baal hadad wrote:The most stunning indictment of Vault is that SRZ is ranked so low despite its peerlessness in funds work
Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings: Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Danger Zone

- Posts: 8258
- Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 10:36 am
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
- sideroxylon

- Posts: 2245
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 2:13 pm
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
let's do it in both threads

- jbagelboy

- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
Schulte is fine. It's a big vault rated market paying firm. It took shit because some dickwad opined on how it rivaled a couple of the most elite firms in manhattan, like Cravath and Davis Polk, a few weeks ago. The same could have happened to Chadbourne or HH or any other placeAnonymous User wrote:As someone who did CBs at both Cadwalader and SRZ, I don't really get the SRZ hate on here. I mean, they're a super profitable firm who paid above-market bonuses, and its not like (except for that one dude) they really have people trolling for them on here.NoLongerALurker wrote:Just based on this running joke, in 5 years SRZ will have jumped up into the V10 on TLS trolling alone. And that, folks, will be the real stunning indictment of vault rankings.baal hadad wrote:The most stunning indictment of Vault is that SRZ is ranked so low despite its peerlessness in funds work
On the other hand, agree with OP: Fuck Cadwalader, worst place I interviewed at. I'd rather work at Skadden or even SullCrom than there
- baal hadad

- Posts: 3167
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:57 pm
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
White and Case is way too high in vault
The cream don't go to white and case
The cream don't go to white and case
- El Pollito

- Posts: 20139
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
I got a really angry PM from cream guy for using this quote.baal hadad wrote:White and Case is way too high in vault
The cream don't go to white and case
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432820
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
i hope you're not as lousy of an attorney/ law student as you appear to be here, but then again, if you can't figure out why i said that, you don't know enough about either firm to have a useful opinion anyway.Anonymous User wrote:If you're not a real person, please never say so, because I love thinking you're real.Anonymous User wrote: cadwalader's attorneys seemed nicer when i visited. skadden was just cold and kept talking about exit options. (what is the point of going to a top law school if you aren't even trying to be partner?)
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432820
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
and you researched the entire firm or just one office?baal hadad wrote: It's funny bc when I was researching Cadwalader a couple years ago for OCI they were making 0 partners and only taking lateral partner
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432820
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
Dec 2013, 5 new partnersAnonymous User wrote:and you researched the entire firm or just one office?baal hadad wrote: It's funny bc when I was researching Cadwalader a couple years ago for OCI they were making 0 partners and only taking lateral partner
Joseph Beach, former Skadden associate
Athena Eastwood, former McDermott partner
Robert Kim, former Millbank associate
Michael Laraoff, also lateralled in with a team from another firm
Shlomo Boehm, MIGHT have been home grown
- baal hadad

- Posts: 3167
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:57 pm
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
I don't even remember that dudes username but I do remeber thatEl Pollito wrote:I got a really angry PM from cream guy for using this quote.baal hadad wrote:White and Case is way too high in vault
The cream don't go to white and case
- Old Gregg

- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
TransferGuy?baal hadad wrote:I don't even remember that dudes username but I do remeber thatEl Pollito wrote:I got a really angry PM from cream guy for using this quote.baal hadad wrote:White and Case is way too high in vault
The cream don't go to white and case
-
mw115

- Posts: 91
- Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 7:45 pm
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
Joe Beach, Athena Eastwood, Shlomo Boehm...
I thought you were making these people up, but lo and behold, they are real people.
I thought you were making these people up, but lo and behold, they are real people.
- baal hadad

- Posts: 3167
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:57 pm
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
ToTransferOrNotzweitbester wrote:TransferGuy?baal hadad wrote:I don't even remember that dudes username but I do remeber thatEl Pollito wrote:I got a really angry PM from cream guy for using this quote.baal hadad wrote:White and Case is way too high in vault
The cream don't go to white and case
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login