From the firm perspective, I suspect it has to do with higher billing rates for people with JDs, but I honestly have no idea.bulinus wrote:If someone says they are only interested in pros, but they are going to LS, and not just doing the patent agent thing, what are some good reasons to justify that. I guess, asked another way, why don't firms rely more heavily on people with STEM grad degrees to draft and prosecute the patents, and then leave the lit and trans stuff for the barred people?
From your perspective, if the firm is hiring JDs with STEMs to write patents, then I don't think you have to worry. But this is outside of my expertise, so I'm only speculating.
I don't know. But I've seen law students use them effectively. Inevitably somebody will say "oh I met so and so in the hospitality suite and she was really great and interested", and either that will bolster her chance for a callback/offer or it will at least get her a screening interview if she didn't already get one.bulinus wrote: ETA: What's the deal with hospitality suites?
Feasibly, there are two uses: 1) go to the suite of a firm you couldn't land a screener with and see if they have gaps or if you can convince an attorney in there to screen you; or 2) go at some point after your interview, say that you're really interested in the firm after meeting (your screener attorney) and claim to be picking up more information about the firm. Or 3) just be honest about the fact that you're taking our coffee and sweets.