DC is more competitive than CA. And within CA, SF is more competitive (and expensive) than LA.Nelson wrote:The short version of this thread: work life is much better pretty much anywhere outside of NYC. Problem is, outside of NYC means either lower offer rates and less $ (secondary market) or insanely competitive (DC, CA).
It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
- Nelson
- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:43 am
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
great use of anon to nitpick something that wasn't the point.Anonymous User wrote:DC is more competitive than CA. And within CA, SF is more competitive (and expensive) than LA.Nelson wrote:The short version of this thread: work life is much better pretty much anywhere outside of NYC. Problem is, outside of NYC means either lower offer rates and less $ (secondary market) or insanely competitive (DC, CA).
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
My point is that your point is generalized, overbroad, and misleading. There are markets outside of NYC where you can have the best of all worlds, contrary to the gist of your post.Nelson wrote:great use of anon to nitpick something that wasn't the point.Anonymous User wrote:DC is more competitive than CA. And within CA, SF is more competitive (and expensive) than LA.Nelson wrote:The short version of this thread: work life is much better pretty much anywhere outside of NYC. Problem is, outside of NYC means either lower offer rates and less $ (secondary market) or insanely competitive (DC, CA).
- megagnarley
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:58 am
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
Anon would you mind shooting me a PM? I have some specific MTO questions and you sound knowledgable.Anonymous User wrote:I did various types of litigation (notably, a cool entertainment law case). They don't have rigid practice groups and I did a bunch of different types of litigation assignments. Yes, they aren't as well known as some other firms and fly under the radar a little bit (maybe because they only have offices in California and many people want to practice on the east coast). They have had 3 partners confirmed to the 9th Circuit in the past few years, too.toothbrush wrote:What practice group were you in? Anything else you can share on MTO? I haven't heard about them before.Anonymous User wrote:Best: Munger, Tolles & Olson, hands down. I could pick pretty much any firm I wanted (top of the class at HYS) and I picked MTO and another firm that is higher ranked on Vault and split my summer. Summered there in the past 3 years and am clerking now but I will most likely return after my clerkship. Extremely high level work and good quality of life (relatively speaking, of course).
I'm happy to share more information/opinions. Do you have any specific questions?
Edit: To the degree that there is a correlation between being "family friendly" and having a higher quality of life, this link might be of interest: http://abovethelaw.com/2014/04/the-top- ... irms-2014/
- Nelson
- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:43 am
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
If you're the munger guy then just lol. This is why anon abuse sucks.Anonymous User wrote:My point is that your point is generalized, overbroad, and misleading. There are markets outside of NYC where you can have the best of all worlds, contrary to the gist of your post.Nelson wrote:great use of anon to nitpick something that wasn't the point.Anonymous User wrote:DC is more competitive than CA. And within CA, SF is more competitive (and expensive) than LA.Nelson wrote:The short version of this thread: work life is much better pretty much anywhere outside of NYC. Problem is, outside of NYC means either lower offer rates and less $ (secondary market) or insanely competitive (DC, CA).
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
PM'd.megagnarley wrote:Anon would you mind shooting me a PM? I have some specific MTO questions and you sound knowledgable.Anonymous User wrote:I did various types of litigation (notably, a cool entertainment law case). They don't have rigid practice groups and I did a bunch of different types of litigation assignments. Yes, they aren't as well known as some other firms and fly under the radar a little bit (maybe because they only have offices in California and many people want to practice on the east coast). They have had 3 partners confirmed to the 9th Circuit in the past few years, too.toothbrush wrote:What practice group were you in? Anything else you can share on MTO? I haven't heard about them before.Anonymous User wrote:Best: Munger, Tolles & Olson, hands down. I could pick pretty much any firm I wanted (top of the class at HYS) and I picked MTO and another firm that is higher ranked on Vault and split my summer. Summered there in the past 3 years and am clerking now but I will most likely return after my clerkship. Extremely high level work and good quality of life (relatively speaking, of course).
I'm happy to share more information/opinions. Do you have any specific questions?
Edit: To the degree that there is a correlation between being "family friendly" and having a higher quality of life, this link might be of interest: http://abovethelaw.com/2014/04/the-top- ... irms-2014/
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 12:55 pm
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
I'd appreciate a PM on MTO, too - thank you!
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
PM'd.JVK wrote:I'd appreciate a PM on MTO, too - thank you!