SullCrom v. DPW Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432831
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: SullCrom v. DPW
It is, I was the person who took Skadden over the other two a few posts ago and yes it is a crap shoot. Like I said my decision making wasn't 100% rational and at some point you just have to find some personal way to differentiate them and that was my way just because I thought in my head (although apparently mistakenly) about Skadden's M&A/Lit relative strength.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432831
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: SullCrom v. DPW
Looking to do M&A and you chose Skadden ... you're in very good shape my friend! Congrats on the decision.Anonymous User wrote:It is, I was the person who took Skadden over the other two a few posts ago and yes it is a crap shoot. Like I said my decision making wasn't 100% rational and at some point you just have to find some personal way to differentiate them and that was my way just because I thought in my head (although apparently mistakenly) about Skadden's M&A/Lit relative strength.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
