Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:Mods, anon is trying to out me, please edit.Anonymous User wrote:Who gives a fuck about cross examination when you have AspLord McProceduralAccolyte ensuring that you never have to deal with it.
NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon does a 180! Holder wept.) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
GoesWithTheTerritory

- Posts: 11
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 11:03 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
- 2014

- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
We are all in on Cravath these daysMlk&Ckies wrote:Speaking of attention to detail, can we stop bumping this except for "PW TO 190"?
Thanks
- Clearly

- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
Cravaths gonna take us home. I'm seriously considering 3L oci to switch to a lower col market that went to 160. I'm not the only one.
-
Internetdan

- Posts: 75
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 9:06 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
Nevermind. I'm starting to believe NY to 200k might not happen and becoming depressed
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
NY to 190k all but confirmed: http://abovethelaw.com/2016/05/law-firm ... n-8-years/
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Monochromatic Oeuvre

- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
With this latest revenue increase, I don't see any way the partners don't finally decide that they have enough money.Anonymous User wrote:NY to 190k all but confirmed: http://abovethelaw.com/2016/05/law-firm ... n-8-years/
- emkay625

- Posts: 1988
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:31 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
Join us my friend. We have free parking, $1 beer nights, and no state income tax.Clearly wrote:Cravaths gonna take us home. I'm seriously considering 3L oci to switch to a lower col market that went to 160. I'm not the only one.
- TLSModBot

- Posts: 14835
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:54 am
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
oh yeah, a high outlier of 1.8% demand growth? Definitely time to pop the champagne.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:With this latest revenue increase, I don't see any way the partners don't finally decide that they have enough money.Anonymous User wrote:NY to 190k all but confirmed: http://abovethelaw.com/2016/05/law-firm ... n-8-years/
It would be interesting to see the breakdown of that revenue growth across firms (i.e. not everybody is going up 1.8% exactly - some might be going up a ton and a bunch are going down slightly, which is what I expect is the case).
- UVAIce

- Posts: 451
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 3:10 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
My current salary as a first year in the market I'm in is worth ~$377K in Manhattan (~$290k in Brooklyn). So NYC can go to $190K a year and I'm more than happy to stay.Clearly wrote:Cravaths gonna take us home. I'm seriously considering 3L oci to switch to a lower col market that went to 160. I'm not the only one.
- UnicornHunter

- Posts: 13507
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 9:16 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
There's no way that's true unless your only expense is rent.UVAIce wrote:My current salary as a first year in the market I'm in is worth ~$377K in Manhattan (~$290k in Brooklyn). So NYC can go to $190K a year and I'm more than happy to stay.Clearly wrote:Cravaths gonna take us home. I'm seriously considering 3L oci to switch to a lower col market that went to 160. I'm not the only one.
- Tiago Splitter

- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
The cost of living calculators are such a joke. You can tell this for many reasons, one of which is that they say making 377k in Manhattan is like making 290k in Brooklyn.UnicornHunter wrote:There's no way that's true unless your only expense is rent.UVAIce wrote:My current salary as a first year in the market I'm in is worth ~$377K in Manhattan (~$290k in Brooklyn). So NYC can go to $190K a year and I'm more than happy to stay.Clearly wrote:Cravaths gonna take us home. I'm seriously considering 3L oci to switch to a lower col market that went to 160. I'm not the only one.
- UVAIce

- Posts: 451
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 3:10 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
I make $160K a year and the mortgage (including property taxes, etc.) on my 2000 square foot, 4 bedroom, 2 1/2 bath house is just under $1,500 a month (plus I get tax savings for owning a home). Everything in my market is less expensive. Eating out is cheaper, the theater is cheaper, groceries are cheaper, health care is cheaper, my taxes across the board are less (state income tax, property taxes, sales tax, etc.).UnicornHunter wrote:There's no way that's true unless your only expense is rent.UVAIce wrote:My current salary as a first year in the market I'm in is worth ~$377K in Manhattan (~$290k in Brooklyn). So NYC can go to $190K a year and I'm more than happy to stay.Clearly wrote:Cravaths gonna take us home. I'm seriously considering 3L oci to switch to a lower col market that went to 160. I'm not the only one.
My commute is under 30 minutes even when there is traffic. It doesn't snow much here and it has more sunny days than NYC. The people are nice. No one honks at people. I love it.
And the kicker is that a seventh year associate at my firm makes the same base salary as a seventh year associate in NYC. We also have every little churn or leverage compared to NYC firms, so being a seventh year associate is a reality that many people can reach.
- Actus Reus

- Posts: 460
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:21 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
Oh good let's turn this thread into a city comparison again rather than focus on Cravath's post-summer program pre-OCI salary boost.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- UVAIce

- Posts: 451
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 3:10 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
There is some truth to this, but I think it also hits the head the nail on the head when it comes to certain things. For example, the type of home I live in probably doesn't exist in NYC or to own that home in the region it would cost more money and I would have an insane commute. And if you're willing to live like a NYC associate in my market you're going to have considerably more take home pay than an associate in NYC, just based on rent.Tiago Splitter wrote:The cost of living calculators are such a joke. You can tell this for many reasons, one of which is that they say making 377k in Manhattan is like making 290k in Brooklyn.UnicornHunter wrote:There's no way that's true unless your only expense is rent.UVAIce wrote:My current salary as a first year in the market I'm in is worth ~$377K in Manhattan (~$290k in Brooklyn). So NYC can go to $190K a year and I'm more than happy to stay.Clearly wrote:Cravaths gonna take us home. I'm seriously considering 3L oci to switch to a lower col market that went to 160. I'm not the only one.
Last edited by UVAIce on Wed May 18, 2016 12:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- UnicornHunter

- Posts: 13507
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 9:16 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
As a member of team #neverNYC I don't disagree with you that there are reasons to not want to live in NY, just pointing out that the straight COL calculators are BS.UVAIce wrote:There is some truth to this, but I think it also hits the head the nail on the head when it comes to certain things. For example, the type of home I live in probably doesn't exist in NYC or to own that home in the region it would cost more money and I would have an insane commute. And i you're willing to live like a NYC associate in my market you're going to have considerably more take home pay than an associate in NYC, just based on rent.Tiago Splitter wrote:The cost of living calculators are such a joke. You can tell this for many reasons, one of which is that they say making 377k in Manhattan is like making 290k in Brooklyn.UnicornHunter wrote:There's no way that's true unless your only expense is rent.UVAIce wrote:My current salary as a first year in the market I'm in is worth ~$377K in Manhattan (~$290k in Brooklyn). So NYC can go to $190K a year and I'm more than happy to stay.Clearly wrote:Cravaths gonna take us home. I'm seriously considering 3L oci to switch to a lower col market that went to 160. I'm not the only one.
Either way, a rising tide lifts all boats, etc... so back to are lobbying for Cravath-->190
- Tiago Splitter

- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
Just to bring this thread back off topic one final time, what you're saying is exactly the problem with the calculator. There is no 4 bedroom single family home with a big yard to buy in midtown Manhattan. And if there were, you'd need to make way more than 377k to afford it.UVAIce wrote:There is some truth to this, but I think it also hits the head the nail on the head when it comes to certain things. For example, the type of home I live in probably doesn't exist in NYC or to own that home in the region it would cost more money and I would have an insane commute. And if you're willing to live like a NYC associate in my market you're going to have considerably more take home pay than an associate in NYC, just based on rent.Tiago Splitter wrote:The cost of living calculators are such a joke. You can tell this for many reasons, one of which is that they say making 377k in Manhattan is like making 290k in Brooklyn.UnicornHunter wrote:There's no way that's true unless your only expense is rent.UVAIce wrote:My current salary as a first year in the market I'm in is worth ~$377K in Manhattan (~$290k in Brooklyn). So NYC can go to $190K a year and I'm more than happy to stay.Clearly wrote:Cravaths gonna take us home. I'm seriously considering 3L oci to switch to a lower col market that went to 160. I'm not the only one.
-
1styearlateral

- Posts: 953
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 3:55 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
This is a fair point to make but I think the accurate comparison is $/square foot (not bedroom/bathroom), which will rise/fall depending on how desirable of a location those particular square feet you are buying. NYC is one of the most, if not THE most, desirable places on the planet. Exclusivity isn't cheap.Tiago Splitter wrote:Just to bring this thread back off topic one final time, what you're saying is exactly the problem with the calculator. There is no 4 bedroom single family home with a big yard to buy in midtown Manhattan. And if there were, you'd need to make way more than 377k to afford it.UVAIce wrote:There is some truth to this, but I think it also hits the head the nail on the head when it comes to certain things. For example, the type of home I live in probably doesn't exist in NYC or to own that home in the region it would cost more money and I would have an insane commute. And if you're willing to live like a NYC associate in my market you're going to have considerably more take home pay than an associate in NYC, just based on rent.Tiago Splitter wrote:The cost of living calculators are such a joke. You can tell this for many reasons, one of which is that they say making 377k in Manhattan is like making 290k in Brooklyn.UnicornHunter wrote:There's no way that's true unless your only expense is rent.UVAIce wrote:My current salary as a first year in the market I'm in is worth ~$377K in Manhattan (~$290k in Brooklyn). So NYC can go to $190K a year and I'm more than happy to stay.Clearly wrote:Cravaths gonna take us home. I'm seriously considering 3L oci to switch to a lower col market that went to 160. I'm not the only one.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- UVAIce

- Posts: 451
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 3:10 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
I don't disagree with any of this.Tiago Splitter wrote:Just to bring this thread back off topic one final time, what you're saying is exactly the problem with the calculator. There is no 4 bedroom single family home with a big yard to buy in midtown Manhattan. And if there were, you'd need to make way more than 377k to afford it.UVAIce wrote:There is some truth to this, but I think it also hits the head the nail on the head when it comes to certain things. For example, the type of home I live in probably doesn't exist in NYC or to own that home in the region it would cost more money and I would have an insane commute. And if you're willing to live like a NYC associate in my market you're going to have considerably more take home pay than an associate in NYC, just based on rent.Tiago Splitter wrote:The cost of living calculators are such a joke. You can tell this for many reasons, one of which is that they say making 377k in Manhattan is like making 290k in Brooklyn.UnicornHunter wrote:There's no way that's true unless your only expense is rent.UVAIce wrote:My current salary as a first year in the market I'm in is worth ~$377K in Manhattan (~$290k in Brooklyn). So NYC can go to $190K a year and I'm more than happy to stay.Clearly wrote:Cravaths gonna take us home. I'm seriously considering 3L oci to switch to a lower col market that went to 160. I'm not the only one.
And to get back on track, if so many secondary markets can afford to pay their associates $160K plus (at least some of them) the NYC scale across the various classes then it's about time for Cravath or someone to raise the pay scale.
- emkay625

- Posts: 1988
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:31 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
Do we have a breakdown of billing rates anywhere? In other words, are NYC offices charging higher rates than Houston/Atlanta/Chicago offices of the same firm?
-
h2go

- Posts: 168
- Joined: Sat May 30, 2015 8:38 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
Yes, at my firm.emkay625 wrote:Do we have a breakdown of billing rates anywhere? In other words, are NYC offices charging higher rates than Houston/Atlanta/Chicago offices of the same firm?
- grand inquisitor

- Posts: 3767
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 11:21 am
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
yesemkay625 wrote:Do we have a breakdown of billing rates anywhere? In other words, are NYC offices charging higher rates than Houston/Atlanta/Chicago offices of the same firm?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- PeanutsNJam

- Posts: 4670
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:57 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
NYC not gonna go up till T14 grads start turning down NYC firms for secondary market firms, and since law students are prestige whores and NYC firms have their shitty Vault list, that'll never happen.
- BmoreOrLess

- Posts: 2195
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:15 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
A lot of people I know did just this at GULC, and plenty of them aren't staying in DC either. I think this is definitely a trend here.PeanutsNJam wrote:NYC not gonna go up tillT14T13grads start turning down NYC firms for secondary market firms, and since law students are prestige whores and NYC firms have their shitty Vault list, that'll never happen.
Some Milbank partners who were doing a presentation here were even saying that it's frustrating how many laterals they lose to secondary markets.
- UnicornHunter

- Posts: 13507
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 9:16 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
Secondary markets just aren't big enough to really threaten NYC. People don't go to NY because of some misguided perception of prestige, they go because that's where the jerbs are. There's a reason why bid NYC is common OCS advice, and it's not because OCS's across the T14 think NYC is just the awesomest.BmoreOrLess wrote:A lot of people I know did just this at GULC, and plenty of them aren't staying in DC either. I think this is definitely a trend here.PeanutsNJam wrote:NYC not gonna go up tillT14T13grads start turning down NYC firms for secondary market firms, and since law students are prestige whores and NYC firms have their shitty Vault list, that'll never happen.
Some Milbank partners who were doing a presentation here were even saying that it's frustrating how many laterals they lose to secondary markets.
- First Offense

- Posts: 7091
- Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:45 pm
Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)
If top candidates chose DC/Chicago/SF over NYC in large enough numbers, that's enough to pressure them.UnicornHunter wrote:Secondary markets just aren't big enough to really threaten NYC. People don't go to NY because of some misguided perception of prestige, they go because that's where the jerbs are. There's a reason why bid NYC is common OCS advice, and it's not because OCS's across the T14 think NYC is just the awesomest.BmoreOrLess wrote:A lot of people I know did just this at GULC, and plenty of them aren't staying in DC either. I think this is definitely a trend here.PeanutsNJam wrote:NYC not gonna go up tillT14T13grads start turning down NYC firms for secondary market firms, and since law students are prestige whores and NYC firms have their shitty Vault list, that'll never happen.
Some Milbank partners who were doing a presentation here were even saying that it's frustrating how many laterals they lose to secondary markets.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login