NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon does a 180! Holder wept.) Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Who will join the CovingTTTon list next?

WilmerHale
15
6%
Arnold & Porter
23
10%
Hogan Lovells
12
5%
Akin Gump
7
3%
Jones Day
114
47%
Jenner & Block
8
3%
Paul Hastings
7
3%
WachTTTell
23
10%
Other
7
3%
No one! YAY!
25
10%
 
Total votes: 241

philepistemer

Bronze
Posts: 104
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 5:43 am

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by philepistemer » Thu May 05, 2016 9:24 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Not flame and hopefully can be corroborated by a CSM associate:

Heard from a friend that Cravath had their yearly state of the union presentation yesterday and their managing partner openly asked about whether compensation was too low and specifically acknowledged rents and student loans as costs that have ballooned since salaries were evaluated. Said if anything happens it would be post summer though.
Can confirm that this is not a flame and actually happened.
Ordered seamless after seeing this. Dat permanent income hypothesis.

misterjames

Bronze
Posts: 266
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 1:20 am

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by misterjames » Fri May 06, 2016 11:50 am

even ATL is getting in on the action: http://abovethelaw.com/2016/05/ny-to-19 ... -pay-hike/

"Interestingly enough, partners with say on this subject seem open to the idea. I had breakfast a few weeks ago with a Biglaw hiring partner who acknowledged that yes, it’s probably about time for a new salary scale. I spoke by phone the other day with a managing partner who expressed a similar willingness to consider the issue. These days, the response of Biglaw management to the idea of a pay hike is “tell us more and make the case” — as opposed to what you would have gotten during the Great Recession and early recovery, “NFW — just be grateful you have a job.”"

User avatar
Actus Reus

Bronze
Posts: 460
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:21 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by Actus Reus » Fri May 06, 2016 11:51 am

philepistemer wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Not flame and hopefully can be corroborated by a CSM associate:

Heard from a friend that Cravath had their yearly state of the union presentation yesterday and their managing partner openly asked about whether compensation was too low and specifically acknowledged rents and student loans as costs that have ballooned since salaries were evaluated. Said if anything happens it would be post summer though.
Can confirm that this is not a flame and actually happened.
Ordered seamless after seeing this. Dat permanent income hypothesis.
Okay, he may have asked, but did anyone say yes or agree.

User avatar
postard

Bronze
Posts: 154
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:39 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by postard » Fri May 06, 2016 1:50 pm

Actus Reus wrote:
philepistemer wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Not flame and hopefully can be corroborated by a CSM associate:

Heard from a friend that Cravath had their yearly state of the union presentation yesterday and their managing partner openly asked about whether compensation was too low and specifically acknowledged rents and student loans as costs that have ballooned since salaries were evaluated. Said if anything happens it would be post summer though.
Can confirm that this is not a flame and actually happened.
Ordered seamless after seeing this. Dat permanent income hypothesis.
Okay, he may have asked, but did anyone say yes or agree.
+1

C'mon Cravath folks, power yields nothing without a demand.

User avatar
Br3v

Gold
Posts: 4290
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:18 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by Br3v » Fri May 06, 2016 2:38 pm

"Nah boss, we good"

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
DELG

Gold
Posts: 3021
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 7:15 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by DELG » Fri May 06, 2016 3:14 pm

Another smaller market moves to 160 http://abovethelaw.com/2016/05/nationwi ... s-america/

favabeansoup

Bronze
Posts: 417
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 1:26 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by favabeansoup » Fri May 06, 2016 3:25 pm

DELG wrote:Another smaller market moves to 160 http://abovethelaw.com/2016/05/nationwi ... s-america/
jesus making 160k in freaking Richmond or Charlotte compared to NYC. Not trying to say everyone should move to those places at all, just that the huge COL difference + same salary is so striking.

User avatar
monsterman

Bronze
Posts: 323
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:29 am

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by monsterman » Fri May 06, 2016 3:28 pm

favabeansoup wrote:
DELG wrote:Another smaller market moves to 160 http://abovethelaw.com/2016/05/nationwi ... s-america/
jesus making 160k in freaking Richmond or Charlotte compared to NYC. Not trying to say everyone should move to those places at all, just that the huge COL difference + same salary is so striking.
Yeah you could buy a city block for 160k in Richmond holy hell

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by Anonymous User » Fri May 06, 2016 3:52 pm

whats the prestige to dollar conversion agiain?

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
smaug

Diamond
Posts: 13972
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by smaug » Fri May 06, 2016 3:58 pm

Help, this is actually making me think the market will move. (Only to 175, though)

I'm like actually hopeful. Someone snap me out of it please.

anonnymouse

Bronze
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:52 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by anonnymouse » Fri May 06, 2016 4:08 pm

smaug wrote:Help, this is actually making me think the market will move. (Only to 175, though)

I'm like actually hopeful. Someone snap me out of it please.
One of us, one of us.

User avatar
Desert Fox

Diamond
Posts: 18283
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by Desert Fox » Fri May 06, 2016 4:10 pm

This secondary market stuff is just millenials that are willing to pay outrageous money to live near a milkbar or a vegan smoke shop in a BIG CITY. That draws them away from secondary cities.

Some of these secondary cities might get to 190k before MFH does.
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 2:55 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
smaug

Diamond
Posts: 13972
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by smaug » Fri May 06, 2016 4:12 pm

Desert Fox wrote:This secondary market stuff is just millenials that are willing to pay outrageous money to live near a milkbar or a vegan smoke shop in a BIG CITY. That draws them away from secondary cities.

Some of these secondary cities might get to 190k before MFH does.
I read this three times and couldn't parse it [real name]

Can you explain again with less shtick?

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
grand inquisitor

Gold
Posts: 3767
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 11:21 am

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by grand inquisitor » Fri May 06, 2016 4:14 pm

he said that even if they could have more buying power in a secondary market, most hipster millenials will choose to live in MFH to be a block from a vegan grocery that has a yoga studio on its 2d floor. this demand will keep the supply of lustful associates flowing into ny such that you won't need to raise salaries. basically, milkbar to 1.90 a cookie

User avatar
emkay625

Gold
Posts: 1988
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:31 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by emkay625 » Fri May 06, 2016 4:17 pm

I truly do not understand the allure of NYC or SF on 160 when you could live in Houston/Dallas/Raleigh/Atlanta etc. on 160. Yes, NYC has good restaurants and theatre and bars and the like. But those other cities have those as well, just in lesser amounts, and it's not as if you have enough free time to be able to experience all that NYC/SF have to offer, anyway. Also I would not enjoy paying $2500 a month to live in a shoebox. But I grew up in Texas, so I'm biased.

But I honestly don't get it.

There are vegan grocery stores and yoga studios and milkbars and mustache grooming specialists in secondary markets. They just will charge you 50% of what one in NYC would.

User avatar
glitched

Silver
Posts: 1263
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 9:50 am

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by glitched » Fri May 06, 2016 4:19 pm

emkay625 wrote:I truly do not understand the allure of NYC or SF on 160 when you could live in Houston/Dallas/Raleigh/Atlanta etc. on 160. Yes, NYC has good restaurants and theatre and bars and the like. But those other cities have those as well, just in lesser amounts, and it's not as if you have enough free time to be able to experience all that NYC/SF have to offer, anyway. Also I would not enjoy paying $2500 a month to live in a shoebox. But I grew up in Texas, so I'm biased.

But I honestly don't get it.

There are vegan grocery stores and yoga studios and milkbars and mustache grooming specialists in secondary markets. They just will charge you 50% of what one in NYC would.
have you ever heard of times square? checkmate.

User avatar
smaug

Diamond
Posts: 13972
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by smaug » Fri May 06, 2016 4:21 pm

Oh. Well (1) it's harder to get the job in the secondary market most of the time and (2) I think there are people like me who refuse to drive and like being in a city with intelligent high achievers.

The biggest difference between NY and other places I've lived is that the people you meet are just way better

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
Tiago Splitter

Diamond
Posts: 17148
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by Tiago Splitter » Fri May 06, 2016 4:29 pm

WTF is a milkbar?

User avatar
acijku2

New
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 5:19 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by acijku2 » Fri May 06, 2016 4:31 pm

Desert Fox wrote:This secondary market stuff is just millenials that are willing to pay outrageous money to live near a milkbar or a vegan smoke shop in a BIG CITY. That draws them away from secondary cities.

Some of these secondary cities might get to 190k before MFH does.
That Crack Pie doe...

SplitMyPants

Gold
Posts: 1673
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:22 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by SplitMyPants » Fri May 06, 2016 4:33 pm

Tiago Splitter wrote:WTF is a milkbar?
all i can think of is clockwork orange

Danger Zone

Platinum
Posts: 8258
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 10:36 am

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by Danger Zone » Fri May 06, 2016 4:34 pm

Tiago Splitter wrote:WTF is a milkbar?
Momofuku bruh
Last edited by Danger Zone on Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!



1styearlateral

Silver
Posts: 953
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 3:55 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by 1styearlateral » Fri May 06, 2016 4:43 pm

The outrageous rent is the only thing I can't seem to get myself to choke down. $16 for a burger? Ok. $2,500 for a studio? Woof.

User avatar
TLSModBot

Diamond
Posts: 14835
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:54 am

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by TLSModBot » Fri May 06, 2016 4:49 pm

smaug wrote:Help, this is actually making me think the market will move. (Only to 175, though)

I'm like actually hopeful. Someone snap me out of it please.
Law firm revenue growth is largely flat, expense growth has only been curtailed due to a massive series of one-off expense reductions (minimizing office space/leases, reducing staff headcount, etc.), and employee salaries are the single largest expense of law firms (60-70% of firm costs). Meanwhile, the catastrophic industry reliance on PPP and other similarly manipulable metrics means that firms will put partner profits over other things 9 times out of 10.

Excepting a few dozen firms at the top who are actually growing, the vast majority of BigLaw couldn't handle a move to 190. Those at the top who could move have no real incentive to because, what, people are going to stop coming to work at Cravath, Quinn, SullCrom, DPW, etc.? Please.

User avatar
2014

Platinum
Posts: 6028
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm

Re: NY to 190k?? (!!) (possibly led by Paul Weiss) (and Cravath!!)

Post by 2014 » Fri May 06, 2016 4:56 pm

1styearlateral wrote:
The outrageous rent is the only thing I can't seem to get myself to choke down. $16 for a burger? Ok. $2,500 for a studio? Woof.
lol 2500, thats below median in most MFH neighborhoods

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”