NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon does a 180! Holder wept.) Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Who will join the CovingTTTon list next?

WilmerHale
15
6%
Arnold & Porter
23
10%
Hogan Lovells
12
5%
Akin Gump
7
3%
Jones Day
114
47%
Jenner & Block
8
3%
Paul Hastings
7
3%
WachTTTell
23
10%
Other
7
3%
No one! YAY!
25
10%
 
Total votes: 241

Mr. Peanutbutter

Diamond
Posts: 10168
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2015 3:48 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Mr. Peanutbutter » Tue Mar 22, 2016 7:55 pm

rpupkin wrote: Ah, I think I get it. So the firm has given summer associates a 10% raise over what a first-year associate would be paid. Does you think this portends a corresponding increase--or perhaps an even greater increase--for first-year associates?
No, they probably do it because it's easier than adding a new category in payroll. Plus, SAs are just added expense. It wouldn't be worth making them work the extra few days that would bring them to truly 2.5 months instead of 10 weeks.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Mar 22, 2016 7:58 pm

The only strategy for unionization at this point is organizing consolidated action.

Rumors and chattering class blog discussion will do nothing to influence the incumbent powers that be. There needs to be a demonstration of the ability to disrupt operations.

I would say a week long no call no show by a sufficient number of associates from 11-15 of V20 firms would get the necessary attention.

Of course the question is who would actually participate.

Senior associates are out despite the fact they have nothing to lose and would likely have the greatest impact psychologically because anyone past year 7 is an entrenched Uncle Tom who would sell us out like Steven in Django for a free closing dinner, a coupon for their cat's day spa, and the required pseudo sexual satisfaction they receive from self-flagellation.

Mid levels actions are still generally dictated by abuse coping responses, would cower in fear and crack after a few passive aggressive emails.

Which leaves juniors, most of whom of course are idiot art history major millennials who actually believe in stupid protest shit. The caveat there is that at least half of law school millennials are striver douches who would gladly scab for their peer strikers, feeling immense fulfillment at waking up in the office at 6am. Still, the youngins are the future life blood of the industry and an unannounced desertion by the hundreds should give significant pause to the Babylon.

I propose French Revolution Jacobin style meetings every Sunday evening in the kitchen of the shake shack in Murray Hill for all relevant (non-Fordham) first through third years to plan their attack. I won't be there, but with a few months of discussions we could have a "black July" that will shake boomers to their core and change the industry forever.

(Edit: I meant actual sexual satisfaction)

User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by rpupkin » Tue Mar 22, 2016 8:02 pm

Mlk&Ckies wrote:
rpupkin wrote: Ah, I think I get it. So the firm has given summer associates a 10% raise over what a first-year associate would be paid. Does you think this portends a corresponding increase--or perhaps an even greater increase--for first-year associates?
No, they probably do it because it's easier than adding a new category in payroll.
Cool...so you're saying that an increase to $190K won't require adding a new category in payroll; instead, Accounting can just tweak the existing categories to result in effectively higher compensation for associates. Since the firm you're talking about has already taken this step for summer associates, it seems logical that they will now do the same for first-year associates.

Mr. Peanutbutter

Diamond
Posts: 10168
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2015 3:48 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Mr. Peanutbutter » Tue Mar 22, 2016 8:04 pm

rpupkin wrote:
Mlk&Ckies wrote:
rpupkin wrote: Ah, I think I get it. So the firm has given summer associates a 10% raise over what a first-year associate would be paid. Does you think this portends a corresponding increase--or perhaps an even greater increase--for first-year associates?
No, they probably do it because it's easier than adding a new category in payroll.
Cool...so you're saying that an increase to $190K won't require adding a new category in payroll; instead, Accounting can just tweak the existing categories to result in effectively higher compensation for associates. Since the firm you're talking about has already taken this step for summer associates, it seems logical that they will now do the same for first-year associates.
I already got my 190, you just gotta flirt with Janice in accounting

kcdc1

Silver
Posts: 992
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 6:48 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by kcdc1 » Tue Mar 22, 2016 8:51 pm

Anonymous User wrote:The only strategy for unionization at this point is organizing consolidated action.

Rumors and chattering class blog discussion will do nothing to influence the incumbent powers that be. There needs to be a demonstration of the ability to disrupt operations.

I would say a week long no call no show by a sufficient number of associates from 11-15 of V20 firms would get the necessary attention.

Of course the question is who would actually participate.

Senior associates are out despite the fact they have nothing to lose and would likely have the greatest impact psychologically because anyone past year 7 is an entrenched Uncle Tom who would sell us out like Steven in Django for a free closing dinner, a coupon for their cat's day spa, and the required pseudo sexual satisfaction they receive from self-flagellation.

Mid levels actions are still generally dictated by abuse coping responses, would cower in fear and crack after a few passive aggressive emails.

Which leaves juniors, most of whom of course are idiot art history major millennials who actually believe in stupid protest shit. The caveat there is that at least half of law school millennials are striver douches who would gladly scab for their peer strikers, feeling immense fulfillment at waking up in the office at 6am. Still, the youngins are the future life blood of the industry and an unannounced desertion by the hundreds should give significant pause to the Babylon.

I propose French Revolution Jacobin style meetings every Sunday evening in the kitchen of the shake shack in Murray Hill for all relevant (non-Fordham) first through third years to plan their attack. I won't be there, but with a few months of discussions we could have a "black July" that will shake boomers to their core and change the industry forever.

(Edit: I meant actual sexual satisfaction)
This is really well thought-out. Glad to have you on board, brother. My only concern is how we'll keep the non-relevant (i.e., Fordham) students out of Shake Shack during our meetings. Do you think they might get hungry on Sundays?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Mar 22, 2016 9:16 pm

I assume we say their parents are inside and having shameful, forced "we're so proud of you" conversations makes everyone uncomfortable.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Mar 27, 2016 11:35 pm

Mlk&Ckies wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
Mlk&Ckies wrote:
rpupkin wrote: Ah, I think I get it. So the firm has given summer associates a 10% raise over what a first-year associate would be paid. Does you think this portends a corresponding increase--or perhaps an even greater increase--for first-year associates?
No, they probably do it because it's easier than adding a new category in payroll.
Cool...so you're saying that an increase to $190K won't require adding a new category in payroll; instead, Accounting can just tweak the existing categories to result in effectively higher compensation for associates. Since the firm you're talking about has already taken this step for summer associates, it seems logical that they will now do the same for first-year associates.
I already got my 190, you just gotta flirt with Janice in accounting
Janice from accounting don't give a fuqqqqq

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Mar 28, 2016 12:47 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Mlk&Ckies wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
Mlk&Ckies wrote:
rpupkin wrote: Ah, I think I get it. So the firm has given summer associates a 10% raise over what a first-year associate would be paid. Does you think this portends a corresponding increase--or perhaps an even greater increase--for first-year associates?
No, they probably do it because it's easier than adding a new category in payroll.
Cool...so you're saying that an increase to $190K won't require adding a new category in payroll; instead, Accounting can just tweak the existing categories to result in effectively higher compensation for associates. Since the firm you're talking about has already taken this step for summer associates, it seems logical that they will now do the same for first-year associates.
I already got my 190, you just gotta flirt with Janice in accounting
Janice from accounting don't give a fuqqqqq
I can assure you that she, quite literally, does

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Mar 31, 2016 6:42 pm

So this means there could potentially be a few more markets joining TX and Charlotte in the "dirt cheap COL but we still make 160k"

If NYC wants to keep people from fleeing to Orlando and Tampa they will have to raise salaries. Right guys??

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
Johann

Diamond
Posts: 19704
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Johann » Thu Mar 31, 2016 7:01 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
So this means there could potentially be a few more markets joining TX and Charlotte in the "dirt cheap COL but we still make 160k"

If NYC wants to keep people from fleeing to Orlando and Tampa they will have to raise salaries. Right guys??
Just like there is long line to overpay for AEs, there is a long line to be underpaid at NY V10s.

User avatar
TLSModBot

Diamond
Posts: 14835
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:54 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by TLSModBot » Thu Mar 31, 2016 7:01 pm

JohannDeMann wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
So this means there could potentially be a few more markets joining TX and Charlotte in the "dirt cheap COL but we still make 160k"

If NYC wants to keep people from fleeing to Orlando and Tampa they will have to raise salaries. Right guys??
Just like there is long line to overpay for AEs, there is a long line to be underpaid at NY V10s.
Also there's probably some correlation/overlap between the two.

User avatar
Johann

Diamond
Posts: 19704
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Johann » Thu Mar 31, 2016 7:04 pm

Capitol_Idea wrote:
JohannDeMann wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
So this means there could potentially be a few more markets joining TX and Charlotte in the "dirt cheap COL but we still make 160k"

If NYC wants to keep people from fleeing to Orlando and Tampa they will have to raise salaries. Right guys??
Just like there is long line to overpay for AEs, there is a long line to be underpaid at NY V10s.
Also there's probably some correlation/overlap between the two.
Very much so. That wasn't coincidence.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Mar 31, 2016 8:39 pm

My secondary market just upped first years from 81k to 82.5k :D :P :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :wink:

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


lurklaw

Silver
Posts: 610
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2016 2:07 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by lurklaw » Thu Mar 31, 2016 8:42 pm

ITS HAPPENING

lavarman84

Platinum
Posts: 8538
Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 5:01 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by lavarman84 » Thu Mar 31, 2016 11:27 pm

JohannDeMann wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
So this means there could potentially be a few more markets joining TX and Charlotte in the "dirt cheap COL but we still make 160k"

If NYC wants to keep people from fleeing to Orlando and Tampa they will have to raise salaries. Right guys??
Just like there is long line to overpay for AEs, there is a long line to be underpaid at NY V10s.
No doubt. Only so many biglaw jobs in the smaller markets like Orlando, Tampa, Charlotte, etc. And those markets can be fairly insular.


User avatar
Cicero76

Silver
Posts: 1284
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:41 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Cicero76 » Mon Apr 04, 2016 9:20 pm

Red alert:

Holland & Knight just raised its Miami first year salary +$25k from $135k to $160k. Hoping it starts a bidding war in SFL.

$160k + $25k = NYC TO $185 YOURE WELCOME BOYS AND GIRLS

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


SplitMyPants

Gold
Posts: 1673
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:22 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by SplitMyPants » Mon Apr 04, 2016 9:55 pm

sauce?

User avatar
PeanutsNJam

Gold
Posts: 4670
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:57 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by PeanutsNJam » Mon Apr 04, 2016 11:12 pm

NY to 200

User avatar
Mack.Hambleton

Platinum
Posts: 5414
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Mack.Hambleton » Tue Apr 05, 2016 3:30 am

Anonymous User wrote:My secondary market just upped first years from 81k to 82.5k :D :P :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :wink:
How secondary lol

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Internetdan

New
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 9:06 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Internetdan » Tue Apr 05, 2016 1:04 pm

Cicero76 wrote:Red alert:

Holland & Knight just raised its Miami first year salary +$25k from $135k to $160k. Hoping it starts a bidding war in SFL.

$160k + $25k = NYC TO $185 YOURE WELCOME BOYS AND GIRLS
Are any of our boys down in verification looking into this?

User avatar
Tiago Splitter

Diamond
Posts: 17148
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Tiago Splitter » Tue Apr 05, 2016 1:07 pm

Internetdan wrote:
Cicero76 wrote:Red alert:

Holland & Knight just raised its Miami first year salary +$25k from $135k to $160k. Hoping it starts a bidding war in SFL.

$160k + $25k = NYC TO $185 YOURE WELCOME BOYS AND GIRLS
Are any of our boys down in verification looking into this?
You'll have to check with the folks in the NYC to 185k?? thread.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Apr 05, 2016 2:13 pm

Internetdan wrote:
Cicero76 wrote:Red alert:

Holland & Knight just raised its Miami first year salary +$25k from $135k to $160k. Hoping it starts a bidding war in SFL.

$160k + $25k = NYC TO $185 YOURE WELCOME BOYS AND GIRLS
Are any of our boys down in verification looking into this?
I mean it just got published on ATL today, in roundabout terms that understate the SHATTERING influence of this in the SFL market, and soon thereafter the market beyond.

Edit: anon button very counterintuitive on phone, this is Cicero

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”