What does a "good" inhouse position look like post Biglaw? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What does a "good" inhouse position look like post Biglaw?
Currently in-house for a large company. Company is in a big city, but not in one of the extremely high COL places. The figures thrown around in this thread are similar to the ones I see. You start out at about 150K with a couple of years of experience plus a good 401K match. Benefits are also better than a majority of Biglaw firms from what I can tell. Hours are reasonable, ~50hrs a week. You get promoted fairly quickly but we don't really give the big bonuses here until you make exec level. Every lawyer makes exec unless they're lazy or incompetent. Within the executive range our salary vary between about 230k and 450K and the bonuses range between nothing and 1.5 million/yr (stock/cash). Then there's the senior executive level. I actually don't know what type of compensation they get but I'm assuming the floor is close to 2 mil and the GC of the company is at least pulling in twice that.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What does a "good" inhouse position look like post Biglaw?
Can you speak to qualifications you see people being hired with? Any common threads or practice areas from firms?Anonymous User wrote:Currently in-house for a large company. Company is in a big city, but not in one of the extremely high COL places. The figures thrown around in this thread are similar to the ones I see. You start out at about 150K with a couple of years of experience plus a good 401K match. Benefits are also better than a majority of Biglaw firms from what I can tell. Hours are reasonable, ~50hrs a week. You get promoted fairly quickly but we don't really give the big bonuses here until you make exec level. Every lawyer makes exec unless they're lazy or incompetent. Within the executive range our salary vary between about 230k and 450K and the bonuses range between nothing and 1.5 million/yr (stock/cash). Then there's the senior executive level. I actually don't know what type of compensation they get but I'm assuming the floor is close to 2 mil and the GC of the company is at least pulling in twice that.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Thu Oct 16, 2014 12:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What does a "good" inhouse position look like post Biglaw?
We've actually been trending younger. Our last two hires (besides me) were IP attorney's, one was 2 years out of law school and worked at V50 firm from CCN. The other person had no firm experience but had worked with the company prior to going to law school at a TT.Anonymous User wrote:Can you speak to qualifications you see people walking in with?Anonymous User wrote:Currently in-house for a large company. Company is in a big city, but not in one of the extremely high COL places. The figures thrown around in this thread are similar to the ones I see. You start out at about 150K with a couple of years of experience plus a good 401K match. Benefits are also better than a majority of Biglaw firms from what I can tell. Hours are reasonable, ~50hrs a week. You get promoted fairly quickly but we don't really give the big bonuses here until you make exec level. Every lawyer makes exec unless they're lazy or incompetent. Within the executive range our salary vary between about 230k and 450K and the bonuses range between nothing and 1.5 million/yr (stock/cash). Then there's the senior executive level. I actually don't know what type of compensation they get but I'm assuming the floor is close to 2 mil and the GC of the company is at least pulling in twice that.
- patogordo
- Posts: 4826
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 3:33 am
Re: What does a "good" inhouse position look like post Biglaw?
ip transactions or patent prosecutors?
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What does a "good" inhouse position look like post Biglaw?
Truthfully, I don't know. I just know they are both engineers and handle IP matters. I'm not an IP attorney and we work in completely different buildings.patogordo wrote:ip transactions or patent prosecutors?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What does a "good" inhouse position look like post Biglaw?
These numbers seem high. I have friends in house at Google, Oracle and L3 and they have given me ballpark numbers that are much lower.Anonymous User wrote:Currently in-house for a large company. Company is in a big city, but not in one of the extremely high COL places. The figures thrown around in this thread are similar to the ones I see. You start out at about 150K with a couple of years of experience plus a good 401K match. Benefits are also better than a majority of Biglaw firms from what I can tell. Hours are reasonable, ~50hrs a week. You get promoted fairly quickly but we don't really give the big bonuses here until you make exec level. Every lawyer makes exec unless they're lazy or incompetent. Within the executive range our salary vary between about 230k and 450K and the bonuses range between nothing and 1.5 million/yr (stock/cash). Then there's the senior executive level. I actually don't know what type of compensation they get but I'm assuming the floor is close to 2 mil and the GC of the company is at least pulling in twice that.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What does a "good" inhouse position look like post Biglaw?
You may have a point, my numbers are specifically for my company. I do think my company pays on the higher side esp. when you factor in the lower cost of living. I was actually surprised because truthfully the salary is very similar to Biglaw and you don't have to worry about getting pushed out in 3 years. What numbers are you hearing?Anonymous User wrote:These numbers seem high. I have friends in house at Google, Oracle and L3 and they have given me ballpark numbers that are much lower.Anonymous User wrote:Currently in-house for a large company. Company is in a big city, but not in one of the extremely high COL places. The figures thrown around in this thread are similar to the ones I see. You start out at about 150K with a couple of years of experience plus a good 401K match. Benefits are also better than a majority of Biglaw firms from what I can tell. Hours are reasonable, ~50hrs a week. You get promoted fairly quickly but we don't really give the big bonuses here until you make exec level. Every lawyer makes exec unless they're lazy or incompetent. Within the executive range our salary vary between about 230k and 450K and the bonuses range between nothing and 1.5 million/yr (stock/cash). Then there's the senior executive level. I actually don't know what type of compensation they get but I'm assuming the floor is close to 2 mil and the GC of the company is at least pulling in twice that.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: What does a "good" inhouse position look like post Biglaw?
This is correct, but not appreciably lower. And it still varies. Amazon, for example, pays biglaw market.These numbers seem high. I have friends in house at Google, Oracle and L3 and they have given me ballpark numbers that are much lower.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What does a "good" inhouse position look like post Biglaw?
Plus bonus?zweitbester wrote:This is correct, but not appreciably lower. And it still varies. Amazon, for example, pays biglaw market.These numbers seem high. I have friends in house at Google, Oracle and L3 and they have given me ballpark numbers that are much lower.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What does a "good" inhouse position look like post Biglaw?
Anonymous User wrote:Currently in-house for a large company. Company is in a big city, but not in one of the extremely high COL places. The figures thrown around in this thread are similar to the ones I see. You start out at about 150K with a couple of years of experience plus a good 401K match. Benefits are also better than a majority of Biglaw firms from what I can tell. Hours are reasonable, ~50hrs a week. You get promoted fairly quickly but we don't really give the big bonuses here until you make exec level. Every lawyer makes exec unless they're lazy or incompetent. Within the executive range our salary vary between about 230k and 450K and the bonuses range between nothing and 1.5 million/yr (stock/cash). Then there's the senior executive level. I actually don't know what type of compensation they get but I'm assuming the floor is close to 2 mil and the GC of the company is at least pulling in twice that.
Is the work very specialized? How is career progression if you want to move inhouse jobs? is it harder/easier than from a law firm? Is that 150 including bonus?
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What does a "good" inhouse position look like post Biglaw?
1) It depends on the job, but most people move around to various departments. I can't really say much more than this because it would get too close to giving the company away.Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Currently in-house for a large company. Company is in a big city, but not in one of the extremely high COL places. The figures thrown around in this thread are similar to the ones I see. You start out at about 150K with a couple of years of experience plus a good 401K match. Benefits are also better than a majority of Biglaw firms from what I can tell. Hours are reasonable, ~50hrs a week. You get promoted fairly quickly but we don't really give the big bonuses here until you make exec level. Every lawyer makes exec unless they're lazy or incompetent. Within the executive range our salary vary between about 230k and 450K and the bonuses range between nothing and 1.5 million/yr (stock/cash). Then there's the senior executive level. I actually don't know what type of compensation they get but I'm assuming the floor is close to 2 mil and the GC of the company is at least pulling in twice that.
Is the work very specialized? How is career progression if you want to move inhouse jobs? is it harder/easier than from a law firm? Is that 150 including bonus?
2) You have to change positions to make it to the exec level.
3) I've never worked at a law firm besides a couple of summers, but most of my coworkers say the QOL is better.
4) You normally don't get a bonus until you've been here for a while, but even then your bonuses are less than 40K and those are pretty much limited to the top performers. At least until you reach Exec level.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Fri Oct 17, 2014 10:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 4:43 am
Re: What does a "good" inhouse position look like post Biglaw?
Lol.Anonymous User wrote:Not OP here. Anyone know the salary range of in-house positions? In the SF area or another high-cost of living area? Is $150k typical, and is this an entry-level salary that is likely to scale up? I'd be a bit disappointed if a successful end to this whole ordeal is a $150k job.
I know he lore -- in-house = better quality of life, better colleagues -- but $150k, as an adult probably raising a family at this point? That isn't close to enough money to raise a family comfortably in a high COL city.
(I live in a high COL area. If you're struggling to raise a family with $150, even here, you need to reexamine your priorities and take a good look at how you spend money. Or you grew up with a lot of money, are somehow oblivious about it, and have no real conception of how the average person lives. That too deserves some self-examination)
-
- Posts: 8058
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 2:47 pm
Re: What does a "good" inhouse position look like post Biglaw?
Do in-house attorneys no get paid on the same scale as other F500 middle/upper management types? Everyone I know who gets a bonus in that situation gets a % of base salary, determined annually on performance (Usually between 10% and 25%).
Last edited by FSK on Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What does a "good" inhouse position look like post Biglaw?
Once again this is specific to my company. But no one in my company gets bonuses like that. The bonuses are set on either an exec plan or high potential plan. Your bonus is a calculation between the level of job you have and your performance and this is static across all job functions including law.flawschoolkid wrote:Do in-house attorneys no get paid on the same scale as other F500 middle/upper management types? Everyone I know who gets a bonus in that situation gets a % of base salary, determined annually on performance (Usually between 10% and 25%).
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What does a "good" inhouse position look like post Biglaw?
I'm an in-house attorney at a software company. Just as another data point, my bonus is calculated as a percentage of my base salary, adjusted for my performance, how the company performed, etc.
That said, my base is high 5-figures, considerably less than the $150k people were talking about earlier. I'm also not in SF.
That said, my base is high 5-figures, considerably less than the $150k people were talking about earlier. I'm also not in SF.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What does a "good" inhouse position look like post Biglaw?
I think you're mistaken. Are you living in Chicago and confused as to what a "high COL area" is? Are you commuting from distant suburbs? Are you saving money for retirement? Raising a family with $150k = $450k mortgage, living mildly comfortable. If you are living a high COL area, raising a family in a 1BR or 2BR apartment (which, if you're lucky, you can find for $450k) sounds sucky. I, for my own life, don't see why I would bother living in a high COL city earning that amount of money. First, I'd be limited to one child. Second, what's the benefit? Move to the middle of the country and earn 50% as much $, and buy a nice 3BR house for $200k with plenty of cash to spare. Obviously, a low COL city has less to offer, but if you can't afford to enjoy what the city has to offer, then what's the point of living in a high COL city?iplulzer wrote:Lol.Anonymous User wrote:Not OP here. Anyone know the salary range of in-house positions? In the SF area or another high-cost of living area? Is $150k typical, and is this an entry-level salary that is likely to scale up? I'd be a bit disappointed if a successful end to this whole ordeal is a $150k job.
I know he lore -- in-house = better quality of life, better colleagues -- but $150k, as an adult probably raising a family at this point? That isn't close to enough money to raise a family comfortably in a high COL city.
(I live in a high COL area. If you're struggling to raise a family with $150, even here, you need to reexamine your priorities and take a good look at how you spend money. Or you grew up with a lot of money, are somehow oblivious about it, and have no real conception of how the average person lives. That too deserves some self-examination)
$150k is top 10%, and less than top 5%--of households--nationwide. (http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012 ... .html?_r=0). Top 10% = lucky -- I am grateful. But when only 28% of Americans hold a bachelor's degree (http://www.census.gov/prod/2012pubs/p20-566.pdf), top 10% isn't that great, relatively speaking. When you adjust for COL, and graduating from a top law school, $150k in SF or NYC or DC is somewhat-failing-at-life. Maybe I have the wrong life priorities. Please elaborate on your situation.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: What does a "good" inhouse position look like post Biglaw?
dumbass.$150k in SF or NYC or DC is somewhat-failing-at-life.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- wiseowl
- Posts: 1070
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 4:38 pm
Re: What does a "good" inhouse position look like post Biglaw?
[25 year old single K-JD living in a studio whose parents paid for LS]iplulzer wrote:Lol.Anonymous User wrote:Not OP here. Anyone know the salary range of in-house positions? In the SF area or another high-cost of living area? Is $150k typical, and is this an entry-level salary that is likely to scale up? I'd be a bit disappointed if a successful end to this whole ordeal is a $150k job.
I know he lore -- in-house = better quality of life, better colleagues -- but $150k, as an adult probably raising a family at this point? That isn't close to enough money to raise a family comfortably in a high COL city.
(I live in a high COL area. If you're struggling to raise a family with $150, even here, you need to reexamine your priorities and take a good look at how you spend money. Or you grew up with a lot of money, are somehow oblivious about it, and have no real conception of how the average person lives. That too deserves some self-examination)
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What does a "good" inhouse position look like post Biglaw?
I've gotten a really good vibe for the position. I am just afraid that it will limit my career prospects for the future.
- jrf12886
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 11:52 am
Re: What does a "good" inhouse position look like post Biglaw?
Lol.flawschoolkid wrote:Danger Zone wrote:Anonymous User wrote:but $150k, as an adult probably raising a family at this point? That isn't close to enough money to raise a family comfortably in a high COL city.
-
- Posts: 626
- Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 3:24 pm
Re: What does a "good" inhouse position look like post Biglaw?
zweitbester wrote:dumbass.$150k in SF or NYC or DC is somewhat-failing-at-life.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: What does a "good" inhouse position look like post Biglaw?
LOL. must be nice to be in a position to feel this way.$150k in SF or NYC or DC is somewhat-failing-at-life.
- 84651846190
- Posts: 2198
- Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm
Re: What does a "good" inhouse position look like post Biglaw?
Which prep school did you attend? Are mommy and daddy still paying for all of your expenses?$150k in SF or NYC or DC is somewhat-failing-at-life.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What does a "good" inhouse position look like post Biglaw?
Do you or anyone else know how attractive a JD/MBA (T10/M10) is to your/similar company(s)?Anonymous User wrote:Currently in-house for a large company. Company is in a big city, but not in one of the extremely high COL places. The figures thrown around in this thread are similar to the ones I see. You start out at about 150K with a couple of years of experience plus a good 401K match. Benefits are also better than a majority of Biglaw firms from what I can tell. Hours are reasonable, ~50hrs a week. You get promoted fairly quickly but we don't really give the big bonuses here until you make exec level. Every lawyer makes exec unless they're lazy or incompetent. Within the executive range our salary vary between about 230k and 450K and the bonuses range between nothing and 1.5 million/yr (stock/cash). Then there's the senior executive level. I actually don't know what type of compensation they get but I'm assuming the floor is close to 2 mil and the GC of the company is at least pulling in twice that.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What does a "good" inhouse position look like post Biglaw?
This is hilarious. Even living in Manhattan you can raise a family comfortably on 150k. Yes, you'll have to live in a small apartment and it'll be a while before you can buy your own, your kids will go to public school, you won't have a car, and you won't have a second house, but you'll be just fine. And if you want want any of those things, the easy solution is for your spouse to work so you have another income or move to the suburbs.A. Nony Mouse wrote:LOL. must be nice to be in a position to feel this way.$150k in SF or NYC or DC is somewhat-failing-at-life.
And in DC you can actually afford a nice townhouse in a nearby suburb (or a nice house in a more distant suburb) with good schools and a nice car on that income. Most families in high COL areas get by on a lot less.
Edit: Accidentally posted anon.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login