Is there any point on doing 2 more years of Biglaw - Considering lateraling in-house Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Is there any point on doing 2 more years of Biglaw - Considering lateraling in-house
OP, the in house position sounds like a great opportunity (at least money and work life balance wise)! From what I heard, two more years will not increase the salary to more than what you are offered here. Do you mind me asking how you got it?
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Is there any point on doing 2 more years of Biglaw - Considering lateraling in-house
OP here, I replied to a cold email from a recruiter. Position priginally advertised a lower salaryAnonymous User wrote:OP, the in house position sounds like a great opportunity (at least money and work life balance wise)! From what I heard, two more years will not increase the salary to more than what you are offered here. Do you mind me asking how you got it?
My research makes me think that I will be able to make a bit more as a 4th year
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
