TooOld4This wrote:This humble brag does not deserve a serious response.
TooOld4This wrote: Anyone who is this blinded by arbitrary prestige deserves what they get.
Anyone dumb enough to have offers at both sets of options and not understand what they mean is beyond saving.
Jesus, you people are assholes. The OP already has a response from a Sussman associate. Yes, the OP could talk to lawyers at those firms (or profs at his law school) about the decision, but it's not crazy for the OP to think that he or she might actually get more honest advice in a forum in which lawyers can post anonymously. There's nothing wrong with asking questions here as part of the information-gathering process.ImNoScar wrote:Yukos wrote:Why are you asking this here?
OP: If you're an aspiring litigator, the "V5" is not a meaningful demarcation line for prestige/compensation/opportunities. For litigation, there are several firms ranked between V10 and V20 that are better places for a litigator to work than, say, Skadden. You're probably better off thinking about this choice as "big law litigation" versus "boutique litigation." Forget the "V5" part. (Unless, of course, you think you might be interested in corporate, in which case you should definitely avoid a litigation boutique.)