Does anyone realistically think this will happen in the near future, say next 2-4 years? (Not necessarily 190k, but an upward change in the lockstep scale). It seems beyond overdue, especially given the huge rise in PPP among elite firms.mvp99 wrote:nyc to 190k!
DF Thread Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432598
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: We a breaking records! But unfortunately ITE, no bonus +
- kjartan
- Posts: 1554
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2014 12:49 am
Re: We a breaking records! But unfortunately ITE, no bonus +
This is debt-crushingly true.DELG wrote:also unless you live at home or get living expenses paid you're gonna end up with a fat tab anyway
and let's be real they'd rather you went to HLS
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
Re: We a breaking records! But unfortunately ITE, no bonus +
It is no longer a total fantasy, but I don't think it'll happen. We might see bonuses start to right though.Anonymous User wrote:Does anyone realistically think this will happen in the near future, say next 2-4 years? (Not necessarily 190k, but an upward change in the lockstep scale). It seems beyond overdue, especially given the huge rise in PPP among elite firms.mvp99 wrote:nyc to 190k!
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1474
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:00 pm
Re: We a breaking records! But unfortunately ITE, no bonus +
Yes. And down the road the HLS guy will be picked before you for that GC job you always wanted.DELG wrote:also unless you live at home or get living expenses paid you're gonna end up with a fat tab anyway
and let's be real they'd rather you went to HLS
- patogordo
- Posts: 4826
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 3:33 am
Re: We a breaking records! But unfortunately ITE, no bonus +
they'll probably just add another tier of bonuses for high billers
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
Re: We a breaking records! But unfortunately ITE, no bonus +
It's also impossible for everyone to take a huge scholarship. The amount schools throw at "great admits" is grossly out of proportion to their value. The disconnect is caused by the ability of the schools to rape the rest of the student population by charging them obscene amounts of tuition, financed by government debt.
A 3.85/173 isn't worth 150k more than a 3.6/169.
A 3.85/173 isn't worth 150k more than a 3.6/169.
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
- patogordo
- Posts: 4826
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 3:33 am
Re: We a breaking records! But unfortunately ITE, no bonus +
what's the law schools actual cost on a full ride (tuition + fees) though. can't be that high.
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
Re: We a breaking records! But unfortunately ITE, no bonus +
Then neither is the cost of a person without scholarship.patogordo wrote:what's the law schools actual cost on a full ride (tuition + fees) though. can't be that high.
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 432598
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: We a breaking records! But unfortunately ITE, no bonus +
Mine will run about $80k total. ($27k-ish/year for living expenses).patogordo wrote:what's the law schools actual cost on a full ride (tuition + fees) though. can't be that high.
- FKASunny
- Posts: 3904
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:40 am
Re: We a breaking records! But unfortunately ITE, no bonus +
That's not what he was talking about. But congrats and thanks for sharing?Anonymous User wrote:Mine will run about $80k total. ($27k-ish/year for living expenses).patogordo wrote:what's the law schools actual cost on a full ride (tuition + fees) though. can't be that high.
-
- Posts: 911
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 10:26 pm
Re: We a breaking records! But unfortunately ITE, no bonus +
I'm the first one to agree that this profession and its ludicrous barrier to entry, i.e., law school, are ludicrous.DELG wrote:How about the fact that they demand we have an expensive, prestigious law degree to work here.hiima3L wrote:Oh you poor underpaid 1-3 year associates. Your wealth of knowledge and experience certainly justifies more $.
(Yes I mad and poor.)
But, frankly, I have 0 sympathy for new big lawl associates who complain about not getting a bonus after making $160k.
-
- Posts: 432598
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: We a breaking records! But unfortunately ITE, no bonus +
I went to a T2 for free in an expensive big city. I couch surfed at a friend's 1L summer and lived with my parents 2L summer. My 3L rent was a joke thanks to luckily stumbling into a rent-controlled apartment. I lived pretty damn frugally all 3 years--lots of shit food, no vacations, no nice clothes (except a couple of suits), and no big purchases except a new laptop when mine went swimming. I had to loan my idiot brother $5k, which was part of the reason I took a job in my hometown my 2L summer. No bar study loans.patogordo wrote:what's the law schools actual cost on a full ride (tuition + fees) though. can't be that high.
I ended up $56k in debt. It would have been less but I maxed the amount my 3L year when I started it without a job lined up. Got a job in October of 3L year so I went totally nuts 3L and ate take out every now and then and bought a $300 guitar. I probably could have left with under $50k had it not been for loaning money and breaking my laptop. But I'm not exaggerating how frugal I was. I lived by campus all 3 years so I went home/brought lunch almost every single day.
- FKASunny
- Posts: 3904
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:40 am
Re: We a breaking records! But unfortunately ITE, no bonus +
Seriously guys?
He meant what's the cost to the law school of giving someone a full ride, he wasn't soliciting a bunch of anecdotes on living expenses at T2s.
He meant what's the cost to the law school of giving someone a full ride, he wasn't soliciting a bunch of anecdotes on living expenses at T2s.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- DELG
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 7:15 pm
Re: We a breaking records! But unfortunately ITE, no bonus +
TBF no one wants sympathy we just want a better comp package. If comp was awarded according to how sympathetic the person was there would be no homeless war vets.hiima3L wrote:I'm the first one to agree that this profession and its ludicrous barrier to entry, i.e., law school, are ludicrous.DELG wrote:How about the fact that they demand we have an expensive, prestigious law degree to work here.hiima3L wrote:Oh you poor underpaid 1-3 year associates. Your wealth of knowledge and experience certainly justifies more $.
(Yes I mad and poor.)
But, frankly, I have 0 sympathy for new big lawl associates who complain about not getting a bonus after making $160k.
- kjartan
- Posts: 1554
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2014 12:49 am
Re: We a breaking records! But unfortunately ITE, no bonus +
LOL at this 160k flame. Sure, you're nominally making 160k, but factor in opportunity cost and debt repayment.hiima3L wrote:I'm the first one to agree that this profession and its ludicrous barrier to entry, i.e., law school, are ludicrous.DELG wrote:How about the fact that they demand we have an expensive, prestigious law degree to work here.hiima3L wrote:Oh you poor underpaid 1-3 year associates. Your wealth of knowledge and experience certainly justifies more $.
(Yes I mad and poor.)
But, frankly, I have 0 sympathy for new big lawl associates who complain about not getting a bonus after making $160k.
- DELG
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 7:15 pm
Re: We a breaking records! But unfortunately ITE, no bonus +
Weird taking shit personally schtick. Have you ever gotten screened for BPD?mvp99 wrote:Yes. And down the road the HLS guy will be picked before you for that GC job you always wanted.DELG wrote:also unless you live at home or get living expenses paid you're gonna end up with a fat tab anyway
and let's be real they'd rather you went to HLS
- 2014
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: We a breaking records! But unfortunately ITE, no bonus +
I'll be interested to see what happens this year if/when bonuses stay flat.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- DELG
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 7:15 pm
Re: We a breaking records! But unfortunately ITE, no bonus +
Also, this is like, such a grim, blindered idea of what you imagine my end game must be. It's like being a senior associate: only law students think practitioners actually hope to be there.DELG wrote:Weird taking shit personally schtick. Have you ever gotten screened for BPD?mvp99 wrote:Yes. And down the road the HLS guy will be picked before you for that GC job you always wanted.DELG wrote:also unless you live at home or get living expenses paid you're gonna end up with a fat tab anyway
and let's be real they'd rather you went to HLS
-
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:26 am
Re: We a breaking records! But unfortunately ITE, no bonus +
.
Last edited by JusticeJackson on Tue Nov 10, 2015 2:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 432598
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: We a breaking records! But unfortunately ITE, no bonus +
Know for a fact that my v100 will up bonus game this year, but no one will follow us.
- XxSpyKEx
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:48 am
Re: We a breaking records! But unfortunately ITE, no bonus +
Why increase salaries when the supply of top law school grads vastly outstrips demand each year? Honestly, firms in major cities could decrease salaries to $120k, and supply would still vastly outnumber demand (assuming all the big firms colluded and dropped salaries at the same time). As a practical matter, where else are you going to find an employer to pay you that much money with no experience whatsoever and nothing going for you but a degree from a t14? The only reason salaries got to $160k /year for first-year associates was because the tech-boom, where the firms were basically fighting tooth and nail for top law school grads (and basically anyone with a t14 degree and a pulse could easily get a biglaw job). Some firms tried to drop salaries after the financial crisis, but most firms didn't follow suit (probably because it reflects poorly on the firm), so biglaw salaries managed to remain at $160k /year for first-year associates. I think at this point firms are probably just waiting for inflation to do its thing where it better balances out the salaries with the supply of recent law school grads.Anonymous User wrote:Does anyone realistically think this will happen in the near future, say next 2-4 years? (Not necessarily 190k, but an upward change in the lockstep scale). It seems beyond overdue, especially given the huge rise in PPP among elite firms.mvp99 wrote:nyc to 190k!
Last edited by XxSpyKEx on Mon Oct 06, 2014 6:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- sideroxylon
- Posts: 2245
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 2:13 pm
Re: We a breaking records! But unfortunately ITE, no bonus +
i'm glad you have a working knowledge of 100 law firmsAnonymous User wrote:Know for a fact that my v100 will up bonus game this year, but no one will follow us.
(but earnestly hope you get your increased bonus!)
- 5ky
- Posts: 10835
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:10 pm
Re: We a breaking records! But unfortunately ITE, no bonus +
(Cahill)Anonymous User wrote:Know for a fact that my v100 will up bonus game this year, but no one will follow us.
- 5ky
- Posts: 10835
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:10 pm
Re: We a breaking records! But unfortunately ITE, no bonus +
They can bc Cahill has given above market bonuses + supplemental bonuses for years now, and nobody follows.sideroxylon wrote:i'm glad you have a working knowledge of 100 law firmsAnonymous User wrote:Know for a fact that my v100 will up bonus game this year, but no one will follow us.
(but earnestly hope you get your increased bonus!)
- sideroxylon
- Posts: 2245
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 2:13 pm
Re: We a breaking records! But unfortunately ITE, no bonus +
I took it to mean up it even more, but yeah Cahill could continue to pay its special bonuses or whatever.5ky wrote:They can bc Cahill has given above market bonuses + supplemental bonuses for years now, and nobody follows.sideroxylon wrote:i'm glad you have a working knowledge of 100 law firmsAnonymous User wrote:Know for a fact that my v100 will up bonus game this year, but no one will follow us.
(but earnestly hope you get your increased bonus!)
Would really like to see the return of the KIRKLAND SHATTERS meme.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login