten CB and McDermott CB (both Chi)
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432757
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:24 pm

Sheppard Mullin NY ding via e-mail
Holland & Knight ding via mail
Wildman ding via mail
Top

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...

Anonymous User
Posts: 432757
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:24 pm

How many of us are there sitting with 0-1 callbacks?
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432757
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:25 pm

Anonymous User wrote:How many of us are there sitting with 0-1 callbacks?
Looking at DC, sitting on 1 CB
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432757
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:26 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:How many of us are there sitting with 0-1 callbacks?
Looking at DC, sitting on 1 CB
Looking at NYC, sitting on just one. Four rejections, but expecting a lot more to be coming very soon.
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432757
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:27 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:How many of us are there sitting with 0-1 callbacks?
Looking at DC, sitting on 1 CB
Looking at NYC, sitting on just one. Four rejections, but expecting a lot more to be coming very soon.

Unless you are under a 176 or socially awkward, you should be getting more callbacks as the law review kids cancel their callbacks and offers.
Top

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!

Anonymous User
Posts: 432757
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:29 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:How many of us are there sitting with 0-1 callbacks?
Looking at DC, sitting on 1 CB
Looking at NYC, sitting on just one. Four rejections, but expecting a lot more to be coming very soon.

I focused on Chicago. I have 4-5 rejections and 1 callback.
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432757
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:30 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Katten CB and McDermott CB (both Chi)
What group did you interview for at McDermott?
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432757
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:35 pm

Pillsbury & Goodwin Procter Bay Area CBs.
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432757
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:39 pm

Chins up, guys. (3L here). Last year, I only had 1 callback by the time OCI ended, and then got 4-5 more in the 2-5 weeks following OCI. (Yep, I got a CB from Latham 5 weeks after OCI ended and everyone else had already heard). I ended up with multiple opportunities from great firms.
Top

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!

Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”