Icecold.Anonymous User wrote:Weil dropped everyone on a big BK once it was confirmed. Happens but not often.Jim Jones wrote:how often does this happen? a big firm has one super giant matter and when it settles they drop weight?
Goodwin Procter Layoffs Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
Re: Goodwin Procter Layoffs
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Goodwin Procter Layoffs
My V50 pwn'd a small group who finished a major case. But they waited 6 months to see if the partners could find new work. They couldn't and they got pwnd.
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2015 8:22 pm
Re: Goodwin Procter Layoffs
Not a great 24 months for Boston firms/offices.
Bingham acquisition/purge in the fall; Weil's little litigation outpost getting hosed; now Goodwin. More distance between Ropes, WH, the Skadden satellite and everyone else, no?
Bingham acquisition/purge in the fall; Weil's little litigation outpost getting hosed; now Goodwin. More distance between Ropes, WH, the Skadden satellite and everyone else, no?
- Big Shrimpin
- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: Goodwin Procter Layoffs
I blame the boomers.
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
Re: Goodwin Procter Layoffs
PPP only went up 7%. Better lay off 1/10th of litigation!Big Shrimpin wrote:I blame the boomers.
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Big Shrimpin
- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: Goodwin Procter Layoffs
Precisely!Desert Fox wrote:PPP only went up 7%. Better lay off 1/10th of litigation!Big Shrimpin wrote:I blame the boomers.
In my day, you had to bill 400 hrs/month to make ends meet.
I put in my time so I deserve it!
- Clearly
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm
Re: Goodwin Procter Layoffs
20% of lit actually.Desert Fox wrote:PPP only went up 7%. Better lay off 1/10th of litigation!Big Shrimpin wrote:I blame the boomers.

- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Goodwin Procter Layoffs
litigation is an oversubscribed and saturated practice, especially since the financial crisis since law students thought the dried up corporate market meant that they had the best shot of getting into a firm by becoming a litigator. problem is also that most exits involve steep paycuts, and it's hard to accept that when you're getting fat paychecks.
probably not the end of such layoffs. there just isnt enough litigation work out there to keep so many people busy. i give applause to goodwin, though, for offering lit associates the ability to switch to corp. that's a life raft that ive never seen a firm give and a career move that few lateral firms would allow.
probably not the end of such layoffs. there just isnt enough litigation work out there to keep so many people busy. i give applause to goodwin, though, for offering lit associates the ability to switch to corp. that's a life raft that ive never seen a firm give and a career move that few lateral firms would allow.
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
Re: Goodwin Procter Layoffs
If they were serious about the corp life raft they would have offered the transfer before shitcanning them.zweitbester wrote:litigation is an oversubscribed and saturated practice, especially since the financial crisis since law students thought the dried up corporate market meant that they had the best shot of getting into a firm by becoming a litigator. problem is also that most exits involve steep paycuts, and it's hard to accept that when you're getting fat paychecks.
probably not the end of such layoffs. there just isnt enough litigation work out there to keep so many people busy. i give applause to goodwin, though, for offering lit associates the ability to switch to corp. that's a life raft that ive never seen a firm give and a career move that few lateral firms would allow.
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Goodwin Procter Layoffs
do u mean to imply they arent serious about it? im not sure it's the case that they arent...Desert Fox wrote:If they were serious about the corp life raft they would have offered the transfer before shitcanning them.zweitbester wrote:litigation is an oversubscribed and saturated practice, especially since the financial crisis since law students thought the dried up corporate market meant that they had the best shot of getting into a firm by becoming a litigator. problem is also that most exits involve steep paycuts, and it's hard to accept that when you're getting fat paychecks.
probably not the end of such layoffs. there just isnt enough litigation work out there to keep so many people busy. i give applause to goodwin, though, for offering lit associates the ability to switch to corp. that's a life raft that ive never seen a firm give and a career move that few lateral firms would allow.
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
Re: Goodwin Procter Layoffs
I have no idea but why would you lay someone off then tell them maybe you have something else for them. Wouldn't you do that first. Maybe I'm overthinking it.zweitbester wrote:do u mean to imply they arent serious about it? im not sure it's the case that they arent...Desert Fox wrote:If they were serious about the corp life raft they would have offered the transfer before shitcanning them.zweitbester wrote:litigation is an oversubscribed and saturated practice, especially since the financial crisis since law students thought the dried up corporate market meant that they had the best shot of getting into a firm by becoming a litigator. problem is also that most exits involve steep paycuts, and it's hard to accept that when you're getting fat paychecks.
probably not the end of such layoffs. there just isnt enough litigation work out there to keep so many people busy. i give applause to goodwin, though, for offering lit associates the ability to switch to corp. that's a life raft that ive never seen a firm give and a career move that few lateral firms would allow.
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Goodwin Procter Layoffs
probably because if u told one and not the other (after all, ur not going to offer all laid off litigation associates this opportunity, just the more junior ones), word would spread that layoffs are occurring before they've actually occurred. i really think there's no way this couldve been handled without there being an even larger PR mess.I have no idea but why would you lay someone off then tell them maybe you have something else for them. Wouldn't you do that first. Maybe I'm overthinking it.
- Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: Goodwin Procter Layoffs
Yeah you wouldn't fire someone to rehire them. This cost them some pretty bad press. That's just their response so they don't look shitty.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- mmelittlechicken
- Posts: 4679
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 12:34 am
Re: Goodwin Procter Layoffs
They should just offer optional severance packages to the entire group, like with secretary downsizing, and plenty of associates would willingly leave without a mess.
- szb5058
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:33 pm
Re: Goodwin Procter Layoffs
are most (all?) of these layoffs taking place in their boston office?
- Big Shrimpin
- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: Goodwin Procter Layoffs
what practice group (or industry or whatev) is it?szb5058 wrote:are most (all?) of these layoffs taking place in their boston office?
edit: nvm...from xoxo:
most of the associates who were let go were general business lit or securities lit types. the firm used to have a bunch of bank of america/countrywide mortgage fraud and securities litigation work based on that and most of that dried up last summer, i think. because that work kept so many associates fed, litigation as a whole was down.
Last edited by Big Shrimpin on Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Big Shrimpin
- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: Goodwin Procter Layoffs
*Fired Shitigator sits down for GP corp interview per severance letter*JohannDeMann wrote:Yeah you wouldn't fire someone to rehire them. This cost them some pretty bad press. That's just their response so they don't look shitty.
Interviewer: "So, why do you want to work at Goodwin Procter?"
Fired Shitigator: "..."
(Credit: xoxo)
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login