(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432579
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Tue Feb 07, 2012 1:48 am
Anonymous User wrote:You can post anonymously in the comments, or PM GTL here on TLS. But I agree he should have a throwaway @gmail or something. I have some info I'd like to email anonymously, don't want it in PM here and don't really want it forever in the comments on the blog (even if anonymous)
totally agree. I have info on the clerks in a circuit, but I'd rather send it through a throw-away.
-
gotmilk?

- Posts: 204
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:25 am
Post
by gotmilk? » Wed Feb 08, 2012 8:05 pm
Hey G.T.L. Rev, any chance you can find some Fed Circuit info? It seems like that knowledge is really hard to come by elsewhere.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432579
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Wed Feb 08, 2012 11:00 pm
So I'm sitting here looking at the materials I've gathered on my own to get ready to apply to clerkships, wondering whether I want to send it into your site. As I think about it more and more, I'm not sure it is to my advantage.
Feel free not to answer this, but is your intention with this site to contribute to the implosion of the clerkship hiring system? Would you have wanted a site like this when you were applying to clerkships? I expect this will reduce some of the effects of top schools' law reviews having great resources on clerkships to the exclusion of others. Is that your intention?
-
kalvano

- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Post
by kalvano » Wed Feb 08, 2012 11:30 pm
So on your SDNY post, you say 3 judges are currently hiring for 2013-14 via OSCAR. Yet I don't even have a "Judges" sub-tab under "Search For Positions" available. Nor does searching for their name find them.
-
kalvano

- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Post
by kalvano » Wed Feb 08, 2012 11:39 pm
So I need to dump my classification on OSCAR in order to be able to see judges that are currently hiring people in my classification?
Edit - yes, I do. That's stupid. OSCAR requires you to identify your expected graduation date, so I set it to this year instead of next. But now won't any potential applications be wrong? Or does no one pay attention to what is on the OSCAR profile?
Last edited by
kalvano on Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
kalvano

- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Post
by kalvano » Wed Feb 08, 2012 11:53 pm
But what about those judges that are currently hiring for a start date in Fall of 2013 (when I am looking to start)...that would be off-plan, so send a paper copy, correct?
Last edited by
kalvano on Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
kalvano

- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Post
by kalvano » Thu Feb 09, 2012 12:03 am
Indeed. But there are a LOT of judges that are "currently accepting" applications for starting in 2013. I was surprised at how many...your post about the hiring plan imploding is spot-on.
Last edited by
kalvano on Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
AreJay711

- Posts: 3406
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:51 pm
Post
by AreJay711 » Thu Feb 09, 2012 12:21 am
You posted that in the "Clerk Taking Q's" thread and I checked it out. Seems like a great idea (even though I don't need to worry about COA judges)
-
kalvano

- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Post
by kalvano » Thu Feb 09, 2012 12:22 am
I suppose one final question - in the judge's information tab, they indicate preferred class ranking, etc. Are they like law firms and only kinda-sorta abide by that, or do they hold pretty firm to that line?
Last edited by
kalvano on Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register for access!
Did I mention it was FREE ?
Already a member? Login
-
kalvano

- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Post
by kalvano » Thu Feb 09, 2012 12:31 am
..
Last edited by
kalvano on Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
JamMasterJ

- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Post
by JamMasterJ » Thu Feb 09, 2012 12:36 am
tagged for future, future, future reference
-
JusticeHarlan

- Posts: 1516
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:56 pm
Post
by JusticeHarlan » Fri Feb 10, 2012 12:32 am
I don't know if I've said this yet, but you're the greatest human being since Raoul Wallenberg.
Thanks bro
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432579
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:08 am
G. T. L. Rev. wrote:Today's post: expanded feeder judge data (LinkRemoved) covering the past ten terms.
Thanks for doing this! I noticed that you're missing Judge Berzon on the Ninth Circuit. One of her clerks, a Boalt grad, is clerking for Ginsburg this term (OT 2011). He was also a Bristow, I believe.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432579
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Mon Feb 13, 2012 9:39 pm
G. T. L. Rev. wrote:I see from the blog stats that the district court posts are quite popular. Which districts do you want next (D.D.C. and D. Mass are already scheduled to go up this week)? And what else can we add to the district court profiles that might be helpful?
N.D. Cal., N.D. Ill., E.D. Pa., E.D. Va., and D. Conn. would all be phenomenal.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432579
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Mon Feb 13, 2012 9:44 pm
G. T. L. Rev. wrote:I see from the blog stats that the district court posts are quite popular. Which districts do you want next (D.D.C. and D. Mass are already scheduled to go up this week)? And what else can we add to the district court profiles that might be helpful?
Seconding EDVA!
-
kalvano

- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Post
by kalvano » Mon Feb 13, 2012 9:45 pm
N.D and E.D TX would be much appreciated.
-
kalvano

- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Post
by kalvano » Wed Feb 15, 2012 7:40 pm
I assume you get OSCAR updates, but in case you don't, Judge Haynes of the 5th Circuit COA in Dallas just opened an application for the 2013-14 term, and she's going off-plan it looks like. Apps accepted from yesterday until June 1 of 2012.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
romothesavior

- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Post
by romothesavior » Wed Feb 15, 2012 8:19 pm
G. T. L. Rev. wrote:Also, check out today's post, which lists the COA judges with "available" 2013-14 slots on OSCAR.
This is probably a noobish question, but where do you see the list of judges with "available" on OSCAR? All I see is positions for staff attorneys on the drop down bar.
-
romothesavior

- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Post
by romothesavior » Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:27 pm
That's what I figured. I wonder if there is a way around it, I'd like to see what is up.
-
kalvano

- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Post
by kalvano » Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:07 pm
..
Last edited by
kalvano on Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
kalvano

- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Post
by kalvano » Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:08 pm
romothesavior wrote:That's what I figured. I wonder if there is a way around it, I'd like to see what is up.
Just change the info in your profile. I did.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
-
IAFG

- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Post
by IAFG » Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:12 pm
Dumb question... how do you know which judges only look at alumni?
-
IAFG

- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Post
by IAFG » Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:16 pm
G. T. L. Rev. wrote:IAFG wrote:Dumb question... how do you know which judges only look at alumni?
They often say so on OSCAR. Others just develop a reputation for it.
thanks

i know you're getting snowed under with questions so i was hesitant to ask.
-
romothesavior

- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Post
by romothesavior » Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:27 pm
G. T. L. Rev. wrote:romothesavior wrote:That's what I figured. I wonder if there is a way around it, I'd like to see what is up.
1. Make an OSCAR account for your goldfish.
2. Tell OSCAR the goldfish is 2009 grad.
3. ???
4. PROFIT!
But... I don't have a goldfish...
headasplode.jpg
ETA: Didn't mean for this to be anon... egregious abuse of the anon feature by Romo, please moderate.
-
fatduck

- Posts: 4135
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:16 pm
Post
by fatduck » Thu Feb 16, 2012 11:36 pm
G. T. L. Rev continues to rule
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login