Columbia EIP 2016 Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432623
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
*edited for shorter scroll*
Last edited by Anonymous User on Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- smaug
- Posts: 13972
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
Still a really weird list. Explain what you're doing or we won't be able to help you much. It's very aggressive but you have Milbank but no Davis Polk... It's just a really odd list.
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
What in the jumpin' Jack fuck does "okay with striking out" mean?Anonymous User wrote:3.61, no LR, solid interviewer, okay with striking out. Want DC lit, but happy with NYC. Feedback on my bids list please? Should I just tack on random firms for the last 10 bids? Am I missing any solid lit places?
1 Hogan Lovells (DC) 3
2 Gibson (NY) 3
3 Deb (NY) 4
4 WilmerHale (NY) 9
5 Milbank (NY) 8
6 Paul Weiss (NY) 11
7 Kramer Levin (NY) 18
8 Cov (NY) 18
9 Gibson (DC) 18
10 WillamsConnolly(DC) 20
11 Cov (DC) 20
12 Wachtell (NY) 24
13 Steptoe&Johnson(DC) 25
14 Cravath (NY) 23
15 WilmerHale(DC) 27
16 K+E (DC) 27
17 Paul Weiss (DC) 29
18 Simpson(NY) 27
19 Deb (DC) 28
20 NixonPeabody(NY) 28
-
- Posts: 432623
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
accidental anon
-
- Posts: 1845
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:22 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
I'm guessing this person wants to do PI/Gov't but is doing EIP because he's got nothing to lose.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:What in the jumpin' Jack fuck does "okay with striking out" mean?Anonymous User wrote:3.61, no LR, solid interviewer, okay with striking out. Want DC lit, but happy with NYC. Feedback on my bids list please? Should I just tack on random firms for the last 10 bids? Am I missing any solid lit places?
1 Hogan Lovells (DC) 3
2 Gibson (NY) 3
3 Deb (NY) 4
4 WilmerHale (NY) 9
5 Milbank (NY) 8
6 Paul Weiss (NY) 11
7 Kramer Levin (NY) 18
8 Cov (NY) 18
9 Gibson (DC) 18
10 WillamsConnolly(DC) 20
11 Cov (DC) 20
12 Wachtell (NY) 24
13 Steptoe&Johnson(DC) 25
14 Cravath (NY) 23
15 WilmerHale(DC) 27
16 K+E (DC) 27
17 Paul Weiss (DC) 29
18 Simpson(NY) 27
19 Deb (DC) 28
20 NixonPeabody(NY) 28
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432623
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
Really my primary interest is DC, and kind of filled that out without spending time to look at Chambers for gov't investigations of NY places and other lit practices. I put in places like Kramer Levin because of the complex lit practices, and since it's a smaller firm I figure I'll have more chances at being a part of that than getting stuck with transactional work at DP.smaug wrote:Still a really weird list. Explain what you're doing or we won't be able to help you much. It's very aggressive but you have Milbank but no Davis Polk... It's just a really odd list.
1 Hogan Lovells (DC) 3
2 Gibson (NY) 3
3 Deb (NY) 4
4 Sidley (DC) 6
5 WilmerHale (NY) 9
6 Paul Weiss (NY) 11
7 DavisPolk(NY) 15
8 Cleary (NY) 14
9 Gibson (DC) 18
10 Kramer Levin (NY) 18
11 Cov (NY) 18
12 Arnold Porter(DC) 19
13 WillamsConnolly(DC) 20
14 Cov (DC) 20
15 Skadden (DC) 20
16 Crowell (DC) 21
17 Wachtell (NY) 24
18 BakerBotts(DC) 25
19 Steptoe&Johnson(DC) 25
20 Cravath (NY) 23
21 Latham(DC) 23
22 WilmerHale(DC) 27
23 K+E (DC) 27
24 Paul Weiss (DC) 29
25 Simpson(NY) 27
26 Deb (DC) 28
27 NixonPeabody(NY) 28
-
- Posts: 432623
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
100% the case.dabigchina wrote:I'm guessing this person wants to do PI/Gov't but is doing EIP because he's got nothing to lose.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:What in the jumpin' Jack fuck does "okay with striking out" mean?Anonymous User wrote:3.61, no LR, solid interviewer, okay with striking out. Want DC lit, but happy with NYC. Feedback on my bids list please? Should I just tack on random firms for the last 10 bids? Am I missing any solid lit places?
Love being at a DA's office this summer, and would be super happy to just take that risk of getting post LS employment at an office I want. But I figured I have grades to do EIP well and I might as well play around with EIP especially since NALP guidelines say firms should hold offers until April for PI pursuits, and splitting a summer is can be an option
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
Why do EIP at all? You just want six weeks of SA lunches and Yankee games at $3500 a week before going off to the noble world?Anonymous User wrote:100% the case.dabigchina wrote:I'm guessing this person wants to do PI/Gov't but is doing EIP because he's got nothing to lose.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:What in the jumpin' Jack fuck does "okay with striking out" mean?Anonymous User wrote:3.61, no LR, solid interviewer, okay with striking out. Want DC lit, but happy with NYC. Feedback on my bids list please? Should I just tack on random firms for the last 10 bids? Am I missing any solid lit places?
Love being at a DA's office this summer, and would be super happy to just take that risk of getting post LS employment at an office I want. But I figured I have grades to do EIP well and I might as well play around with EIP especially since NALP guidelines say firms should hold offers until April for PI pursuits, and splitting a summer is can be an option
-
- Posts: 1845
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:22 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
I know jack shit about PI, but I have heard that government/PI really value commitment. Summering at a firm may make them question that commitment.Anonymous User wrote:100% the case.dabigchina wrote:I'm guessing this person wants to do PI/Gov't but is doing EIP because he's got nothing to lose.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:What in the jumpin' Jack fuck does "okay with striking out" mean?Anonymous User wrote:3.61, no LR, solid interviewer, okay with striking out. Want DC lit, but happy with NYC. Feedback on my bids list please? Should I just tack on random firms for the last 10 bids? Am I missing any solid lit places?
Love being at a DA's office this summer, and would be super happy to just take that risk of getting post LS employment at an office I want. But I figured I have grades to do EIP well and I might as well play around with EIP especially since NALP guidelines say firms should hold offers until April for PI pursuits, and splitting a summer is can be an option
But, I'd like to reiterate that I know nothing about any of this.
- smaug
- Posts: 13972
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
That's misguided because I would bet there are more lit jobs at SullCrom and DPW than you'll find in many smaller firms.Anonymous User wrote:Really my primary interest is DC, and kind of filled that out without spending time to look at Chambers for gov't investigations of NY places and other lit practices. I put in places like Kramer Levin because of the complex lit practices, and since it's a smaller firm I figure I'll have more chances at being a part of that than getting stuck with transactional work at DP.smaug wrote:Still a really weird list. Explain what you're doing or we won't be able to help you much. It's very aggressive but you have Milbank but no Davis Polk... It's just a really odd list.
1 Hogan Lovells (DC) 3
2 Gibson (NY) 3
3 Deb (NY) 4
4 Sidley (DC) 6
5 WilmerHale (NY) 9
6 Paul Weiss (NY) 11
7 DavisPolk(NY) 15
8 Cleary (NY) 14
9 Gibson (DC) 18
10 Kramer Levin (NY) 18
11 Cov (NY) 18
12 Arnold Porter(DC) 19
13 WillamsConnolly(DC) 20
14 Cov (DC) 20
15 Skadden (DC) 20
16 Crowell (DC) 21
17 Wachtell (NY) 24
18 BakerBotts(DC) 25
19 Steptoe&Johnson(DC) 25
20 Cravath (NY) 23
21 Latham(DC) 23
22 WilmerHale(DC) 27
23 K+E (DC) 27
24 Paul Weiss (DC) 29
25 Simpson(NY) 27
26 Deb (DC) 28
27 NixonPeabody(NY) 28
If you want DC a little confused by some of the firm choices but you're kinda cagey and I don't feel like digging to give you better advice.
-
- Posts: 432623
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
I don't really think this is the thread to get into this, but yeah you're definitely right. I'm still deciding/figuring out what I think is the best option (whether it be firm for 3 years before lateraling to something else), regardless doing EIP can't hurt, and I don't have to take any of the offers, all it gives me is more choices down the road.dabigchina wrote: I know jack shit about PI, but I have heard that government/PI really value commitment. Summering at a firm may make them question that commitment.
But, I'd like to reiterate that I know nothing about any of this.
-
- Posts: 432623
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
Really don't mean to come off as cagey. Talked to OCS a bunch and looked at Chambers bands, which is where I pretty much came up with my list. I think I might have just gotten misguided from OCS. I'm from NYC, but would prefer to be in DC. Really don't want to end up doing transactional work, so I thought to focus on firms that seem to do a lot of lit work, but I guess I was just wrong with that. Sorry if that was more complicated than it needed to be.smaug wrote: That's misguided because I would bet there are more lit jobs at SullCrom and DPW than you'll find in many smaller firms.
If you want DC a little confused by some of the firm choices but you're kinda cagey and I don't feel like digging to give you better advice.
- smaug
- Posts: 13972
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
Got it now. I think that some of the firms are just massive and do lots of work.Anonymous User wrote:Really don't mean to come off as cagey. Talked to OCS a bunch and looked at Chambers bands, which is where I pretty much came up with my list. I think I might have just gotten misguided from OCS. I'm from NYC, but would prefer to be in DC. Really don't want to end up doing transactional work, so I thought to focus on firms that seem to do a lot of lit work, but I guess I was just wrong with that. Sorry if that was more complicated than it needed to be.smaug wrote: That's misguided because I would bet there are more lit jobs at SullCrom and DPW than you'll find in many smaller firms.
If you want DC a little confused by some of the firm choices but you're kinda cagey and I don't feel like digging to give you better advice.
In terms of your DC list, I was thinking about the lack of Cleary, WSGR and some others and was trying to figure out why you included firms like Steptoe and Nixon on your list.
I can't give great DC advice (or great advice at all, really) but I'd take a hard look at the offices there and figure out where it makes sense to bid.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432623
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
Thank you for that, and sorry again for dragging it out.smaug wrote:Got it now. I think that some of the firms are just massive and do lots of work.Anonymous User wrote:Really don't mean to come off as cagey. Talked to OCS a bunch and looked at Chambers bands, which is where I pretty much came up with my list. I think I might have just gotten misguided from OCS. I'm from NYC, but would prefer to be in DC. Really don't want to end up doing transactional work, so I thought to focus on firms that seem to do a lot of lit work, but I guess I was just wrong with that. Sorry if that was more complicated than it needed to be.smaug wrote: That's misguided because I would bet there are more lit jobs at SullCrom and DPW than you'll find in many smaller firms.
If you want DC a little confused by some of the firm choices but you're kinda cagey and I don't feel like digging to give you better advice.
In terms of your DC list, I was thinking about the lack of Cleary, WSGR and some others and was trying to figure out why you included firms like Steptoe and Nixon on your list.
I can't give great DC advice (or great advice at all, really) but I'd take a hard look at the offices there and figure out where it makes sense to bid.
-
- Posts: 432623
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
Any idea if there's a lot of movement in FFB #? Is it safe to be 2-3 bids above the 2015 FFB or is it more a crap shoot?
-
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2015 6:00 pm
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
.
Last edited by Bach-City on Mon Aug 28, 2017 12:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
I feel like there is quite a bit of movement in the FFB and 2 bids above definitely isn't safe. I would do at least 3 for firms you want to interview with but aren't committed to, and at least 4 for necessary firms.Anonymous User wrote:Any idea if there's a lot of movement in FFB #? Is it safe to be 2-3 bids above the 2015 FFB or is it more a crap shoot?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
I have no idea why PI bros don't just do SA + the year-ish of Biglaw where you could bill 1500 and not get fired. Seems like a sweet deal.Bach-City wrote:Not OP, but that sounds pretty solid if I were the PI type.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:Why do EIP at all? You just want six weeks of SA lunches and Yankee games at $3500 a week before going off to the noble world?Anonymous User wrote:100% the case.dabigchina wrote:I'm guessing this person wants to do PI/Gov't but is doing EIP because he's got nothing to lose.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:What in the jumpin' Jack fuck does "okay with striking out" mean?Anonymous User wrote:3.61, no LR, solid interviewer, okay with striking out. Want DC lit, but happy with NYC. Feedback on my bids list please? Should I just tack on random firms for the last 10 bids? Am I missing any solid lit places?
Love being at a DA's office this summer, and would be super happy to just take that risk of getting post LS employment at an office I want. But I figured I have grades to do EIP well and I might as well play around with EIP especially since NALP guidelines say firms should hold offers until April for PI pursuits, and splitting a summer is can be an option
- smaug
- Posts: 13972
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
Because then they probably won't get the PI jobMonochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
I have no idea why PI bros don't just do SA + the year-ish of Biglaw where you could bill 1500 and not get fired. Seems like a sweet deal.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
smaug wrote:Because then they probably won't get the PI jobMonochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
I have no idea why PI bros don't just do SA + the year-ish of Biglaw where you could bill 1500 and not get fired. Seems like a sweet deal.
-
- Posts: 217
- Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 7:25 pm
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
I think last year there were a couple of 5+jbagelboy wrote:I feel like there is quite a bit of movement in the FFB and 2 bids above definitely isn't safe. I would do at least 3 for firms you want to interview with but aren't committed to, and at least 4 for necessary firms.Anonymous User wrote:Any idea if there's a lot of movement in FFB #? Is it safe to be 2-3 bids above the 2015 FFB or is it more a crap shoot?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432623
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Thu Jun 30, 2016 2:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
The PI job, maybe not. But a PI job? Pretty likely. Then you just have to decide whether Job A is worth a relatively chill $215k more than Job B.smaug wrote:Because then they probably won't get the PI jobMonochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
I have no idea why PI bros don't just do SA + the year-ish of Biglaw where you could bill 1500 and not get fired. Seems like a sweet deal.
- smaug
- Posts: 13972
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
I think you're still significantly overestimating the value of a biglaw washout.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:The PI job, maybe not. But a PI job? Pretty likely. Then you just have to decide whether Job A is worth a relatively chill $215k more than Job B.smaug wrote:Because then they probably won't get the PI jobMonochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
I have no idea why PI bros don't just do SA + the year-ish of Biglaw where you could bill 1500 and not get fired. Seems like a sweet deal.
-
- Posts: 432623
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
I got a bunch of screeners in my preferred market through a career fair. The problem is a few of my those offices were also on my bidlist. Do I have to drop them from my bidlist?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login