Seems like you can move a firm up and it will automatically bump others down. But if you move it down it will not bump anything up...Regulus wrote:It is probably just Symplicity's shitty version of CAPTCHA that makes sure you aren't botting your bid list.beepboopbeep wrote:That "feature" is driving me insane right now. Why does it automatically work just sometimes?Regulus wrote:lol... Also, at first I had gone through and just selected the numbers from the drop-down menu because it specifically says "THERE IS NO "Submit" BUTTON. As soon as you select a bid number in the drop down field it is submitted." However, I later noticed that for some firms it takes you to another page after selecting it and you have to click "Apply" in order to make it actually count your bid. We should probably have you design a new website for next year.
Weird... I changed a few and it didn't auto-update. I also removed firms some I originally had, but switching them to "no bid" didn't cause the others to auto-sort either.Crowing wrote:Wait what? When I change one it bumps all the rest accordingly.
UChicago OCI 2014 Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Anyone know where we need to bid the government agencies/public defenders in order to guarantee an interview?
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Grades: Transfer, T1 Top 5%
URM/Female: No
Work Exp: 5 years
Preferred Market: Chicago
Practice Area: Litigation
Misc: All Chicago (good ties). Would consider NY, if anyone has advice on which firms would fit well in the teens (or lower?) and be relatively safe picks. I also feel like I'm putting some of the 21-slot Chicago firms too low, and that adding NY would effectively make those picks worthless...TYIA for any advice!
Bid list:
1 Jenner (63)
2 Mayer (63)
3 Sidley (84)
4 Jones Day (21)
5 Kirkland (84)
6 Perkins Coie (21)
7 Skadden (84)
8 MWE (63)
9 Vedder (21)
10 Winston (42)
11 Schiff (84)
12 Latham (51)
13 Katten (42)
14 Foley (42)
15 GT (21)
16 Baker & McKenzie (21)
17 Morgan Lewis (21)
18 Dykema (21)
19 DLA Piper (21)
20 mcguirewoods (21)
21 Ropes (42)
22 Holland & Knight (21)
23 Drinker Biddle (21)
24 Dentons (21)
URM/Female: No
Work Exp: 5 years
Preferred Market: Chicago
Practice Area: Litigation
Misc: All Chicago (good ties). Would consider NY, if anyone has advice on which firms would fit well in the teens (or lower?) and be relatively safe picks. I also feel like I'm putting some of the 21-slot Chicago firms too low, and that adding NY would effectively make those picks worthless...TYIA for any advice!
Bid list:
1 Jenner (63)
2 Mayer (63)
3 Sidley (84)
4 Jones Day (21)
5 Kirkland (84)
6 Perkins Coie (21)
7 Skadden (84)
8 MWE (63)
9 Vedder (21)
10 Winston (42)
11 Schiff (84)
12 Latham (51)
13 Katten (42)
14 Foley (42)
15 GT (21)
16 Baker & McKenzie (21)
17 Morgan Lewis (21)
18 Dykema (21)
19 DLA Piper (21)
20 mcguirewoods (21)
21 Ropes (42)
22 Holland & Knight (21)
23 Drinker Biddle (21)
24 Dentons (21)
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Thoughts?
6 Jones Day NY 21
7 Boies (LIT) NY 21
8 Cleary NY 42
9 Skadden NY 42
10 Proskauer Rose NY 21
11 Davis Polk NY 42
12 Simpson NY 57
13 Debevoise NY 63
14 S&C NY 42
15 Cravath NY 38
16 Milbank NY 21
17 Wilmer Hale NY 38
18 Sidley Austin NY 21
19 Kirkland Ellis NY 21
20 Kirkland Ellis LA 21
6 Jones Day NY 21
7 Boies (LIT) NY 21
8 Cleary NY 42
9 Skadden NY 42
10 Proskauer Rose NY 21
11 Davis Polk NY 42
12 Simpson NY 57
13 Debevoise NY 63
14 S&C NY 42
15 Cravath NY 38
16 Milbank NY 21
17 Wilmer Hale NY 38
18 Sidley Austin NY 21
19 Kirkland Ellis NY 21
20 Kirkland Ellis LA 21
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Just to confirm, what is the absolute lowest you all would bid Jones Day NY (21 seats) if you really wanted an interview with them?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Another list!
178.75-179, male, not urm, average interview skills, not k-jd but no substantive we.
Bidding Chicago, some NY, and a little bit of Texas. On the fence as to corp or lit, so looking for firms that are competent in both. The only reason I'm bidding NYC is because I don't want to be unemployed, so exit options are an important consideration for the NY firms.
Goals: maximize screeners, maximize callbacks, get a jerb.
Would appreciate any and all feedback.
All firms are Chicago unless otherwise indicated.
1. Jones Day Chicago - 21 spots
2. K&E - 84
3. Sidley - 84
4. Mayer - 63
5. Skadden - 84
6. Latham - 61
7. Katten - 42
8. McDermott - 63
9. Jenner - 63
10. Davis Polk - 42 (NYC)
11. Cleary - 42 (NYC)
12. Schiff - 84
13. Simpson Thacher - 57 (NYC)
14. Vinson + Elkins - 21 (Houston)
15. Baker Botts - 21 (Houston)
16. Gibson Dunn - 6 (Dallas)
17. Sullivan Cromwell - 42 (NYC)
18. Cravath - 38 (NYC)
19. Debevoise - 63 (NYC)
20. Fried Frank - 21 (NYC)
178.75-179, male, not urm, average interview skills, not k-jd but no substantive we.
Bidding Chicago, some NY, and a little bit of Texas. On the fence as to corp or lit, so looking for firms that are competent in both. The only reason I'm bidding NYC is because I don't want to be unemployed, so exit options are an important consideration for the NY firms.
Goals: maximize screeners, maximize callbacks, get a jerb.
Would appreciate any and all feedback.
All firms are Chicago unless otherwise indicated.
1. Jones Day Chicago - 21 spots
2. K&E - 84
3. Sidley - 84
4. Mayer - 63
5. Skadden - 84
6. Latham - 61
7. Katten - 42
8. McDermott - 63
9. Jenner - 63
10. Davis Polk - 42 (NYC)
11. Cleary - 42 (NYC)
12. Schiff - 84
13. Simpson Thacher - 57 (NYC)
14. Vinson + Elkins - 21 (Houston)
15. Baker Botts - 21 (Houston)
16. Gibson Dunn - 6 (Dallas)
17. Sullivan Cromwell - 42 (NYC)
18. Cravath - 38 (NYC)
19. Debevoise - 63 (NYC)
20. Fried Frank - 21 (NYC)
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
I'll add to the profusion of bidlists for our kind 3Ls to review
180.5, law review, no real work experience. Mostly interested in Kirkland/Sidley/Jenner + NY, and just throwing in MTO and a few DC firms. I have very little idea what I'm doing...Do I need more safeties?
1. Jenner Chi (63)
2. Kirkland Chi (84)
3. Sidley Chi (84)
4. Gibson Dunn NY (21)
5. Boies Schiller - Lit NY (21)
6. Freshfields NY (15)
7. Allen & Overy NY (21)
8. Skadden NY (42)
9. Cleary Gottlieb NY (42)
10. Debevoise NY (63)
11. Davis Polk NY (42)
12. Simpson Thatcher Bartlett NY (57)
13. Sullivan & Cromwell NY (42)
14. Cravath NY (38)
15. Paul Weiss NY (42)
16. White & Case NY (42)
17. Weil NY (21)
18. Baker & McKenzie (21)
19. DLA Piper Chi (21)
20. Jones Day Chi (21)
21. Latham Chi (51)
22. Covington & Burling DC (21)
23. Williams & Connolly DC (38)
24. Wachtell NY (42)
…
49. Munger (42)
And it can't be said enough: thank you so much for doing this!

180.5, law review, no real work experience. Mostly interested in Kirkland/Sidley/Jenner + NY, and just throwing in MTO and a few DC firms. I have very little idea what I'm doing...Do I need more safeties?
1. Jenner Chi (63)
2. Kirkland Chi (84)
3. Sidley Chi (84)
4. Gibson Dunn NY (21)
5. Boies Schiller - Lit NY (21)
6. Freshfields NY (15)
7. Allen & Overy NY (21)
8. Skadden NY (42)
9. Cleary Gottlieb NY (42)
10. Debevoise NY (63)
11. Davis Polk NY (42)
12. Simpson Thatcher Bartlett NY (57)
13. Sullivan & Cromwell NY (42)
14. Cravath NY (38)
15. Paul Weiss NY (42)
16. White & Case NY (42)
17. Weil NY (21)
18. Baker & McKenzie (21)
19. DLA Piper Chi (21)
20. Jones Day Chi (21)
21. Latham Chi (51)
22. Covington & Burling DC (21)
23. Williams & Connolly DC (38)
24. Wachtell NY (42)
…
49. Munger (42)
And it can't be said enough: thank you so much for doing this!
-
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:24 pm
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
If I really wanted an interview: 7/8.Anonymous User wrote:Just to confirm, what is the absolute lowest you all would bid Jones Day NY (21 seats) if you really wanted an interview with them?
If I just wanted one: 10-12
If I didn't really care but think they sound cool: 14
People got them w/ the third option.
-
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:24 pm
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Anonymous User wrote:I'll add to the profusion of bidlists for our kind 3Ls to review :D
180.5, law review, no real work experience. Mostly interested in Kirkland/Sidley/Jenner + NY, and just throwing in MTO and a few DC firms. I have very little idea what I'm doing...Do I need more safeties?
1. Jenner Chi (63)
2. Kirkland Chi (84)
3. Sidley Chi (84)
4. Gibson Dunn NY (21)
5. Boies Schiller - Lit NY (21)
6. Freshfields NY (15)
7. Allen & Overy NY (21)
8. Skadden NY (42)
9. Cleary Gottlieb NY (42)
10. Debevoise NY (63)
11. Davis Polk NY (42)
12. Simpson Thatcher Bartlett NY (57)
13. Sullivan & Cromwell NY (42)
14. Cravath NY (38)
15. Paul Weiss NY (42)
16. White & Case NY (42)
17. Weil NY (21)
18. Baker & McKenzie (21)
19. DLA Piper Chi (21)
20. Jones Day Chi (21)
21. Latham Chi (51)
22. Covington & Burling DC (21)
23. Williams & Connolly DC (38)
24. Wachtell NY (42)
…
49. Munger (42)
And it can't be said enough: thank you so much for doing this!
very hard to tell if you've PM'd me but 15 down worries me (and I've said where most of these firms should go earlier ITT). Everything above that is good.
-
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:24 pm
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
all are fine unless i make a comment:
1. Jones Day Chicago - 21 spots
2. K&E - 84
3. Sidley - 84
4. Mayer - 63
5. Skadden - 84
6. Latham - 61
7. Katten - 42
8. McDermott - 63
9. Jenner - 63 maybe too late
10. Davis Polk - 42 (NYC)
11. Cleary - 42 (NYC)
12. Schiff - 84 i think this is okay? I didn't bid schiff but 84 slots and less desirable than kirk/sidley/skadden/jenner
13. Simpson Thacher - 57 (NYC)
14. Vinson + Elkins - 21 (Houston)?
15. Baker Botts - 21 (Houston)?
16. Gibson Dunn - 6 (Dallas)?
17. Sullivan Cromwell - 42 (NYC) probably pushing it but a decent chance at S&C here
18. Cravath - 38 (NYC) fine
19. Debevoise - 63 (NYC) probably ok (would obviously be safer further up
20. Fried Frank - 21 (NYC) nope
1. Jones Day Chicago - 21 spots
2. K&E - 84
3. Sidley - 84
4. Mayer - 63
5. Skadden - 84
6. Latham - 61
7. Katten - 42
8. McDermott - 63
9. Jenner - 63 maybe too late
10. Davis Polk - 42 (NYC)
11. Cleary - 42 (NYC)
12. Schiff - 84 i think this is okay? I didn't bid schiff but 84 slots and less desirable than kirk/sidley/skadden/jenner
13. Simpson Thacher - 57 (NYC)
14. Vinson + Elkins - 21 (Houston)?
15. Baker Botts - 21 (Houston)?
16. Gibson Dunn - 6 (Dallas)?
17. Sullivan Cromwell - 42 (NYC) probably pushing it but a decent chance at S&C here
18. Cravath - 38 (NYC) fine
19. Debevoise - 63 (NYC) probably ok (would obviously be safer further up
20. Fried Frank - 21 (NYC) nope
-
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:24 pm
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Anonymous User wrote:Grades: Transfer, T1 Top 5%
URM/Female: No
Work Exp: 5 years
Preferred Market: Chicago
Practice Area: Litigation
Misc: All Chicago (good ties). Would consider NY, if anyone has advice on which firms would fit well in the teens (or lower?) and be relatively safe picks. I also feel like I'm putting some of the 21-slot Chicago firms too low, and that adding NY would effectively make those picks worthless...TYIA for any advice!
Bid list:
1 Jenner (63)
2 Mayer (63)
3 Sidley (84)
4 Jones Day (21)
5 Kirkland (84)
6 Perkins Coie (21)
7 Skadden (84)
8 MWE (63)
9 Vedder (21)
10 Winston (42)
11 Schiff (84)
12 Latham (51)
13 Katten (42)
14 Foley (42)
15 GT (21)
16 Baker & McKenzie (21)
17 Morgan Lewis (21)
18 Dykema (21)
19 DLA Piper (21)
20 McGuireWoods (21)
21 Ropes (42)
22 Holland & Knight (21)
23 Drinker Biddle (21)
24 Dentons (21)
Only firms I could really help you with are the top 6 and they look relatively fine (though I'd prioritize Perkins/Kirkland/sidley over Mayer/jenner but reasonable minds could disagree)
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
How many screeners should we be aiming to get?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
This is my expectation but if I get 20+ I'm feeling good. I'll also be hustling for more during lunch sign ups.Anonymous User wrote:How many screeners should we be aiming to get?
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
I heard a lot of people are putting NYC high this year. Everyone else get that vibe?
-
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:24 pm
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
My impression is that lots of people are bidding NYC (based on the # of PM's I've gotten). This may mean that Chicago/DC are easier to get. Last year, Chicago was heavily overbid and NY was underbid. Might be a cycle. That said, from TLS it doesn't seem like anyone is bidding DC and people feasted there last year...Anonymous User wrote:I heard a lot of people are putting NYC high this year. Everyone else get that vibe?
You should expect to get most, if not all of your top 15, and then everything after is luck. With smart bidding, you can extend that number to expected 17-18, and then luck after that.Anonymous User wrote:How many screeners should we be aiming to get?
-
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:24 pm
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
And add/drop. IMO that's better than lunch sign-ups because you guarantee yourself a full interview.Mal Reynolds wrote:This is my expectation but if I get 20+ I'm feeling good. I'll also be hustling for more during lunch sign ups.Anonymous User wrote:How many screeners should we be aiming to get?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Bidding DC with no ties: feasible or stupid?
-
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 3:35 pm
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Incredibly stupid without amazing grades.Anonymous User wrote:Bidding DC with no ties: feasible or stupid?
Edit: Fine if it's one or two firms. Iffy with a bunch. Incredibly stupid if it's most of your list.
-
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:24 pm
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
This, but ties can come from practice area if you've done your hw (note: appellate litigation doesn't count as a practice area for this comment). Should obviously mix as you would with any selective marketWheninLaw wrote:Incredibly stupid without amazing grades.Anonymous User wrote:Bidding DC with no ties: feasible or stupid?
Edit: Fine if it's one or two firms. Iffy with a bunch. Incredibly stupid if it's most of your list.
- 2014
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
I had like 23 screeners from bidding last year and that was definitely on the high end. After open sign ups I ended up doing like 27 or 28 or something.
I also get the feeling that more people are doing NY than our year but it could just be a sample size thing. Almost all lists I've looked at have also had the 7-8 usual Chi suspects on them too.
I also get the feeling that more people are doing NY than our year but it could just be a sample size thing. Almost all lists I've looked at have also had the 7-8 usual Chi suspects on them too.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Hi everyone. Here is another bid list that I need some urgent help with since I just found out about the information here and apparently I've been doing it all wrong. I have a 175.8 GPA, and am a non-URM with no past substantial work experience. I lived in DC for two years when I was in high school, however, so I am hoping to work those ties. I am mainly interested in doing litigation in DC. Here is the bid list that I originally made, but a friend just told me that I should probably switch some things up. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Let me know if I am not providing the information in the correct format. Lastly, all of the firms listed below are the DC office unless otherwise stated.
1 - Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP (5)
2 - Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP (21)
3 - Dechert LLP (21)
4 - Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP (21)
5 - susman godfrey llp (19) - New York
6 - Foley & Lardner LLP (42)
7 - Kirkland & Ellis LLP (21)
8 - Morrison & Foerster LLP (21) - San Francisco
9 - BakerHostetler (16)
10 - White & Case LLP (21)
11 - Jenner & Block LLP (21)
12 - Ropes & Gray LLP (42)
13 - Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP (21)
14 - Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (38)
15 - Baker Botts LLP (21)
16 - Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP (21)
17 - Latham & Watkins (31)
18 - Simpson Thacher & Bartlett (3)
19 - Crowell & Moring L.L.P. (21)
20 - sidley austin llp (21)
21 - paul hastings llp (4)
22 - mayer brown llp (21)
23 - Holland & Knight LLP (11)
24 - Steptoe & Johnson LLP (18)
25 - Williams & Connolly (38)
Sorry to bother you all with this so late in the game, but the deadline is tomorrow.
1 - Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP (5)
2 - Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP (21)
3 - Dechert LLP (21)
4 - Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP (21)
5 - susman godfrey llp (19) - New York
6 - Foley & Lardner LLP (42)
7 - Kirkland & Ellis LLP (21)
8 - Morrison & Foerster LLP (21) - San Francisco
9 - BakerHostetler (16)
10 - White & Case LLP (21)
11 - Jenner & Block LLP (21)
12 - Ropes & Gray LLP (42)
13 - Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP (21)
14 - Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (38)
15 - Baker Botts LLP (21)
16 - Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP (21)
17 - Latham & Watkins (31)
18 - Simpson Thacher & Bartlett (3)
19 - Crowell & Moring L.L.P. (21)
20 - sidley austin llp (21)
21 - paul hastings llp (4)
22 - mayer brown llp (21)
23 - Holland & Knight LLP (11)
24 - Steptoe & Johnson LLP (18)
25 - Williams & Connolly (38)
Sorry to bother you all with this so late in the game, but the deadline is tomorrow.
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
I would bid ALL NYC if I were you plus a hometown secondary market if you have ties to one. I hope you're mass mailing also. Susman is a firm I don't even think Law Review people are a lock for. Same goes for Williams. I'm in your class so take my advice with a large grain of salt but your GPA will not lend itself well to a bidlist like that.
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
Does anyone know when San Diego firms become wasted bids? I'm thinking of putting them mid 20s. But if there's no shot then I'll probably just put a few in the 40s and see if I can snag them during sign ups.
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: UChicago OCI 2014
How low can you put Paul Hastings LA?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login