Kirkland Layoffs Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
thisismytlsuername

Bronze
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2017 10:22 pm

Re: Kirkland Layoffs

Post by thisismytlsuername » Wed Apr 05, 2023 6:33 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Apr 05, 2023 5:28 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Apr 05, 2023 5:13 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Apr 05, 2023 4:30 pm
There’s always a hyper focus on Kirkland here. Stealth layoffs are happening now across the V100.
Well some may argue Kirkland is the biggest law firm with over 6 billion in revenue and over 3000 lawyers which is why we focus on it so much.
My biglaw firm is doing the same thing but giving 3 months. Kirkland is giving 5 so I don’t see why they’re being called out
Have you called out your biglaw firm?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432181
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Kirkland Layoffs

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Apr 06, 2023 11:10 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Apr 02, 2023 2:24 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Apr 02, 2023 1:29 pm
Is that no longer the case?
K&E's headcount has nearly doubled in the last five years. Peer firms either stayed relatively stable, or increased by max 30% (e.g., L&W, Gibson). So, no, it's no longer the case.
Well headcount grew, but so did business. Everyone keeps running with the “Kirkland grew too fast and now has to cut because they don’t have work to sustain them” narrative, but according to the latest financials that dropped yesterday, they were basically the only firm among their peers to INCREASE revenue and PPEP in 2022, above the 2021 record highs. Which makes me think maybe the cuts are not as widespread or economically-motivated as people assume.

Yes, you can say “well maybe it’s not 2022 numbers, maybe business has softened in Q1 2023 and that’s why they’re cutting” but everyone said the same thing during the fall and now we can see that, in fact, the firm was at that point in the middle of yet another record-breaking year.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”