Fall 2015 OCI Results Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
User avatar
jbagelboy

Diamond
Posts: 10361
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: Fall 2015 OCI Results

Post by jbagelboy » Sun Nov 08, 2015 8:15 pm

RaceJudicata wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Just posting what I wish I had known before making my bidlist, and what my friends said they wished they had known. It wasn't meant at all to influence school decisions.
The lack of self-awareness of some people (especially for someone with demonstrated academic ability) truly boggles my mind.
in fairness, the entire pretence of this thread is that information from successful OCI candidates would be valuable for future reference. it's more that the whole scheme is dumb/lacks self-awareness than that one individual student with a strong academic record and performance is a particularly eggregious offendor

User avatar
pancakes3

Platinum
Posts: 6619
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:49 pm

Re: Fall 2015 OCI Results

Post by pancakes3 » Sun Nov 08, 2015 8:16 pm

bearsfan23 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Just posting what I wish I had known before making my bidlist, and what my friends said they wished they had known. It wasn't meant at all to influence school decisions.
You're the reason people hate law students
Like he cares about your approval. Who are you compared to the DPW hiring partner?

RaceJudicata

Gold
Posts: 1867
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:51 pm

Re: Fall 2015 OCI Results

Post by RaceJudicata » Sun Nov 08, 2015 8:18 pm

jbagelboy wrote:
RaceJudicata wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Just posting what I wish I had known before making my bidlist, and what my friends said they wished they had known. It wasn't meant at all to influence school decisions.
The lack of self-awareness of some people (especially for someone with demonstrated academic ability) truly boggles my mind.
in fairness, the entire pretence of this thread is that information from successful OCI candidates would be valuable for future reference. it's more that the whole scheme is dumb/lacks self-awareness than that one individual student with a strong academic record and performance is a particularly eggregious offendor

Fair point. If anything, the timing - a solid 1.5-2 months post-hiring - is just strange. I don't even know why i still look in this thread..haha signing off.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432625
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Fall 2015 OCI Results

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Nov 08, 2015 10:03 pm

School Range: T2
Market(s): Chicago, Midwest, NY
Approximate class rank: Top 10%
Law review: No, secondary journal
Work experience: KJD
IP background: None
Anything else that might have an impact? No
Screening Interviews: 16 OCI; 2 Mass Mail
Callbacks received: 7 OCI, 1 Mass Mail
Callbacks accepted: 8
Offers w/vault ranges: 3 (1 Midsized, 2 V100)
How many firms just didn't get back with you with a rejection/callback?: 3? Not sure. Many more from mass mail obviously. Lost track.
Thank-you notes sent: Almost always, although stopped at very end.

Ended up happy with my choices, but the callback-offer ratio seemed off, especially when my screener --> callback ratio was so high.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432625
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Fall 2015 OCI Results

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Nov 09, 2015 1:44 am

As a SLS student, I don't get the shitting on the SLS poster.

OCS here absolutely DOES NOT make it clear how difficult SF is and does not do a good job of making sure marginal candidates bid at least some NY firms (because it is absolutely true that there's a comparative lack of SLS students at NY firms and that people who bid NY here did extremely well). From what I've heard from friends, OCS basically makes NY sound like it's just as competitive as SF, LA, and DC, which simply isn't true (and they don't talk about how SF is infinitely more competitive than any other major market).

SF is brutal, and I know numerous people who struck out in SF. I personally came close: I'm top 5-10%, a pretty good interviewer, not KJD, had decent (though not great) ties to SF, and basically only bid SF. Out of 4 SF callbacks, I only got 1 offer (I had 3 other callbacks scheduled, but canceled them after I got an offer from my top choice, and I think at best I would've gotten an offer from 1 of the 3 remaining). I wasn't set on doing biglaw, so I personally wasn't super concerned about the risk of striking out, but I would advise anyone at SLS (no matter how good their grades/interviewing skills/WE are) to bid at least some NY/DC firms (I also noticed that people here did surprisingly well at DC firms this year, even people with terrible grades, contrary to conventional wisdom about DC).

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
052220152

Gold
Posts: 4798
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 1:24 pm

Re: Fall 2015 OCI Results

Post by 052220152 » Mon Nov 09, 2015 3:33 am

Anonymous User wrote:As a SLS student, I don't get the shitting on the SLS poster.

OCS here absolutely DOES NOT make it clear how difficult SF is and does not do a good job of making sure marginal candidates bid at least some NY firms (because it is absolutely true that there's a comparative lack of SLS students at NY firms and that people who bid NY here did extremely well). From what I've heard from friends, OCS basically makes NY sound like it's just as competitive as SF, LA, and DC, which simply isn't true (and they don't talk about how SF is infinitely more competitive than any other major market).

SF is brutal, and I know numerous people who struck out in SF. I personally came close: I'm top 5-10%, a pretty good interviewer, not KJD, had decent (though not great) ties to SF, and basically only bid SF. Out of 4 SF callbacks, I only got 1 offer (I had 3 other callbacks scheduled, but canceled them after I got an offer from my top choice, and I think at best I would've gotten an offer from 1 of the 3 remaining). I wasn't set on doing biglaw, so I personally wasn't super concerned about the risk of striking out, but I would advise anyone at SLS (no matter how good their grades/interviewing skills/WE are) to bid at least some NY/DC firms (I also noticed that people here did surprisingly well at DC firms this year, even people with terrible grades, contrary to conventional wisdom about DC).
you sound terrible. why are you anon anyway

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse

Diamond
Posts: 29293
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: Fall 2015 OCI Results

Post by A. Nony Mouse » Mon Nov 09, 2015 9:09 am

There is plenty of personal info in that post, enough to justify posting anon. Chill.

User avatar
jbagelboy

Diamond
Posts: 10361
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: Fall 2015 OCI Results

Post by jbagelboy » Mon Nov 09, 2015 11:05 am

Anonymous User wrote:As a SLS student, I don't get the shitting on the SLS poster.

OCS here absolutely DOES NOT make it clear how difficult SF is and does not do a good job of making sure marginal candidates bid at least some NY firms (because it is absolutely true that there's a comparative lack of SLS students at NY firms and that people who bid NY here did extremely well). From what I've heard from friends, OCS basically makes NY sound like it's just as competitive as SF, LA, and DC, which simply isn't true (and they don't talk about how SF is infinitely more competitive than any other major market).

SF is brutal, and I know numerous people who struck out in SF. I personally came close: I'm top 5-10%, a pretty good interviewer, not KJD, had decent (though not great) ties to SF, and basically only bid SF. Out of 4 SF callbacks, I only got 1 offer (I had 3 other callbacks scheduled, but canceled them after I got an offer from my top choice, and I think at best I would've gotten an offer from 1 of the 3 remaining). I wasn't set on doing biglaw, so I personally wasn't super concerned about the risk of striking out, but I would advise anyone at SLS (no matter how good their grades/interviewing skills/WE are) to bid at least some NY/DC firms (I also noticed that people here did surprisingly well at DC firms this year, even people with terrible grades, contrary to conventional wisdom about DC).
I feel like this advise is specific to SLS, and might be better served in a stanford ask a law student thread. Coming from an east coast peer SF isn't noticably more difficult than other challenging smaller markets like DC and Chicago. As a general matter, proximity to the market is a double edged sword; a more crowded field results in more competition, but there are still more grads in the market overall. The same advise goes for UChicago students wrt Chi market: NY is easier and top firms will reach deep into the class, don't underestimate how tough chicago market can be even though you attend the top school in the region.

barkschool

Silver
Posts: 1024
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 12:05 am

Re: Fall 2015 OCI Results

Post by barkschool » Mon Nov 09, 2015 3:03 pm

Jim Jones wrote:
barkschool wrote:
Brut wrote:this thread is fucking stupid
More useful if we had a spreadsheet form that people could drop their info in

i would like to reiterate burt's point that this thread is fucking stupid, that its useless, that the people who post their results in it are fucking awful, and that a spreadsheet would be as equally fucking dumb
But where would we get the kind of magic that only this thread turns out?
Anonymous wrote:I habitually make a motion with my hands in which I simulate the spinning and firing of revolvers. I do this periodically to punctuate something I say. I didn't think about stuff like that at all when I did all my interviews (I just figured, body language--whatever)

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
Desert Fox

Diamond
Posts: 18283
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm

DFTHREAD

Post by Desert Fox » Mon Nov 09, 2015 4:06 pm

Image
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:36 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
star fox

Diamond
Posts: 20790
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:13 pm

Re: Fall 2015 OCI Results

Post by star fox » Mon Nov 09, 2015 11:18 pm

jbagelboy wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:As a SLS student, I don't get the shitting on the SLS poster.

OCS here absolutely DOES NOT make it clear how difficult SF is and does not do a good job of making sure marginal candidates bid at least some NY firms (because it is absolutely true that there's a comparative lack of SLS students at NY firms and that people who bid NY here did extremely well). From what I've heard from friends, OCS basically makes NY sound like it's just as competitive as SF, LA, and DC, which simply isn't true (and they don't talk about how SF is infinitely more competitive than any other major market).

SF is brutal, and I know numerous people who struck out in SF. I personally came close: I'm top 5-10%, a pretty good interviewer, not KJD, had decent (though not great) ties to SF, and basically only bid SF. Out of 4 SF callbacks, I only got 1 offer (I had 3 other callbacks scheduled, but canceled them after I got an offer from my top choice, and I think at best I would've gotten an offer from 1 of the 3 remaining). I wasn't set on doing biglaw, so I personally wasn't super concerned about the risk of striking out, but I would advise anyone at SLS (no matter how good their grades/interviewing skills/WE are) to bid at least some NY/DC firms (I also noticed that people here did surprisingly well at DC firms this year, even people with terrible grades, contrary to conventional wisdom about DC).
I feel like this advise is specific to SLS, and might be better served in a stanford ask a law student thread. Coming from an east coast peer SF isn't noticably more difficult than other challenging smaller markets like DC and Chicago. As a general matter, proximity to the market is a double edged sword; a more crowded field results in more competition, but there are still more grads in the market overall. The same advise goes for UChicago students wrt Chi market: NY is easier and top firms will reach deep into the class, don't underestimate how tough chicago market can be even though you attend the top school in the region.
Of non NY markets Chicago is about as good as it gets to target.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”