Mlk&Ckies wrote:Is it really awkward in the office right now for people not at Cravath?
Lots of associate huddles and silence around partners who are mourning the loss of their down payment for the Outer Banks home
Mlk&Ckies wrote:Is it really awkward in the office right now for people not at Cravath?
Yes. No one is working.Mlk&Ckies wrote:Is it really awkward in the office right now for people not at Cravath?
It's a little worse than that since bonuses are typically considered supplemental wages and taxed at a flat 25% (unless biglaw aggregates?). Still, more money is more money.sweeteavodka wrote:Bonuses are merely deferred compensation. If first year bonuses drop from $15k to $10k, that's still a raise, and money now is better than money later.desertlaw wrote:Curmudgeon partner in our office just said that bonuses will probably go down a bit. Thoughts?
Obviously, though, I'd rather bonuses stay flat or up. But if lower bonuses and higher base pay is the new normal, I'll take that trade any day.
Actus Reus wrote:Mlk&Ckies wrote:Is it really awkward in the office right now for people not at Cravath?
Lots of associate huddles and silence around partners who are mourning the loss of their down payment for the Outer Banks home
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Why? If Latham, Skadden, Kirkland go to 180k in their DC offices, I can't imagine Covington, A&P, Wilmer, etc. would not as well.Desert Fox wrote:They'll match for their NYC office, but I'm not so sure about their the DC offices.Wolfpac2 wrote:I doubt this. Seems like there is a difference between not matching NYC bonuses, as some elite DC offices have done in the past, and not matching standard NYC pay scale.Desert Fox wrote:Most of the comp leaders won't do NYC only. But I could see a bunch of V50's only doing NYC. It'll be interesting to see what Latham, Skadden, K&E, Quinn, and Gibson do. If they all go 180k in CA & DC, I don't see how the most of the rest of the V50 don't.bruinfan10 wrote:odds that this is a nyc-only raise?
But for DC, I could see Covington, A&P, etc. not doing 180k.
Bonuses are taxed at same rate as wages. Both are considered income. However, withholding is calculated differently for bonuses than wages. You get that back when you file for your refund.JenDarby wrote:It's a little worse than that since bonuses are typically considered supplemental wages and taxed at a flat 25% (unless biglaw aggregates?). Still, more money is more money.sweeteavodka wrote:Bonuses are merely deferred compensation. If first year bonuses drop from $15k to $10k, that's still a raise, and money now is better than money later.desertlaw wrote:Curmudgeon partner in our office just said that bonuses will probably go down a bit. Thoughts?
Obviously, though, I'd rather bonuses stay flat or up. But if lower bonuses and higher base pay is the new normal, I'll take that trade any day.
Bonuses can be considered income (employer aggregates) or supplemental income. If they're paid out as supplemental income then it is a flat 25% (unless the bonus is over a mil then it's a whole other story). For high earners, supplemental income bonuses are generally preferable.Anonymous User wrote:Bonuses are taxed at same rate as wages. Both are considered income. However, withholding is calculated differently for bonuses than wages. You get that back when you file for your refund.JenDarby wrote:It's a little worse than that since bonuses are typically considered supplemental wages and taxed at a flat 25% (unless biglaw aggregates?). Still, more money is more money.sweeteavodka wrote:Bonuses are merely deferred compensation. If first year bonuses drop from $15k to $10k, that's still a raise, and money now is better than money later.desertlaw wrote:Curmudgeon partner in our office just said that bonuses will probably go down a bit. Thoughts?
Obviously, though, I'd rather bonuses stay flat or up. But if lower bonuses and higher base pay is the new normal, I'll take that trade any day.
where you at Johann??WestOfTheRest wrote:Can't help but laugh at all the asshats in here who were so adamant this wouldn't happen.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Does this actually matter for tax payment or does it only matter for withholding.JenDarby wrote:Bonuses can be considered income (employer aggregates) or supplemental income. If they're paid out as supplemental income then it is a flat 25% (unless the bonus is over a mil then it's a whole other story). For high earners, supplemental income bonuses are generally preferable.Anonymous User wrote:Bonuses are taxed at same rate as wages. Both are considered income. However, withholding is calculated differently for bonuses than wages. You get that back when you file for your refund.JenDarby wrote:It's a little worse than that since bonuses are typically considered supplemental wages and taxed at a flat 25% (unless biglaw aggregates?). Still, more money is more money.sweeteavodka wrote:Bonuses are merely deferred compensation. If first year bonuses drop from $15k to $10k, that's still a raise, and money now is better than money later.desertlaw wrote:Curmudgeon partner in our office just said that bonuses will probably go down a bit. Thoughts?
Obviously, though, I'd rather bonuses stay flat or up. But if lower bonuses and higher base pay is the new normal, I'll take that trade any day.
So if you're saying that biglaw aggregates, then yes t doesn't matter. Why is that post even anon.
I'm saying doesn't matter cuz when you file your tax return, any diff between tax rates of bonuses is moot cuz it's taxed like general income and u get $ back or pay more depending on how taxes were withheld. Withholding is different for supplemental wages, tax rates are not.JenDarby wrote:Bonuses can be considered income (employer aggregates) or supplemental income. If they're paid out as supplemental income then it is a flat 25% (unless the bonus is over a mil then it's a whole other story). For high earners, supplemental income bonuses are generally preferable.Anonymous User wrote:Bonuses are taxed at same rate as wages. Both are considered income. However, withholding is calculated differently for bonuses than wages. You get that back when you file for your refund.JenDarby wrote:It's a little worse than that since bonuses are typically considered supplemental wages and taxed at a flat 25% (unless biglaw aggregates?). Still, more money is more money.sweeteavodka wrote:Bonuses are merely deferred compensation. If first year bonuses drop from $15k to $10k, that's still a raise, and money now is better than money later.desertlaw wrote:Curmudgeon partner in our office just said that bonuses will probably go down a bit. Thoughts?
Obviously, though, I'd rather bonuses stay flat or up. But if lower bonuses and higher base pay is the new normal, I'll take that trade any day.
So if you're saying that biglaw aggregates, then yes t doesn't matter. Why is that post even anon.
Don't you still come out ahead after bonus + benefits? And your job isn't horrible since you're not doing biglaw.TripTrip wrote:MFW I signed with MBB just before the legal salary bump.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
Yeah withholding =/= actual tax liability.Desert Fox wrote:Does this actually matter for tax payment or does it only matter for withholding.JenDarby wrote:Bonuses can be considered income (employer aggregates) or supplemental income. If they're paid out as supplemental income then it is a flat 25% (unless the bonus is over a mil then it's a whole other story). For high earners, supplemental income bonuses are generally preferable.Anonymous User wrote:Bonuses are taxed at same rate as wages. Both are considered income. However, withholding is calculated differently for bonuses than wages. You get that back when you file for your refund.JenDarby wrote:It's a little worse than that since bonuses are typically considered supplemental wages and taxed at a flat 25% (unless biglaw aggregates?). Still, more money is more money.sweeteavodka wrote:Bonuses are merely deferred compensation. If first year bonuses drop from $15k to $10k, that's still a raise, and money now is better than money later.desertlaw wrote:Curmudgeon partner in our office just said that bonuses will probably go down a bit. Thoughts?
Obviously, though, I'd rather bonuses stay flat or up. But if lower bonuses and higher base pay is the new normal, I'll take that trade any day.
So if you're saying that biglaw aggregates, then yes t doesn't matter. Why is that post even anon.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
It doesn't matter - people just get confused about this issue all the time.JenDarby wrote:Well shit, if it's purely for withholdings why do people even give a fuck. I' have multiple coworkers with very strong opinions on this.
BAN BAN BANPomeranian wrote:Cravath is a small elite office that could do this easily.
Most economic indicators point to another recession looming. The official government May jobs report was the worse figure in at least five years! When the economy crashes again, I don't think too many on here will be celebrating!
Woof!
Don't worry, soon America Will Be Great, Again!Pomeranian wrote:Cravath is a small elite office that could do this easily.
Most economic indicators point to another recession looming. The official government May jobs report was the worse figure in at least five years! When the economy crashes again, I don't think too many on here will be celebrating!
Woof!
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login