Stealth Layoff Check-in Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
2013

Silver
Posts: 931
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:29 am

Re: Stealth Layoff Check-in

Post by 2013 » Sat Sep 21, 2019 8:48 am

64Fl wrote:
whats an updog wrote:It sucks too, because a good secretary is a godsend.
It's not like firms are axing all of their secretaries. They are just making the ratio make more sense. There is no need to have a 1:1 or 1:2 lawyer:secretary ratio anymore like there used to be 40 years ago. If the average legal secretary in a major market costs $100k (salary + benefits + other associated employment costs, like required square footage and the time it takes to do reviews), then cutting 50 secretaries is saving $5M/yr. That's a good chunk of change, and, quite frankly, there might almost no business disruption. Several of the secretaries I work with spend more time playing games on their computers or browsing Facebook than actually doing anything. They aren't lazy; they just genuinely don't get used nearly as much.
Lol 1:1 or 1:2.

It’s going to be like 1:10 soon.

User avatar
LaLiLuLeLo

Silver
Posts: 949
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 11:54 am

Re: Stealth Layoff Check-in

Post by LaLiLuLeLo » Sat Sep 21, 2019 12:57 pm

2013 wrote:
64Fl wrote:
whats an updog wrote:It sucks too, because a good secretary is a godsend.
It's not like firms are axing all of their secretaries. They are just making the ratio make more sense. There is no need to have a 1:1 or 1:2 lawyer:secretary ratio anymore like there used to be 40 years ago. If the average legal secretary in a major market costs $100k (salary + benefits + other associated employment costs, like required square footage and the time it takes to do reviews), then cutting 50 secretaries is saving $5M/yr. That's a good chunk of change, and, quite frankly, there might almost no business disruption. Several of the secretaries I work with spend more time playing games on their computers or browsing Facebook than actually doing anything. They aren't lazy; they just genuinely don't get used nearly as much.
Lol 1:1 or 1:2.

It’s going to be like 1:10 soon.
It’s a poooooool

Ugh

User avatar
whats an updog

Bronze
Posts: 440
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:12 am

Re: Stealth Layoff Check-in

Post by whats an updog » Sat Sep 21, 2019 4:08 pm

The changes described above are already in full effect at my office. As a second year, I currently have a pool (~1:15). It's like flipping a coin every time whether I get what I need without further intervention or just giving up and doing it myself. I can use a partner's secretary for some stuff, and there is a huge difference in reliability. With the pool, it seems like a negative feedback loop where people use them less and less because they are bad and eventually they'll just do away with the pool too. A good balance would be 1:3 or 1:4.

User avatar
Monochromatic Oeuvre

Gold
Posts: 2481
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm

Re: Stealth Layoff Check-in

Post by Monochromatic Oeuvre » Mon Sep 23, 2019 1:54 am

whats an updog wrote:With the pool, it seems like a negative feedback loop where people use them less and less because they are bad and eventually they'll just do away with the pool too. A good balance would be 1:3 or 1:4.
This is not what "negative feedback loop" means.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”