Quinn v. Boies v. Kasowitz v. smaller lit boutique Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Quinn v. Boies v. Kasowitz v. smaller lit boutique
Yes I should clarify that I'm a 2L and these are all SA offers. I'm aware that I'll need to clerk if I want a permanent position at Keker but was planning on applying for clerkships anyhow
-
JusticeJackson
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:26 am
Re: Quinn v. Boies v. Kasowitz v. smaller lit boutique
.
Last edited by JusticeJackson on Tue Dec 24, 2013 3:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Quinn v. Boies v. Kasowitz v. smaller lit boutique
Don't think that really changes things. Also, Keker repped HTC in HTC v. Apple.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
