Prestigewhore DC Lit: Hogan v. Latham Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Prestigewhore DC Lit: Hogan v. Latham
Bumping this topic. Dan anyone speak more about Hogan's hours requirement vs. Latham's?
-
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Prestigewhore DC Lit: Hogan v. Latham
Close law school friend is at Hogan in DC. Hogan has a 2000 hours requirement, which can include a decent amount of pro bono. No real incentive to work more than that, or at least that is what my friend has experienced. Seems like a great place to work (at least on the lit/white collar side, I can't speak to the other groups).Anonymous User wrote:Bumping this topic. Dan anyone speak more about Hogan's hours requirement vs. Latham's?
-
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Prestigewhore DC Lit: Hogan v. Latham
Anonymous User wrote:Close law school friend is at Hogan in DC. Hogan has a 2000 hours requirement, which can include a decent amount of pro bono. No real incentive to work more than that, or at least that is what my friend has experienced. Seems like a great place to work (at least on the lit/white collar side, I can't speak to the other groups).Anonymous User wrote:Bumping this topic. Dan anyone speak more about Hogan's hours requirement vs. Latham's?
Thanks for the input. I've heard only good things about Hogan and I'm pretty sure I'm going with them now.
-
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Prestigewhore DC Lit: Hogan v. Latham
Latham has a 1900 requirement for bonus but don't believe that's all you'll be working.Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Close law school friend is at Hogan in DC. Hogan has a 2000 hours requirement, which can include a decent amount of pro bono. No real incentive to work more than that, or at least that is what my friend has experienced. Seems like a great place to work (at least on the lit/white collar side, I can't speak to the other groups).Anonymous User wrote:Bumping this topic. Dan anyone speak more about Hogan's hours requirement vs. Latham's?
Thanks for the input. I've heard only good things about Hogan and I'm pretty sure I'm going with them now.
If you want Lit, Hogan by a mile. If you're unsure or want corporate work, Latham by a mile. Regulatory practices - might be a closer call but I'd lean towards Hogan
-
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Prestigewhore DC Lit: Hogan v. Latham
Deleted
Last edited by Anonymous User on Wed Sep 06, 2017 12:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Prestigewhore DC Lit: Hogan v. Latham
Which firm provides the better exit options to Gov.
-
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Prestigewhore DC Lit: Hogan v. Latham
Hogan DC no offered at least one person this year. Maybe not relevant to the decision making process, but something to be aware of.
-
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Prestigewhore DC Lit: Hogan v. Latham
Wow, I was told everyone got an offer. Mind if I ask where you got this from?Anonymous User wrote:Hogan DC no offered at least one person this year. Maybe not relevant to the decision making process, but something to be aware of.
-
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Prestigewhore DC Lit: Hogan v. Latham
Depends what practice. Lit across the board - Hogan. Regulatory agencies like FCC, FTC - Latham. In-house? Possibly Latham from its M&A practice in DC.Anonymous User wrote:Which firm provides the better exit options to Gov.
-
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Prestigewhore DC Lit: Hogan v. Latham
Roommate is friends with the no-offeree.Anonymous User wrote:Wow, I was told everyone got an offer. Mind if I ask where you got this from?Anonymous User wrote:Hogan DC no offered at least one person this year. Maybe not relevant to the decision making process, but something to be aware of.
-
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Prestigewhore DC Lit: Hogan v. Latham
Any particular reason? I think Vault also lists everyone as receiving an offer. This is a little alarming.Anonymous User wrote:Roommate is friends with the no-offeree.Anonymous User wrote:Wow, I was told everyone got an offer. Mind if I ask where you got this from?Anonymous User wrote:Hogan DC no offered at least one person this year. Maybe not relevant to the decision making process, but something to be aware of.
-
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Prestigewhore DC Lit: Hogan v. Latham
I have also heard about the no offer.Anonymous User wrote:Any particular reason? I think Vault also lists everyone as receiving an offer. This is a little alarming.Anonymous User wrote:Roommate is friends with the no-offeree.Anonymous User wrote:Wow, I was told everyone got an offer. Mind if I ask where you got this from?Anonymous User wrote:Hogan DC no offered at least one person this year. Maybe not relevant to the decision making process, but something to be aware of.
Also, Latham is still Latham, which should concern people.
-
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Prestigewhore DC Lit: Hogan v. Latham
That's 2016 info not 2017 (I think they do usually give 100% offers). I don't have a specific reason but it sounded like a combination of work product and fit? Then again there's probably something I don't know.Anonymous User wrote: Any particular reason? I think Vault also lists everyone as receiving an offer. This is a little alarming.
But yeah there is also a reason Lathaming is a verb.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Prestigewhore DC Lit: Hogan v. Latham
A single no-offer just means the person did something to lose the offer, same as any other firm. 100% offer firms still give cold offers if someone earns it.
-
- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm
Re: Prestigewhore DC Lit: Hogan v. Latham
Yeah, unless you're planning on being the guy who jumps in the river at a firm event or completely fails to turn in his assignments, a single no offer shouldn't concern you.Anonymous User wrote:A single no-offer just means the person did something to lose the offer, same as any other firm. 100% offer firms still give cold offers if someone earns it.
-
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Prestigewhore DC Lit: Hogan v. Latham
The Hogan no-offer (cold-offer) was well deserved and earned, and was unsurprising to fellow Hogan summers.
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 7:04 pm
Re: Prestigewhore DC Lit: Hogan v. Latham
I don't have a dog in this fight, but fwiw hogan lovells just hired the former FTC chairwoman under Obama: https://www.hoganlovells.com/en/news/fo ... an-lovellsAnonymous User wrote:Depends what practice. Lit across the board - Hogan. Regulatory agencies like FCC, FTC - Latham. In-house? Possibly Latham from its M&A practice in DC.Anonymous User wrote:Which firm provides the better exit options to Gov.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Prestigewhore DC Lit: Hogan v. Latham
While it may not be ranked as high as Latham in the national Vault rankings, Hogan is definitely a top tier firm in DC.
-
- Posts: 3843
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am
Re: Prestigewhore DC Lit: Hogan v. Latham
tell us moreAnonymous User wrote:The Hogan no-offer (cold-offer) was well deserved and earned, and was unsurprising to fellow Hogan summers.
don't tease us like that
ETA word on the street is that it was a straight-up no offer
-
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Prestigewhore DC Lit: Hogan v. Latham
Yeah the one I know about (and I assume there was only one) was a full no offer not a cold offer, though i guess the difference is not important. I do want to know what the real story is though.Hand wrote:tell us moreAnonymous User wrote:The Hogan no-offer (cold-offer) was well deserved and earned, and was unsurprising to fellow Hogan summers.
don't tease us like that
ETA word on the street is that it was a straight-up no offer
-
- Posts: 1362
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:43 pm
Re: Prestigewhore DC Lit: Hogan v. Latham
hogan not close
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Prestigewhore DC Lit: Hogan v. Latham
Oddly enough there was a guy my summer who literally jumped in the river at an event and he still got an offer.dixiecupdrinking wrote:Yeah, unless you're planning on being the guy who jumps in the river at a firm event or completely fails to turn in his assignments, a single no offer shouldn't concern you.Anonymous User wrote:A single no-offer just means the person did something to lose the offer, same as any other firm. 100% offer firms still give cold offers if someone earns it.
-
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Prestigewhore DC Lit: Hogan v. Latham
LOL I heard about this but thought it was fake!!!Anonymous User wrote:Oddly enough there was a guy my summer who literally jumped in the river at an event and he still got an offer.dixiecupdrinking wrote:Yeah, unless you're planning on being the guy who jumps in the river at a firm event or completely fails to turn in his assignments, a single no offer shouldn't concern you.Anonymous User wrote:A single no-offer just means the person did something to lose the offer, same as any other firm. 100% offer firms still give cold offers if someone earns it.
-
- Posts: 3843
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am
Re: Prestigewhore DC Lit: Hogan v. Latham
Come on original anon, don't be a cock tease. I've heard about throwing up in the office elevator, but surely there is moreAnonymous User wrote:Yeah the one I know about (and I assume there was only one) was a full no offer not a cold offer, though i guess the difference is not important. I do want to know what the real story is though.Hand wrote:tell us moreAnonymous User wrote:The Hogan no-offer (cold-offer) was well deserved and earned, and was unsurprising to fellow Hogan summers.
don't tease us like that
ETA word on the street is that it was a straight-up no offer
-
- Posts: 432508
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Prestigewhore DC Lit: Hogan v. Latham
I know that there is at least one person not returning to Hogan. I do not think there is any certainty that the person did not receive an offer. It is entirely possible that person simply decided not to return.Hand wrote:Come on original anon, don't be a cock tease. I've heard about throwing up in the office elevator, but surely there is moreAnonymous User wrote:Yeah the one I know about (and I assume there was only one) was a full no offer not a cold offer, though i guess the difference is not important. I do want to know what the real story is though.Hand wrote:tell us moreAnonymous User wrote:The Hogan no-offer (cold-offer) was well deserved and earned, and was unsurprising to fellow Hogan summers.
don't tease us like that
ETA word on the street is that it was a straight-up no offer
I would be curious to know if anyone knows, for sure, that it was a no offer and the reasons for that no offer.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login