Lots of back and forth on this thread. Bottom line - both are good firms and you can’t really go wrong here (despite what some would have you believe).
Generally speaking, exits will largely be the same from either, but it’s important to realize (and I certainly didn’t when I was a law student 6 years ago) that there is a TON of factors that go into your future exit options that you have absolutely no control over right now, so basing this particular decision on some vague notion of one firm having better exit options is silly.
Sidley v. Ropes & Gray (Chicago) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432644
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Sidley v. Ropes & Gray (Chicago)
Can you please elaborate on the factors that influence exit options?persia1921 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 31, 2022 7:42 pmLots of back and forth on this thread. Bottom line - both are good firms and you can’t really go wrong here (despite what some would have you believe).
Generally speaking, exits will largely be the same from either, but it’s important to realize (and I certainly didn’t when I was a law student 6 years ago) that there is a TON of factors that go into your future exit options that you have absolutely no control over right now, so basing this particular decision on some vague notion of one firm having better exit options is silly.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
