(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
2013

- Posts: 931
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:29 am
Post
by 2013 » Sat Sep 21, 2019 8:48 am
64Fl wrote:whats an updog wrote:It sucks too, because a good secretary is a godsend.
It's not like firms are axing all of their secretaries. They are just making the ratio make more sense. There is no need to have a 1:1 or 1:2 lawyer:secretary ratio anymore like there used to be 40 years ago. If the average legal secretary in a major market costs $100k (salary + benefits + other associated employment costs, like required square footage and the time it takes to do reviews), then cutting 50 secretaries is saving $5M/yr. That's a good chunk of change, and, quite frankly, there might almost no business disruption. Several of the secretaries I work with spend more time playing games on their computers or browsing Facebook than actually doing anything. They aren't lazy; they just genuinely don't get used nearly as much.
Lol 1:1 or 1:2.
It’s going to be like 1:10 soon.
-
LaLiLuLeLo

- Posts: 949
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 11:54 am
Post
by LaLiLuLeLo » Sat Sep 21, 2019 12:57 pm
2013 wrote:64Fl wrote:whats an updog wrote:It sucks too, because a good secretary is a godsend.
It's not like firms are axing all of their secretaries. They are just making the ratio make more sense. There is no need to have a 1:1 or 1:2 lawyer:secretary ratio anymore like there used to be 40 years ago. If the average legal secretary in a major market costs $100k (salary + benefits + other associated employment costs, like required square footage and the time it takes to do reviews), then cutting 50 secretaries is saving $5M/yr. That's a good chunk of change, and, quite frankly, there might almost no business disruption. Several of the secretaries I work with spend more time playing games on their computers or browsing Facebook than actually doing anything. They aren't lazy; they just genuinely don't get used nearly as much.
Lol 1:1 or 1:2.
It’s going to be like 1:10 soon.
It’s a poooooool
Ugh
-
whats an updog

- Posts: 440
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:12 am
Post
by whats an updog » Sat Sep 21, 2019 4:08 pm
The changes described above are already in full effect at my office. As a second year, I currently have a pool (~1:15). It's like flipping a coin every time whether I get what I need without further intervention or just giving up and doing it myself. I can use a partner's secretary for some stuff, and there is a huge difference in reliability. With the pool, it seems like a negative feedback loop where people use them less and less because they are bad and eventually they'll just do away with the pool too. A good balance would be 1:3 or 1:4.
-
Monochromatic Oeuvre

- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Post
by Monochromatic Oeuvre » Mon Sep 23, 2019 1:54 am
whats an updog wrote:With the pool, it seems like a negative feedback loop where people use them less and less because they are bad and eventually they'll just do away with the pool too. A good balance would be 1:3 or 1:4.
This is not what "negative feedback loop" means.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login