Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Which Firm

Schulte
22
37%
Fried Frank
25
42%
Decher
12
20%
 
Total votes: 59

Anonymous User
Posts: 432653
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Sep 14, 2014 10:15 pm

Fried Frank

Anonymous User
Posts: 432653
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Sep 15, 2014 6:52 pm

So it looks like no more offers (except maybe Chadbourne) are coming in. I'm gonna do second looks at at least FF and Schulte (maybe Dechert). What sorts of things are worth finding out in order to distinguish the firms? My biggest concerns are offer rates, FF's layoffs during and after the crisis, FF's recent partner departures and the vast differences in their revenues over the last few years. At Schulte, I'm worried about QOL, not being diversified practice-wise. I'm not sure how explicitly to ask these sorts of things.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432653
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Sep 15, 2014 9:15 pm

Anonymous User wrote:So it looks like no more offers (except maybe Chadbourne) are coming in. I'm gonna do second looks at at least FF and Schulte (maybe Dechert). What sorts of things are worth finding out in order to distinguish the firms? My biggest concerns are offer rates, FF's layoffs during and after the crisis, FF's recent partner departures and the vast differences in their revenues over the last few years. At Schulte, I'm worried about QOL, not being diversified practice-wise. I'm not sure how explicitly to ask these sorts of things.
Re QOL @ SRZ: They have a 2k minimum billable requirement to get your bonus. That's either good in that you have a goal and don't need to worry about competing with those around you gunning and you aren't worried if you are doing enough or is bad in that if there isn't enough work to go around, that could suck.

Offer rates seem to be 100% @ both these places


I always wanted to get honest numbers about actual billing hours of associates, amount of work available, and face time but really had no real way of asking this so I didn't even bother to do second looks.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432653
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Sep 16, 2014 12:19 am

Why the worry about QOL at SRZ but not FF? I've never heard bad things about the hours/people at SRZ - exactly the opposite in fact at least with respect to the people.

Never really heard anything good or bad with regards to QOL at FF.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432653
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Sep 23, 2014 9:09 am

Does anyone know anything about the partner departures at FF? I really don't know how much I should consider something like this: http://abovethelaw.com/2014/09/musical- ... s/#respond

Also how should I go about asking this? FWIW there are a ton of alumni of my school at the firm both partners and associates.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432653
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Sep 23, 2014 2:11 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Does anyone know anything about the partner departures at FF? I really don't know how much I should consider something like this: http://abovethelaw.com/2014/09/musical- ... s/#respond

Also how should I go about asking this? FWIW there are a ton of alumni of my school at the firm both partners and associates.
I would be concerned, its not like these are no-name partners.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432653
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Sep 23, 2014 10:04 pm

This is an awkward question, but I think most partners would leave if they got a significantly better deal somewhere else in terms of shares. It doesn't necessarily say something is wrong with FF, but the partners create the work so if it's a big hit, that will be rough for you.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432653
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:24 pm

Anonymous User wrote:This is an awkward question, but I think most partners would leave if they got a significantly better deal somewhere else in terms of shares. It doesn't necessarily say something is wrong with FF, but the partners create the work so if it's a big hit, that will be rough for you.
Thats what I was getting at. The firm's Co-Chair left along with 2 other big name partners. Thats a lot of business leaving the door (which results in less work and less need for first year associates, which could lead to more no-offers in the summer class).

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”