Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk Scale: NYC to 215-396.5k
Fried Frank match (again), reflected in 3/31 paycheck and retroactive to 1/1.
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk Scale: NYC to 215-396.5k
Weil match, retro to 1/1
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk Scale: NYC to 215-396.5k
Latham hasn't matched yet and I was stuffing my bag full of snacks from the office last night in anger when I realized these are *Kirkland* brand snacks, not name brand. Obvioulsy the firm is going bankrupt and no raise coming.
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk Scale: NYC to 215-396.5k
Yeah but among law firms Kirkland snacks are actually more expensive because of the above-market bonuses.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 25, 2022 1:15 pmLatham hasn't matched yet and I was stuffing my bag full of snacks from the office last night in anger when I realized these are *Kirkland* brand snacks, not name brand. Obvioulsy the firm is going bankrupt and no raise coming.
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk Scale: NYC to 215-396.5k
above market bonus, below market dollars per hour workedAnonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 25, 2022 1:33 pmYeah but among law firms Kirkland snacks are actually more expensive because of the above-market bonuses.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk Scale: NYC to 215-396.5k
Stroock matched! Not sure if anyone cares, but I'm a happy camper 

-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk Scale: NYC to 215-396.5k
Because the rest of the V10 isn't working just as muchAnonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 25, 2022 1:51 pmabove market bonus, below market dollars per hour workedAnonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 25, 2022 1:33 pmYeah but among law firms Kirkland snacks are actually more expensive because of the above-market bonuses.

-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk Scale: NYC to 215-396.5k
Did S&C match? I didn't see anything from them on the move to 205 or this new one to 215
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk Scale: NYC to 215-396.5k
As an aside, I am at an AmLaw100 firm that doesn’t pay market but generally bumps when the market moves. However, they haven’t done any raises to correspond to this recent increase. Anyone else at a similarly situated firm?
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk Scale: NYC to 215-396.5k
S&C did match the move to 205 (with the 202.5 for stubs). Probably waiting for their next partner meeting to move to 215.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Feb 26, 2022 7:00 pmDid S&C match? I didn't see anything from them on the move to 205 or this new one to 215
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk Scale: NYC to 215-396.5k
Seeing these raises as a third year causes some sadness. Guess it was inevitable that juniors were going to get comparatively shafted at some pointed. Oh well, had decided last year to stick around for at least four years in total, so at least get to reap some of these benefits at some point.
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk Scale: NYC to 215-396.5k
Will Cravath match tomorrow or give everyone +5/10K bumps over DPW?
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk Scale: NYC to 215-396.5k
can you elaborate?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Feb 23, 2022 7:05 pmThose cheap bastards might match the scale for juniors but they compress mid-level and senior associate salaries.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 931
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:29 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk Scale: NYC to 215-396.5k
They actually shaft everyone now.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 8:49 pmcan you elaborate?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Feb 23, 2022 7:05 pmThose cheap bastards might match the scale for juniors but they compress mid-level and senior associate salaries.
Before they went to the two tier scale, they were market the first 2-3 years regardless of hours.
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk Scale: NYC to 215-396.5k
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 7:08 pmWill Cravath match tomorrow or give everyone +5/10K bumps over DPW?
Can Cravath afford to lol? I feel like they might even want to give up that market leader spot because they're noticeably less profitable (like by at least half a million) than their peers.
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk Scale: NYC to 215-396.5k
Gibson Dunn match.
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk Scale: NYC to 215-396.5k
The ATL post is so tone deaf: https://abovethelaw.com/2022/02/gibson-raises-22/
Disgusting.There’s a lot of awful in the world right now. But if you need some relief from scrolling the Kyiv Independent’s feed for the latest in the war effort, perhaps this will help. Another Biglaw firm has decided to share the proceeds of their good year with hardworking associates in the form of raises.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk Scale: NYC to 215-396.5k
Huge yikesAnonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 10:41 amThe ATL post is so tone deaf: https://abovethelaw.com/2022/02/gibson-raises-22/
Disgusting.There’s a lot of awful in the world right now. But if you need some relief from scrolling the Kyiv Independent’s feed for the latest in the war effort, perhaps this will help. Another Biglaw firm has decided to share the proceeds of their good year with hardworking associates in the form of raises.
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk Scale: NYC to 215-396.5k
Just needed a rant and this seemed like the most appropriate thread…
I keep seeing hot takes in my LinkedIn feed, including to linked articles in the legal media, about how these pay hikes will upset clients, because the costs of the hikes are ultimately being passed onto them. One even said, Milbank is positioning themselves terribly from a client standpoint by pushing for these pay increases.
Surely, people see through this ridiculous argument? No firm is going out to the market and saying, “You’ll need to pay us more because, well, we need to fund the latest associate pay hike.”
Legal fees are a function of pure economics (supply, demand, price elasticity, etc.) I’m sure clients would pay law firms peanuts if it was feasible from a business perspective. Most of the improved market position has been to the benefit of the equity partnerships in the form of record levels of PEP. Good for them. Associate pay is a cost of doing business for the firm (similar to office space, IT equipment and so on). There also is a market for associate hiring and retention, and a price point for not just having access to the best legal talent, but even putting bums on seats with the current workload burden.
A lot of the arguments out there seem to come from disgruntled partners who are being greedy and want to disingenuously reframe the situation.
I keep seeing hot takes in my LinkedIn feed, including to linked articles in the legal media, about how these pay hikes will upset clients, because the costs of the hikes are ultimately being passed onto them. One even said, Milbank is positioning themselves terribly from a client standpoint by pushing for these pay increases.
Surely, people see through this ridiculous argument? No firm is going out to the market and saying, “You’ll need to pay us more because, well, we need to fund the latest associate pay hike.”
Legal fees are a function of pure economics (supply, demand, price elasticity, etc.) I’m sure clients would pay law firms peanuts if it was feasible from a business perspective. Most of the improved market position has been to the benefit of the equity partnerships in the form of record levels of PEP. Good for them. Associate pay is a cost of doing business for the firm (similar to office space, IT equipment and so on). There also is a market for associate hiring and retention, and a price point for not just having access to the best legal talent, but even putting bums on seats with the current workload burden.
A lot of the arguments out there seem to come from disgruntled partners who are being greedy and want to disingenuously reframe the situation.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Mon Feb 28, 2022 1:06 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk Scale: NYC to 215-396.5k
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 12:50 pmOne even said, Milbank is positioning themselves terribly from a client standpoint by pushing for these pay increases.
Surely, people see through this ridiculous argument?
Speaking from an envy perspective, it's easy for one to shit on Milbank to excuse its own firm for not matching.
I don't see Milbank closing its door anytime soon. If anything, it is positioning itself to replace Cravath as the common household name among law students and associates (some/most of which will eventually go in-house and become the next crops of clients). I see it as a strategic long-term play by Milbank, building up a lot of good will. Time will tell.
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk Scale: NYC to 215-396.5k
NRF matched retroactive to Jan 1st.
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk Scale: NYC to 215-396.5k
Cannot believe Cravath still hasn't matched. Is there a real chance they could try to upset the scale? Or is this just them dragging their heels?
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2020 1:05 pm
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk Scale: NYC to 215-396.5k
Akin matched retroactive to Jan 1
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk Scale: NYC to 215-396.5k
Sources say Cravath raised?!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login