
NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon does a 180! Holder wept.) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
- Cobretti
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Well looks like KE cares about recruiting junior talent, shocking 

- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
- bearsfan23
- Posts: 1754
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:19 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
I really can't wait for the day NY does go to $190k (or whatever they raise it to).
DF is going to be so pissed. He's literally the only law student/associate who doesn't want salaries to go up. I get you hate being a lawyer DF, but this crusade against pay raises is just weird
DF is going to be so pissed. He's literally the only law student/associate who doesn't want salaries to go up. I get you hate being a lawyer DF, but this crusade against pay raises is just weird
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 3311
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
I don't want pay going up either.
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
He's a realist, guys, not a misanthrope.Desert Fox wrote:Woa woa woabearsfan23 wrote:I really can't wait for the day NY does go to $190k (or whatever they raise it to).
DF is going to be so pissed. He's literally the only law student/associate who doesn't want salaries to go up. I get you hate being a lawyer DF, but this crusade against pay raises is just weird
I think we are underpaid. I would throw a party if DC to 190k happened.
I just don't think it will.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Why not?minnbills wrote:I don't want pay going up either.
-
- Posts: 3311
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
I'm (in a not funny way) joking. Of course I want people to do better.
But seeing people make 6 times what I do instead of 5 is not exactly fun, either.
But seeing people make 6 times what I do instead of 5 is not exactly fun, either.
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
- 84651846190
- Posts: 2198
- Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
don't have time to read the last few pages of this thread. could someone *concisely* summarize, please? thank
- abitaman6363
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 9:42 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Sure. Minor signs indicate that NY will move to $190k, and as incredible as that is, no one really has a damn clue if that is true or not. Everyone wants the pay increase to happen (despite DF joking about it and minnbills feeling slightly insecure about his salary relative to biglaw associates).Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:don't have time to read the last few pages of this thread. could someone *concisely* summarize, please? thank
As for the minor signs: Some Philly firms have increased to $160k (thereby putting pressure on NYC firms to shoot higher), no pay increases since ST did so in 2007, PPP has caught up to it's 2007 levels, Paul Weiss told summer they would announce compensation structure in February 2016 (OP said last time this happened was when there was a pay increase but unsure if this is true), and some other "clues" that seem nuanced at best and naïve at worst.
(I think that catches everything)
As for my own opinion (fwiw), we all want pay raises to happen. The more word gets out that it is expected to, the more pressure there will be on NYC-based firms to do so. In the meantime, there is little incentive for management to decrease partner profits by $30k/1st year associate (not to mention potentially larger cuts in profits per partner for salary increases for mid- and senior level associates). Thus, I am skeptical but do appreciate the up-tick in chatter on the subject and hope the ripple becomes a wave.
Last edited by abitaman6363 on Fri Jul 31, 2015 12:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- abitaman6363
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 9:42 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Also, I cannot believe Philly has been $145k until now. Even TX firms (Dallas, Houston, and several Austin firms) have been at the NYC $160k level and there is not even state tax here.
-
- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
2Ls argue that firms are under pressure to increase starting salaries by 20% because _____.Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:don't have time to read the last few pages of this thread. could someone *concisely* summarize, please? thank
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
dixiecupdrinking wrote:Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:don't have time to read the last few pages of this thread. could someone *concisely* summarize, please? thank2Ls argue that firms are under pressure to increase starting salaries by 20% because ____NYC to 190
- Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
WHAT! This is the second time I've seen you cockblocking lawyers. You realize we are all in the same field right? Shit that is good for them is good for all of us down the road at some point - even people working in small law shops that seem completely disconnected.minnbills wrote:I don't want pay going up either.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 3311
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
See my later post broJohannDeMann wrote:WHAT! This is the second time I've seen you cockblocking lawyers. You realize we are all in the same field right? Shit that is good for them is good for all of us down the road at some point - even people working in small law shops that seem completely disconnected.minnbills wrote:I don't want pay going up either.
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
- Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Let me tell you how this works. Biglaw attorney that was going to leave and open up his own shop because he was making 250k busting his ass is now making 300k and decides to stay in biglaw. There is less competition among the smaller firms because the demand pie for legal services grew. You now have more clients willing to pay you $300 an hour instead of slashing your rate to $150 an hour or writing off significant amounts of time to compete with the lawyer beside you.minnbills wrote:I'm (in a not funny way) joking. Of course I want people to do better.
But seeing people make 6 times what I do instead of 5 is not exactly fun, either.
Yeah sorry didn't read your later post until now. It's a good thing. Your pay will go up too. Legal services being in demand is good for us all.
-
- Posts: 3311
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
It's not a good thing for anybody but biglaw associates. As someone who works in shitlaw, I can tell you with 100% confidence that my clients are NOT going to be paying me any more because the real lawyers now make more. They can't afford to pay me more. It's not different for any of the other lawyers in my office either (they practice in different areas).
If biglaw pay jumps, the only difference for me is I feel even shittier about my own life.
If biglaw pay jumps, the only difference for me is I feel even shittier about my own life.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
No it's not. Looks like KE is swimming in work that they would otherwise be leaving on the table without having the 3Ls do it. The partner takes a cut, the 3L gets a portion and everyone is happier than they were if that work jsut sat on the table.Desert Fox wrote:also biglaw salary is a zero sum game. Either I get or some cocksucking partner gets EXTRA money on top of his two mil a year.
- Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
If you're gonna be this dumb and pessimistic, you prolly deserve to work in shitlaw, but that's not how it works at all. More biglaw work means more assoicates hired means less people competing for insurance defense jobs means less people competing for shitlaw jobs. If biglaw firms have more work to do, the legal sector as a whole grew. If you don't understand how that places less pressure on the solos and small law shops, you just aren't looking at the big picture. It means less competition of people moving to regional law firms that are big relative to their size.minnbills wrote:It's not a good thing for anybody but biglaw associates. As someone who works in shitlaw, I can tell you with 100% confidence that my clients are NOT going to be paying me any more because the real lawyers now make more. They can't afford to pay me more. It's not different for any of the other lawyers in my office either (they practice in different areas).
If biglaw pay jumps, the only difference for me is I feel even shittier about my own life.
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
-
- Posts: 3311
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Disagree. We are talking about two separate worlds here. People don't move between one and the other very much. Of the 100 or so people in my practice area I've seen in my market so far (and I always make a point to research other attorneys) not a single one has worked in biglaw or at a comparable job.
They are essentially different markets altogether.
They are essentially different markets altogether.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login