NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon does a 180! Holder wept.) Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Who will join the CovingTTTon list next?

WilmerHale
15
6%
Arnold & Porter
23
10%
Hogan Lovells
12
5%
Akin Gump
7
3%
Jones Day
114
47%
Jenner & Block
8
3%
Paul Hastings
7
3%
WachTTTell
23
10%
Other
7
3%
No one! YAY!
25
10%
 
Total votes: 241

User avatar
heythatslife

Silver
Posts: 1201
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 7:18 pm

Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!!

Post by heythatslife » Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:07 pm

Why are the other usual suspects so slow to match? I can only assume it's because partners are bickering over whether to one up at 190k or 200k.

User avatar
MKC

Diamond
Posts: 16246
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 10:18 am

Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!!

Post by MKC » Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:07 pm

El Pollito wrote:[youtube]y2ak_oBeC-I[/youtube]
When I played the video it kind of looks like your tar is dancing.

Definitely an improvement from the fart huffing interpretation.
Last edited by MKC on Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Monochromatic Oeuvre

Gold
Posts: 2481
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm

Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!!

Post by Monochromatic Oeuvre » Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:09 pm

MarkinKansasCity wrote:
Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote: But then again, it's all eventually driven by what clients find "prestigious." And if Fortune 500 companies think it's the height of awesome to be in the Lipstick Building, then they won't give a fuck that you Latham can't afford associates after its a 1BR after your loan rent payments.
Did that fatwa we put out on Bob Dell ever expire?

User avatar
androstan

Gold
Posts: 4633
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:07 am

Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!!

Post by androstan » Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:11 pm

smaug wrote:
androstan wrote:Who the fuck is El Politico.
wb androstan

Why did you leave
ty smaug I just needed a break, rf leaving was very traumatizing. But the timing was pretty perfect since the first two years of being a lit associate isn't a good time to dick around on tls if your plan/goal is to make it to midlevel and eventually senior associate.

Really looking forward to my firm matching in DC.

User avatar
John_Luther1989

Bronze
Posts: 189
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2015 11:10 am

Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!!

Post by John_Luther1989 » Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:11 pm

heythatslife wrote:Why are the other usual suspects so slow to match? I can only assume it's because partners are bickering over whether to one up at 190k or 200k.
I'm willing to bet there was a firm out there who was waiting to announce $190k and is now having a cocaine party to celebrate saving some money.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


patentlitigatrix

Silver
Posts: 658
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2015 2:18 pm

Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!!

Post by patentlitigatrix » Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:19 pm

El Pollito wrote:
androstan wrote:Who the fuck is El Politico.
my political gambling handle is el pollito politico tbf
Ha sorry dude.

User avatar
TripTrip

Gold
Posts: 2767
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am

Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!!

Post by TripTrip » Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:25 pm

John_Luther1989 wrote:
heythatslife wrote:Why are the other usual suspects so slow to match? I can only assume it's because partners are bickering over whether to one up at 190k or 200k.
I'm willing to bet there was a firm out there who was waiting to announce $190k and is now having a cocaine party to celebrate saving some money.
My bet's on Quinn.

terpie

New
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:40 pm

Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!!

Post by terpie » Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:29 pm

TripTrip wrote:
John_Luther1989 wrote:
heythatslife wrote:Why are the other usual suspects so slow to match? I can only assume it's because partners are bickering over whether to one up at 190k or 200k.
I'm willing to bet there was a firm out there who was waiting to announce $190k and is now having a cocaine party to celebrate saving some money.
My bet's on Quinn.
Not a chance Quinn would be a first-mover. Their seamless budget is a hard $23 and I'm not kidding.

User avatar
TripTrip

Gold
Posts: 2767
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am

Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!!

Post by TripTrip » Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:32 pm

terpie wrote:
TripTrip wrote:
John_Luther1989 wrote:
heythatslife wrote:Why are the other usual suspects so slow to match? I can only assume it's because partners are bickering over whether to one up at 190k or 200k.
I'm willing to bet there was a firm out there who was waiting to announce $190k and is now having a cocaine party to celebrate saving some money.
My bet's on Quinn.
Not a chance Quinn would be a first-mover. Their seamless budget is a hard $23 and I'm not kidding.
Maybe I'm missing your joke but
“No doubt we will be raising as will other firms,” John Quinn, co-founder of litigation powerhouse Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, said in an email. “This market is very efficient in that way.”

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
Yardbird

Silver
Posts: 1156
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 1:45 pm

Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!!

Post by Yardbird » Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:34 pm

TripTrip wrote:
terpie wrote:
TripTrip wrote:
John_Luther1989 wrote:
heythatslife wrote:Why are the other usual suspects so slow to match? I can only assume it's because partners are bickering over whether to one up at 190k or 200k.
I'm willing to bet there was a firm out there who was waiting to announce $190k and is now having a cocaine party to celebrate saving some money.
My bet's on Quinn.
Not a chance Quinn would be a first-mover. Their seamless budget is a hard $23 and I'm not kidding.
Maybe I'm missing your joke but
“No doubt we will be raising as will other firms,” John Quinn, co-founder of litigation powerhouse Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, said in an email. “This market is very efficient in that way.”
Seamless to $1.80!

terpie

New
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:40 pm

Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!!

Post by terpie » Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:36 pm

TripTrip wrote:
terpie wrote:
TripTrip wrote:
John_Luther1989 wrote:
heythatslife wrote:Why are the other usual suspects so slow to match? I can only assume it's because partners are bickering over whether to one up at 190k or 200k.
I'm willing to bet there was a firm out there who was waiting to announce $190k and is now having a cocaine party to celebrate saving some money.
My bet's on Quinn.
Not a chance Quinn would be a first-mover. Their seamless budget is a hard $23 and I'm not kidding.
Maybe I'm missing your joke but
“No doubt we will be raising as will other firms,” John Quinn, co-founder of litigation powerhouse Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, said in an email. “This market is very efficient in that way.”
You're quoting someone saying a firm was about to move to 190k before Cravath announced the 180k... implying they dodged a bullet by waiting long enough for Cravath to beat them to the punch.

Quinn would not have been that firm. They will pay to match when their hand is forced but otherwise are very cheap.

blahblewblah

New
Posts: 97
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:42 pm

Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!!

Post by blahblewblah » Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:39 pm

terpie wrote:
TripTrip wrote:
terpie wrote:
TripTrip wrote:
John_Luther1989 wrote:
heythatslife wrote:Why are the other usual suspects so slow to match? I can only assume it's because partners are bickering over whether to one up at 190k or 200k.
I'm willing to bet there was a firm out there who was waiting to announce $190k and is now having a cocaine party to celebrate saving some money.
My bet's on Quinn.
Not a chance Quinn would be a first-mover. Their seamless budget is a hard $23 and I'm not kidding.
Maybe I'm missing your joke but
“No doubt we will be raising as will other firms,” John Quinn, co-founder of litigation powerhouse Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, said in an email. “This market is very efficient in that way.”
You're quoting someone saying a firm was about to move to 190k before Cravath announced the 180k... implying they dodged a bullet by waiting long enough for Cravath to beat them to the punch.

Quinn would not have been that firm. They will pay to match when their hand is forced but otherwise are very cheap.
http://abovethelaw.com/2016/01/clerkshi ... -standard/ :?: :?:

User avatar
jbagelboy

Diamond
Posts: 10361
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!!

Post by jbagelboy » Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:41 pm

blahblewblah wrote:
terpie wrote:
TripTrip wrote:
terpie wrote:
TripTrip wrote:
John_Luther1989 wrote:
heythatslife wrote:Why are the other usual suspects so slow to match? I can only assume it's because partners are bickering over whether to one up at 190k or 200k.
I'm willing to bet there was a firm out there who was waiting to announce $190k and is now having a cocaine party to celebrate saving some money.
My bet's on Quinn.
Not a chance Quinn would be a first-mover. Their seamless budget is a hard $23 and I'm not kidding.
Maybe I'm missing your joke but
“No doubt we will be raising as will other firms,” John Quinn, co-founder of litigation powerhouse Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, said in an email. “This market is very efficient in that way.”
You're quoting someone saying a firm was about to move to 190k before Cravath announced the 180k... implying they dodged a bullet by waiting long enough for Cravath to beat them to the punch.

Quinn would not have been that firm. They will pay to match when their hand is forced but otherwise are very cheap.
http://abovethelaw.com/2016/01/clerkshi ... -standard/ :?: :?:
only because they eliminated their summer program. that's a cost-effective move for them, don't even fuck wit it

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


terpie

New
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:40 pm

Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!!

Post by terpie » Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:45 pm

blahblewblah wrote:
terpie wrote:
TripTrip wrote:
terpie wrote:
TripTrip wrote:
John_Luther1989 wrote:
heythatslife wrote:Why are the other usual suspects so slow to match? I can only assume it's because partners are bickering over whether to one up at 190k or 200k.
I'm willing to bet there was a firm out there who was waiting to announce $190k and is now having a cocaine party to celebrate saving some money.
My bet's on Quinn.
Not a chance Quinn would be a first-mover. Their seamless budget is a hard $23 and I'm not kidding.
Maybe I'm missing your joke but
“No doubt we will be raising as will other firms,” John Quinn, co-founder of litigation powerhouse Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, said in an email. “This market is very efficient in that way.”
You're quoting someone saying a firm was about to move to 190k before Cravath announced the 180k... implying they dodged a bullet by waiting long enough for Cravath to beat them to the punch.

Quinn would not have been that firm. They will pay to match when their hand is forced but otherwise are very cheap.
http://abovethelaw.com/2016/01/clerkshi ... -standard/ :?: :?:
I thought someone would post that. They did that after they axed their summer class to save money... They needed a way to build classes after that. They're still saving money. They also require billing 10 hrs to take a taxi home. Doesn't matter if you did pro bono from 8 til noon and then got slammed at 1 and worked non-stop until 10:30pm. You're SOL.

terpie

New
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:40 pm

Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!!

Post by terpie » Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:45 pm

DP
Last edited by terpie on Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
MCFC

Platinum
Posts: 9695
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:46 pm

Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!!

Post by MCFC » Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:46 pm

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2016/06/07/mil ... es-raises/
Milbank chairman Scott Edelman put it simply: “We want them to be paid consistent with what the top firms pay.” Mr. Edelman said the firm’s 450 associates weren’t agitating for a pay raise. Pressed on whether Milbank had considered making its own pay bump before Cravath’s move, Mr. Edelman said, “At the end of the day, it always seems like some competitor is more eager to increase pay than us.”

blahblewblah

New
Posts: 97
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:42 pm

Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!!

Post by blahblewblah » Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:47 pm

terpie wrote:
I thought someone would post that. They did that after they axed their summer class to save money... They needed a way to build classes after that. They're still saving money. They also require billing 10 hrs to take a taxi home. Doesn't matter if you did pro bono from 8 til noon and then got slammed at 1 and worked non-stop until 10:30pm. You're SOL.
Wouldn't axing their summer program--and the need to build classes--provide some motivation for them to beat Cravath? I'm not saying it will happen, but unless they are content to hire almost exclusively clerks, a slightly higher salary could be a way to build classes. Comparing forms of comp is more relevant than comparing seamless or taxis.
Last edited by blahblewblah on Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
jbagelboy

Diamond
Posts: 10361
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!!

Post by jbagelboy » Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:48 pm

MCFC wrote:http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2016/06/07/mil ... es-raises/
Milbank chairman Scott Edelman put it simply: “We want them to be paid consistent with what the top firms pay.” Mr. Edelman said the firm’s 450 associates weren’t agitating for a pay raise. Pressed on whether Milbank had considered making its own pay bump before Cravath’s move, Mr. Edelman said, “At the end of the day, it always seems like some competitor is more eager to increase pay than us.”
he doesn't seem super in touch with associate moral/sentiment.

User avatar
Tiago Splitter

Diamond
Posts: 17148
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am

Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!!

Post by Tiago Splitter » Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:48 pm

MCFC wrote:http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2016/06/07/mil ... es-raises/
Milbank chairman Scott Edelman put it simply: “We want them to be paid consistent with what the top firms pay.” Mr. Edelman said the firm’s 450 associates weren’t agitating for a pay raise. Pressed on whether Milbank had considered making its own pay bump before Cravath’s move, Mr. Edelman said, “At the end of the day, it always seems like some competitor is more eager to increase pay than us.”
Well yeah but only because his associates aren't really interested in pay raises.

User avatar
PvblivsScipio

Bronze
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 11:41 pm

Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!!

Post by PvblivsScipio » Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:50 pm

MCFC wrote:http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2016/06/07/mil ... es-raises/
Milbank chairman Scott Edelman put it simply: “We want them to be paid consistent with what the top firms pay.” Mr. Edelman said the firm’s 450 associates weren’t agitating for a pay raise. Pressed on whether Milbank had considered making its own pay bump before Cravath’s move, Mr. Edelman said, “At the end of the day, it always seems like some competitor is more eager to increase pay than us.”

Delete
Last edited by PvblivsScipio on Wed May 17, 2017 9:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

TheoO

Silver
Posts: 713
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 1:28 am

Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!!

Post by TheoO » Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:51 pm

MCFC wrote:http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2016/06/07/mil ... es-raises/
Milbank chairman Scott Edelman put it simply: “We want them to be paid consistent with what the top firms pay.” Mr. Edelman said the firm’s 450 associates weren’t agitating for a pay raise. Pressed on whether Milbank had considered making its own pay bump before Cravath’s move, Mr. Edelman said, “At the end of the day, it always seems like some competitor is more eager to increase pay than us.
Man, this sounds quite resentful

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
El Pollito

Diamond
Posts: 20139
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!!

Post by El Pollito » Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:56 pm

lol an associate dug up our salary policy and it says we match market

let's go west coast

User avatar
cookiejar1

Silver
Posts: 867
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 2:07 am

Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!!

Post by cookiejar1 » Tue Jun 07, 2016 4:00 pm

El Pollito wrote:lol an associate dug up our salary policy and it says we match market

let's go west coast
lol what a legend

Anonymous User
Posts: 432652
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!!

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Jun 07, 2016 4:01 pm

El Pollito wrote:lol an associate dug up our salary policy and it says we match market

let's go west coast
0.2 hrs, Professional Development

Anonymous User
Posts: 432652
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!!

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Jun 07, 2016 4:02 pm

blahblewblah wrote:
terpie wrote:
I thought someone would post that. They did that after they axed their summer class to save money... They needed a way to build classes after that. They're still saving money. They also require billing 10 hrs to take a taxi home. Doesn't matter if you did pro bono from 8 til noon and then got slammed at 1 and worked non-stop until 10:30pm. You're SOL.
Wouldn't axing their summer program--and the need to build classes--provide some motivation for them to beat Cravath? I'm not saying it will happen, but unless they are content to hire almost exclusively clerks, a slightly higher salary could be a way to build classes. Comparing forms of comp is more relevant than comparing seamless or taxis.
Making sense of QE is a lost cause. Low seamless budget with draconian rules, a relatively high floor for bonuses, and so on all say "very cheap." That said they used to have above market comp (no longer), have always done the bizarre hike thing, and have strange perks like the "go work on a tropical island for a bit, it's like a vacation," a tech stipend, and other odds and ends that you don't see everywhere else.

In the end it seems like QE spends money on things that John Quinn likes and doesn't spend money on things he doesn't care about. This is good if you care about the same things as him and bad if you don't.

Agreed that it's doubtful that QE would be the first to move to increase salaries generally, but disagree that QE could never return to slightly above market comp. It'll depend on how the current summer associate experiment goes as much as anything else, I'd wager.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”