Bumping to see if anyone has an answer to this Q.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Oct 04, 2023 12:25 pmDoes anyone know what they offer in terms of clerkship bonuses?
MoloLamken Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432643
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MoloLamken
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432643
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MoloLamken
Figured I would try to necro since this thread got derailed last time pretty quickly. Am thinking about submitting an application, any current/former associates care to speak to what it's like there?
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432643
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MoloLamken
I also thought they were pretty hostile and weird in the interviews. I think they also pay below market and there is 0 chance of making equity partner. The appeal, I suppose, is being able to work on matters before SCOTUS without needing the super high credentials other shops demand. Personally, I see no reason why anyone should come here over Quinn for example. All in all it was an unpleasant process, but hey their insane interview process helps you figure that out on your own.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432643
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MoloLamken
ML associate here. I'm sorry to hear that the above poster had a bad experience interviewing with us.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 5:46 pmI also thought they were pretty hostile and weird in the interviews. I think they also pay below market and there is 0 chance of making equity partner. The appeal, I suppose, is being able to work on matters before SCOTUS without needing the super high credentials other shops demand. Personally, I see no reason why anyone should come here over Quinn for example. All in all it was an unpleasant process, but hey their insane interview process helps you figure that out on your own.
I won't correct each of the post's erroneous statements, but I will mention that (1) we pay above market and (2) working at MoloLamken is nothing like working at Quinn. Anyone interested in ML should just email an associate and ask for a 30-minute phone call -- we're a happy bunch and we like to talk about the firm!
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432643
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MoloLamken
I just went through the interview process with them. They pay above-market.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432643
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MoloLamken
I also don't think it's right that they're flexible on credentials, or that their major practice is appellate...
