No, they probably do it because it's easier than adding a new category in payroll. Plus, SAs are just added expense. It wouldn't be worth making them work the extra few days that would bring them to truly 2.5 months instead of 10 weeks.rpupkin wrote: Ah, I think I get it. So the firm has given summer associates a 10% raise over what a first-year associate would be paid. Does you think this portends a corresponding increase--or perhaps an even greater increase--for first-year associates?
NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon does a 180! Holder wept.) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Mr. Peanutbutter

- Posts: 10168
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2015 3:48 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
The only strategy for unionization at this point is organizing consolidated action.
Rumors and chattering class blog discussion will do nothing to influence the incumbent powers that be. There needs to be a demonstration of the ability to disrupt operations.
I would say a week long no call no show by a sufficient number of associates from 11-15 of V20 firms would get the necessary attention.
Of course the question is who would actually participate.
Senior associates are out despite the fact they have nothing to lose and would likely have the greatest impact psychologically because anyone past year 7 is an entrenched Uncle Tom who would sell us out like Steven in Django for a free closing dinner, a coupon for their cat's day spa, and the required pseudo sexual satisfaction they receive from self-flagellation.
Mid levels actions are still generally dictated by abuse coping responses, would cower in fear and crack after a few passive aggressive emails.
Which leaves juniors, most of whom of course are idiot art history major millennials who actually believe in stupid protest shit. The caveat there is that at least half of law school millennials are striver douches who would gladly scab for their peer strikers, feeling immense fulfillment at waking up in the office at 6am. Still, the youngins are the future life blood of the industry and an unannounced desertion by the hundreds should give significant pause to the Babylon.
I propose French Revolution Jacobin style meetings every Sunday evening in the kitchen of the shake shack in Murray Hill for all relevant (non-Fordham) first through third years to plan their attack. I won't be there, but with a few months of discussions we could have a "black July" that will shake boomers to their core and change the industry forever.
(Edit: I meant actual sexual satisfaction)
Rumors and chattering class blog discussion will do nothing to influence the incumbent powers that be. There needs to be a demonstration of the ability to disrupt operations.
I would say a week long no call no show by a sufficient number of associates from 11-15 of V20 firms would get the necessary attention.
Of course the question is who would actually participate.
Senior associates are out despite the fact they have nothing to lose and would likely have the greatest impact psychologically because anyone past year 7 is an entrenched Uncle Tom who would sell us out like Steven in Django for a free closing dinner, a coupon for their cat's day spa, and the required pseudo sexual satisfaction they receive from self-flagellation.
Mid levels actions are still generally dictated by abuse coping responses, would cower in fear and crack after a few passive aggressive emails.
Which leaves juniors, most of whom of course are idiot art history major millennials who actually believe in stupid protest shit. The caveat there is that at least half of law school millennials are striver douches who would gladly scab for their peer strikers, feeling immense fulfillment at waking up in the office at 6am. Still, the youngins are the future life blood of the industry and an unannounced desertion by the hundreds should give significant pause to the Babylon.
I propose French Revolution Jacobin style meetings every Sunday evening in the kitchen of the shake shack in Murray Hill for all relevant (non-Fordham) first through third years to plan their attack. I won't be there, but with a few months of discussions we could have a "black July" that will shake boomers to their core and change the industry forever.
(Edit: I meant actual sexual satisfaction)
- rpupkin

- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Cool...so you're saying that an increase to $190K won't require adding a new category in payroll; instead, Accounting can just tweak the existing categories to result in effectively higher compensation for associates. Since the firm you're talking about has already taken this step for summer associates, it seems logical that they will now do the same for first-year associates.Mlk&Ckies wrote:No, they probably do it because it's easier than adding a new category in payroll.rpupkin wrote: Ah, I think I get it. So the firm has given summer associates a 10% raise over what a first-year associate would be paid. Does you think this portends a corresponding increase--or perhaps an even greater increase--for first-year associates?
-
Mr. Peanutbutter

- Posts: 10168
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2015 3:48 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
I already got my 190, you just gotta flirt with Janice in accountingrpupkin wrote:Cool...so you're saying that an increase to $190K won't require adding a new category in payroll; instead, Accounting can just tweak the existing categories to result in effectively higher compensation for associates. Since the firm you're talking about has already taken this step for summer associates, it seems logical that they will now do the same for first-year associates.Mlk&Ckies wrote:No, they probably do it because it's easier than adding a new category in payroll.rpupkin wrote: Ah, I think I get it. So the firm has given summer associates a 10% raise over what a first-year associate would be paid. Does you think this portends a corresponding increase--or perhaps an even greater increase--for first-year associates?
-
kcdc1

- Posts: 992
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 6:48 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
This is really well thought-out. Glad to have you on board, brother. My only concern is how we'll keep the non-relevant (i.e., Fordham) students out of Shake Shack during our meetings. Do you think they might get hungry on Sundays?Anonymous User wrote:The only strategy for unionization at this point is organizing consolidated action.
Rumors and chattering class blog discussion will do nothing to influence the incumbent powers that be. There needs to be a demonstration of the ability to disrupt operations.
I would say a week long no call no show by a sufficient number of associates from 11-15 of V20 firms would get the necessary attention.
Of course the question is who would actually participate.
Senior associates are out despite the fact they have nothing to lose and would likely have the greatest impact psychologically because anyone past year 7 is an entrenched Uncle Tom who would sell us out like Steven in Django for a free closing dinner, a coupon for their cat's day spa, and the required pseudo sexual satisfaction they receive from self-flagellation.
Mid levels actions are still generally dictated by abuse coping responses, would cower in fear and crack after a few passive aggressive emails.
Which leaves juniors, most of whom of course are idiot art history major millennials who actually believe in stupid protest shit. The caveat there is that at least half of law school millennials are striver douches who would gladly scab for their peer strikers, feeling immense fulfillment at waking up in the office at 6am. Still, the youngins are the future life blood of the industry and an unannounced desertion by the hundreds should give significant pause to the Babylon.
I propose French Revolution Jacobin style meetings every Sunday evening in the kitchen of the shake shack in Murray Hill for all relevant (non-Fordham) first through third years to plan their attack. I won't be there, but with a few months of discussions we could have a "black July" that will shake boomers to their core and change the industry forever.
(Edit: I meant actual sexual satisfaction)
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
I assume we say their parents are inside and having shameful, forced "we're so proud of you" conversations makes everyone uncomfortable.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Janice from accounting don't give a fuqqqqqMlk&Ckies wrote:I already got my 190, you just gotta flirt with Janice in accountingrpupkin wrote:Cool...so you're saying that an increase to $190K won't require adding a new category in payroll; instead, Accounting can just tweak the existing categories to result in effectively higher compensation for associates. Since the firm you're talking about has already taken this step for summer associates, it seems logical that they will now do the same for first-year associates.Mlk&Ckies wrote:No, they probably do it because it's easier than adding a new category in payroll.rpupkin wrote: Ah, I think I get it. So the firm has given summer associates a 10% raise over what a first-year associate would be paid. Does you think this portends a corresponding increase--or perhaps an even greater increase--for first-year associates?
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
I can assure you that she, quite literally, doesAnonymous User wrote:Janice from accounting don't give a fuqqqqqMlk&Ckies wrote:I already got my 190, you just gotta flirt with Janice in accountingrpupkin wrote:Cool...so you're saying that an increase to $190K won't require adding a new category in payroll; instead, Accounting can just tweak the existing categories to result in effectively higher compensation for associates. Since the firm you're talking about has already taken this step for summer associates, it seems logical that they will now do the same for first-year associates.Mlk&Ckies wrote:No, they probably do it because it's easier than adding a new category in payroll.rpupkin wrote: Ah, I think I get it. So the firm has given summer associates a 10% raise over what a first-year associate would be paid. Does you think this portends a corresponding increase--or perhaps an even greater increase--for first-year associates?
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
So this means there could potentially be a few more markets joining TX and Charlotte in the "dirt cheap COL but we still make 160k"
If NYC wants to keep people from fleeing to Orlando and Tampa they will have to raise salaries. Right guys??
- Johann

- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Just like there is long line to overpay for AEs, there is a long line to be underpaid at NY V10s.Anonymous User wrote:So this means there could potentially be a few more markets joining TX and Charlotte in the "dirt cheap COL but we still make 160k"
If NYC wants to keep people from fleeing to Orlando and Tampa they will have to raise salaries. Right guys??
- TLSModBot

- Posts: 14835
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:54 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Also there's probably some correlation/overlap between the two.JohannDeMann wrote:Just like there is long line to overpay for AEs, there is a long line to be underpaid at NY V10s.Anonymous User wrote:So this means there could potentially be a few more markets joining TX and Charlotte in the "dirt cheap COL but we still make 160k"
If NYC wants to keep people from fleeing to Orlando and Tampa they will have to raise salaries. Right guys??
- Johann

- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Very much so. That wasn't coincidence.Capitol_Idea wrote:Also there's probably some correlation/overlap between the two.JohannDeMann wrote:Just like there is long line to overpay for AEs, there is a long line to be underpaid at NY V10s.Anonymous User wrote:So this means there could potentially be a few more markets joining TX and Charlotte in the "dirt cheap COL but we still make 160k"
If NYC wants to keep people from fleeing to Orlando and Tampa they will have to raise salaries. Right guys??
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
My secondary market just upped first years from 81k to 82.5k

Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
lurklaw

- Posts: 610
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2016 2:07 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
ITS HAPPENING
-
lavarman84

- Posts: 8538
- Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 5:01 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
No doubt. Only so many biglaw jobs in the smaller markets like Orlando, Tampa, Charlotte, etc. And those markets can be fairly insular.JohannDeMann wrote:Just like there is long line to overpay for AEs, there is a long line to be underpaid at NY V10s.Anonymous User wrote:So this means there could potentially be a few more markets joining TX and Charlotte in the "dirt cheap COL but we still make 160k"
If NYC wants to keep people from fleeing to Orlando and Tampa they will have to raise salaries. Right guys??
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
- Cicero76

- Posts: 1284
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:41 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Red alert:
Holland & Knight just raised its Miami first year salary +$25k from $135k to $160k. Hoping it starts a bidding war in SFL.
$160k + $25k = NYC TO $185 YOURE WELCOME BOYS AND GIRLS
Holland & Knight just raised its Miami first year salary +$25k from $135k to $160k. Hoping it starts a bidding war in SFL.
$160k + $25k = NYC TO $185 YOURE WELCOME BOYS AND GIRLS
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
SplitMyPants

- Posts: 1673
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:22 pm
- PeanutsNJam

- Posts: 4670
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:57 pm
- Mack.Hambleton

- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
How secondary lolAnonymous User wrote:My secondary market just upped first years from 81k to 82.5k![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
- curepure

- Posts: 79
- Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2012 4:39 pm
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Internetdan

- Posts: 75
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 9:06 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Are any of our boys down in verification looking into this?Cicero76 wrote:Red alert:
Holland & Knight just raised its Miami first year salary +$25k from $135k to $160k. Hoping it starts a bidding war in SFL.
$160k + $25k = NYC TO $185 YOURE WELCOME BOYS AND GIRLS
- Tiago Splitter

- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
You'll have to check with the folks in the NYC to 185k?? thread.Internetdan wrote:Are any of our boys down in verification looking into this?Cicero76 wrote:Red alert:
Holland & Knight just raised its Miami first year salary +$25k from $135k to $160k. Hoping it starts a bidding war in SFL.
$160k + $25k = NYC TO $185 YOURE WELCOME BOYS AND GIRLS
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
I mean it just got published on ATL today, in roundabout terms that understate the SHATTERING influence of this in the SFL market, and soon thereafter the market beyond.Internetdan wrote:Are any of our boys down in verification looking into this?Cicero76 wrote:Red alert:
Holland & Knight just raised its Miami first year salary +$25k from $135k to $160k. Hoping it starts a bidding war in SFL.
$160k + $25k = NYC TO $185 YOURE WELCOME BOYS AND GIRLS
Edit: anon button very counterintuitive on phone, this is Cicero
- abitaman6363

- Posts: 171
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 9:42 pm
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login