Quinn v. Boies v. Kasowitz v. smaller lit boutique Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Which should I pick?

Quinn
8
15%
Boies
18
34%
Kasowitz
5
9%
Keker
22
42%
 
Total votes: 53

Anonymous User
Posts: 432521
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Quinn v. Boies v. Kasowitz v. smaller lit boutique

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Aug 17, 2013 1:06 pm

Yes I should clarify that I'm a 2L and these are all SA offers. I'm aware that I'll need to clerk if I want a permanent position at Keker but was planning on applying for clerkships anyhow

JusticeJackson

Silver
Posts: 609
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:26 am

Re: Quinn v. Boies v. Kasowitz v. smaller lit boutique

Post by JusticeJackson » Sat Aug 17, 2013 1:10 pm

.
Last edited by JusticeJackson on Tue Dec 24, 2013 3:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Old Gregg

Platinum
Posts: 5409
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm

Re: Quinn v. Boies v. Kasowitz v. smaller lit boutique

Post by Old Gregg » Sat Aug 17, 2013 2:14 pm

Don't think that really changes things. Also, Keker repped HTC in HTC v. Apple.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”