TBF, it's more like anonymous poster vs. anonymous poster who claims to be current COA clerk.vamedic03 wrote:Anonymous User wrote:I've heard from practicing attorneys that you get WAY more out of a D. Ct. clerkship in terms of practical experience for the vast majority of litigation practices. CoA clerkships are desirable because of the prestige and because a lot of brainy people have fantasies about being appellate litigators.G. T. L. Rev. wrote:Say what? Obviously people are going to have differing opinions on varioys types of legal jobs, but to cast COA clerkships as a universally bad experience is pretty ridiculous. I happen to love mine, and I can think of several hundred applicants we turned down who would jump at the chance to come on board next year.Anonymous User wrote: CoAs aren't really good experiences either... The dockets are so light and the judges kinda just do whatever the hell they want since they are article III judges and can't be fired. The reason you do them is because they are really prestigious. But I guess the same isn't necessarily true of state supreme courts.
Hmm... anonymous poster who's heard rumors versus a nonanonymous current COA clerk.
Making Clerkship Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- RVP11
- Posts: 2774
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:32 pm
Re: Making Clerkship
- vanwinkle
- Posts: 8953
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am
Re: Making Clerkship
I can personally understand trial litigators having this POV; of course they're going to say something like this, since they're trial litigators and thus trial-biased. And there is something practical to working in a district court if you're actually going to be a trial litigator, because unlike in a COA clerkship you get to actually witness trials and learn how they work from the judge's perspective, and to a trial litigator that could be very useful. However, with regard to legal training, everything I've read says COA clerkships are more desirable because they're solely about matters of law and legal application, and push you further intellectually as a result.Anonymous User wrote:I've heard from practicing attorneys that you get WAY more out of a D. Ct. clerkship in terms of practical experience for the vast majority of litigation practices. CoA clerkships are desirable because of the prestige and because a lot of brainy people have fantasies about being appellate litigators.
And, of course, there is the prestige.
-
- Posts: 432618
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Making Clerkship
A lot of alum that I talked to that did or were in CoA clerkships said basically this as well (i.e. that they loved the job but thought they might have gained more by doing a D. Ct. first).Anonymous User wrote:I've heard from practicing attorneys that you get WAY more out of a D. Ct. clerkship in terms of practical experience for the vast majority of litigation practices. CoA clerkships are desirable because of the prestige and because a lot of brainy people have fantasies about being appellate litigators.G. T. L. Rev. wrote:Say what? Obviously people are going to have differing opinions on varioys types of legal jobs, but to cast COA clerkships as a universally bad experience is pretty ridiculous. I happen to love mine, and I can think of several hundred applicants we turned down who would jump at the chance to come on board next year.Anonymous User wrote: CoAs aren't really good experiences either... The dockets are so light and the judges kinda just do whatever the hell they want since they are article III judges and can't be fired. The reason you do them is because they are really prestigious. But I guess the same isn't necessarily true of state supreme courts.
-
- Posts: 432618
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Making Clerkship
This....Anonymous User wrote:No on LR, being published, or faculty going to bat for me. But a judge in one of those districts knows me well and would probably recommend me to others on his district.G. T. L. Rev. wrote:LR? Published? Faculty going to make calls for you? If yes on all three, then I'd say a pretty good shot but not a lock; if only two, a nonzero, but far from guaranteed chance remains; and if one or none, then the odds are against you. Finish strong, lock up strong faculty support, and apply as an alum (for a year after graduation) if you want to maximize your odds.Anonymous User wrote:How hard to get a flyover district court clerkship from top 25% at T10? Or how about SD California, Nevada, Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, Oregon?
???
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 10:17 pm
Re: Making Clerkship
This question is relevant to my interests. Music conservatory undergrad, music teaching WE, no grad school.Anonymous User wrote:Does undergrad or work experience matter at all when it comes to clerkships? Focusing more on lack of prestigious undergrad and lack of work experience hurting a top students chances than the opposite being a benefit.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login