in fairness, the entire pretence of this thread is that information from successful OCI candidates would be valuable for future reference. it's more that the whole scheme is dumb/lacks self-awareness than that one individual student with a strong academic record and performance is a particularly eggregious offendorRaceJudicata wrote:The lack of self-awareness of some people (especially for someone with demonstrated academic ability) truly boggles my mind.Anonymous User wrote:Just posting what I wish I had known before making my bidlist, and what my friends said they wished they had known. It wasn't meant at all to influence school decisions.
Fall 2015 OCI Results Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Fall 2015 OCI Results
- pancakes3
- Posts: 6619
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:49 pm
Re: Fall 2015 OCI Results
Like he cares about your approval. Who are you compared to the DPW hiring partner?bearsfan23 wrote:You're the reason people hate law studentsAnonymous User wrote:Just posting what I wish I had known before making my bidlist, and what my friends said they wished they had known. It wasn't meant at all to influence school decisions.
-
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:51 pm
Re: Fall 2015 OCI Results
jbagelboy wrote:in fairness, the entire pretence of this thread is that information from successful OCI candidates would be valuable for future reference. it's more that the whole scheme is dumb/lacks self-awareness than that one individual student with a strong academic record and performance is a particularly eggregious offendorRaceJudicata wrote:The lack of self-awareness of some people (especially for someone with demonstrated academic ability) truly boggles my mind.Anonymous User wrote:Just posting what I wish I had known before making my bidlist, and what my friends said they wished they had known. It wasn't meant at all to influence school decisions.
Fair point. If anything, the timing - a solid 1.5-2 months post-hiring - is just strange. I don't even know why i still look in this thread..haha signing off.
-
- Posts: 432625
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Fall 2015 OCI Results
School Range: T2
Market(s): Chicago, Midwest, NY
Approximate class rank: Top 10%
Law review: No, secondary journal
Work experience: KJD
IP background: None
Anything else that might have an impact? No
Screening Interviews: 16 OCI; 2 Mass Mail
Callbacks received: 7 OCI, 1 Mass Mail
Callbacks accepted: 8
Offers w/vault ranges: 3 (1 Midsized, 2 V100)
How many firms just didn't get back with you with a rejection/callback?: 3? Not sure. Many more from mass mail obviously. Lost track.
Thank-you notes sent: Almost always, although stopped at very end.
Ended up happy with my choices, but the callback-offer ratio seemed off, especially when my screener --> callback ratio was so high.
Market(s): Chicago, Midwest, NY
Approximate class rank: Top 10%
Law review: No, secondary journal
Work experience: KJD
IP background: None
Anything else that might have an impact? No
Screening Interviews: 16 OCI; 2 Mass Mail
Callbacks received: 7 OCI, 1 Mass Mail
Callbacks accepted: 8
Offers w/vault ranges: 3 (1 Midsized, 2 V100)
How many firms just didn't get back with you with a rejection/callback?: 3? Not sure. Many more from mass mail obviously. Lost track.
Thank-you notes sent: Almost always, although stopped at very end.
Ended up happy with my choices, but the callback-offer ratio seemed off, especially when my screener --> callback ratio was so high.
-
- Posts: 432625
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Fall 2015 OCI Results
As a SLS student, I don't get the shitting on the SLS poster.
OCS here absolutely DOES NOT make it clear how difficult SF is and does not do a good job of making sure marginal candidates bid at least some NY firms (because it is absolutely true that there's a comparative lack of SLS students at NY firms and that people who bid NY here did extremely well). From what I've heard from friends, OCS basically makes NY sound like it's just as competitive as SF, LA, and DC, which simply isn't true (and they don't talk about how SF is infinitely more competitive than any other major market).
SF is brutal, and I know numerous people who struck out in SF. I personally came close: I'm top 5-10%, a pretty good interviewer, not KJD, had decent (though not great) ties to SF, and basically only bid SF. Out of 4 SF callbacks, I only got 1 offer (I had 3 other callbacks scheduled, but canceled them after I got an offer from my top choice, and I think at best I would've gotten an offer from 1 of the 3 remaining). I wasn't set on doing biglaw, so I personally wasn't super concerned about the risk of striking out, but I would advise anyone at SLS (no matter how good their grades/interviewing skills/WE are) to bid at least some NY/DC firms (I also noticed that people here did surprisingly well at DC firms this year, even people with terrible grades, contrary to conventional wisdom about DC).
OCS here absolutely DOES NOT make it clear how difficult SF is and does not do a good job of making sure marginal candidates bid at least some NY firms (because it is absolutely true that there's a comparative lack of SLS students at NY firms and that people who bid NY here did extremely well). From what I've heard from friends, OCS basically makes NY sound like it's just as competitive as SF, LA, and DC, which simply isn't true (and they don't talk about how SF is infinitely more competitive than any other major market).
SF is brutal, and I know numerous people who struck out in SF. I personally came close: I'm top 5-10%, a pretty good interviewer, not KJD, had decent (though not great) ties to SF, and basically only bid SF. Out of 4 SF callbacks, I only got 1 offer (I had 3 other callbacks scheduled, but canceled them after I got an offer from my top choice, and I think at best I would've gotten an offer from 1 of the 3 remaining). I wasn't set on doing biglaw, so I personally wasn't super concerned about the risk of striking out, but I would advise anyone at SLS (no matter how good their grades/interviewing skills/WE are) to bid at least some NY/DC firms (I also noticed that people here did surprisingly well at DC firms this year, even people with terrible grades, contrary to conventional wisdom about DC).
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- 052220152
- Posts: 4798
- Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 1:24 pm
Re: Fall 2015 OCI Results
you sound terrible. why are you anon anywayAnonymous User wrote:As a SLS student, I don't get the shitting on the SLS poster.
OCS here absolutely DOES NOT make it clear how difficult SF is and does not do a good job of making sure marginal candidates bid at least some NY firms (because it is absolutely true that there's a comparative lack of SLS students at NY firms and that people who bid NY here did extremely well). From what I've heard from friends, OCS basically makes NY sound like it's just as competitive as SF, LA, and DC, which simply isn't true (and they don't talk about how SF is infinitely more competitive than any other major market).
SF is brutal, and I know numerous people who struck out in SF. I personally came close: I'm top 5-10%, a pretty good interviewer, not KJD, had decent (though not great) ties to SF, and basically only bid SF. Out of 4 SF callbacks, I only got 1 offer (I had 3 other callbacks scheduled, but canceled them after I got an offer from my top choice, and I think at best I would've gotten an offer from 1 of the 3 remaining). I wasn't set on doing biglaw, so I personally wasn't super concerned about the risk of striking out, but I would advise anyone at SLS (no matter how good their grades/interviewing skills/WE are) to bid at least some NY/DC firms (I also noticed that people here did surprisingly well at DC firms this year, even people with terrible grades, contrary to conventional wisdom about DC).
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Fall 2015 OCI Results
There is plenty of personal info in that post, enough to justify posting anon. Chill.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Fall 2015 OCI Results
I feel like this advise is specific to SLS, and might be better served in a stanford ask a law student thread. Coming from an east coast peer SF isn't noticably more difficult than other challenging smaller markets like DC and Chicago. As a general matter, proximity to the market is a double edged sword; a more crowded field results in more competition, but there are still more grads in the market overall. The same advise goes for UChicago students wrt Chi market: NY is easier and top firms will reach deep into the class, don't underestimate how tough chicago market can be even though you attend the top school in the region.Anonymous User wrote:As a SLS student, I don't get the shitting on the SLS poster.
OCS here absolutely DOES NOT make it clear how difficult SF is and does not do a good job of making sure marginal candidates bid at least some NY firms (because it is absolutely true that there's a comparative lack of SLS students at NY firms and that people who bid NY here did extremely well). From what I've heard from friends, OCS basically makes NY sound like it's just as competitive as SF, LA, and DC, which simply isn't true (and they don't talk about how SF is infinitely more competitive than any other major market).
SF is brutal, and I know numerous people who struck out in SF. I personally came close: I'm top 5-10%, a pretty good interviewer, not KJD, had decent (though not great) ties to SF, and basically only bid SF. Out of 4 SF callbacks, I only got 1 offer (I had 3 other callbacks scheduled, but canceled them after I got an offer from my top choice, and I think at best I would've gotten an offer from 1 of the 3 remaining). I wasn't set on doing biglaw, so I personally wasn't super concerned about the risk of striking out, but I would advise anyone at SLS (no matter how good their grades/interviewing skills/WE are) to bid at least some NY/DC firms (I also noticed that people here did surprisingly well at DC firms this year, even people with terrible grades, contrary to conventional wisdom about DC).
-
- Posts: 1024
- Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 12:05 am
Re: Fall 2015 OCI Results
But where would we get the kind of magic that only this thread turns out?Jim Jones wrote:barkschool wrote:More useful if we had a spreadsheet form that people could drop their info inBrut wrote:this thread is fucking stupid
i would like to reiterate burt's point that this thread is fucking stupid, that its useless, that the people who post their results in it are fucking awful, and that a spreadsheet would be as equally fucking dumb
Anonymous wrote:I habitually make a motion with my hands in which I simulate the spinning and firing of revolvers. I do this periodically to punctuate something I say. I didn't think about stuff like that at all when I did all my interviews (I just figured, body language--whatever)
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
- star fox
- Posts: 20790
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:13 pm
Re: Fall 2015 OCI Results
Of non NY markets Chicago is about as good as it gets to target.jbagelboy wrote:I feel like this advise is specific to SLS, and might be better served in a stanford ask a law student thread. Coming from an east coast peer SF isn't noticably more difficult than other challenging smaller markets like DC and Chicago. As a general matter, proximity to the market is a double edged sword; a more crowded field results in more competition, but there are still more grads in the market overall. The same advise goes for UChicago students wrt Chi market: NY is easier and top firms will reach deep into the class, don't underestimate how tough chicago market can be even though you attend the top school in the region.Anonymous User wrote:As a SLS student, I don't get the shitting on the SLS poster.
OCS here absolutely DOES NOT make it clear how difficult SF is and does not do a good job of making sure marginal candidates bid at least some NY firms (because it is absolutely true that there's a comparative lack of SLS students at NY firms and that people who bid NY here did extremely well). From what I've heard from friends, OCS basically makes NY sound like it's just as competitive as SF, LA, and DC, which simply isn't true (and they don't talk about how SF is infinitely more competitive than any other major market).
SF is brutal, and I know numerous people who struck out in SF. I personally came close: I'm top 5-10%, a pretty good interviewer, not KJD, had decent (though not great) ties to SF, and basically only bid SF. Out of 4 SF callbacks, I only got 1 offer (I had 3 other callbacks scheduled, but canceled them after I got an offer from my top choice, and I think at best I would've gotten an offer from 1 of the 3 remaining). I wasn't set on doing biglaw, so I personally wasn't super concerned about the risk of striking out, but I would advise anyone at SLS (no matter how good their grades/interviewing skills/WE are) to bid at least some NY/DC firms (I also noticed that people here did surprisingly well at DC firms this year, even people with terrible grades, contrary to conventional wisdom about DC).
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login