NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon does a 180! Holder wept.) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- smaug

- Posts: 13972
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
I think I know more people who tried to get QOL and got burned by working long hours anyway than folks who went to a "good" firm and got burned by not getting good experience at least
There are some upsides to being expensive, one of them is that you do less bullshit work
There are some upsides to being expensive, one of them is that you do less bullshit work
- First Offense

- Posts: 7091
- Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:45 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
Partners think they're not making enough money.glitched wrote:http://abovethelaw.com/2016/05/biglaw-f ... late/?rf=1
More at 11.
- Pomeranian

- Posts: 306
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 10:23 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
I doubt 190k anytime soon, the country is due for another recession in the next few years.
- Single-Malt-Liquor

- Posts: 1450
- Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 4:49 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
...fueled by excessive salaries. NY to 200!Pomeranian wrote:I doubt 190k anytime soon, the country is due for another recession in the next few years.
-
philepistemer

- Posts: 104
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 5:43 am
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
Lol, recency bias.Pomeranian wrote:I doubt 190k anytime soon, the country is due for another recession in the next few years.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
-
cjw564

- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 4:01 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
If you look at most of the economic indicators, you would not be so comfortable.philepistemer wrote:Lol, recency bias.Pomeranian wrote:I doubt 190k anytime soon, the country is due for another recession in the next few years.
-
Mr. Peanutbutter

- Posts: 10168
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2015 3:48 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
Weren't the last few raises right before recessions? Could be good for those of us who survive it.
-
mvp99

- Posts: 1474
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:00 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
Yes but wasn't base salary increased in 2007 when there was still some growth? Right now it's just slow.Mlk&Ckies wrote:Weren't the last few raises right before recessions? Could be good for those of us who survive it.
- 2014

- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
Or it's just faster than it has been in 8 years.mvp99 wrote:Yes but wasn't base salary increased in 2007 when there was still some growth? Right now it's just slow.Mlk&Ckies wrote:Weren't the last few raises right before recessions? Could be good for those of us who survive it.
- Johann

- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
that doesn;t mean it was the best quarter in the last 8 years. they're using some weird wording and comparisons to say this 1st Q rise has been the biggest since 2008. 2014 is still the best year and benchmark since the 2008 recession.2014 wrote:Or it's just faster than it has been in 8 years.mvp99 wrote:Yes but wasn't base salary increased in 2007 when there was still some growth? Right now it's just slow.Mlk&Ckies wrote:Weren't the last few raises right before recessions? Could be good for those of us who survive it.
"The survey said revenue rose 5.8 percent in the first three months of the year from the same period a year ago. It was the strongest gain since the first quarter of 2008 — before the economic meltdown of the financial crisis."
Just means a low 2015 Q1 set this up for this statistic. And 2015 was not a good year.
- El Pollito

- Posts: 20139
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
Sorry, they're not. Weekends appear to be more respected though.dabigchina wrote:This is firm by firm, but from what I've heard the working conditions are much more humane in SV than in NYC.WestOfTheRest wrote:Not that I disagree with you, but why would top candidates choose SF over NYC?First Offense wrote: If top candidates chose DC/Chicago/SF over NYC in large enough numbers, that's enough to pressure them.
*There are plenty of reasons why they would, but for the purposes of this discussion the only one that matters is COL and SF is arguably more expensive than NYC.
- Tiago Splitter

- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
It's funny my hours are really low overall but I work like every weekend.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
philepistemer

- Posts: 104
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 5:43 am
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
If you're so smart, why aren't you short some index a massive amount?cjw564 wrote:If you look at most of the economic indicators, you would not be so comfortable.philepistemer wrote:Lol, recency bias.Pomeranian wrote:I doubt 190k anytime soon, the country is due for another recession in the next few years.
-
KM2016

- Posts: 282
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 1:20 am
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
More clickbait from the town crier over at ATL: http://abovethelaw.com/2016/05/ny-to-19 ... -now-when/
- pancakes3

- Posts: 6619
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:49 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
Not a matter of if, but when.philepistemer wrote:If you're so smart, why aren't you short some index a massive amount?cjw564 wrote:If you look at most of the economic indicators, you would not be so comfortable.philepistemer wrote:Lol, recency bias.Pomeranian wrote:I doubt 190k anytime soon, the country is due for another recession in the next few years.
-
Sgtpeppernyc

- Posts: 156
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 5:51 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
Thanks, Warren Buffet. Great to know that, at some point in the future, the stock market will go down.pancakes3 wrote:Not a matter of if, but when.philepistemer wrote:If you're so smart, why aren't you short some index a massive amount?cjw564 wrote:If you look at most of the economic indicators, you would not be so comfortable.philepistemer wrote:Lol, recency bias.Pomeranian wrote:I doubt 190k anytime soon, the country is due for another recession in the next few years.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Pomeranian

- Posts: 306
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 10:23 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
The post-Great Recession "recovery" is largely smoke and mirrors based on unprecedented Fed monetary stimulus. When it all comes crashing down (I suspect sometime in the first term of the next POTUS), it won't be pretty! :*(
- PennBull

- Posts: 18705
- Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:59 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
(chances that poster has used term "Obummer": 100%)Pomeranian wrote:The post-Great Recession "recovery" is largely smoke and mirrors based on unprecedented Fed monetary stimulus. When it all comes crashing down (I suspect sometime in the first term of the next POTUS), it won't be pretty! :*(
-
h2go

- Posts: 168
- Joined: Sat May 30, 2015 8:38 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
Probably same person asking about endorsing Trump in the other thread.PennBull wrote:(chances that poster has used term "Obummer": 100%)Pomeranian wrote:The post-Great Recession "recovery" is largely smoke and mirrors based on unprecedented Fed monetary stimulus. When it all comes crashing down (I suspect sometime in the first term of the next POTUS), it won't be pretty! :*(
-
kcdc1

- Posts: 992
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 6:48 am
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
Are 3-5 word normative comments with zero information value considered good argument in our post-Trump world? Will this be the norm when NY moves to 190k?Pomeranian wrote:It won't be pretty!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Slytherpuff

- Posts: 5401
- Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2013 12:50 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
I brought up NY to 190 when speaking with a partner at a social this week. He shook his head at me and said "don't hold your breath." Wish I had better news to report.
- rpupkin

- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
OUT THE FIRMSlytherpuff wrote:I brought up NY to 190 when speaking with a partner at a social this week. He shook his head at me and said "don't hold your breath." Wish I had better news to report.
- PennBull

- Posts: 18705
- Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:59 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
(lacks citation)Pomeranian wrote:The post-Great Recession "recovery" is largely smoke and mirrors based on unprecedented Fed monetary stimulus. When it all comes crashing down (I suspect sometime in the first term of the next POTUS), it won't be pretty! :*(
- DELG

- Posts: 3021
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 7:15 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
Unless you're at a market leader firm that doesn't mean a whole hell of a lot. Not everyone will move anyway.Slytherpuff wrote:I brought up NY to 190 when speaking with a partner at a social this week. He shook his head at me and said "don't hold your breath." Wish I had better news to report.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login