I mean Milbank would probably have anticipated a DPW re-raise after their initial announcement, and planned accordingly- and they probably expected DPW to raise more than they did. So Milbank may have anticipated needing to go higher than this, and gone ahead with their first raise anyways. Their partnership might be happy to walk away now and save some money, or they might think "well we planned for more anyways, so lets just go for broke and raise to what we expected."DoveBodyWash wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:09 pmCould see this tooAnonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:06 pmHilariously weak. If I was Milbucks I'd re-raise just to assert dominance.
Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432618
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Yeah I could see these levels. Really sleeves off their vest given their size vis-a-vis peers. Might finally force larger shops like Skadden/Sidley to stagger pay in different marketsAureliusCapital wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:18 pmIt should be 215 -> 225 -> 250 -> 300 -> 350 -> 375 -> 400 -> 425.DoveBodyWash wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:08 pmpredicting CSM to come over top. DPW made it too easy. Relatively cheap for a single office shop like Cravath. How many senior associates do they even have at this point?
215
225
250
295
340
365
385
400
-
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2019 8:17 pm
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:19 pmYeah, I could see Cravath or another major player cleaning this up in its announcement along these lines.DoveBodyWash wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:08 pmpredicting CSM to come over top. DPW made it too easy. Relatively cheap for a single office shop like Cravath. How many senior associates do they even have at this point?
215
225
250
295
340
365
385
400
Not sure re the "cleaning it up." Part of the thinking, especially from a firm like DPW (recall their emails re optics at the start of the pandemic), is that clients are pretty well aware that juniors have less value. Yes yes, we know, the raise doesn't have to come out of the client's pocket, but clients still think in a way that makes it seem that it does, ultimately. So it makes sense, in a way, that raises on the eve of a slow-down (and war...?) skip the most junior year classes.
-
- Posts: 432618
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
I’d call this thread a draw since all the hysterical “V10 firms won’t match and are going permanently under-market” people were wrong (and were clearly wrong all along); but, as usual, the “maybe now we’ll see stratification and V10 pulling away from the rest” camp was also wrong.
ETA: So in broad strokes, this is all just a continuation of status quo. One of the lasting impacts of this raise cycle may be the timeline: I don’t think anyone at the start expected this to take a month to resolve. Not sure whether that’s something we’ll continue to see going forward.
ETA: So in broad strokes, this is all just a continuation of status quo. One of the lasting impacts of this raise cycle may be the timeline: I don’t think anyone at the start expected this to take a month to resolve. Not sure whether that’s something we’ll continue to see going forward.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 432618
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Just a thought of positivity: DPW failing to shatter the Milbank scale could be influenced by the anticipation of needing to award spring/fall bonuses consistent with last year.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- BrowsingTLS
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2021 6:17 pm
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
As a non-useless junior (who knows other non-useless juniors) fuck DPW.
-
- Posts: 432618
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
So do we think the rest of the v10 is going to match dpw's exact scale? More importantly (for me), what are the chances that they bump first years to 220?
-
- Posts: 432618
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Babe, we're all pretty useless.BrowsingTLS wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:28 pmAs a non-useless junior (who knows other non-useless juniors) fuck DPW.
-
- Posts: 432618
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Right. Weren’t those first announced in late March last year? If DPW waits to true people up until 3/15, they could be announcing spring bonuses before the subsequent paycheck… it could all be part of a master plan to maximize retention.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:27 pmJust a thought of positivity: DPW failing to shatter the Milbank scale could be influenced by the anticipation of needing to award spring/fall bonuses consistent with last year.
-
- Posts: 432618
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
I mean cleaning up the odd-ball numbers, not necessarily adding comp for years 1-3Joachim2017 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:24 pmAnonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:19 pmYeah, I could see Cravath or another major player cleaning this up in its announcement along these lines.DoveBodyWash wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:08 pmpredicting CSM to come over top. DPW made it too easy. Relatively cheap for a single office shop like Cravath. How many senior associates do they even have at this point?
215
225
250
295
340
365
385
400
Not sure re the "cleaning it up." Part of the thinking, especially from a firm like DPW (recall their emails re optics at the start of the pandemic), is that clients are pretty well aware that juniors have less value. Yes yes, we know, the raise doesn't have to come out of the client's pocket, but clients still think in a way that makes it seem that it does, ultimately. So it makes sense, in a way, that raises on the eve of a slow-down (and war...?) skip the most junior year classes.
-
- Posts: 432618
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
I think this might be how it goes from now on. Most associates would probably prefer the true-up plus the long wait over a faster process with no backpay, and firms probably like the fact that it takes some of the pressure off them to match quickly.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:27 pmI’d call this thread a draw since all the hysterical “V10 firms won’t match and are going permanently under-market” people were wrong (and were clearly wrong all along); but, as usual, the “maybe now we’ll see stratification and V10 pulling away from the rest” camp was also wrong.
ETA: So in broad strokes, this is all just a continuation of status quo. One of the lasting impacts of this raise cycle may be the timeline: I don’t think anyone at the start expected this to take a month to resolve. Not sure whether that’s something we’ll continue to see going forward.
-
- Posts: 432618
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
I thought I was a non-useless junior when I was a junior, too. I was wrong.BrowsingTLS wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:28 pmAs a non-useless junior (who knows other non-useless juniors) fuck DPW.
-
- Posts: 432618
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Watch as I become less useful as the gap between my salary and mid-level's+ becomes larger.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:48 pmI thought I was a non-useless junior when I was a junior, too. I was wrong.BrowsingTLS wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:28 pmAs a non-useless junior (who knows other non-useless juniors) fuck DPW.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432618
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:49 pmWatch as I become less useful as the gap between my salary and mid-level's+ becomes larger.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:48 pmI thought I was a non-useless junior when I was a junior, too. I was wrong.BrowsingTLS wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:28 pmAs a non-useless junior (who knows other non-useless juniors) fuck DPW.
Do you realize how little money we're talking about, after taxes? Not worth the emotion or frustration, TBH. Mental energy is real energy.
-
- Posts: 432618
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Cool, then that junior should get fired. He/she just got a 10-15k raise (on top of their class year bump) for doing nothing more than continuing to work. He'll/she'll now make 215-250k base and maybe ~300k all-in depending on how special bonuses shake out. To essentially check commas. Junior associate worth is entirely about availability and working long hours. You're not getting paid these sums because of your great heart surgery technique.goanchors wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:14 pmNot to rehash the thread about junior availability, but if I’m a junior, I’m now even more incentivized to wait to respond any weekend and late night items until 9-5 business hours and say “sorry, my current workload does not allow for me to help with this request.”flowersandsunshine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:08 pmWhat does DPW have against C/O 2021? First 202.5 and now this
-
- Posts: 432618
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
I still think there's a real chance spring / fall bonuses get announced. People need to calm the fuck down. There's a thread that was getting a lot of traction in January just before Milbank started this that was asking for predictions about whether (and if so, when) spring bonuses would get announced and the smart money was on "yes, March." Maybe that timing gets pushed back a tad but if the money continues to come in then I don't see why not. I still put it at better than even odds that there's some sort of mid-year special bonus announcement this year.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:32 pmRight. Weren’t those first announced in late March last year? If DPW waits to true people up until 3/15, they could be announcing spring bonuses before the subsequent paycheck… it could all be part of a master plan to maximize retention.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:27 pmJust a thought of positivity: DPW failing to shatter the Milbank scale could be influenced by the anticipation of needing to award spring/fall bonuses consistent with last year.
-
- Posts: 485
- Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2019 5:23 pm
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
they aren't getting paid for "availability" they are getting paid because that is what the market demands. what's "market" isn't constant availability on the part of juniorsAnonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 5:04 pmCool, then that junior should get fired. He/she just got a 10-15k raise (on top of their class year bump) for doing nothing more than continuing to work. He'll/she'll now make 215-250k base and maybe ~300k all-in depending on how special bonuses shake out. To essentially check commas. Junior associate worth is entirely about availability and working long hours. You're not getting paid these sums because of your great heart surgery technique.goanchors wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:14 pmNot to rehash the thread about junior availability, but if I’m a junior, I’m now even more incentivized to wait to respond any weekend and late night items until 9-5 business hours and say “sorry, my current workload does not allow for me to help with this request.”flowersandsunshine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:08 pmWhat does DPW have against C/O 2021? First 202.5 and now this
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 2:08 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
When the market tanks and firms are looking to trim the fat, availability on the part of juniors will become market. Agreed it isn’t now, though.jotarokujo wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 5:10 pmthey aren't getting paid for "availability" they are getting paid because that is what the market demands. what's "market" isn't constant availability on the part of juniorsAnonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 5:04 pmCool, then that junior should get fired. He/she just got a 10-15k raise (on top of their class year bump) for doing nothing more than continuing to work. He'll/she'll now make 215-250k base and maybe ~300k all-in depending on how special bonuses shake out. To essentially check commas. Junior associate worth is entirely about availability and working long hours. You're not getting paid these sums because of your great heart surgery technique.goanchors wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:14 pmNot to rehash the thread about junior availability, but if I’m a junior, I’m now even more incentivized to wait to respond any weekend and late night items until 9-5 business hours and say “sorry, my current workload does not allow for me to help with this request.”flowersandsunshine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:08 pmWhat does DPW have against C/O 2021? First 202.5 and now this
-
- Posts: 432618
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
So… any predictions for a third re-raise for years 1-3?
-
- Posts: 432618
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
(Guy from Kirkland's Salt Lake City office.) In all seriousness, the "market" for most biglaw firms in most cities has built in an expectation that if I e-mail you as a 27 year old 2nd year at 11pm at night you'll respond with a "will do" not a "sorry, you've reached me after ordinary business hours." That's a major reason the pay is what it is in biglaw. We all acknowledge attrition is up but it isn't up so significantly that that fundamental piece of the model has changed.jotarokujo wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 5:10 pmthey aren't getting paid for "availability" they are getting paid because that is what the market demands. what's "market" isn't constant availability on the part of juniorsAnonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 5:04 pmCool, then that junior should get fired. He/she just got a 10-15k raise (on top of their class year bump) for doing nothing more than continuing to work. He'll/she'll now make 215-250k base and maybe ~300k all-in depending on how special bonuses shake out. To essentially check commas. Junior associate worth is entirely about availability and working long hours. You're not getting paid these sums because of your great heart surgery technique.goanchors wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:14 pmNot to rehash the thread about junior availability, but if I’m a junior, I’m now even more incentivized to wait to respond any weekend and late night items until 9-5 business hours and say “sorry, my current workload does not allow for me to help with this request.”flowersandsunshine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:08 pmWhat does DPW have against C/O 2021? First 202.5 and now this
Last edited by Anonymous User on Tue Feb 22, 2022 5:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 432618
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Looking at some of the posts in this thread, it seems our worth is somewhere between "incredibly high" and "overpaid comma checkers." Given that the partners at my firm hate to check their own commas, I'd say we are 100% getting re-raises.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 5:12 pmSo… any predictions for a third re-raise for years 1-3?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432618
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Hey, to defend myself as the "comma chaser" guy, I don't think juniors are overpaid. I think they're paid about what they should be given how we're billing and the $ we're bringing in. I'm just pointing out that that pay comes with certain expectations and I thought it was pretty galling to see that one comment complaining about how they think juniors are entitled to go to a 9-5 model because they've "only" gotten a 10-15k raise (to the tune of maybe 250k-300k all-in now). ThankAnonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 5:14 pmLooking at some of the posts in this thread, it seems our worth is somewhere between "incredibly high" and "overpaid comma checkers." Given that the partners at my firm hate to check their own commas, I'd say we are 100% getting re-raises.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 5:12 pmSo… any predictions for a third re-raise for years 1-3?
-
- Posts: 432618
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
isn't cap markets deal flow finally slowing down? I have absolutely nothing against more money for us, but confused as to why bonuses would be on the table when everyone is dragging their feet to match Milbank and things finally seem to be slowing a bit after two busy yearsAnonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 5:09 pmI still think there's a real chance spring / fall bonuses get announced. People need to calm the fuck down. There's a thread that was getting a lot of traction in January just before Milbank started this that was asking for predictions about whether (and if so, when) spring bonuses would get announced and the smart money was on "yes, March." Maybe that timing gets pushed back a tad but if the money continues to come in then I don't see why not. I still put it at better than even odds that there's some sort of mid-year special bonus announcement this year.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:32 pmRight. Weren’t those first announced in late March last year? If DPW waits to true people up until 3/15, they could be announcing spring bonuses before the subsequent paycheck… it could all be part of a master plan to maximize retention.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:27 pmJust a thought of positivity: DPW failing to shatter the Milbank scale could be influenced by the anticipation of needing to award spring/fall bonuses consistent with last year.
-
- Posts: 432618
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Yeah, fire the junior and check the commas yourself, I mean all through this thread mid levels and seniors have been talking about how much spare capacity to do more work they have. Shouldn't be a problem.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 5:04 pmCool, then that junior should get fired. He/she just got a 10-15k raise (on top of their class year bump) for doing nothing more than continuing to work. He'll/she'll now make 215-250k base and maybe ~300k all-in depending on how special bonuses shake out. To essentially check commas. Junior associate worth is entirely about availability and working long hours. You're not getting paid these sums because of your great heart surgery technique.goanchors wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:14 pmNot to rehash the thread about junior availability, but if I’m a junior, I’m now even more incentivized to wait to respond any weekend and late night items until 9-5 business hours and say “sorry, my current workload does not allow for me to help with this request.”flowersandsunshine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:08 pmWhat does DPW have against C/O 2021? First 202.5 and now this
-
- Posts: 432618
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
You sound miserable to work for. Other juniors, don't let people tell you you're worth so little. Unless you want to make partner. Then you have no worth and should grind until you can't take it.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 5:13 pm(Guy from Kirkland's Salt Lake City office.) In all seriousness, the "market" for most biglaw firms in most cities has built in an expectation that if I e-mail you as a 27 year old 2nd year at 11pm at night you'll respond with a "will do" not a "sorry, you've reached me after ordinary business hours." That's a major reason the pay is what it is in biglaw. We all acknowledge attrition is up but it isn't up so significantly that that fundamental piece of the model has changed.jotarokujo wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 5:10 pmthey aren't getting paid for "availability" they are getting paid because that is what the market demands. what's "market" isn't constant availability on the part of juniorsAnonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 5:04 pmCool, then that junior should get fired. He/she just got a 10-15k raise (on top of their class year bump) for doing nothing more than continuing to work. He'll/she'll now make 215-250k base and maybe ~300k all-in depending on how special bonuses shake out. To essentially check commas. Junior associate worth is entirely about availability and working long hours. You're not getting paid these sums because of your great heart surgery technique.goanchors wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:14 pmNot to rehash the thread about junior availability, but if I’m a junior, I’m now even more incentivized to wait to respond any weekend and late night items until 9-5 business hours and say “sorry, my current workload does not allow for me to help with this request.”flowersandsunshine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:08 pmWhat does DPW have against C/O 2021? First 202.5 and now this
Source -- Second year in good standing with great reviews, who would either ignore your email until the morning or reply with a "will look in the morning."
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login