Is that because no GW people wanted to end up there or no GW people stuck out to Latham?flawschoolkid wrote:Latham had a suite in addition to 2/3 screening attorneys at GW's OCI, and none ended up there.Hahahahahhaa
3 years in Malibu --> DC. Someone is clearly winning at life.Anonymous User wrote:Is that because no GW people wanted to end up there or no GW people stuck out to Latham?flawschoolkid wrote:Latham had a suite in addition to 2/3 screening attorneys at GW's OCI, and none ended up there.Hahahahahhaa
That also seems to be an odd school distribution. A lot of one offs from random schools.
Sometimes firms misjudge a school and school classes value firms differently. I know Weil was confused by their inability to get a northwestern grads to accept offers. But they were only offering people who had a bunch of v10 offers.Anonymous User wrote:Is that because no GW people wanted to end up there or no GW people stuck out to Latham?flawschoolkid wrote:Latham had a suite in addition to 2/3 screening attorneys at GW's OCI, and none ended up there.Hahahahahhaa
That also seems to be an odd school distribution. A lot of one offs from random schools.
Desert Fox wrote:Sometimes firms misjudge a school and school classes value firms differently. I know Weil was confused by their inability to get a northwestern grads to accept offers. But they were only offering people who had a bunch of v10 offers.Anonymous User wrote:Is that because no GW people wanted to end up there or no GW people stuck out to Latham?flawschoolkid wrote:Latham had a suite in addition to 2/3 screening attorneys at GW's OCI, and none ended up there.Hahahahahhaa
That also seems to be an odd school distribution. A lot of one offs from random schools.
This happened at my T14 with Skadden. A shit ton of people accepted the year before, including some law review folks. So, this year it seemed like they where making offers mostly to people with really good grades that had a lot of options and ended up only picking up a couple of people. I also know that they were confused and irritated with their yield this year, because they had expected better.Desert Fox wrote:Sometimes firms misjudge a school and school classes value firms differently. I know Weil was confused by their inability to get a northwestern grads to accept offers. But they were only offering people who had a bunch of v10 offers.Anonymous User wrote:Is that because no GW people wanted to end up there or no GW people stuck out to Latham?flawschoolkid wrote:Latham had a suite in addition to 2/3 screening attorneys at GW's OCI, and none ended up there.Hahahahahhaa
That also seems to be an odd school distribution. A lot of one offs from random schools.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
This is a friend of mine. The "winning" is countered by now being EIC.Anonymous User wrote:3 years in Malibu --> DC. Someone is clearly winning at life.Anonymous User wrote:Is that because no GW people wanted to end up there or no GW people stuck out to Latham?flawschoolkid wrote:Latham had a suite in addition to 2/3 screening attorneys at GW's OCI, and none ended up there.Hahahahahhaa
That also seems to be an odd school distribution. A lot of one offs from random schools.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
TLS doesn't--and shouldn't--ever let up on firms who fuck over people's careers with no recourse after lying about a situation. Insensitivity is the price to tell any Winston summer that doesn't already know that the firm isn't trustworthy and that summering there is a giant risk that should only be taken as a last resort.jbagelboy wrote:y'all are seeming pretty insensitive considering the anon poster self-evidently is summering at Winston.
Anon cause I am at W&S. Not trying to be a shill for the firm because what happened a few summers ago was terrible. But just to reassure any ppl summering at Winston that might see this, they almost certainly will get offers. The firm historically has been 100% offer and certainly since all the crap they got (deservedly so) for no offering 1/3 of the class back in 2012 they have been. Not defending anything else, just saying the summers shouldn't have to worry about getting an offermvp99 wrote:so Winston has a horrible offer rate?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Well now I'm convinced!Anonymous User wrote:Anon cause I am at W&S. Not trying to be a shill for the firm because what happened a few summers ago was terrible. But just to reassure any ppl summering at Winston that might see this, they almost certainly will get offers. The firm historically has been 100% offer and certainly since all the crap they got (deservedly so) for no offering 1/3 of the class back in 2012 they have been. Not defending anything else, just saying the summers shouldn't have to worry about getting an offermvp99 wrote:so Winston has a horrible offer rate?
Interesting that Kirkland/Sidley IIRC prefer NU, Skadden prefers UChicago.Anonymous User wrote:Skadden Chi
UChi 10
HLS 7
NU 4
UMich 3
YLS 2
Iowa 2
Upenn 1
Loyola 1
Kent 1
previous years have been a lot closer to 1:1 and the rumblings are that yield wasn't as high as expected from NU, so I don't know that there is a real preference there. with that said, i'd be willing to bet they dip lower in the class at uchi though.parkslope wrote:Interesting that Kirkland/Sidley IIRC prefer NU, Skadden prefers UChicago.Anonymous User wrote:Skadden Chi
UChi 10
HLS 7
NU 4
UMich 3
YLS 2
Iowa 2
Upenn 1
Loyola 1
Kent 1
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
