Columbia EIP 2014 Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2014
Roberts & Holland CB today, a long time after EIP. I don't think I'm going to take it, because the firm offer I'll likely take won't let me split the summer with them. Hope that frees it up for someone who wants it.
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2014
Between Cravath or Simpson for me. Probably going w/ Cravath. Good luck to all others.
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2014
I don't work at Schutle, I was just saying how much I hated doing fund formation work.Slambonie3 wrote:Could you pm me or post here on how you like the firm? And what the potential exit options look like etc. Schulte is one of my considerationsAnonymous User wrote:To chime in as a second year associate, getting staffed to the deal team of a hedge fund formation was by far the worst part of my first year. just so much bs paperpushingAnonymous User wrote:All this Schulte stuff is coming from the same guy who wants to "do hedge funds." If you'd rather do the paperwork to set up funds then exit to compliance in an HF or PE firm than work for or against a hedge fund in a contested transaction then exit to the business side in an HF or PE firm, you should choose Schulte over Cravath.
I had a horrible callback experience at Schulte and did not get an offer.
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2014
What does one usually look out for when going back to a firm for a second look after an offer?
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2014
What exactly does fund formation work specifically entail that makes it so cumbersome, and what sort of exit options do you have? Is it essentially compliance at PE/hedge funds?Anonymous User wrote: I don't work at Schutle, I was just saying how much I hated doing fund formation work.
I had a horrible callback experience at Schulte and did not get an offer.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2014
Gibson LA offer, for those wondering
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2014
THis was the only fund work i've ever done, so I really am not qualified to speak about exit options, etc.Anonymous User wrote:What exactly does fund formation work specifically entail that makes it so cumbersome, and what sort of exit options do you have? Is it essentially compliance at PE/hedge funds?Anonymous User wrote: I don't work at Schutle, I was just saying how much I hated doing fund formation work.
I had a horrible callback experience at Schulte and did not get an offer.
This was for an initial formation of a hedge fund and the first closing. Much of the work related to the main agreement between the general partner (an entity of the people actually forming the hedge fund) and the limited partners (the investors) (the limited partnership agreement/LPA). As a junior, this essentially meant turning comments of the full document (~110 pages) a couple of times a week. The comments I had to turn were generally hand-written, which is a very person-specific thing but made it unpleasant.
We had to form a number of corporate entities in order to have the proper corporate structure, all of which require certificates of formation, initial LPAs, initial LLC agreements, getting EINs, etc.
Side letters with each individual investor (again, mostly turning hand-written comments and being organized about things).
Helping prepare securities and tax legal opinions and backup certificates. Coordinating with Delaware counsel for their opinion.
Preparation and organization of subscription documents (where each investor actually signs up and commits to provide X amount of money)
Continually monitoring and updating closing checklist for the above and a million other pieces of small shit to make sure we were on track and had everything.
etc.
It was just a lot of really small things to (a) keep track of and (b) make sure were perfect and in order. I would personally rather be doing something like diligence for m&a or cap markets than updating the closing checklist and rewording the LPA for the 20th time that month, but to each their own
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2014
You understand that you had those jobs prob bc you were the most junior associate on the project and therefore had the shitty job right? And that's not an accurate reflection of the substantive work you'd be doing once more experiencedAnonymous User wrote:THis was the only fund work i've ever done, so I really am not qualified to speak about exit options, etc.Anonymous User wrote:What exactly does fund formation work specifically entail that makes it so cumbersome, and what sort of exit options do you have? Is it essentially compliance at PE/hedge funds?Anonymous User wrote: I don't work at Schutle, I was just saying how much I hated doing fund formation work.
I had a horrible callback experience at Schulte and did not get an offer.
This was for an initial formation of a hedge fund and the first closing. Much of the work related to the main agreement between the general partner (an entity of the people actually forming the hedge fund) and the limited partners (the investors) (the limited partnership agreement/LPA). As a junior, this essentially meant turning comments of the full document (~110 pages) a couple of times a week. The comments I had to turn were generally hand-written, which is a very person-specific thing but made it unpleasant.
We had to form a number of corporate entities in order to have the proper corporate structure, all of which require certificates of formation, initial LPAs, initial LLC agreements, getting EINs, etc.
Side letters with each individual investor (again, mostly turning hand-written comments and being organized about things).
Helping prepare securities and tax legal opinions and backup certificates. Coordinating with Delaware counsel for their opinion.
Preparation and organization of subscription documents (where each investor actually signs up and commits to provide X amount of money)
Continually monitoring and updating closing checklist for the above and a million other pieces of small shit to make sure we were on track and had everything.
etc.
It was just a lot of really small things to (a) keep track of and (b) make sure were perfect and in order. I would personally rather be doing something like diligence for m&a or cap markets than updating the closing checklist and rewording the LPA for the 20th time that month, but to each their own
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2014
On the spot?Anonymous User wrote:Gibson LA offer, for those wondering
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2014
Yes, as I said in my post, "as a junior, this means you will be..."Anonymous User wrote:
You understand that you had those jobs prob bc you were the most junior associate on the project and therefore had the shitty job right? And that's not an accurate reflection of the substantive work you'd be doing once more experienced
My point was that I like the shitty jobs in m&a/cap markets much more than fund formation. This is directed at current 2Ls, so that's what they would be doing for the first few years, many of whom wouldn't make it beyond that point. Just stating the facts.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 10:18 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2014
Same question as the other anon then about exit options after working on hedge funds fora few years if anyone knows
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2014
Yup exactly. The other poster completely missed your point.Anonymous User wrote:Yes, as I said in my post, "as a junior, this means you will be..."Anonymous User wrote:
You understand that you had those jobs prob bc you were the most junior associate on the project and therefore had the shitty job right? And that's not an accurate reflection of the substantive work you'd be doing once more experienced
My point was that I like the shitty jobs in m&a/cap markets much more than fund formation. This is directed at current 2Ls, so that's what they would be doing for the first few years, many of whom wouldn't make it beyond that point. Just stating the facts.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2014
did schulte give a ton of offers? how have they taken over this thread?
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2014
Not original anon, but I've heard they're doing on the spot offers.Anonymous User wrote:On the spot?Anonymous User wrote:Gibson LA offer, for those wondering
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2014
If you look at Schulte's EIP results from last year they had a very low percentage of people actually accept their offers, which suggests that they made offers mostly to people who had other offers at higher ranked firms like Cravath. I'm not sure how you could tell that by interviewing and looking at a resume, but I imagine it has to do with honors/law review.Anonymous User wrote:did schulte give a ton of offers? how have they taken over this thread?
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2014
Less than a quarter of Schulte offers were made to Honors students last year. Schulte is basically two things: a solid backup option for Stone/Kent people and a reliable target for the rest of the class.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2014
Unless you know you want to do investment mgmt/hedge funds or even certain litigation I believe. Then they're a great option for any one hereAnonymous User wrote:Less than a quarter of Schulte offers were made to Honors students last year. Schulte is basically two things: a solid backup option for Stone/Kent people and a reliable target for the rest of the class.
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2014
No CLS kid is taking Schulte over Cravath/SullCrom/Skadden/DPW etc. A solid backup because it gives so many offers and is not selective, but not many end up taking the offer.Anonymous User wrote:Unless you know you want to do investment mgmt/hedge funds or even certain litigation I believe. Then they're a great option for any one hereAnonymous User wrote:Less than a quarter of Schulte offers were made to Honors students last year. Schulte is basically two things: a solid backup option for Stone/Kent people and a reliable target for the rest of the class.
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2014
They're about as selective as Paul Hastings yupAnonymous User wrote:No CLS kid is taking Schulte over Cravath/SullCrom/Skadden/DPW etc. A solid backup because it gives so many offers and is not selective, but not many end up taking the offer.Anonymous User wrote:Unless you know you want to do investment mgmt/hedge funds or even certain litigation I believe. Then they're a great option for any one hereAnonymous User wrote:Less than a quarter of Schulte offers were made to Honors students last year. Schulte is basically two things: a solid backup option for Stone/Kent people and a reliable target for the rest of the class.
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2014
any latham ny offers? what was the turnaround time?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2014
.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Sat Aug 23, 2014 12:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2014
I still haven't heard from 3 firms from EIP: Ropes and Gray JL, Mintz Levin SR, and Haynes and Boone (scheduled with MM and YM, but I forget who I actually interviewed with) (all NY offices). I'm assuming that they're all implied rejections (especially because I know that Ropes and Mintz have already conducted callbacks), but I was wondering if anybody has gotten official rejections from them?
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2014
Someone's bitter towards Schulte lol
-
- Posts: 432502
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2014
I haven't heard back from ropes either. Along with a few others such as Mayer brown Cahill Wilson sonsini PA and hogan lovellsAnonymous User wrote:I still haven't heard from 3 firms from EIP: Ropes and Gray JL, Mintz Levin SR, and Haynes and Boone (scheduled with MM and YM, but I forget who I actually interviewed with) (all NY offices). I'm assuming that they're all implied rejections (especially because I know that Ropes and Mintz have already conducted callbacks), but I was wondering if anybody has gotten official rejections from them?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login