if u want NYC to 190, u need to do more deals. Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 12:37 pm
Re: if u want NYC to 190, u need to do more deals.
Number of corporate associates in the U.S. down by more than 25% from 2007
******
Despite disproportionate decrease in associates, deal flow on pace to be 75% of 2007
******
Real pay down 30% from 2007
******
TLS and partners: "Work harder if you want more pay!"
******
Despite disproportionate decrease in associates, deal flow on pace to be 75% of 2007
******
Real pay down 30% from 2007
******
TLS and partners: "Work harder if you want more pay!"
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: if u want NYC to 190, u need to do more deals.
i never said work harder. i just said do more deals, idiot. bring dat deal flow to 95% of 2007.dodgers327 wrote:Number of corporate associates in the U.S. down by more than 25% from 2007
******
Despite disproportionate decrease in associates, deal flow on pace to be 75% of 2007
******
Real pay down 30% from 2007
******
TLS and partners: "Work harder if you want more pay!"
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 12:37 pm
Re: if u want NYC to 190, u need to do more deals.
Lolzweitbester wrote:i never said work harder. i just said do more deals, idiot. bring dat deal flow to 95% of 2007.dodgers327 wrote:Number of corporate associates in the U.S. down by more than 25% from 2007
******
Despite disproportionate decrease in associates, deal flow on pace to be 75% of 2007
******
Real pay down 30% from 2007
******
TLS and partners: "Work harder if you want more pay!"
-
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:03 pm
Re: if u want NYC to 190, u need to do more deals.
Associates should unionizeDesert Fox wrote:Nah we need actual corp bros to do less deals. Bill 1700 hours and stop.911 crisis actor wrote:If every associate in NYC just did one more deal per year we could hit 190
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: if u want NYC to 190, u need to do more deals.
on a different note, lateral market for corp associates is hot hot hot. thought it was flame, but am law 100 partner told me his firm is offering "accelerated partner track" to midlevel corp associates.
maybe the corp associate lateral market is hot, but "accelerated partner track"... lol.
maybe the corp associate lateral market is hot, but "accelerated partner track"... lol.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 12:37 pm
Re: if u want NYC to 190, u need to do more deals.
"You'll be kicked out a year sooner!"zweitbester wrote:on a different note, lateral market for corp associates is hot hot hot. thought it was flame, but am law 100 partner told me his firm is offering "accelerated partner track" to midlevel corp associates.
maybe the corp associate lateral market is hot, but "accelerated partner track"... lol.
Yeah, lateral market has been hot all year for 2nd through 6th years.
- 84651846190
- Posts: 2198
- Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm
Re: if u want NYC to 190, u need to do more deals.
good luck with that911 crisis actor wrote:Associates should unionizeDesert Fox wrote:Nah we need actual corp bros to do less deals. Bill 1700 hours and stop.911 crisis actor wrote:If every associate in NYC just did one more deal per year we could hit 190
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
Re: if u want NYC to 190, u need to do more deals.
This is why corp bros should start slacking off. The more bodies they need the better comp will be because they gotta entice people to stay.zweitbester wrote:on a different note, lateral market for corp associates is hot hot hot. thought it was flame, but am law 100 partner told me his firm is offering "accelerated partner track" to midlevel corp associates.
maybe the corp associate lateral market is hot, but "accelerated partner track"... lol.
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:03 pm
Re: if u want NYC to 190, u need to do more deals.
We shall overcomeBiglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:good luck with that911 crisis actor wrote:Associates should unionizeDesert Fox wrote:Nah we need actual corp bros to do less deals. Bill 1700 hours and stop.911 crisis actor wrote:If every associate in NYC just did one more deal per year we could hit 190
We shall overcome
We shall overcome some day
-
- Posts: 432506
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: if u want NYC to 190, u need to do more deals.
Other option is where we all agree to keep working but not record our billable time for [month][2 weeks]. That way, the work still gets done, but the ones feeling the pain/worry are the partners. I suppose they could just estimate our time and send to client, though. Might be better way to send a message than not working at all. Stopping at 1700 sounds nice; would have been great to take off the months of August through December.911 crisis actor wrote:Associates should unionizeDesert Fox wrote:Nah we need actual corp bros to do less deals. Bill 1700 hours and stop.911 crisis actor wrote:If every associate in NYC just did one more deal per year we could hit 190
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: if u want NYC to 190, u need to do more deals.
you couldn't have thought of a better way to get fired very quickly.Other option is where we all agree to keep working but not record our billable time for [month][2 weeks]. That way, the work still gets done, but the ones feeling the pain/worry are the partners. I suppose they could just estimate our time and send to client, though. Might be better way to send a message than not working at all. Stopping at 1700 sounds nice; would have been great to take off the months of August through December.
-
- Posts: 432506
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: if u want NYC to 190, u need to do more deals.
Which is why you'd need all biglaw associates to do it at the same time.zweitbester wrote:you couldn't have thought of a better way to get fired very quickly.Other option is where we all agree to keep working but not record our billable time for [month][2 weeks]. That way, the work still gets done, but the ones feeling the pain/worry are the partners. I suppose they could just estimate our time and send to client, though. Might be better way to send a message than not working at all. Stopping at 1700 sounds nice; would have been great to take off the months of August through December.
- Calvin Murphy
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 1:58 am
Re: if u want NYC to 190, u need to do more deals.
I keep checking this thread to see if NYC has gone to 190.
Can someone just PM me when it happens so I can stop checking thread?
Can someone just PM me when it happens so I can stop checking thread?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1651
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:42 am
Re: if u want NYC to 190, u need to do more deals.
I predict that NYC will go to 175 before December 31, 2015.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: if u want NYC to 190, u need to do more deals.
You are very stupid to think that the thread title at all implies that NYC to 190. It's. Conditional statement; the context of which indicates that a a necessary condition hadn't occurred.Calvin Murphy wrote:I keep checking this thread to see if NYC has gone to 190.
Can someone just PM me when it happens so I can stop checking thread?
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: if u want NYC to 190, u need to do more deals.
whooshzweitbester wrote:You are very stupid to think that the thread title at all implies that NYC to 190. It's. Conditional statement; the context of which indicates that a a necessary condition hadn't occurred.Calvin Murphy wrote:I keep checking this thread to see if NYC has gone to 190.
Can someone just PM me when it happens so I can stop checking thread?
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 6:57 am
Re: if u want NYC to 190, u need to do more deals.
Any idea which one will make the first move? The only market leaders in recent years have been Cravath, SullCrom, and STB (and Skadden if you count a move that other firms didn't follow).Hutz_and_Goodman wrote:I predict that NYC will go to 175 before December 31, 2015.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- 84651846190
- Posts: 2198
- Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm
Re: if u want NYC to 190, u need to do more deals.
the leads are weak
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: if u want NYC to 190, u need to do more deals.
YOU'RE WEAKBiglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:the leads are weak
- utahraptor
- Posts: 3439
- Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2014 1:05 pm
Re: if u want NYC to 190, u need to do more deals.
I predict that another market will drop to 145k or lower before NYC goes to 175k.Hutz_and_Goodman wrote:I predict that NYC will go to 175 before December 31, 2015.
-
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:03 pm
Re: if u want NYC to 190, u need to do more deals.
Coffee's for closersBiglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:the leads are weak
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:03 pm
Re: if u want NYC to 190, u need to do more deals.
190k is for closers911 crisis actor wrote:Coffee's for closersBiglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:the leads are weak
- heythatslife
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 7:18 pm
Re: if u want NYC to 190, u need to do more deals.
If law students in a 1L section consisting of 70-80 people couldn't game the curve by collectively slacking off, then what makes you think they'll be able to pull off something like this industry-wide?Anonymous User wrote:Which is why you'd need all biglaw associates to do it at the same time.zweitbester wrote:you couldn't have thought of a better way to get fired very quickly.Other option is where we all agree to keep working but not record our billable time for [month][2 weeks]. That way, the work still gets done, but the ones feeling the pain/worry are the partners. I suppose they could just estimate our time and send to client, though. Might be better way to send a message than not working at all. Stopping at 1700 sounds nice; would have been great to take off the months of August through December.
- lacrossebrother
- Posts: 7150
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2014 11:15 pm
Re: if u want NYC to 190, u need to do more deals.
I don't see why anyone even does nyc at 160 when stl, Atl, Nash , Texas at even just 100 is a better way of life.
- Borg
- Posts: 369
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 6:08 pm
Re: if u want NYC to 190, u need to do more deals.
Two pages in without the words "supply" or "demand" ever entering the conversation...
This is why I think law school is stupid/worthless unless you a) know something about finance/economics already or b) aren't planning on doing anything related to business or the regulation thereof.
This is why I think law school is stupid/worthless unless you a) know something about finance/economics already or b) aren't planning on doing anything related to business or the regulation thereof.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login