who anon's an exact quote anywayMal Reynolds wrote:Don't be a coward. Associate this with your username.Anonymous User wrote:moonman157 wrote:I'm just waiting for DF to post a threat that says "Remember: you and everyone you love will eventually die."
Any firm would Latham or Winston you if they had too Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Any firm would Latham or Winston you if they had too
- heavoldgotjuice
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 6:48 pm
Re: Any firm would Latham or Winston you if they had too
[racist language redacted] cock
-
- Posts: 16094
- Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2014 5:06 am
Re: Any firm would Latham or Winston you if they had too
No way, these are entertaining.brazleton wrote: Disagree. These are far worse.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Any firm would Latham or Winston you if they had too
Someone should (not me) try to correlate revenue drops with layoffs.
My guess it's a very strong correlation.
My guess it's a very strong correlation.
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Any firm would Latham or Winston you if they had too
Who's saying this isn't the case. Might as well avoid the notoriously bad offenders.Desert Fox wrote:Someone should (not me) try to correlate revenue drops with layoffs.
My guess it's a very strong correlation.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Any firm would Latham or Winston you if they had too
People who think firms are just inherently "evil" v. "good bros." Latham got fat on work that suddenly disappeared, they had lay offs. When Weil's BK stuff slowed down, they had lay offs.Mal Reynolds wrote:Who's saying this isn't the case. Might as well avoid the notoriously bad offenders.Desert Fox wrote:Someone should (not me) try to correlate revenue drops with layoffs.
My guess it's a very strong correlation.
The only way to avoid it is to go to a firm that will never be slow. That's a very narrow field of firms.
-
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:03 pm
Re: Any firm would Latham or Winston you if they had too
I've heard Schulte is never slow
-
- Posts: 375
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 1:43 pm
Re: Any firm would Latham or Winston you if they had too
Which ones?Desert Fox wrote: That's a very narrow field of firms.