Which SF firm should I go to? Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Which firm would you go to?

Kobre Kim
15
32%
Kirkland Ellis
13
28%
Sidley Austin
8
17%
Farella Braun
5
11%
Other
6
13%
 
Total votes: 47

Anonymous User
Posts: 432629
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Which SF firm should I go to?

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Jul 25, 2018 5:14 pm

Kirkland taking the lead!

I think Farella is being discounted here. A lot of top students at my law school ranked them very highly during OCI. Albeit this was awhile ago, but IU don't see why that would change.

potted plant

New
Posts: 98
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 8:01 pm

Re: Which SF firm should I go to?

Post by potted plant » Thu Jul 26, 2018 3:49 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:SF-based litigator here. Kirkland/Sidley are fine, but if you don't look hard at these four firms, you're not doing your diligence.

http://www.kblfirm.com/careers/
https://www.taylorpatchen.com/
http://lewisllewellyn.com/
https://durietangri.com/

SF has a great boutique culture. You'll get much better experience at these firms than you will at Kirkland/Sidley.

Also, MTO has an SF office. It's absurdly selective, but also likely a better experience than Kirkland/Sidley.

Edit: Also, if you're looking AUSA/BigFed, why aren't Covington/Gibson/Latham/Orrick on your list? All have large SF offices with strong reputations in white collar.
This was crazy helpful thanks. I had not heard of any these boutiques you listed. I'm going to look into them. With regards to Cov/Gibson/Latham, I was under the impression that the SF offices did mostly IP work and the white collar or commercial lit practices were in LA. I could be wrong.


Given my bigfed ambitions, I was thinking that whit ecollar practice would be most preferable, then commercial lit. As for Orrick, I just forgot about it... and will be applying if I can find an opening that fits.
As an SF litigator at one of these firms I can say your impression is wrong. The majority of work in these offices is white collar and commercial lit. The firms/offices with heavy IP practices are mostly in Palo Alto or elsewhere on the peninsula.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432629
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Which SF firm should I go to?

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Jul 26, 2018 5:52 pm

potted plant wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:SF-based litigator here. Kirkland/Sidley are fine, but if you don't look hard at these four firms, you're not doing your diligence.

http://www.kblfirm.com/careers/
https://www.taylorpatchen.com/
http://lewisllewellyn.com/
https://durietangri.com/

SF has a great boutique culture. You'll get much better experience at these firms than you will at Kirkland/Sidley.

Also, MTO has an SF office. It's absurdly selective, but also likely a better experience than Kirkland/Sidley.

Edit: Also, if you're looking AUSA/BigFed, why aren't Covington/Gibson/Latham/Orrick on your list? All have large SF offices with strong reputations in white collar.
This was crazy helpful thanks. I had not heard of any these boutiques you listed. I'm going to look into them. With regards to Cov/Gibson/Latham, I was under the impression that the SF offices did mostly IP work and the white collar or commercial lit practices were in LA. I could be wrong.


Given my bigfed ambitions, I was thinking that whit ecollar practice would be most preferable, then commercial lit. As for Orrick, I just forgot about it... and will be applying if I can find an opening that fits.
As an SF litigator at one of these firms I can say your impression is wrong. The majority of work in these offices is white collar and commercial lit. The firms/offices with heavy IP practices are mostly in Palo Alto or elsewhere on the peninsula.
Thanks, which firms are you referring to? All 4?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”