Kirkland v. Cahill v. Schulte v. Weil (ALL NY) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
smaug
- Posts: 13972
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm
Re: Kirkland v. Cahill v. Schulte v. Weil (ALL NY)
I'm not anti SRZ but I still don't get this flame.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432569
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland v. Cahill v. Schulte v. Weil (ALL NY)
People I've met so far from Cahill are amazing. The office is really shitty compared to some other firms though. The should get a new location.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
