Cravath's Spawn - the Wave of Copycats - RUNNING TALLY Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432598
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432598
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cravath's Spawn - the Wave of Copycats - RUNNING TALLY
Kelley Drye's announcement was just a cheap attempt to drum up attention. It wasn't paying market to begin with. But I think it's perfectly fine to place them on a TTT list in response.Huluba wrote:Why is Kelley Drye on the list at all. Don't they pay 1st years 145k anyway?
-
trbrny
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 3:57 pm
Re: Cravath's Spawn - the Wave of Copycats - RUNNING TALLY
it is a TTT List.Huluba wrote:Why is Kelley Drye on the list at all. Don't they pay 1st years 145k anyway?
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432598
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432598
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cravath's Spawn - the Wave of Copycats - RUNNING TALLY
Time to put Clifford Chance up on the big board
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432598
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432598
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cravath's Spawn - the Wave of Copycats - RUNNING TALLY
For all U.S. Associates. Link: http://abovethelaw.com/2016/06/biggest- ... pay-scale/Anonymous User wrote:Sidley match.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432598
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cravath's Spawn - the Wave of Copycats - RUNNING TALLY
Does D.C. count as the United States? Just wondering.Anonymous User wrote:For all U.S. Associates.Anonymous User wrote:Sidley match.
Sincerely,
Covington Managing Partner
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432598
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cravath's Spawn - the Wave of Copycats - RUNNING TALLY
[accidental double post]
-
trbrny
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 3:57 pm
Re: Cravath's Spawn - the Wave of Copycats - RUNNING TALLY
u/d with new matches.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432598
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cravath's Spawn - the Wave of Copycats - RUNNING TALLY
ATL: http://abovethelaw.com/2016/06/biggest- ... pay-scale/Anonymous User wrote:Sidley match.
-
UMich11
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 8:34 pm
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432598
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cravath's Spawn - the Wave of Copycats - RUNNING TALLY
Proskauer match
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
trbrny
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 3:57 pm
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432598
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cravath's Spawn - the Wave of Copycats - RUNNING TALLY
Baker did not say it was matching, it just said that it is monitoring the situation and intends to stay competitive with its peers- http://abovethelaw.com/2016/06/at-least ... te-raises/
That could be read multiple ways. Depending on who Baker thinks its peers are, it may be that most of them haven't matched yet at least, even in NYC.
Munger is confirmed- http://abovethelaw.com/2016/06/prestigi ... ry-raises/
That could be read multiple ways. Depending on who Baker thinks its peers are, it may be that most of them haven't matched yet at least, even in NYC.
Munger is confirmed- http://abovethelaw.com/2016/06/prestigi ... ry-raises/
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432598
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cravath's Spawn - the Wave of Copycats - RUNNING TALLY
O'melveny matching per firmwide voice mail.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432598
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cravath's Spawn - the Wave of Copycats - RUNNING TALLY
Anonymous User wrote:per firmwide voice mail
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432598
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cravath's Spawn - the Wave of Copycats - RUNNING TALLY
Proskauer confirmed- http://abovethelaw.com/2016/06/game-set ... r-offices/
Matching in Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, and Washington, D.C., but not its smaller offices in Boca Raton, New Orleans, and Newark
Matching in Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, and Washington, D.C., but not its smaller offices in Boca Raton, New Orleans, and Newark
-
TLSModBot
- Posts: 14835
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:54 am
Re: Cravath's Spawn - the Wave of Copycats - RUNNING TALLY
If anyone cares, here is the initial slew of NY to 160 matches back in 2007:
After late June 2007 it's just a trickle but if there's interest I can fill that data out too.
After late June 2007 it's just a trickle but if there's interest I can fill that data out too.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432598
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cravath's Spawn - the Wave of Copycats - RUNNING TALLY
smart they don't want it posted on ATL.Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:per firmwide voice mail
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432598
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cravath's Spawn - the Wave of Copycats - RUNNING TALLY
if you can upload to a google sheet and the link to it, that'd be great.Capitol_Idea wrote:If anyone cares, here is the initial slew of NY to 160 matches back in 2007:
After late June 2007 it's just a trickle but if there's interest I can fill that data out too.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432598
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cravath's Spawn - the Wave of Copycats - RUNNING TALLY
Just to double-check: "firmwide" as in they are matching in every office? Or just NY?Anonymous User wrote:O'melveny matching per firmwide voice mail.
Edit: Yes. http://abovethelaw.com/2016/06/money_on_the_west_coast/
Last edited by Anonymous User on Thu Jun 09, 2016 7:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
TLSModBot
- Posts: 14835
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:54 am
-
Mack.Hambleton
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: Cravath's Spawn - the Wave of Copycats - RUNNING TALLY
good shitCapitol_Idea wrote:NY to 160 Timeline as google doc:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432598
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cravath's Spawn - the Wave of Copycats - RUNNING TALLY
Associates seem to think that means it's going to happen, not that they're trying to wait it out. Baker is huge and slow and bureaucratic.Anonymous User wrote:Baker did not say it was matching, it just said that it is monitoring the situation and intends to stay competitive with its peers- http://abovethelaw.com/2016/06/at-least ... te-raises/
That could be read multiple ways. Depending on who Baker thinks its peers are, it may be that most of them haven't matched yet at least, even in NYC.
Munger is confirmed- http://abovethelaw.com/2016/06/prestigi ... ry-raises/
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
