Columbia EIP 2016 Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 432623
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia EIP 2016

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Jun 29, 2016 5:39 pm

*edited for shorter scroll*
Last edited by Anonymous User on Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
smaug

Diamond
Posts: 13972
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm

Re: Columbia EIP 2016

Post by smaug » Wed Jun 29, 2016 5:48 pm

Still a really weird list. Explain what you're doing or we won't be able to help you much. It's very aggressive but you have Milbank but no Davis Polk... It's just a really odd list.

User avatar
Monochromatic Oeuvre

Gold
Posts: 2481
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm

Re: Columbia EIP 2016

Post by Monochromatic Oeuvre » Wed Jun 29, 2016 5:53 pm

Anonymous User wrote:3.61, no LR, solid interviewer, okay with striking out. Want DC lit, but happy with NYC. Feedback on my bids list please? Should I just tack on random firms for the last 10 bids? Am I missing any solid lit places?

1 Hogan Lovells (DC) 3
2 Gibson (NY) 3
3 Deb (NY) 4
4 WilmerHale (NY) 9
5 Milbank (NY) 8
6 Paul Weiss (NY) 11
7 Kramer Levin (NY) 18
8 Cov (NY) 18
9 Gibson (DC) 18
10 WillamsConnolly(DC) 20
11 Cov (DC) 20
12 Wachtell (NY) 24
13 Steptoe&Johnson(DC) 25
14 Cravath (NY) 23
15 WilmerHale(DC) 27
16 K+E (DC) 27
17 Paul Weiss (DC) 29
18 Simpson(NY) 27
19 Deb (DC) 28
20 NixonPeabody(NY) 28
What in the jumpin' Jack fuck does "okay with striking out" mean?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432623
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia EIP 2016

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Jun 29, 2016 5:54 pm

accidental anon

dabigchina

Gold
Posts: 1845
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:22 am

Re: Columbia EIP 2016

Post by dabigchina » Wed Jun 29, 2016 5:57 pm

Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:3.61, no LR, solid interviewer, okay with striking out. Want DC lit, but happy with NYC. Feedback on my bids list please? Should I just tack on random firms for the last 10 bids? Am I missing any solid lit places?

1 Hogan Lovells (DC) 3
2 Gibson (NY) 3
3 Deb (NY) 4
4 WilmerHale (NY) 9
5 Milbank (NY) 8
6 Paul Weiss (NY) 11
7 Kramer Levin (NY) 18
8 Cov (NY) 18
9 Gibson (DC) 18
10 WillamsConnolly(DC) 20
11 Cov (DC) 20
12 Wachtell (NY) 24
13 Steptoe&Johnson(DC) 25
14 Cravath (NY) 23
15 WilmerHale(DC) 27
16 K+E (DC) 27
17 Paul Weiss (DC) 29
18 Simpson(NY) 27
19 Deb (DC) 28
20 NixonPeabody(NY) 28
What in the jumpin' Jack fuck does "okay with striking out" mean?
I'm guessing this person wants to do PI/Gov't but is doing EIP because he's got nothing to lose.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432623
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia EIP 2016

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Jun 29, 2016 5:59 pm

smaug wrote:Still a really weird list. Explain what you're doing or we won't be able to help you much. It's very aggressive but you have Milbank but no Davis Polk... It's just a really odd list.
Really my primary interest is DC, and kind of filled that out without spending time to look at Chambers for gov't investigations of NY places and other lit practices. I put in places like Kramer Levin because of the complex lit practices, and since it's a smaller firm I figure I'll have more chances at being a part of that than getting stuck with transactional work at DP.

1 Hogan Lovells (DC) 3
2 Gibson (NY) 3
3 Deb (NY) 4
4 Sidley (DC) 6
5 WilmerHale (NY) 9
6 Paul Weiss (NY) 11
7 DavisPolk(NY) 15
8 Cleary (NY) 14
9 Gibson (DC) 18
10 Kramer Levin (NY) 18
11 Cov (NY) 18
12 Arnold Porter(DC) 19
13 WillamsConnolly(DC) 20
14 Cov (DC) 20
15 Skadden (DC) 20
16 Crowell (DC) 21
17 Wachtell (NY) 24
18 BakerBotts(DC) 25
19 Steptoe&Johnson(DC) 25
20 Cravath (NY) 23
21 Latham(DC) 23
22 WilmerHale(DC) 27
23 K+E (DC) 27
24 Paul Weiss (DC) 29
25 Simpson(NY) 27
26 Deb (DC) 28
27 NixonPeabody(NY) 28

Anonymous User
Posts: 432623
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia EIP 2016

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:02 pm

dabigchina wrote:
Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:3.61, no LR, solid interviewer, okay with striking out. Want DC lit, but happy with NYC. Feedback on my bids list please? Should I just tack on random firms for the last 10 bids? Am I missing any solid lit places?
What in the jumpin' Jack fuck does "okay with striking out" mean?
I'm guessing this person wants to do PI/Gov't but is doing EIP because he's got nothing to lose.
100% the case.

Love being at a DA's office this summer, and would be super happy to just take that risk of getting post LS employment at an office I want. But I figured I have grades to do EIP well and I might as well play around with EIP especially since NALP guidelines say firms should hold offers until April for PI pursuits, and splitting a summer is can be an option

User avatar
Monochromatic Oeuvre

Gold
Posts: 2481
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm

Re: Columbia EIP 2016

Post by Monochromatic Oeuvre » Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:07 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
dabigchina wrote:
Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:3.61, no LR, solid interviewer, okay with striking out. Want DC lit, but happy with NYC. Feedback on my bids list please? Should I just tack on random firms for the last 10 bids? Am I missing any solid lit places?
What in the jumpin' Jack fuck does "okay with striking out" mean?
I'm guessing this person wants to do PI/Gov't but is doing EIP because he's got nothing to lose.
100% the case.

Love being at a DA's office this summer, and would be super happy to just take that risk of getting post LS employment at an office I want. But I figured I have grades to do EIP well and I might as well play around with EIP especially since NALP guidelines say firms should hold offers until April for PI pursuits, and splitting a summer is can be an option
Why do EIP at all? You just want six weeks of SA lunches and Yankee games at $3500 a week before going off to the noble world?

dabigchina

Gold
Posts: 1845
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:22 am

Re: Columbia EIP 2016

Post by dabigchina » Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:18 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
dabigchina wrote:
Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:3.61, no LR, solid interviewer, okay with striking out. Want DC lit, but happy with NYC. Feedback on my bids list please? Should I just tack on random firms for the last 10 bids? Am I missing any solid lit places?
What in the jumpin' Jack fuck does "okay with striking out" mean?
I'm guessing this person wants to do PI/Gov't but is doing EIP because he's got nothing to lose.
100% the case.

Love being at a DA's office this summer, and would be super happy to just take that risk of getting post LS employment at an office I want. But I figured I have grades to do EIP well and I might as well play around with EIP especially since NALP guidelines say firms should hold offers until April for PI pursuits, and splitting a summer is can be an option
I know jack shit about PI, but I have heard that government/PI really value commitment. Summering at a firm may make them question that commitment.

But, I'd like to reiterate that I know nothing about any of this.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
smaug

Diamond
Posts: 13972
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm

Re: Columbia EIP 2016

Post by smaug » Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:23 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
smaug wrote:Still a really weird list. Explain what you're doing or we won't be able to help you much. It's very aggressive but you have Milbank but no Davis Polk... It's just a really odd list.
Really my primary interest is DC, and kind of filled that out without spending time to look at Chambers for gov't investigations of NY places and other lit practices. I put in places like Kramer Levin because of the complex lit practices, and since it's a smaller firm I figure I'll have more chances at being a part of that than getting stuck with transactional work at DP.

1 Hogan Lovells (DC) 3
2 Gibson (NY) 3
3 Deb (NY) 4
4 Sidley (DC) 6
5 WilmerHale (NY) 9
6 Paul Weiss (NY) 11
7 DavisPolk(NY) 15
8 Cleary (NY) 14
9 Gibson (DC) 18
10 Kramer Levin (NY) 18
11 Cov (NY) 18
12 Arnold Porter(DC) 19
13 WillamsConnolly(DC) 20
14 Cov (DC) 20
15 Skadden (DC) 20
16 Crowell (DC) 21
17 Wachtell (NY) 24
18 BakerBotts(DC) 25
19 Steptoe&Johnson(DC) 25
20 Cravath (NY) 23
21 Latham(DC) 23
22 WilmerHale(DC) 27
23 K+E (DC) 27
24 Paul Weiss (DC) 29
25 Simpson(NY) 27
26 Deb (DC) 28
27 NixonPeabody(NY) 28
That's misguided because I would bet there are more lit jobs at SullCrom and DPW than you'll find in many smaller firms.

If you want DC a little confused by some of the firm choices but you're kinda cagey and I don't feel like digging to give you better advice.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432623
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia EIP 2016

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:25 pm

dabigchina wrote: I know jack shit about PI, but I have heard that government/PI really value commitment. Summering at a firm may make them question that commitment.

But, I'd like to reiterate that I know nothing about any of this.
I don't really think this is the thread to get into this, but yeah you're definitely right. I'm still deciding/figuring out what I think is the best option (whether it be firm for 3 years before lateraling to something else), regardless doing EIP can't hurt, and I don't have to take any of the offers, all it gives me is more choices down the road.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432623
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia EIP 2016

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:36 pm

smaug wrote: That's misguided because I would bet there are more lit jobs at SullCrom and DPW than you'll find in many smaller firms.

If you want DC a little confused by some of the firm choices but you're kinda cagey and I don't feel like digging to give you better advice.
Really don't mean to come off as cagey. Talked to OCS a bunch and looked at Chambers bands, which is where I pretty much came up with my list. I think I might have just gotten misguided from OCS. I'm from NYC, but would prefer to be in DC. Really don't want to end up doing transactional work, so I thought to focus on firms that seem to do a lot of lit work, but I guess I was just wrong with that. Sorry if that was more complicated than it needed to be.

User avatar
smaug

Diamond
Posts: 13972
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm

Re: Columbia EIP 2016

Post by smaug » Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:52 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
smaug wrote: That's misguided because I would bet there are more lit jobs at SullCrom and DPW than you'll find in many smaller firms.

If you want DC a little confused by some of the firm choices but you're kinda cagey and I don't feel like digging to give you better advice.
Really don't mean to come off as cagey. Talked to OCS a bunch and looked at Chambers bands, which is where I pretty much came up with my list. I think I might have just gotten misguided from OCS. I'm from NYC, but would prefer to be in DC. Really don't want to end up doing transactional work, so I thought to focus on firms that seem to do a lot of lit work, but I guess I was just wrong with that. Sorry if that was more complicated than it needed to be.
Got it now. I think that some of the firms are just massive and do lots of work.

In terms of your DC list, I was thinking about the lack of Cleary, WSGR and some others and was trying to figure out why you included firms like Steptoe and Nixon on your list.

I can't give great DC advice (or great advice at all, really) but I'd take a hard look at the offices there and figure out where it makes sense to bid.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432623
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia EIP 2016

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:00 pm

smaug wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
smaug wrote: That's misguided because I would bet there are more lit jobs at SullCrom and DPW than you'll find in many smaller firms.

If you want DC a little confused by some of the firm choices but you're kinda cagey and I don't feel like digging to give you better advice.
Really don't mean to come off as cagey. Talked to OCS a bunch and looked at Chambers bands, which is where I pretty much came up with my list. I think I might have just gotten misguided from OCS. I'm from NYC, but would prefer to be in DC. Really don't want to end up doing transactional work, so I thought to focus on firms that seem to do a lot of lit work, but I guess I was just wrong with that. Sorry if that was more complicated than it needed to be.
Got it now. I think that some of the firms are just massive and do lots of work.

In terms of your DC list, I was thinking about the lack of Cleary, WSGR and some others and was trying to figure out why you included firms like Steptoe and Nixon on your list.

I can't give great DC advice (or great advice at all, really) but I'd take a hard look at the offices there and figure out where it makes sense to bid.
Thank you for that, and sorry again for dragging it out.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432623
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia EIP 2016

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Jun 30, 2016 11:36 am

Any idea if there's a lot of movement in FFB #? Is it safe to be 2-3 bids above the 2015 FFB or is it more a crap shoot?

Bach-City

Bronze
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2015 6:00 pm

Re: Columbia EIP 2016

Post by Bach-City » Thu Jun 30, 2016 12:10 pm

.
Last edited by Bach-City on Mon Aug 28, 2017 12:00 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
jbagelboy

Diamond
Posts: 10361
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: Columbia EIP 2016

Post by jbagelboy » Thu Jun 30, 2016 12:36 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Any idea if there's a lot of movement in FFB #? Is it safe to be 2-3 bids above the 2015 FFB or is it more a crap shoot?
I feel like there is quite a bit of movement in the FFB and 2 bids above definitely isn't safe. I would do at least 3 for firms you want to interview with but aren't committed to, and at least 4 for necessary firms.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
Monochromatic Oeuvre

Gold
Posts: 2481
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm

Re: Columbia EIP 2016

Post by Monochromatic Oeuvre » Thu Jun 30, 2016 1:15 pm

Bach-City wrote:
Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
dabigchina wrote:
Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:3.61, no LR, solid interviewer, okay with striking out. Want DC lit, but happy with NYC. Feedback on my bids list please? Should I just tack on random firms for the last 10 bids? Am I missing any solid lit places?
What in the jumpin' Jack fuck does "okay with striking out" mean?
I'm guessing this person wants to do PI/Gov't but is doing EIP because he's got nothing to lose.
100% the case.

Love being at a DA's office this summer, and would be super happy to just take that risk of getting post LS employment at an office I want. But I figured I have grades to do EIP well and I might as well play around with EIP especially since NALP guidelines say firms should hold offers until April for PI pursuits, and splitting a summer is can be an option
Why do EIP at all? You just want six weeks of SA lunches and Yankee games at $3500 a week before going off to the noble world?
Not OP, but that sounds pretty solid if I were the PI type.
I have no idea why PI bros don't just do SA + the year-ish of Biglaw where you could bill 1500 and not get fired. Seems like a sweet deal.

User avatar
smaug

Diamond
Posts: 13972
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm

Re: Columbia EIP 2016

Post by smaug » Thu Jun 30, 2016 1:17 pm

Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
I have no idea why PI bros don't just do SA + the year-ish of Biglaw where you could bill 1500 and not get fired. Seems like a sweet deal.
Because then they probably won't get the PI job

User avatar
jbagelboy

Diamond
Posts: 10361
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: Columbia EIP 2016

Post by jbagelboy » Thu Jun 30, 2016 1:27 pm

smaug wrote:
Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
I have no idea why PI bros don't just do SA + the year-ish of Biglaw where you could bill 1500 and not get fired. Seems like a sweet deal.
Because then they probably won't get the PI job

wons

Bronze
Posts: 217
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 7:25 pm

Re: Columbia EIP 2016

Post by wons » Thu Jun 30, 2016 1:38 pm

jbagelboy wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Any idea if there's a lot of movement in FFB #? Is it safe to be 2-3 bids above the 2015 FFB or is it more a crap shoot?
I feel like there is quite a bit of movement in the FFB and 2 bids above definitely isn't safe. I would do at least 3 for firms you want to interview with but aren't committed to, and at least 4 for necessary firms.
I think last year there were a couple of 5+

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432623
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia EIP 2016

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Jun 30, 2016 2:10 pm

.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Thu Jun 30, 2016 2:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Monochromatic Oeuvre

Gold
Posts: 2481
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm

Re: Columbia EIP 2016

Post by Monochromatic Oeuvre » Thu Jun 30, 2016 2:30 pm

smaug wrote:
Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
I have no idea why PI bros don't just do SA + the year-ish of Biglaw where you could bill 1500 and not get fired. Seems like a sweet deal.
Because then they probably won't get the PI job
The PI job, maybe not. But a PI job? Pretty likely. Then you just have to decide whether Job A is worth a relatively chill $215k more than Job B.

User avatar
smaug

Diamond
Posts: 13972
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm

Re: Columbia EIP 2016

Post by smaug » Thu Jun 30, 2016 2:55 pm

Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
smaug wrote:
Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
I have no idea why PI bros don't just do SA + the year-ish of Biglaw where you could bill 1500 and not get fired. Seems like a sweet deal.
Because then they probably won't get the PI job
The PI job, maybe not. But a PI job? Pretty likely. Then you just have to decide whether Job A is worth a relatively chill $215k more than Job B.
I think you're still significantly overestimating the value of a biglaw washout.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432623
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia EIP 2016

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Jun 30, 2016 6:20 pm

I got a bunch of screeners in my preferred market through a career fair. The problem is a few of my those offices were also on my bidlist. Do I have to drop them from my bidlist?

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”