NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon does a 180! Holder wept.) Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Who will join the CovingTTTon list next?

WilmerHale
15
6%
Arnold & Porter
23
10%
Hogan Lovells
12
5%
Akin Gump
7
3%
Jones Day
114
47%
Jenner & Block
8
3%
Paul Hastings
7
3%
WachTTTell
23
10%
Other
7
3%
No one! YAY!
25
10%
 
Total votes: 241

GoesWithTheTerritory

New
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 11:03 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by GoesWithTheTerritory » Tue May 10, 2016 3:21 am

Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Who gives a fuck about cross examination when you have AspLord McProceduralAccolyte ensuring that you never have to deal with it.
Mods, anon is trying to out me, please edit.
:lol:

User avatar
2014

Platinum
Posts: 6028
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by 2014 » Tue May 10, 2016 10:45 am

Mlk&Ckies wrote:Speaking of attention to detail, can we stop bumping this except for "PW TO 190"?

Thanks
We are all in on Cravath these days

User avatar
Clearly

Gold
Posts: 4189
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by Clearly » Tue May 10, 2016 12:59 pm

Cravaths gonna take us home. I'm seriously considering 3L oci to switch to a lower col market that went to 160. I'm not the only one.

Internetdan

New
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 9:06 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by Internetdan » Tue May 10, 2016 1:52 pm

Nevermind. I'm starting to believe NY to 200k might not happen and becoming depressed

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
Monochromatic Oeuvre

Gold
Posts: 2481
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by Monochromatic Oeuvre » Wed May 18, 2016 10:08 am

Anonymous User wrote:NY to 190k all but confirmed: http://abovethelaw.com/2016/05/law-firm ... n-8-years/
With this latest revenue increase, I don't see any way the partners don't finally decide that they have enough money.

User avatar
emkay625

Gold
Posts: 1988
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:31 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by emkay625 » Wed May 18, 2016 10:22 am

Clearly wrote:Cravaths gonna take us home. I'm seriously considering 3L oci to switch to a lower col market that went to 160. I'm not the only one.
Join us my friend. We have free parking, $1 beer nights, and no state income tax.

User avatar
TLSModBot

Diamond
Posts: 14835
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:54 am

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by TLSModBot » Wed May 18, 2016 10:48 am

Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:NY to 190k all but confirmed: http://abovethelaw.com/2016/05/law-firm ... n-8-years/
With this latest revenue increase, I don't see any way the partners don't finally decide that they have enough money.
oh yeah, a high outlier of 1.8% demand growth? Definitely time to pop the champagne.

It would be interesting to see the breakdown of that revenue growth across firms (i.e. not everybody is going up 1.8% exactly - some might be going up a ton and a bunch are going down slightly, which is what I expect is the case).

User avatar
UVAIce

Bronze
Posts: 451
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 3:10 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by UVAIce » Wed May 18, 2016 10:56 am

Clearly wrote:Cravaths gonna take us home. I'm seriously considering 3L oci to switch to a lower col market that went to 160. I'm not the only one.
My current salary as a first year in the market I'm in is worth ~$377K in Manhattan (~$290k in Brooklyn). So NYC can go to $190K a year and I'm more than happy to stay.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
UnicornHunter

Diamond
Posts: 13507
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 9:16 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by UnicornHunter » Wed May 18, 2016 11:21 am

UVAIce wrote:
Clearly wrote:Cravaths gonna take us home. I'm seriously considering 3L oci to switch to a lower col market that went to 160. I'm not the only one.
My current salary as a first year in the market I'm in is worth ~$377K in Manhattan (~$290k in Brooklyn). So NYC can go to $190K a year and I'm more than happy to stay.
There's no way that's true unless your only expense is rent.

User avatar
Tiago Splitter

Diamond
Posts: 17148
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by Tiago Splitter » Wed May 18, 2016 11:29 am

UnicornHunter wrote:
UVAIce wrote:
Clearly wrote:Cravaths gonna take us home. I'm seriously considering 3L oci to switch to a lower col market that went to 160. I'm not the only one.
My current salary as a first year in the market I'm in is worth ~$377K in Manhattan (~$290k in Brooklyn). So NYC can go to $190K a year and I'm more than happy to stay.
There's no way that's true unless your only expense is rent.
The cost of living calculators are such a joke. You can tell this for many reasons, one of which is that they say making 377k in Manhattan is like making 290k in Brooklyn.

User avatar
UVAIce

Bronze
Posts: 451
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 3:10 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by UVAIce » Wed May 18, 2016 11:37 am

UnicornHunter wrote:
UVAIce wrote:
Clearly wrote:Cravaths gonna take us home. I'm seriously considering 3L oci to switch to a lower col market that went to 160. I'm not the only one.
My current salary as a first year in the market I'm in is worth ~$377K in Manhattan (~$290k in Brooklyn). So NYC can go to $190K a year and I'm more than happy to stay.
There's no way that's true unless your only expense is rent.
I make $160K a year and the mortgage (including property taxes, etc.) on my 2000 square foot, 4 bedroom, 2 1/2 bath house is just under $1,500 a month (plus I get tax savings for owning a home). Everything in my market is less expensive. Eating out is cheaper, the theater is cheaper, groceries are cheaper, health care is cheaper, my taxes across the board are less (state income tax, property taxes, sales tax, etc.).

My commute is under 30 minutes even when there is traffic. It doesn't snow much here and it has more sunny days than NYC. The people are nice. No one honks at people. I love it.

And the kicker is that a seventh year associate at my firm makes the same base salary as a seventh year associate in NYC. We also have every little churn or leverage compared to NYC firms, so being a seventh year associate is a reality that many people can reach.

User avatar
Actus Reus

Bronze
Posts: 460
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:21 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by Actus Reus » Wed May 18, 2016 11:43 am

Oh good let's turn this thread into a city comparison again rather than focus on Cravath's post-summer program pre-OCI salary boost.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
UVAIce

Bronze
Posts: 451
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 3:10 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by UVAIce » Wed May 18, 2016 11:45 am

Tiago Splitter wrote:
UnicornHunter wrote:
UVAIce wrote:
Clearly wrote:Cravaths gonna take us home. I'm seriously considering 3L oci to switch to a lower col market that went to 160. I'm not the only one.
My current salary as a first year in the market I'm in is worth ~$377K in Manhattan (~$290k in Brooklyn). So NYC can go to $190K a year and I'm more than happy to stay.
There's no way that's true unless your only expense is rent.
The cost of living calculators are such a joke. You can tell this for many reasons, one of which is that they say making 377k in Manhattan is like making 290k in Brooklyn.
There is some truth to this, but I think it also hits the head the nail on the head when it comes to certain things. For example, the type of home I live in probably doesn't exist in NYC or to own that home in the region it would cost more money and I would have an insane commute. And if you're willing to live like a NYC associate in my market you're going to have considerably more take home pay than an associate in NYC, just based on rent.
Last edited by UVAIce on Wed May 18, 2016 12:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
UnicornHunter

Diamond
Posts: 13507
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 9:16 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by UnicornHunter » Wed May 18, 2016 12:02 pm

UVAIce wrote:
Tiago Splitter wrote:
UnicornHunter wrote:
UVAIce wrote:
Clearly wrote:Cravaths gonna take us home. I'm seriously considering 3L oci to switch to a lower col market that went to 160. I'm not the only one.
My current salary as a first year in the market I'm in is worth ~$377K in Manhattan (~$290k in Brooklyn). So NYC can go to $190K a year and I'm more than happy to stay.
There's no way that's true unless your only expense is rent.
The cost of living calculators are such a joke. You can tell this for many reasons, one of which is that they say making 377k in Manhattan is like making 290k in Brooklyn.
There is some truth to this, but I think it also hits the head the nail on the head when it comes to certain things. For example, the type of home I live in probably doesn't exist in NYC or to own that home in the region it would cost more money and I would have an insane commute. And i you're willing to live like a NYC associate in my market you're going to have considerably more take home pay than an associate in NYC, just based on rent.
As a member of team #neverNYC I don't disagree with you that there are reasons to not want to live in NY, just pointing out that the straight COL calculators are BS.

Either way, a rising tide lifts all boats, etc... so back to are lobbying for Cravath-->190

User avatar
Tiago Splitter

Diamond
Posts: 17148
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by Tiago Splitter » Wed May 18, 2016 1:19 pm

UVAIce wrote:
Tiago Splitter wrote:
UnicornHunter wrote:
UVAIce wrote:
Clearly wrote:Cravaths gonna take us home. I'm seriously considering 3L oci to switch to a lower col market that went to 160. I'm not the only one.
My current salary as a first year in the market I'm in is worth ~$377K in Manhattan (~$290k in Brooklyn). So NYC can go to $190K a year and I'm more than happy to stay.
There's no way that's true unless your only expense is rent.
The cost of living calculators are such a joke. You can tell this for many reasons, one of which is that they say making 377k in Manhattan is like making 290k in Brooklyn.
There is some truth to this, but I think it also hits the head the nail on the head when it comes to certain things. For example, the type of home I live in probably doesn't exist in NYC or to own that home in the region it would cost more money and I would have an insane commute. And if you're willing to live like a NYC associate in my market you're going to have considerably more take home pay than an associate in NYC, just based on rent.
Just to bring this thread back off topic one final time, what you're saying is exactly the problem with the calculator. There is no 4 bedroom single family home with a big yard to buy in midtown Manhattan. And if there were, you'd need to make way more than 377k to afford it.

1styearlateral

Silver
Posts: 953
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 3:55 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by 1styearlateral » Wed May 18, 2016 1:25 pm

Tiago Splitter wrote:
UVAIce wrote:
Tiago Splitter wrote:
UnicornHunter wrote:
UVAIce wrote:
Clearly wrote:Cravaths gonna take us home. I'm seriously considering 3L oci to switch to a lower col market that went to 160. I'm not the only one.
My current salary as a first year in the market I'm in is worth ~$377K in Manhattan (~$290k in Brooklyn). So NYC can go to $190K a year and I'm more than happy to stay.
There's no way that's true unless your only expense is rent.
The cost of living calculators are such a joke. You can tell this for many reasons, one of which is that they say making 377k in Manhattan is like making 290k in Brooklyn.
There is some truth to this, but I think it also hits the head the nail on the head when it comes to certain things. For example, the type of home I live in probably doesn't exist in NYC or to own that home in the region it would cost more money and I would have an insane commute. And if you're willing to live like a NYC associate in my market you're going to have considerably more take home pay than an associate in NYC, just based on rent.
Just to bring this thread back off topic one final time, what you're saying is exactly the problem with the calculator. There is no 4 bedroom single family home with a big yard to buy in midtown Manhattan. And if there were, you'd need to make way more than 377k to afford it.
This is a fair point to make but I think the accurate comparison is $/square foot (not bedroom/bathroom), which will rise/fall depending on how desirable of a location those particular square feet you are buying. NYC is one of the most, if not THE most, desirable places on the planet. Exclusivity isn't cheap.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
UVAIce

Bronze
Posts: 451
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 3:10 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by UVAIce » Wed May 18, 2016 2:00 pm

Tiago Splitter wrote:
UVAIce wrote:
Tiago Splitter wrote:
UnicornHunter wrote:
UVAIce wrote:
Clearly wrote:Cravaths gonna take us home. I'm seriously considering 3L oci to switch to a lower col market that went to 160. I'm not the only one.
My current salary as a first year in the market I'm in is worth ~$377K in Manhattan (~$290k in Brooklyn). So NYC can go to $190K a year and I'm more than happy to stay.
There's no way that's true unless your only expense is rent.
The cost of living calculators are such a joke. You can tell this for many reasons, one of which is that they say making 377k in Manhattan is like making 290k in Brooklyn.
There is some truth to this, but I think it also hits the head the nail on the head when it comes to certain things. For example, the type of home I live in probably doesn't exist in NYC or to own that home in the region it would cost more money and I would have an insane commute. And if you're willing to live like a NYC associate in my market you're going to have considerably more take home pay than an associate in NYC, just based on rent.
Just to bring this thread back off topic one final time, what you're saying is exactly the problem with the calculator. There is no 4 bedroom single family home with a big yard to buy in midtown Manhattan. And if there were, you'd need to make way more than 377k to afford it.
I don't disagree with any of this.

And to get back on track, if so many secondary markets can afford to pay their associates $160K plus (at least some of them) the NYC scale across the various classes then it's about time for Cravath or someone to raise the pay scale.

User avatar
emkay625

Gold
Posts: 1988
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:31 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by emkay625 » Wed May 18, 2016 2:16 pm

Do we have a breakdown of billing rates anywhere? In other words, are NYC offices charging higher rates than Houston/Atlanta/Chicago offices of the same firm?

h2go

Bronze
Posts: 168
Joined: Sat May 30, 2015 8:38 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by h2go » Wed May 18, 2016 2:17 pm

emkay625 wrote:Do we have a breakdown of billing rates anywhere? In other words, are NYC offices charging higher rates than Houston/Atlanta/Chicago offices of the same firm?
Yes, at my firm.

User avatar
grand inquisitor

Gold
Posts: 3767
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 11:21 am

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by grand inquisitor » Wed May 18, 2016 2:18 pm

emkay625 wrote:Do we have a breakdown of billing rates anywhere? In other words, are NYC offices charging higher rates than Houston/Atlanta/Chicago offices of the same firm?
yes

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
PeanutsNJam

Gold
Posts: 4670
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:57 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by PeanutsNJam » Wed May 18, 2016 2:20 pm

NYC not gonna go up till T14 grads start turning down NYC firms for secondary market firms, and since law students are prestige whores and NYC firms have their shitty Vault list, that'll never happen.

User avatar
BmoreOrLess

Gold
Posts: 2195
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:15 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by BmoreOrLess » Wed May 18, 2016 2:34 pm

PeanutsNJam wrote:NYC not gonna go up till T14 T13grads start turning down NYC firms for secondary market firms, and since law students are prestige whores and NYC firms have their shitty Vault list, that'll never happen.
A lot of people I know did just this at GULC, and plenty of them aren't staying in DC either. I think this is definitely a trend here.

Some Milbank partners who were doing a presentation here were even saying that it's frustrating how many laterals they lose to secondary markets.

User avatar
UnicornHunter

Diamond
Posts: 13507
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 9:16 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by UnicornHunter » Wed May 18, 2016 3:20 pm

BmoreOrLess wrote:
PeanutsNJam wrote:NYC not gonna go up till T14 T13grads start turning down NYC firms for secondary market firms, and since law students are prestige whores and NYC firms have their shitty Vault list, that'll never happen.
A lot of people I know did just this at GULC, and plenty of them aren't staying in DC either. I think this is definitely a trend here.

Some Milbank partners who were doing a presentation here were even saying that it's frustrating how many laterals they lose to secondary markets.
Secondary markets just aren't big enough to really threaten NYC. People don't go to NY because of some misguided perception of prestige, they go because that's where the jerbs are. There's a reason why bid NYC is common OCS advice, and it's not because OCS's across the T14 think NYC is just the awesomest.

User avatar
First Offense

Platinum
Posts: 7091
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:45 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by First Offense » Wed May 18, 2016 3:29 pm

UnicornHunter wrote:
BmoreOrLess wrote:
PeanutsNJam wrote:NYC not gonna go up till T14 T13grads start turning down NYC firms for secondary market firms, and since law students are prestige whores and NYC firms have their shitty Vault list, that'll never happen.
A lot of people I know did just this at GULC, and plenty of them aren't staying in DC either. I think this is definitely a trend here.

Some Milbank partners who were doing a presentation here were even saying that it's frustrating how many laterals they lose to secondary markets.
Secondary markets just aren't big enough to really threaten NYC. People don't go to NY because of some misguided perception of prestige, they go because that's where the jerbs are. There's a reason why bid NYC is common OCS advice, and it's not because OCS's across the T14 think NYC is just the awesomest.
If top candidates chose DC/Chicago/SF over NYC in large enough numbers, that's enough to pressure them.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”