yupCapitol_Idea wrote:Serves us right for not being talented, intelligent, innovative, or comfortable with risk. And double serves you right if you're any of those things and still chose law.Big Shrimpin wrote:which brings me back to a common talking point i oft employ:
fuck this shitty profession
NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon does a 180! Holder wept.) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 1267
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:58 pm
Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon to 160?!?)
- TLSModBot
- Posts: 14835
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:54 am
Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon to 160?!?)
White & Case partners frantically meeting to figure out how to top the marketLaLiLuLeLo wrote:Meanwhile, Scott Edelman was FURIOUS that Milbank wasn't even on the poll, prompting him to race to be the first big firm to match.soj wrote:In positive news, our poll works! I can say with scientific certainty that Weil and Cleary were among the first firms to match Cravath as a direct result of being the bottom two vote-getters in our poll, which lit some fire under their asses. Paul Comma Weiss was the first listed firm to match and also was among the lowest vote-getters.
With that said, I'm taking suggestions for a new poll question. What will happen to DC? How many Fortune 500 clients will now flock IN DROVES to Covington? How many children and stepchildren's love will Cov partners now be able to buy with all that money?
-
- Posts: 432682
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon to 160?!?)
I think the people who responded to the poll actually responded to the question, "Who is most likely to beat Cravath and get us to $190k?"
- Big Shrimpin
- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon to 160?!?)
none of thoseCapitol_Idea wrote:Serves us right for not being talented, intelligent, innovative, or comfortable with risk. And double serves you right if you're any of those things and still chose law.Big Shrimpin wrote:which brings me back to a common talking point i oft employ:
fuck this shitty profession
i, as did you all, fucked up
(jk actually enjoy my practice but this industry is terrible, generally)
-
- Posts: 432682
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon to 160?!?)
I've received 3 unsolicited, "Hope your summer and bar prep are going well" emails from partners today. Saved in Drafts: "You better not be trying to butter me up just to tell me you're not matching!!"
NY office of Non-NY based V50.
NY office of Non-NY based V50.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon to 160?!?)
LOLAnonymous User wrote:not flame, I saw a Kelley Drye partner bragging about this on LinkedIn this very morning.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:(Non-Super Lawyer Rising Star)JusticeJackson wrote:Yes, Mr. Johnson, you seem to have really really good facts and a sympathetic client. And this jurisdiction is certainly known for plaintiff-friendly verdicts. But don't forget that Mr. Simms is AV rated, went to Harvard Law School, and was on the school's moot court team.bern victim wrote: outed as never having participated in major settlement negotiations
the first thing on the agenda is always a comparative accounting of the skill level of each side's respective attorneys
Kelley Drye's seppuku might be my favorite part of all this so far.
“With [Monday’s] announcement some big law firms demonstrate that they do not listen to what their clients have been saying over the past decade about the price of legal services,” said Kelley Drye & Warren chair James Carr, who assumed leadership of his firm last year. “While we continue to monitor the compensation market, in our view, sophisticated purchasers realize that they can obtain equal or better legal services at Kelley Drye for a fraction of the cost.”
"We are a complete decrepit TTT crackhouse," said Kelley Drye & Warren "chair" James Carr, who assumed "leadership" of his "firm" and role as this millenium's Romulus Augustulus last year. "“While we continue to monitor the compensation market, in our view, you're better off checking the temperature of the roasted turkey at Sylvia Plath's house than coming to this homeless bridge ghetto barrel fire we slapped an LLP on."
- Big Shrimpin
- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
- LaLiLuLeLo
- Posts: 949
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 11:54 am
Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon to 160?!?)
You misspelled CovingTTTon.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:LOLAnonymous User wrote:not flame, I saw a Kelley Drye partner bragging about this on LinkedIn this very morning.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:(Non-Super Lawyer Rising Star)JusticeJackson wrote:Yes, Mr. Johnson, you seem to have really really good facts and a sympathetic client. And this jurisdiction is certainly known for plaintiff-friendly verdicts. But don't forget that Mr. Simms is AV rated, went to Harvard Law School, and was on the school's moot court team.bern victim wrote: outed as never having participated in major settlement negotiations
the first thing on the agenda is always a comparative accounting of the skill level of each side's respective attorneys
Kelley Drye's seppuku might be my favorite part of all this so far.
“With [Monday’s] announcement some big law firms demonstrate that they do not listen to what their clients have been saying over the past decade about the price of legal services,” said Kelley Drye & Warren chair James Carr, who assumed leadership of his firm last year. “While we continue to monitor the compensation market, in our view, sophisticated purchasers realize that they can obtain equal or better legal services at Kelley Drye for a fraction of the cost.”
"We are a complete decrepit TTT crackhouse," said Kelley Drye & Warren "chair" James Carr, who assumed "leadership" of his "firm" and role as this millenium's Romulus Augustulus last year. "“While we continue to monitor the compensation market, in our view, you're better off checking the temperature of the roasted turkey at Sylvia Plath's house than coming to this homeless bridge ghetto barrel fire we slapped an LLP on."
- UnicornHunter
- Posts: 13507
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 9:16 pm
Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon to 160?!?)
For example, nobody here really gives a shit about paralegal/secretary/hr/etc pay.Big Shrimpin wrote:^^^(DELG poast on last page)
exactly
id venture a guess that upwards of 75% of partners don't give a dry fuck about associate compensation other than that it cuts into their 2nd/3rd home fund
many here will be the same way if/when making partner
that's how the business works
- TLSModBot
- Posts: 14835
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:54 am
Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon to 160?!?)
I'm so excited - I predicted exactly this in that shitty research paper that's had me neck-deep in the AmLaw data for the past 6 months. We're probably going to see a LOT more firms fold and give up trying to keep up with the top dogs this time around, and some are coming up early to announce that they won't be able or willing to make the 180 jump (note: CovingTTTon is not in this group - they'll pony up sooner or later).Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:LOLAnonymous User wrote:not flame, I saw a Kelley Drye partner bragging about this on LinkedIn this very morning.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:(Non-Super Lawyer Rising Star)JusticeJackson wrote:Yes, Mr. Johnson, you seem to have really really good facts and a sympathetic client. And this jurisdiction is certainly known for plaintiff-friendly verdicts. But don't forget that Mr. Simms is AV rated, went to Harvard Law School, and was on the school's moot court team.bern victim wrote: outed as never having participated in major settlement negotiations
the first thing on the agenda is always a comparative accounting of the skill level of each side's respective attorneys
Kelley Drye's seppuku might be my favorite part of all this so far.
“With [Monday’s] announcement some big law firms demonstrate that they do not listen to what their clients have been saying over the past decade about the price of legal services,” said Kelley Drye & Warren chair James Carr, who assumed leadership of his firm last year. “While we continue to monitor the compensation market, in our view, sophisticated purchasers realize that they can obtain equal or better legal services at Kelley Drye for a fraction of the cost.”
"We are a complete decrepit TTT crackhouse," said Kelley Drye & Warren "chair" James Carr, who assumed "leadership" of his "firm" and role as this millenium's Romulus Augustulus last year. "“While we continue to monitor the compensation market, in our view, you're better off checking the temperature of the roasted turkey at Sylvia Plath's house than coming to this homeless bridge ghetto barrel fire we slapped an LLP on."
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon to 160?!?)
LaLiLuLeLo wrote:You misspelled CovingTTTon.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
LOL
Kelley Drye's seppuku might be my favorite part of all this so far.
“With [Monday’s] announcement some big law firms demonstrate that they do not listen to what their clients have been saying over the past decade about the price of legal services,” said Kelley Drye & Warren chair James Carr, who assumed leadership of his firm last year. “While we continue to monitor the compensation market, in our view, sophisticated purchasers realize that they can obtain equal or better legal services at Kelley Drye for a fraction of the cost.”
"We are a complete decrepit TTT crackhouse," said Kelley Drye & Warren "chair" James Carr, who assumed "leadership" of his "firm" and role as this millenium's Romulus Augustulus last year. "“While we continue to monitor the compensation market, in our view, you're better off checking the temperature of the roasted turkey at Sylvia Plath's house than coming to this homeless bridge ghetto barrel fire we slapped an LLP on."
CovingTTTon to DC associates
-
- Posts: 432682
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon to 160?!?)
So who remembers what happened with Covington and Hogan back in 2007? I don't recall. Did Covington resist going to 160 then as well? How long did it take for them to submit to market pressure?
-
- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm
Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon to 160?!?)
I literally have no idea what they make and suspect they would piss in our coffee if they overheard associates complaining about pay.UnicornHunter wrote:For example, nobody here really gives a shit about paralegal/secretary/hr/etc pay.Big Shrimpin wrote:^^^(DELG poast on last page)
exactly
id venture a guess that upwards of 75% of partners don't give a dry fuck about associate compensation other than that it cuts into their 2nd/3rd home fund
many here will be the same way if/when making partner
that's how the business works
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon to 160?!?)
What's notable here isn't that Covington is resisting going toAnonymous User wrote:So who remembers what happened with Covington and Hogan back in 2007? I don't recall. Did Covington resist going to 160 then as well? How long did it take for them to submit to market pressure?
Last edited by rpupkin on Wed Jun 08, 2016 3:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon to 160?!?)
We already sort of knew who it was gonna be based on who didn't match DPW bonuses in 2014, minus maybe a few members who will feel compelled to match because not having a market base salary is a bit more embarrassing than not having market bonuses (even if they're below market for midlevels and seniors or some other TTT shit). They're the ones who had scarlet letters on the bidlists at any school worth its shit.Capitol_Idea wrote: I'm so excited - I predicted exactly this in that shitty research paper that's had me neck-deep in the AmLaw data for the past 6 months. We're probably going to see a LOT more firms fold and give up trying to keep up with the top dogs this time around, and some are coming up early to announce that they won't be able or willing to make the 180 jump (note: CovingTTTon is not in this group - they'll pony up sooner or later).
But I honestly expected them to hide in the corner like frightened antelopes while the big boys of the Serengeti all roared. Seeing them come out with tremendous pride in their ketchup-sandwich level of poverty has been 180.
- TLSModBot
- Posts: 14835
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:54 am
Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon to 160?!?)
Simpson released their move to 160 on 1/22/2007. Hogan moved quickly to quash it spreading to DC; on 1/25/07 Hogan announced NY only would go to 160 and DC would be "raised" to 145. Covington followed suit on 1/29/07 and WH did so on 1/31.Anonymous User wrote:So who remembers what happened with Covington and Hogan back in 2007? I don't recall. Did Covington resist going to 160 then as well? How long did it take for them to submit to market pressure?
Later, around May 2nd 2007, mounting pressure saw California firms move to 160 for their offices, and with it DC offices starting going to 160 en masse. Covington STILL waited til the end of May until finally going with the flow.
-
- Posts: 432682
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon to 160?!?)
The Kelley Drye thing makes even less sense though since afaik they don't pay market (I believe 1st years start at 145k). So why bother chest thumping about not following cravath et al?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432682
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon to 160?!?)
Some secretaries at my firm have been around 30 years, make six figures, and work about four hours a day with a two hour lunch. I may be the one doing the Keurination.dixiecupdrinking wrote:I literally have no idea what they make and suspect they would piss in our coffee if they overheard associates complaining about pay.UnicornHunter wrote:For example, nobody here really gives a shit about paralegal/secretary/hr/etc pay.Big Shrimpin wrote:^^^(DELG poast on last page)
exactly
id venture a guess that upwards of 75% of partners don't give a dry fuck about associate compensation other than that it cuts into their 2nd/3rd home fund
many here will be the same way if/when making partner
that's how the business works
-
- Posts: 432682
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon to 160?!?)
Covington shamelessly laying on the third rails of recruiting -- no-offering people this summer and not matching market. They're only going to get the most desperate SAs now.
-
- Posts: 432682
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon to 160?!?)
But didn't they try doing this in 2007 as well? I seem to recall someone saying that Covington and Hogan tried to essentially keep the DC market from matching the new 160k scale back then, but ultimately failed and ending up matching several months later.rpupkin wrote:What's notable here isn't that Covington is resisting going to 160--they've been a relatively cheap firm for a long time--it's that they went of their way to take the lead on not raising salaries. They're hoping that their announcement will halt the momentum of other firms rushing to raise salaries to $180K in DC, California, and Chicago. They know what they're doing.Anonymous User wrote:So who remembers what happened with Covington and Hogan back in 2007? I don't recall. Did Covington resist going to 160 then as well? How long did it take for them to submit to market pressure?
-
- Posts: 432682
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon to 160?!?)
CovingTTTon SafeTTTrack - DC Summer 2016Anonymous User wrote:Covington shamelessly laying on the third rails of recruiting -- no-offering people this summer and not matching market. They're only going to get the most desperate SAs now.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Actus Reus
- Posts: 460
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:21 pm
Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon to 160?!?)
Covington is no-offering people?Anonymous User wrote:Covington shamelessly laying on the third rails of recruiting -- no-offering people this summer and not matching market. They're only going to get the most desperate SAs now.
-
- Posts: 432682
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon to 160?!?)
Every summer associate at last night's event who said the words "Paul Weiss" was immediately canned for not being a team player.Actus Reus wrote:Covington is no-offering people?Anonymous User wrote:Covington shamelessly laying on the third rails of recruiting -- no-offering people this summer and not matching market. They're only going to get the most desperate SAs now.
-
- Posts: 432682
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon to 160?!?)
Word is three summers got no-offed last summer.Actus Reus wrote:Covington is no-offering people?Anonymous User wrote:Covington shamelessly laying on the third rails of recruiting -- no-offering people this summer and not matching market. They're only going to get the most desperate SAs now.
-
- Posts: 993
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 2:27 pm
Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon to 160?!?)
On the bright side with QE matching in all offices, the salary raise has now spread to Chicago.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login