yea it really is tough to know when you're behavior in social settings, or on an online forum, isn't appropriate in a professional setting.Anonymous User wrote:Last summer I implied during a lunch that I didn't go to class much. I got weird looks from an older partner. Sometimes it's easy to forget that what counts as acceptable, even laudable, behavior on TLS / in school sends the exact wrong message to an employer. He basically heard me say that I blow off scheduled meetings. Anyway, that's not enough to get no-offered, but it's the kind of slip-up that anyone -- not just weirdos -- can make.
Check out top-law-schools.com Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- Kratos
- Posts: 7776
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2014 3:50 pm
Re: Summer Associate Class of 2015: Get on In
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
Re: Summer Associate Class of 2015: Get on In
TLS-SA "I retook the LSAT 5 times so I wouldn't have to go to that TTT (that partner went to). I got my 170 and ED'd to UVA. I really wanna work here at SRZ because it's the harvard of fund work. Like these Alan Edmonds? (is on a boat)"
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 4:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Cobretti
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am
Re: Summer Associate Class of 2015: Get on In
Like exaggerating the point of someone's helpful anecdote given as advice in a conversation looking for advice on the very subject, just to make them sound like an asshole? Would that be inappropriate among colleagues?Kratos wrote:yea it really is tough to know when you're behavior in social settings, or on an online forum, isn't appropriate in a professional setting.Anonymous User wrote:Last summer I implied during a lunch that I didn't go to class much. I got weird looks from an older partner. Sometimes it's easy to forget that what counts as acceptable, even laudable, behavior on TLS / in school sends the exact wrong message to an employer. He basically heard me say that I blow off scheduled meetings. Anyway, that's not enough to get no-offered, but it's the kind of slip-up that anyone -- not just weirdos -- can make.
- Kratos
- Posts: 7776
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2014 3:50 pm
Re: Summer Associate Class of 2015: Get on In
not at all, they'll respect your no nonsense mentality
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: Summer Associate Class of 2015: Get on In
Checking in.
Really mad I can't get the "offers are totally a sure thing!" idea out of my brain and would be very grateful if someone would smack me every week to invigorate the motivational neuroses I need to overcome my SPS work habits. TYIA
Really mad I can't get the "offers are totally a sure thing!" idea out of my brain and would be very grateful if someone would smack me every week to invigorate the motivational neuroses I need to overcome my SPS work habits. TYIA
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
Re: Summer Associate Class of 2015: Get on In
do you work in a legit 100% firm?Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:Checking in.
Really mad I can't get the "offers are totally a sure thing!" idea out of my brain and would be very grateful if someone would smack me every week to invigorate the motivational neuroses I need to overcome my SPS work habits. TYIA
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 4:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
- lawhopeful10
- Posts: 979
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:29 pm
Re: Summer Associate Class of 2015: Get on In
Firm is business casual. Yes / no for a jacket first day and same question about a tie. I have never worked in an office before haha.
- chuckbass
- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: Summer Associate Class of 2015: Get on In
My firm is business casual as well and they said I may just want to wear a sports coat the first day fwiw. Figured I'd do that and then could just leave it at the office.lawhopeful10 wrote:Firm is business casual. Yes / no for a jacket first day and same question about a tie. I have never worked in an office before haha.
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: Summer Associate Class of 2015: Get on In
Then dress business casual. If you want to be extra conservative, wear a jacket.lawhopeful10 wrote:Firm is business casual. Yes / no for a jacket first day and same question about a tie. I have never worked in an office before haha.
- skers
- Posts: 5230
- Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:33 am
Re: Summer Associate Class of 2015: Get on In
I mean do you want to wear a jacket? No one is really going to care either way.lawhopeful10 wrote:Firm is business casual. Yes / no for a jacket first day and same question about a tie. I have never worked in an office before haha.
- lawhopeful10
- Posts: 979
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:29 pm
Re: Summer Associate Class of 2015: Get on In
Alright thanks. I guess the recurring theme here is to just not overthink things.
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: Summer Associate Class of 2015: Get on In
Almost? Only one no-offer in NYC in the past three years.Desert Fox wrote:do you work in a legit 100% firm?Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:Checking in.
Really mad I can't get the "offers are totally a sure thing!" idea out of my brain and would be very grateful if someone would smack me every week to invigorate the motivational neuroses I need to overcome my SPS work habits. TYIA
Really hoping it was hitting on a partner's wife or something controllable as opposed to work product issues.
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
Re: Summer Associate Class of 2015: Get on In
I'd be afraid. You absolutely can get shittcanned here.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:Almost? Only one no-offer in NYC in the past three years.Desert Fox wrote:do you work in a legit 100% firm?Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:Checking in.
Really mad I can't get the "offers are totally a sure thing!" idea out of my brain and would be very grateful if someone would smack me every week to invigorate the motivational neuroses I need to overcome my SPS work habits. TYIA
Really hoping it was hitting on a partner's wife or something controllable as opposed to work product issues.
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 4:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- skers
- Posts: 5230
- Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:33 am
Re: Summer Associate Class of 2015: Get on In
Idk if there's really a true 100% offer firm though.
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
Re: Summer Associate Class of 2015: Get on In
Yea there are. I know of one that offered someone who legit sexually harassed a midlevel, who requested he be no offered because of the harassment.skers wrote:Idk if there's really a true 100% offer firm though.
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 4:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 432506
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Summer Associate Class of 2015: Get on In
I'll be at a v5. Do you think those are truly 100% offers or do they cold offer enough to retract that status ?Desert Fox wrote:Yea there are. I know of one that offered someone who legit sexually harassed a midlevel, who requested he be no offered because of the harassment.skers wrote:Idk if there's really a true 100% offer firm though.
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
Re: Summer Associate Class of 2015: Get on In
I think Skadden will ding the dingberries. But Cravath, DPW, and Sulcrom seem to be 100%.Anonymous User wrote:I'll be at a v5. Do you think those are truly 100% offers or do they cold offer enough to retract that status ?Desert Fox wrote:Yea there are. I know of one that offered someone who legit sexually harassed a midlevel, who requested he be no offered because of the harassment.skers wrote:Idk if there's really a true 100% offer firm though.
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 4:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: Summer Associate Class of 2015: Get on In
Everything changes when you're at a v5. Everything.Anonymous User wrote:I'll be at a v5. Do you think those are truly 100% offers or do they cold offer enough to retract that status ?Desert Fox wrote:Yea there are. I know of one that offered someone who legit sexually harassed a midlevel, who requested he be no offered because of the harassment.skers wrote:Idk if there's really a true 100% offer firm though.
-
- Posts: 432506
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Summer Associate Class of 2015: Get on In
what's the consensus on having a mustache. Anon because of my mustache.
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 6:00 pm
Re: Summer Associate Class of 2015: Get on In
.
Last edited by Garden District on Sun Apr 03, 2016 1:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 432506
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Summer Associate Class of 2015: Get on In
2 no offers firm wide last year. 1 threw up on a partner apparently, so pretty close to 100%Desert Fox wrote:I think Skadden will ding the dingberries. But Cravath, DPW, and Sulcrom seem to be 100%.Anonymous User wrote:I'll be at a v5. Do you think those are truly 100% offers or do they cold offer enough to retract that status ?Desert Fox wrote:Yea there are. I know of one that offered someone who legit sexually harassed a midlevel, who requested he be no offered because of the harassment.skers wrote:Idk if there's really a true 100% offer firm though.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- goden
- Posts: 2756
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 12:52 pm
Re: Summer Associate Class of 2015: Get on In
Df please rank firms in order of most likely to no offer to least likely with approximate percentages tyia
-
- Posts: 432506
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Summer Associate Class of 2015: Get on In
1. WinsTTTon
2. Bingham Lewis
2. Bingham Lewis
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
Re: Summer Associate Class of 2015: Get on In
Nah, firms who purged go back to 100% to make it seem safe.Anonymous User wrote:1. WinsTTTon
2. Bingham Lewis
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 4:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2015 1:11 pm
Re: Summer Associate Class of 2015: Get on In
Checking in.
I'm not planning on shaving my beard. Sent in my headshot for the firm's internal network with a beard, too.Anonymous User wrote:what's the consensus on having a mustache. Anon because of my mustache.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login