Was this for the SF office or the SD office?Anonymous User wrote:Got the ding today =\ unfortunately, only one strike left for me
For SF: I could have sworn I was told the hiring committee was meeting weekly, but I may have misheard.
Was this for the SF office or the SD office?Anonymous User wrote:Got the ding today =\ unfortunately, only one strike left for me
I wasn't the poster who got dinged but SD office told me they met weekly as well and made decisions on a rolling bassi, so chances are the SF office does the same.Anonymous User wrote:Was this for the SF office or the SD office?Anonymous User wrote:Got the ding today =\ unfortunately, only one strike left for me
For SF: I could have sworn I was told the hiring committee was meeting weekly, but I may have misheard.
No news is good news?Anonymous User wrote:I wasn't the poster who got dinged but SD office told me they met weekly as well and made decisions on a rolling bassi, so chances are the SF office does the same.Anonymous User wrote:Was this for the SF office or the SD office?Anonymous User wrote:Got the ding today =\ unfortunately, only one strike left for me
For SF: I could have sworn I was told the hiring committee was meeting weekly, but I may have misheard.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
I think rolling is acceptable under NALP...it's just giving offers to the strongest candidates first and waiting to see who accepts/declines before extending more offers. I've never heard of a NALP requirement for giving offers all at once.Anonymous User wrote:rolling as in not following NALP? Why do you think that? Curious... and do you think you'll take it given kind of the shaky situation w/ layoffs/deferrals/salary freezes, etc?
Agreed. NALP doesn't say anything about how or when a firm may give out offers. It only regulates what the firm can do once those offers are handed out (e.g. not rescind the offer before 45 days).shadowfish wrote:I think rolling is acceptable under NALP...it's just giving offers to the strongest candidates first and waiting to see who accepts/declines before extending more offers. I've never heard of a NALP requirement for giving offers all at once.Anonymous User wrote:rolling as in not following NALP? Why do you think that? Curious... and do you think you'll take it given kind of the shaky situation w/ layoffs/deferrals/salary freezes, etc?
I was told they weren't planning on substantially cutting the size of the summer class (who knows if that's true or not).Anonymous User wrote:This is anon above with the SF offer.
Mofo deferred class of 2009 to april 2010, but it supposedly had a near 100% offer rate this summer. Could be that they're seeing work pick up? No idea on the start date for the SAs this past summer though. I think we won't know how they are doing as a firm until we get closer to that april 2010 date. Wish I knew more.
Does anyone know SF's anticipated class size for next summer?
slightly over 2 weeks. i'll be accepting it soon since it's the only one i have. ITE has been rough, even to T14 top 20% people.Anonymous User wrote:I was told they weren't planning on substantially cutting the size of the summer class (who knows if that's true or not).Anonymous User wrote:This is anon above with the SF offer.
Mofo deferred class of 2009 to april 2010, but it supposedly had a near 100% offer rate this summer. Could be that they're seeing work pick up? No idea on the start date for the SAs this past summer though. I think we won't know how they are doing as a firm until we get closer to that april 2010 date. Wish I knew more.
Does anyone know SF's anticipated class size for next summer?
How long between CB and offer for you, if you don't mind me asking.
ITE is screwing everything up.Anonymous User wrote:slightly over 2 weeks. i'll be accepting it soon since it's the only one i have. ITE has been rough, even to T14 top 20% people.Anonymous User wrote:I was told they weren't planning on substantially cutting the size of the summer class (who knows if that's true or not).Anonymous User wrote:This is anon above with the SF offer.
Mofo deferred class of 2009 to april 2010, but it supposedly had a near 100% offer rate this summer. Could be that they're seeing work pick up? No idea on the start date for the SAs this past summer though. I think we won't know how they are doing as a firm until we get closer to that april 2010 date. Wish I knew more.
Does anyone know SF's anticipated class size for next summer?
How long between CB and offer for you, if you don't mind me asking.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Don't know about SF but SD last year was 100%.Anonymous User wrote:Does anyone know mofo's past offer rate in specific offices like SF?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login