(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Monochromatic Oeuvre

- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Post
by Monochromatic Oeuvre » Sat Jul 02, 2016 6:08 pm
Pomeranian wrote:Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:Pomeranian wrote:bern victim wrote:Pomeranian wrote:AndroidLawyer wrote:I don't think firm's reaction to the last downturn should be the standard. The last recession was the worst since the Great Depression, so the next downturn may or may not be as bad. Firms will adjust based on the specific market conditions.
Thanks to the Federal Reserve, the next economic downturn is going to make 2008 seem like a fart joke.
how much gold you got?
Gold is a good long term bet. In the shorter term, as long as the Fed keeps interest rates near zero and keeps printing billions in cheap money, stocks will keep going up (bubble anyone?)
If you were really this confident about the ease of picking the market, you wouldn't be in law.
It's not just me who thinks this, far from it. People far more knowledgeable of the markets such as Carl Icahn and George Soros also think this as well. Thanks to the Federal Reserve, bubbles are everywhere, and when they finally burst the economy will go to hell in a hand basket!
I can't tell you how many of my friends said the same thing in 2011 and how much money they've lost since then.
Maybe, maybe not. All I know is you're not confident enough to put your life savings on it, and a lot of investors disagree with you.
-
bern victim

- Posts: 1267
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:58 pm
Post
by bern victim » Sat Jul 02, 2016 8:53 pm
look, Pomeranian may be a deranged moron, or he may be a clairvoyant genius. we'll never know until we AUDIT THE FED
-
J9ofDiamonds

- Posts: 3367
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 9:06 pm
Post
by J9ofDiamonds » Sat Jul 02, 2016 10:21 pm
Pomeranians are shitty ass dogs anyways. atleast be a real dog if you are going to be an armchair economist
-
Pomeranian

- Posts: 306
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 10:23 pm
Post
by Pomeranian » Sat Jul 02, 2016 10:28 pm
J9ofDiamonds wrote:Pomeranians are shitty ass dogs anyways. atleast be a real dog if you are going to be an armchair economist
MY POMERANIAN HAS BIGGER BALLS THAN YOU'LL EVER HAVE (IT'S A GIRL TOO). WOOF!
-
imalreadyamember?

- Posts: 145
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 11:03 am
Post
by imalreadyamember? » Sun Jul 03, 2016 2:38 am
Effingham wrote:Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:Pomeranian wrote:bern victim wrote:Pomeranian wrote:AndroidLawyer wrote:I don't think firm's reaction to the last downturn should be the standard. The last recession was the worst since the Great Depression, so the next downturn may or may not be as bad. Firms will adjust based on the specific market conditions.
Thanks to the Federal Reserve, the next economic downturn is going to make 2008 seem like a fart joke.
how much gold you got?
Gold is a good long term bet. In the shorter term, as long as the Fed keeps interest rates near zero and keeps printing billions in cheap money, stocks will keep going up (bubble anyone?)
If you were really this confident about the ease of picking the market, you wouldn't be in law.
Seriously, fucking hate all the arm chair market experts in law.
Oh it's cool, pretty sure he's a 0L so he's not actually "in law" per se. Unless I'm mistaking with another poster.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Pokemon

- Posts: 3528
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:58 pm
Post
by Pokemon » Sun Jul 03, 2016 3:40 pm

arm chair Economisms should be bannable offense.
Op, no one knows how firms will respond to downturn and even firms that responded a certain way in the past might respond differently in future. I mean no one expected weil to lay off their Boston associates when the market was doing better, especially since they did not have as many layoffs during the downturn.
Want to continue reading?
Register for access!
Did I mention it was FREE ?
Already a member? Login